1.Omicron SARS-CoV-2 outcomes in vaccinated individuals with heart failure and ischaemic heart disease.
Liang En WEE ; Enoch Xueheng LOY ; Jue Tao LIM ; Yew Woon CHIA ; Shir Lynn LIM ; Jonathan YAP ; Khung Keong YEO ; Derek J HAUSENLOY ; Mark Yan Yee CHAN ; David Chien Boon LYE ; Kelvin Bryan TAN
Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore 2025;54(5):270-282
INTRODUCTION:
Outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in patients with heart failure (HF) and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) remain poorly defined.
METHOD:
In a highly vaccinated cohort of adult Singapore citizens and permanent residents, we used Cox proportional hazards models (adjusted for sociodemographic variables and comorbidities) to compare the risks of Omicron infection, COVID-19- related hospitalisation, and severe COVID-19 between indivi-duals with HF or IHD and matched controls without these conditions.
RESULTS:
From national databases, we identified 15,426 HF patients matched 1:∼3 to 41,221 controls, and 110,442 IHD patients matched 1:∼2 to 223,843 controls. Over 80% of HF and IHD patients had received at least 3 vaccine doses. During the Omicron-predominant period, both HF and IHD cohorts demonstrated higher adjusted risks of COVID-19 hospitalisation compared with matched controls (HF: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.65-1.90; IHD: aHR 1.21, 95% CI 1.17-1.26). Among those with at least 1 HF-or IHD-related admission in the prior year, hospitalisation risk was further elevated (HF: aHR 1.27, 95% CI 1.13-1.42; IHD: aHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.23). Receipt of ≥3 vaccine doses was associated with substantially lower risk of severe COVID-19 versus only 2 doses (HF: aHR 0.35, 95% CI 0.28-0.43; IHD: aHR 0.27, 95% CI 0.23-0.32). A fourth dose conferred additional reductions in infection and adverse outcomes, though CIs for infection overlapped with those for 3 doses.
CONCLUSION
During Omicron predominance, HF and IHD patients experienced greater risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation and severe COVID-19 versus matched controls. Booster vaccinations attenuated these risks. Individuals with recent HF/IHD admissions should be prioritised for receipt of booster vaccine doses.
Humans
;
COVID-19/complications*
;
Male
;
Heart Failure/complications*
;
Myocardial Ischemia/complications*
;
Female
;
Middle Aged
;
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data*
;
Aged
;
COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage*
;
Singapore/epidemiology*
;
SARS-CoV-2
;
Proportional Hazards Models
;
Adult
;
Case-Control Studies
;
Vaccination/statistics & numerical data*
3.Barriers to effective research supervision in clinical specialist training: Experience from a medical school in Malaysia
Lee Yew Kong ; Ng Chirk Jenn ; Sim Joong Hiong ; Firdaus Amira ; Foong Chan Choong ; Hong Wei Han ; Junedah Sanusi ; Adrian Lim Jia Hwa ; Christopher Boey Chiong Meng
Malaysian Family Physician 2021;16(3):77-86
Introduction: A compulsory research component is becoming increasingly common for clinical residents. However, integrating research into a busy clinical training schedule can be challenging. This study aimed to explore barriers to research supervision in specialist training programmes from the perspectives of clinical supervisors and trainees at a Malaysian university hospital.
Methods: Qualitative interviews and focus group discussions were conducted (December 2016 to July 2017) with clinical supervisors (n=11) and clinical trainees (n=26) utilising a topic guide exploring institutional guidelines, research culture and supervisor-student roles. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically to identify barriers to research supervision.
Results: Supervisors and trainees from 11 out of 18 departments participated. Both clinical supervisors and trainees struggled to successfully integrate a compulsory research component into residency training. Among the reasons identified included a lack of supervisory access due to the nature of clinical rotations and placements, clashing training priorities (clinical vs research) that discouraged trainees and supervisors from engaging in research, poor research expertise and experience among clinical supervisors hampering high-quality supervision, and a frustrating lack of clear standards between the various parties involved in research guidance and examination.
Conclusion: Both clinical supervisors and trainees struggled to successfully integrate a compulsory research component into residency training. This was not only an issue of resource limitation since questions regarding clinical priorities and unclear research standards emerged. Thus, institutional coordinators need to set clear standards and provide adequate training to make research meaningful and achievable for busy clinical supervisors and trainees.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail