Non-pharmacological interventions are integral to the multidisciplinary management of fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), complementing pharmacological therapies by addressing functional decline, symptom burden, and quality of life. Palliative care is fundamental, offering a structured approach to symptom control—particularly dyspnoea— and facilitating advance care planning. Oxygen therapy may provide symptomatic benefit in patients with resting, nocturnal, or exertional hypoxemia, though evidence remains limited and extrapolated mainly from idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis cohorts. Pulmonary rehabilitation, encompassing supervised exercise and patient education, has demonstrated short-term improvements in exercise tolerance; however, long-term effects on dyspnoea and health-related quality of life are inconsistent. Nutritional status is an emerging area of interest, with data linking low body mass index and unintentional weight loss, underscoring the potential value of dietary assessment and intervention. Psychological support is critical, as ILD patients frequently experience anxiety, depression, and psychological distress. Although peer-led interventions remain under-investigated, they appear to address significant unmet needs in patient education and emotional support. Occupational therapy provides tailored strategies to maintain functional independence and manage fatigue, thereby improving daily living. Immunization against influenza, pneumococcus, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus- 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is essential, given the elevated risk of infection-related morbidity and mortality. For selected patients with progressive disease refractory to medical therapy, lung transplantation offers a potential survival advantage, necessitating timely referral and evaluation. Although results are promising, evidence is still limited for some interventions and further research is warranted to establish robust, evidence-based guidelines for non-pharmacological management in fibrosing ILD.

Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the go-to method for obtaining samples from gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic lesions. When the transduodenal approach is utilized, the use of a more flexible needle, such as a nitinol 19-gauge (G) needle, has been recommended. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of 19-G flexible aspiration needles in obtaining samples from solid lesions through a transduodenal approach. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from eight Italian endoscopy centers. Consecutive patients with solid lesions who underwent transduodenal EUS-FNA with a 19-G flexible needle were included. Results: A total of 201 patients were enrolled. According to histology, EUS, radiology and 12 months of follow-up, 151 patients had malignant lesions and 50 patients had benign lesions. EUS-FNA was feasible in all cases. An adequate histologic sample was obtained in all except eight cases (96.1%). The sensitivity of EUS-FNA was 92.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.8%–95.7%), and the specificity was 100% (95% CI, 90.5%–100%). The positive predictive value was 100% (95% CI, 93.4%–100%), and the negative predictive value was 74% (95% CI, 62.8%–82.7%). The diagnostic accuracy was 93.5% (95% CI, 89.2%–96.5%). Conclusions The transduodenal approach for obtaining samples from solid lesions using a 19-G flexible needle seems feasible and accurate.

Background/Aims: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is the go-to method for obtaining samples from gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic lesions. When the transduodenal approach is utilized, the use of a more flexible needle, such as a nitinol 19-gauge (G) needle, has been recommended. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of 19-G flexible aspiration needles in obtaining samples from solid lesions through a transduodenal approach. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from eight Italian endoscopy centers. Consecutive patients with solid lesions who underwent transduodenal EUS-FNA with a 19-G flexible needle were included. Results: A total of 201 patients were enrolled. According to histology, EUS, radiology and 12 months of follow-up, 151 patients had malignant lesions and 50 patients had benign lesions. EUS-FNA was feasible in all cases. An adequate histologic sample was obtained in all except eight cases (96.1%). The sensitivity of EUS-FNA was 92.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 86.8%–95.7%), and the specificity was 100% (95% CI, 90.5%–100%). The positive predictive value was 100% (95% CI, 93.4%–100%), and the negative predictive value was 74% (95% CI, 62.8%–82.7%). The diagnostic accuracy was 93.5% (95% CI, 89.2%–96.5%). Conclusions The transduodenal approach for obtaining samples from solid lesions using a 19-G flexible needle seems feasible and accurate.

In this study we evaluated the role of a candidate gene for major psychosis, Sialyltransferase (ST8SIA2), in the risk to develop a schizophrenia spectrum disorders, taking into account exposure to stressful life events (SLEs). Eight polymorphisms (SNPs) were tested in 94 Schizophreniainpatients and 176 healthy controls. Schizophrenia patients were also evaluated for SLEs in different life periods. None of the SNPs showed association with schizophrenia. Nevertheless, when crossing genetic variants with childhood SLEs, we could observe trends of interaction with age of onset. Though several limitations, our results support a protective role of ST8SIA2 in individuals exposed to moderate childhood stress.
Age of Onset* ; Gene-Environment Interaction ; Humans ; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ; Psychotic Disorders ; Schizophrenia*