OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of seven pediatric patients with Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) positive for the t(16;21)(p11;q22) FUS::ERG fusion gene. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on the clinical data, treatment, and prognosis of seven AML patients with t(16;21)(p11;q22) FUS::ERG fusion gene admitted to Henan Children's Hospital between June 2015 and November 2024. Relevant literature was also reviewed. This study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Hospital (Ethics No.: 2024-102-001). RESULTS: Among 297 pediatric patients with AML, 7 cases (2.36%) were positive for the t(16;21)(p11;q22) FUS::ERG fusion gene, including 3 males and 4 females, with a median age of 11 years (range: 3 ~ 12 years). According to the FAB classification, these included 1 case of M2, 3 cases of M5, and 3 cases of AML-not otherwise specified (non-M3). All 7 patients were found to harbor the t(16;21)(p11;q22) translocation, with 3 cases showing additional chromosomal abnormalities. Immunophenotyping revealed universal expression of CD13, CD33, CD34, and CD117, with partial expression of CD56, CD4, CD64, CD123, CD15, CD38, CD11b, HLA-DR, cMPO, and CD16. One patient achieved complete remission (CR) after the first course of DAE (cytarabine + daunorubicin + etoposide) induction chemotherapy but relapsed and discontinued the treatment. Six patients received DAH (cytarabine + daunorubicin + homoharringtonine) induction therapy, of whom 2 achieved CR after two courses and underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), resulting in an overall CR rate of 42.86%. Five children did not receive allo-HSCT and had a median overall survival of 9 months (range: 6 ~ 18 months). Two children who underwent transplantation achieved bone marrow morphological and molecular biological relapse at 6 and 9 months post-transplantation, respectively. After receiving combined chemotherapy and donor lymphocyte infusion, one child failed to achieve remission and died at 22 months post-transplantation, while the other has been followed up to date with positive fusion gene status. Their overall survival was 25 months and 30 months, respectively. CONCLUSION The t(16;21)(p11;q22) FUS::ERG fusion gene is rare in pediatric AML and associated with poor prognosis. Allo-HSCT may mitigate the adverse prognostic impact of the FUS::ERG fusion gene and contribute to prolonged survival.
Humans ; Male ; Child ; Female ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics* ; Translocation, Genetic ; Retrospective Studies ; RNA-Binding Protein FUS/genetics* ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16/genetics* ; Adolescent ; Child, Preschool ; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 21/genetics* ; Prognosis ; Treatment Outcome

Pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is more aggressive than adult CML, with unique molecular characteristics and a higher propensity for lymphoid blast crisis. The application of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has significantly improved the prognosis of pediatric CML. Based on international consensus and clinical experience, this article proposes standardized diagnosis and treatment recommendations for pediatric CML, covering initial therapy selection, efficacy evaluation, drug switching, and management of adverse effects. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is recommended only for patients with disease progression or failure of multiple lines of TKI therapy. For children newly diagnosed with CML in accelerated phase, high-dose imatinib or second-generation TKIs are recommended as first-line therapy. Those achieving optimal responses should continue maintenance therapy, while non-responders require switching to alternative TKIs and consider allo-HSCT. For blast-phase CML, induction therapy requires a combination of TKIs and chemotherapy, with allo-HSCT serving as the core curative intervention. This article highlights common but challenging problems (poor response, drug intolerance, and disease progression) in pediatric CML treatment using three typical cases, aiming to optimize treatment strategies. Furthermore, the goal of achieving treatment-free remission needs to be further addressed through multi-center clinical studies.
Humans ; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy* ; Child ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Male ; Female ; Adolescent

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the short-term efficacy and safety of low-dose venetoclax combined with CHG (cytarabine+homoharringtonine+G-CSF) priming regimen in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. METHODS: The data of 14 patients with AML or high-risk MDS admitted to the department of hematology/oncology of the First Hospital of Tsinghua University and 2 cooperative institutions from July 2022 to August 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. All the patients were treated with low-dose venetoclax combined with CHG priming regimen and the early induction (one course) efficacy and adverse reactions were observed. RESULTS: Among the 14 patients, 10 were males and 4 were females, with a median age of 69.5 (46-83) years. After 1 cycle of induction chemotherapy, the complete remission (CR) rate was 64.3% (9/14) and overall response rate (ORR) was 78.6% (11/14). Among the 10 patients with adverse prognosis according to cytogenetics and molecular genetics, the CR rate was 50.0% (5/10), and ORR was 70.0% (7/10). In 7 patients with TP53 mutation, the CR rate was 42.9% (3/7) and ORR was 71.4% (5/7). In the 6 patients with complex karyotype, CR rate was 33.3% (2/6) and ORR was 66.7% (4/6). While the CR rate and ORR of 8 non-complex karyotype patients were both 87.5% (7/8), and the difference in CR rate between patients with complex karyotype and non-complex karyotype was statistically significant ( P < 0.05). The adverse reactions of chemotherapy were tolerable, without early treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION Low-dose venetoclax combined with CHG priming regimen can be used as an effective treatment for AML and high-risk MDS patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, and it is safe and worthy of clinical application.
Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Aged ; Male ; Female ; Sulfonamides/therapeutic use* ; Middle Aged ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes/drug therapy* ; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use* ; Aged, 80 and over ; Retrospective Studies ; Cytarabine/administration & dosage* ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Homoharringtonine/therapeutic use*

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients treated with venetoclax combined with azacitidine (Ven/Aza) or standard "3+7" regimen and similar regimens, collect real-world study data, compare the treatment response and adverse events between the two regimens, as well as perform survival analysis. METHODS: To retrospectively analyze the efficacy, survival, and adverse reactions of newly diagnosed AML patients treated with Ven/Aza (24 cases) and "3+7" regimens (117 cases ) in our hospital from September 2009 to March 2023, as well as factors influencing outcomes. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed on age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) to obtain a 1:1 matched cohort of 20 pairs, and the efficacy and survival before and after the matching were compared. RESULTS: The median age of patients in the Ven/Aza group was 69 years, while that in the "3+7" group was 56 years (P <0.001). Objective remission rate (ORR) was 62.5% in Ven/Aza group and 74.8% in "3+7" group (P >0.05). The median overall survival (OS) in the Ven/Aza group was 522 days, while that in the "3+7" group was 1 002 days (P >0.05). After controlling the two variables of age and ECOG PS, a PSM cohort of 20 pairs was obtained, in which the ORR was 65% in Ven/Aza group and 60% in "3+7" group (P >0.05). The median OS was 522 days and 629 days, and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 531 days and 198 days between the two groups, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in OS and PFS between the two groups (both P >0.05). Additionally, the incidence of adverse events in the Ven/Aza group was significantly reduced. CONCLUSION The overall cohort shows that the "3+7" regimen has advantages in efficacy and survival, but Ven/Aza regimen is relatively safer. After performing PSM on age and ECOG PS, the Ven/Aza group showed improved efficacy, and a longer median PFS compared to "3+7" group.
Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Sulfonamides/administration & dosage* ; Azacitidine/administration & dosage* ; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/administration & dosage* ; Aged ; Middle Aged ; Male ; Female ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome

OBJECTIVE: To retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics of 15 children with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) treated with blinatumomab, and summarize the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab in the treatment of pediatric B-ALL. METHODS: Fifteen children who received treatment with blinatumomab from February 2022 to January 2023 were enrolled in this study. One course (28 days) of blinatumomab concurrent with intrathecal chemotherapy was given according to the standard regimen, except for 2 cases who had shortened course of treatment due to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and did not receive combined intrathecal chemotherapy, and 1 case had a shortened course of treatment due to economic problems. The efficacy and safety of the treatment were evaluated. RESULTS: In terms of efficacy, for the children who had achieved complete molecular remission (CMR) before treatment, blinatumomab treatment could effectively maintain CMR status; For the children who did not achieve CMR, the CMR rate after one standard course of treatment with blinatumomab reached 66.7%(4/6); For the children with relapsed/refractory ALL (R/R ALL) who had minimal residual disease (MRD), the MRD clearance rate reached 75.0%(3/4). The statistical results of the incidence of adverse events showed that 13.3%(2/15) of the children did not experience any adverse events. The most common adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (73.3%, 11/15) and transaminase elevation (26.7%, 4/15); 33.3%(5/15) of the children experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events. All the adverse events were resolved after symptomatic treatment.The level of IgG decreased significantly after 4-7 weeks of treatment with blinatumomab, and gradually recovered after 8 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION Blinatumomab can be used as a safe and effective treatment for inducing deep remission in pediatric R/R-ALL patients and as a bridge therapy for the pediatric ALL patients who are intolerant to chemotherapy.
Humans ; Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic use* ; Child ; Retrospective Studies ; Female ; Male ; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy* ; Remission Induction ; Treatment Outcome ; Child, Preschool ; Adolescent ; Precursor B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic of venetoclax (VEN) combined targeted therapy in acute leukemia (AL) patients with PICALM∷MLLT10 fusion gene positivity. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 16 PICALM∷MLLT10-positive AL patients treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from January 2021 to August 2024. These patients were diagnosed by targeted RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) or reverse transcription multiplex PCR, including newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory (R/R) cases. The immunophenotypes, genetic features, gene mutations, and the efficacy of VEN combination targeted therapy of patients were evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 16 cases, 3 were confirmed by reverse transcription multiplex PCR, and 13 were detected through targeted RNA-seq among 528 AL patients, with a detection rate of 2.46%. The averge age of patients was (28.0±8.58) years. Patients exhibited diverse immunophenotypes, including 7 cases of acute myeloid leukemia, 5 of acute T-lymphoblastic leukemia, 1 of acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia, 1 of acute undifferentiated leukemia, and 2 of mixed-phenotype acute leukemia. Among them, 11 had extramedullary disease (EMD), 14 expressed CD7, and 12 expressed CD33. Major co-occurring mutations included PHF6 (6 cases), NOTCH1 (5 cases), and 7 cases with complex karyotypes. Of the 12 patients who received standard induction therapy, 7 did not achieve remission (PR+NR). All 4 patients treated with VEN combination therapy achieved complete remission (CR). Among the 7 induction failure cases, 4 achieved CR upon re-induction with VEN, while the remaining 3 re-induced with standard therapy, did not achieve CR. Thirteen patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, including 6 who received maintenance therapy with hypomethylating agents (HMA) alone or in combination with VEN, and seven were followed up. Survival analysis showed that the overall survival was better in the maintenance therapy group (P =0.044). CONCLUSION PICALM∷MLLT10-positive AL involves multiple lineages and demonstrates poor response to conventional chemotherapy. VEN combination therapy shows promising efficacy in both newly diagnosed and R/R patients. Post-transplant maintenance therapy with HMA alone or combined with VEN may extend survival; however, further clinical validation is required.
Humans ; Sulfonamides/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Prognosis ; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use* ; Adult ; Male ; Female ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics* ; Mutation ; Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/genetics* ; Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and efficacy of avatrombopag（AVA） combined with rhIL-11 in treating thrombocytopenia induced by chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia. METHODS: The clinical information of 8 patients in the real world who received avatrombopag combined with rhIL-11 in cancer treatment-induced thrombocytopenia(CTIT) after AML chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed, and at the same time, 8 patients who received rhIL-11 only in CTIT after AML chemotherapy served as the control group, A preliminary observation was to summarize and compare the therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects between the two groups. RESULTS: D3 and D7 platelet counts were not significantly different between the observation group and the control group after treatment. The platelet counts in the observation group was significantly higher than those of the control group on the 10th day after treatment (P < 0.01). The adverse reactions, such as weakness, abdominal pain, fatigue, nausea and edema after treatment were mild in the observation group and the control group. Except for one patient in the observation group who had a history of cerebral infarction before the onset of the disease and was routinely taking antiplatelet drugs, no thrombosis events occurred in the patients in the observation and control groups during the period of administration of the drug, and the total incidence rate of adverse reactions was not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION The combination of AVA and rhIL-11 can enhance platelet recovery in CTIT of AML patients after chemotherapy. Compared with the rhIL-11 alone group, the platelet recovery time in AVA+rhIL-11 group was significantly shorter, the platelet count on the 10th day after drug administration was significantly higher. No statistically significant difference in the total incidence rate of adverse reactions was observed between rhIL-11 alone group and AVA+rhIL-11 group.
Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced* ; Interleukin-11/therapeutic use* ; Retrospective Studies ; Adult ; Thiophenes/therapeutic use* ; Platelet Count ; Female ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Thiazoles

Poor prognosis and high mortality rate are frequently observed in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML), and there is no standard salvage therapy for these patients. As a method to evade apoptosis, cancer cells often upregulate anti-apoptotic proteins BCL-2 and MCL-1. Recently, venetoclax-based combination therapies have demonstrated promising prospects in treating R/R AML. However, the prevalent use of venetoclax comes with a new challenge of resistance. Upregulation of BCL-1 and/or MCL-1 is the main cause of venetoclax resistance and preemptively targeting BCL-2/BCL-XL/MCL-1 can be used to delay or forestall drug resistance. Thus, selective targeting of BCL-2 and MCL-1 is a viable treatment strategy. This review reports the latest clinical progress on targeting BCL-2 and MCL-1 in R/R AML.
Humans ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy* ; Myeloid Cell Leukemia Sequence 1 Protein ; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2 ; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm ; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic/therapeutic use* ; Sulfonamides/therapeutic use* ; Recurrence

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of different previous treatments on the efficacy of flumatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). METHODS: The clinical data of 69 patients with CML treated with flumatinib in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from 2019 to 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a first-line flumatinib group and a first-line non-flumatinib group according to whether flumatinib was used as first-line treatment. The molecular response (MR) at 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment was compared between the two groups to evaluate the early efficacy. The first-line non-flumatinib group was further divided into imatinib group, nilotinib group, and dasatinib group according to the previous first-line drugs used. The efficacy data of these three groups at 3, 6 and 12 months after switching to flumatinib were collected, and the MR was evaluated to compare efficacy differences. RESULTS: The rate of early molecular response (EMR) in the first-line flumatinib group was significantly higher than that in the first-line non-flumatinib group (P < 0.05). At 6 months and 12 months of treatment, the proportion of patients achieving MR 4.5 in the first-line flumatinib group was significantly higher than that in the first-line non-flumatinib group (P < 0.05). Compared with the imatinib and nilotinib groups, the previous dasatinib group showed a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving MR 5.0 at 3, 6, and 12 months after switching to flumatinib (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Compared with the previous treatment with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), initial use of flumatinib at diagnosis enable patients to achieve deeper molecular remission more rapidly. Compared with previous use of imatinib or nilotinib, previous use of dasatinib is associated with deeper molecular remission after switching to flumatinib.
Humans ; Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy* ; Retrospective Studies ; Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use* ; Dasatinib/therapeutic use* ; Treatment Outcome ; Pyrimidines/therapeutic use* ; Female ; Male ; Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use* ; Middle Aged ; Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use*

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of non-chemotherapy strategy of retinoic acid (ATRA) combined with arsenic trioxide (ATO) on the survival of patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). METHODS: The data of APL patients with complete information diagnosed in the hematology department of our hospital from June 2009 to November 2024 were retrospective analyzed. All patients in the non-CHT group received ATRA-ATO induction, consolidation and maintenance therapy. Patients in the CHT group received ATRA-ATO+chemotherapy induction therapy, followed by 3 cycles of ATRA-ATO+CHT consolidation therapy and 6-10 cycles of ATRA-ATO maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), remission rate, differentiation syndrome (DS) and safety. RESULTS: There were 182 patients with APL and 15 patients with early death (ED), accounting for 8.24%, which was related to age and risk stratification. There was no significant difference in remission rate between the non-CHT group and the CHT group (P =0.486). As of February 2025, the median follow-up time of patients was 39.5 months. The EFS of the non-CHT group was significantly better than that of the CHT group (P =0.038). There was no significant difference in OS between the two groups (P =0.442). Subgroup analysis showed that EFS in the non-CHT was longer in standard-risk patients (P =0.012). There was no significant difference in EFS (P =0.585) and OS (P =0.473) between the CHT and non-CHT groups in high-risk patients. The incidence of mild DS was 23.6% in the non-CHT group and 23.1% in the CHT group, respectively, with no statistically significant difference(P =0.937). Compared with CHT group, the incidence of serious adverse events was lower in the non-CHT group. CONCLUSION The non-chemotherapy regimen of ATRA combined with ATO is a feasible method to cure APL patients.
Humans ; Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/drug therapy* ; Arsenic Trioxide/therapeutic use* ; Tretinoin/administration & dosage* ; Retrospective Studies ; Female ; Treatment Outcome ; Male ; Adult ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use* ; Middle Aged ; Remission Induction