PURPOSE: Pelvic fractures are severe injuries and are often associated with multiple system injuries, exacerbating the overall outcome. In India, the incidence of pelvic fractures is on a rise due to suboptimal roads and traffics but related literature regarding the overall epidemiology of these injuries is scarce and scanty. Our aim was to study the epidemiology of patients admitted with pelvic fractures at a level 1 trauma centre in India. METHODS: A 16-month (between September 2015 and December 2016) prospective observational study was carried out on trauma patients with pelvic fractures at a level 1 trauma centre of a tertiary care hospital. Demography of patients, mechanism of injuries and complications were recorded prospectively. RESULTS: We observed 75 patients who presented with pelvic fractures, where 56 were males and 19 were females. Mean age of the study population was 37.57 years. Road traffic accidents were the most common mode of injuries. Lateral compression injuries were the most common pattern. Associated injuries frequently encountered were lower extremities and acetabulum fractures, blunt abdominal trauma, urogenital injuries and head injuries. Out of the 75 patients, 52 were treated surgically and 23 were managed by conservative methods. Associated injuries of the extremities, head, abdomen and urogenital system indicated a longer hospital stay. CONCLUSION Pelvic fractures, although belong to a relatively rare trauma subset, cause a high morbidity and mortality with considerable burden on the economy. Proper road safety training and driving etiquettes along with its strict implementation in true sense and spirit are the need of the hour.
Accidents, Traffic ; prevention & control ; statistics & numerical data ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cohort Studies ; Cost of Illness ; Female ; Fractures, Bone ; economics ; epidemiology ; mortality ; Humans ; Incidence ; Length of Stay ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pelvic Bones ; injuries ; Prospective Studies ; Tertiary Care Centers ; statistics & numerical data ; Time Factors ; Young Adult

BACKGROUNDThe study was to explore the causes of high inpatient expenditure through analyzing the distribution characteristics as well as the influence factors of high inpatient expenditure cases during 3 years within a Grade-A tertiary hospital through various aspects and multiple angles, thus identifying the major influence factors for high medical expenditure to develop further research.

METHODSWe retrospectively studied 2041 inpatient cases which cost more than RMB 100,000 Yuan per case in a Grade-A tertiary hospital from 2013 to 2015. We analyzed the compositions of the medical cost to evaluate the major factors that cause the high inpatient expenditure. All the data and materials were collected from medical record system, and the statistical methods included t-test, variance of analysis, and multivariate linear regression.

RESULTSThe average cost of the 2,041 cases was RMB 152,173 Yuan for medicines and materials of medical costs, which respectively accounted for 33.03% and 32.32% of the total cost; and the average length of hospital stay was 28.39 days/person. Diseases of skeletal and muscular system, circulatory system, and tumor were the top three disease categories of high inpatient expenditure, which accounted for 39.00%, 33.46%, and 18.03%, respectively. Complications, criticality of the disease, gender of the patients, the occurrence of death, and the excessive length of hospital stay all had great impacts on average medical expenditure, while age, hospital infection, and surgery showed no significant impact on average medical cost.

CONCLUSIONSThe main factors for high inpatient expenditure included the inadequate use of high-value medicines and materials, lacking cost control measures within the hospital, the excessive length of hospital stay for inpatients, and the unnecessary treatment for the patients.

China ; Female ; Health Expenditures ; statistics & numerical data ; Hospitalization ; economics ; Humans ; Inpatients ; statistics & numerical data ; Length of Stay ; economics ; Male ; Multivariate Analysis ; Retrospective Studies

Adenolymphoma ; surgery ; Adenoma, Pleomorphic ; surgery ; Compression Bandages ; Drainage ; Facial Nerve Diseases ; epidemiology ; Female ; Fibrin Tissue Adhesive ; therapeutic use ; Health Care Costs ; Hospitalization ; economics ; statistics & numerical data ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Parotid Gland ; surgery ; Parotid Neoplasms ; surgery ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Singapore ; epidemiology ; Tissue Adhesives ; therapeutic use

Adolescent ; Adult ; Cardiac Catheterization ; economics ; methods ; Cardiac Surgical Procedures ; economics ; methods ; Cardiac Valve Annuloplasty ; Child ; China ; epidemiology ; Echocardiography ; Female ; Heart Septal Defects, Ventricular ; complications ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Humans ; Length of Stay ; statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications ; epidemiology ; Septal Occluder Device ; Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency ; complications ; diagnostic imaging ; surgery ; Young Adult

Adolescent ; Cardiac Catheterization ; economics ; methods ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent ; surgery ; Female ; Health Care Costs ; Humans ; Infant ; Intensive Care Units ; economics ; utilization ; Length of Stay ; economics ; statistics & numerical data ; Ligation ; economics ; methods ; Male ; Postoperative Complications ; economics ; epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Septal Occluder Device ; economics ; Singapore ; epidemiology ; Treatment Outcome

PURPOSE: Aim of this study is to investigate the characteristics and performance of colorectal-anal specialty vs. general hospitals for South Korean inpatients with colorectal-anal diseases, and assesses the short-term designation effect of the government's specialty hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nationwide all colorectal-anal disease inpatient claims (n=292158) for 2010-2012 were used to investigate length of stay and inpatient charges for surgical and medical procedures in specialty vs. general hospitals. The patients' claim data were matched to hospital data, and multi-level linear mixed models to account for clustering of patients within hospitals were performed. RESULTS: Inpatient charges at colorectal-anal specialty hospitals were 27% greater per case and 92% greater per day than those at small general hospitals, but the average length of stay was 49% shorter. Colorectal-anal specialty hospitals had shorter length of stay and a higher inpatient charges per day for both surgical and medical procedures, but per case charges were not significantly different. A "specialty" designation effect also found that the colorectal-anal specialty hospitals may have consciously attempted to reduce their length of stay and inpatient charges. Both hospital and patient level factors had significant roles in determining length of stay and inpatient charges. CONCLUSION: Colorectal-anal specialty hospitals have shorter length of stay and higher inpatient charges per day than small general hospitals. A "specialty" designation by government influence performance and healthcare spending of hospitals as well. In order to maintain prosperous specialty hospital system, investigation into additional factors that affect performance, such as quality of care and patient satisfaction should be carried out.
Adult ; Aged ; Anus Diseases/economics/*therapy ; Colonic Diseases/economics/*therapy ; Efficiency, Organizational ; Female ; Hospital Charges/*statistics & numerical data ; Hospitals, General/organization & administration ; Hospitals, Special/organization & administration ; Humans ; Inpatients/*statistics & numerical data ; Length of Stay/economics/*statistics & numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/economics/methods/*statistics & numerical data ; Rectal Diseases/economics/*therapy ; Republic of Korea

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was conducted to evaluate whether medical costs can be reduced using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) instead of conventional surgeries in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). METHODS: Patients who underwent open gastrectomy (OG), laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG), and ESD for EGC were recruited from three medical institutions in 2009. For macro-costing, the medical costs for each patient were derived from the expenses incurred during the patient's hospital stay and 1-year follow-up. The overall costs in micro-costing were determined by multiplying the unit cost with the resources used during the patients' hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients were included in this study. The hospital stay for ESD was 5 to 8 days and was significantly shorter than the 12-day hospital stay for OG or the 11- to 17-day stay for LAG. Using macro-costing, the average medical costs for ESD during the hospital stay ranged from 2.1 to 3.4 million Korean Won (KRW) per patient, and the medical costs for conventional surgeries were estimated to be between 5.1 million and 8.2 million KRW. There were no significant differences in the 1-year follow-up costs between ESD and conventional surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: ESD patients had lower medical costs than those patients who had conventional surgeries for EGC with conservative indications.
*Costs and Cost Analysis ; Dissection/*economics/methods ; Gastrectomy/*economics/methods ; Gastric Mucosa/surgery ; Gastroscopy/*economics/methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data ; Republic of Korea ; Stomach Neoplasms/pathology/*surgery

BACKGROUND/AIMS: This study was conducted to evaluate whether medical costs can be reduced using endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) instead of conventional surgeries in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC). METHODS: Patients who underwent open gastrectomy (OG), laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG), and ESD for EGC were recruited from three medical institutions in 2009. For macro-costing, the medical costs for each patient were derived from the expenses incurred during the patient's hospital stay and 1-year follow-up. The overall costs in micro-costing were determined by multiplying the unit cost with the resources used during the patients' hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 194 patients were included in this study. The hospital stay for ESD was 5 to 8 days and was significantly shorter than the 12-day hospital stay for OG or the 11- to 17-day stay for LAG. Using macro-costing, the average medical costs for ESD during the hospital stay ranged from 2.1 to 3.4 million Korean Won (KRW) per patient, and the medical costs for conventional surgeries were estimated to be between 5.1 million and 8.2 million KRW. There were no significant differences in the 1-year follow-up costs between ESD and conventional surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: ESD patients had lower medical costs than those patients who had conventional surgeries for EGC with conservative indications.
*Costs and Cost Analysis ; Dissection/*economics/methods ; Gastrectomy/*economics/methods ; Gastric Mucosa/surgery ; Gastroscopy/*economics/methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data ; Republic of Korea ; Stomach Neoplasms/pathology/*surgery

PURPOSE: This study compared in-hospital mortality within 30 days of admission, lengths of stay, and inpatient charges among patients with heart failure admitted to public and private hospitals in South Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained health insurance claims data for all heart failure inpatients nationwide between November 1, 2011 and May 31, 2012. These data were then matched with hospital-level data, and multi-level regression models were examined. A total of 8406 patients from 253 hospitals, including 31 public hospitals, were analyzed. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate within 30 days of admission was 0.92% greater and the mean length of stay was 1.94 days longer at public hospitals than at private hospitals (mortality: 5.18% and 4.26%, respectively; LOS: 12.08 and 10.14 days, respectively). The inpatient charges were 11.4% lower per case and 24.5% lower per day at public hospitals than at private hospitals. After adjusting for patient- and hospital-level confounders, public hospitals had a 1.62-fold higher in-hospital mortality rate, a 16.5% longer length of stay, and an 11.7% higher inpatient charge per case than private hospitals, although the charges of private hospitals were greater in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: We recommend that government agencies and policy makers continue to monitor quality of care, lengths of stay in the hospital, and expenditures according to type of hospital ownership to improve healthcare outcomes and reduce spending.
Aged ; Female ; Heart Failure/economics/*mortality/therapy ; Hospital Charges/*statistics & numerical data ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitalization/economics ; Hospitals, Private/*economics ; Hospitals, Public/*economics ; Humans ; Inpatients/*statistics & numerical data ; Length of Stay/economics/*statistics & numerical data ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/economics ; Patient Discharge/economics/statistics & numerical data ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors

PURPOSE: This study compared in-hospital mortality within 30 days of admission, lengths of stay, and inpatient charges among patients with heart failure admitted to public and private hospitals in South Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We obtained health insurance claims data for all heart failure inpatients nationwide between November 1, 2011 and May 31, 2012. These data were then matched with hospital-level data, and multi-level regression models were examined. A total of 8406 patients from 253 hospitals, including 31 public hospitals, were analyzed. RESULTS: The in-hospital mortality rate within 30 days of admission was 0.92% greater and the mean length of stay was 1.94 days longer at public hospitals than at private hospitals (mortality: 5.18% and 4.26%, respectively; LOS: 12.08 and 10.14 days, respectively). The inpatient charges were 11.4% lower per case and 24.5% lower per day at public hospitals than at private hospitals. After adjusting for patient- and hospital-level confounders, public hospitals had a 1.62-fold higher in-hospital mortality rate, a 16.5% longer length of stay, and an 11.7% higher inpatient charge per case than private hospitals, although the charges of private hospitals were greater in univariate analysis. CONCLUSION: We recommend that government agencies and policy makers continue to monitor quality of care, lengths of stay in the hospital, and expenditures according to type of hospital ownership to improve healthcare outcomes and reduce spending.
Aged ; Female ; Heart Failure/economics/*mortality/therapy ; Hospital Charges/*statistics & numerical data ; Hospital Mortality ; Hospitalization/economics ; Hospitals, Private/*economics ; Hospitals, Public/*economics ; Humans ; Inpatients/*statistics & numerical data ; Length of Stay/economics/*statistics & numerical data ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate Analysis ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care)/economics ; Patient Discharge/economics/statistics & numerical data ; Republic of Korea/epidemiology ; Survival Analysis ; Time Factors