BACKGROUND: Telesurgery has the potential to overcome spatial limitations for surgeons, which depends on surgical robot and the quality of network communication. However, the influence of network latency and bandwidth on telesurgery is not well understood. METHODS: A telesurgery system capable of dynamically adjusting image compression ratios in response to bandwidth changes was established between Beijing and Sanya (Hainan province), covering a distance of 3000 km. In total, 108 animal operations, including 12 surgical procedures, were performed. Total latency ranging from 170 ms to 320 ms and bandwidth from 15-20 Mbps to less than 1 Mbps were explored using designed surgical tasks and hemostasis models for renal vein and internal iliac artery rupture bleeding. Network latency, jitter, frame loss, and bit rate code were systemically measured during these operations. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and a self-designed scale measured the workload and subjective perception of surgeons. RESULTS: All 108 animal telesurgeries, conducted from January 2023 to June 2023, were performed effectively over a total duration of 3866 min. The operations were completed with latency up to 320 ms and bandwidths as low as 1-5 Mbps. Hemostasis for vein and artery rupture bleeding models was effectively achieved under these low bandwidth conditions. The NASA-TLX results indicated that latency significantly impacted surgical performance more than bandwidth and image clarity reductions. CONCLUSIONS This telesurgery system demonstrated safety and reliability. A total of 320 ms latency is acceptable for telesurgery operations. Reducing image clarity can effectively mitigate the potential latency increase caused by decreased bandwidth, offering a new method to reduce the impact of latency on telesurgery.
Animals ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Laparoscopy/methods*

The clinical burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) is high. Population-based screening and early detection are essential to improve the long-term clinical outcome. Nonetheless, a significant proportion of patients still present at an advanced stage, including with acute large bowel obstruction. Image-enhanced endoscopy and artificial intelligence can improve the detection and diagnosis of colonic adenomas and early cancer. Endoscopic resection is regarded as the preferred curative treatment option for colonic adenoma and T0 and T1 CRC limited to the superficial submucosa. Emergency colonic stenting as bridge to interval curative surgery is increasingly accepted as a first-line option when technically feasible. Minimally invasive resection techniques such as laparoscopic colectomy and robot-assisted colorectal surgery have also come of age. These techniques reduce post-treatment morbidity, shorten the recovery process and can be cost-effective while maintaining long-term oncological cure. These outcome measures are relevant to our patients; therefore, minimally invasive approaches to curative resection should be embraced.
Humans ; Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Colectomy/methods* ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Treatment Outcome ; Colonoscopy/methods*

Humans ; Laparoscopy/education* ; Female ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/education* ; Consensus ; Genital Diseases, Female/surgery* ; China ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods*

Pancreatoduodenectomy with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction can provide radical surgical opportunities for patients with venous invasion and enable them to benefit from the surgery. With the development of minimally invasive concepts and surgical techniques, laparoscopic and robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction is being increasingly widely carried out. This surgical procedure is highly technically demanding, and the perioperative management of patients is complex. However, there is a lack of high-quality and high-level evidence-based clinical studies in this regard. In order to better standardize the clinical application of laparoscopic or robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction in China, the Study Group of Minimally Invasive Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer in China Anti-Cancer Association, guided by problems and based on evidence, formed 17 recommendations through full discussions among experts. The recommendations involve the safety, oncological benefits, and perioperative patient management of the minimally invasive approach to pancreatoduodenectomy with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction.
Humans ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy/methods* ; Mesenteric Veins/surgery* ; Laparoscopy ; Portal Vein/surgery* ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Consensus

Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for end-stage liver disease. Liver transplantation is technically complex and associated with significant trauma. In recent years,minimally invasive surgical techniques,such as laparoscopy and robotic surgery,have rapidly developed and been widely applied across various surgical fields. Minimally invasive surgery offers advantages including reduced trauma,less bleeding,and faster postoperative recovery,and has become a mainstream trend in surgical development. In the field of liver transplantation,laparoscopic and robotic donor hepatectomy techniques for living donor liver transplantation have made significant progress. However, due to difficulties in exposing the anastomotic sites of the donor liver and challenges in vascular anastomosis,the application of minimally invasive techniques in donor liver implantation has progressed relatively slowly. With advancements in laparoscopic and robotic surgical techniques and related instruments,laparoscopic donor liver implantation has gradually become feasible. Currently,multiple liver transplant centers worldwide have begun to progressively perform laparoscopic or robot-assisted liver transplantation in recipients,demonstrating potential advantages in reducing surgical trauma and accelerating postoperative recovery. However,there is currently a lack of guidelines or consensus on the application of minimally invasive surgery in liver transplant recipients. Therefore,Branch of Organ Transplantation of Chinese Medical Association,Surgery Group of Chinese Society of Surgery of Chinese Medical Association,and Branch of Organ Transplant Physicians of Chinese Medical Doctor Association invited experts in the field to discuss clinical issues. Combining published guidelines,consensus statements,and research advancements,they formulated the "Technical guidelines for minimally invasive surgery in liver transplant recipients（2025）", aiming to provide reasonable guidance and references for clinical practitioners in the field of liver transplantation.
Humans ; Liver Transplantation/methods* ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Laparoscopy ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Practice Guidelines as Topic

Compared with traditional laparotomy,laparoscopy is restricted to the location and number of trocars,making it still faces many problems such as "chopstick effect", insufficient exposure of viscera and tissues,and limited surgical field. Magnetic-anchoring technology,as an innovative method specifically designed to assist tissue retraction and broaden surgical field in laparoscopy,has been applied in a variety of surgical procedures,including hepatobiliary surgery,thoracic surgery,gastrointestinal surgery,weight loss and metabolic surgery,gynecology,urology and other departments. Thus,it is of great significance to standardize the clinical application of magnetic-anchoring technology in assisting tissue retraction and broaden surgical field in laparoscopic surgery. This consensus was built according to evidence from published clinical researches and relative experiences,and was shaped based on key literature collection and discussion about practicing magnetic anchoring technology assisted laparoscopic tissue retraction and surgical field exposure. Further,this consensus was drafted by experts from related field,and was revised by 38 invited units and 68 invited professionals across China,from which the suggestions were collected and verified by the corresponding authors to officially establish this consensus.
Laparoscopy/methods* ; Humans ; Consensus ; Magnetics

Objective： To investigate the effects of 3D laparoscopic radical resection prostatectomy(LRP) on urinary control and sexual function of patients with prostatic cancer. Methods： A total of 268 patients who were treated with LRP in the Fifth People's Hospital of Huai'an City from January 2019 to May 2022 were selected and divided into 2 groups according to surgical methods, with 134 cases in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with traditional LRP, and the 3D LRP was used in the observation group. The clinical effects of the two groups were compared. Results： The patients in observation group had less blood loss (［135.62±13.58］ mL vs ［143.18±14.89］ mL) and shorter indwelling catheter time (［8.26±1.47］ d vs ［9.78±1.73］ d) compared with control group, but the operation time (［160.52±10.78］ min vs ［154.47±10.41］ min) was longer than that in the control group (P<0.05). The recovery of sexual function and urinary control in the observation group was better than that in the control group after 3, 6 and 12 months of the surgery(P<0.05). After one month of surgery, the scores of ICIQ-SF and 1h urine pad test were lower than those of the control group. The EPIC-UIN score（［72.63±6.85］ points vs ［67.15±5.09］ points）of the observation group was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). The patients in the observation group had lower level of residual urine volume（［60.26±6.63］mL vs ［76.89±7.89］mL）, higher maximum urine flow rate（［7.52±0.46］mL/s vs ［6.17±0.43］mL/s） and detrusor pressure（［85.19±7.18］mL vs ［76.29±6.85］mL） at maximum urine flow rate compared with the control group (P<0.05). There was no difference in the incidence of complications between the observation group and the control group (5.97% vs8.27%，P>0.05). The recurrence rate of tumor 3 years after operation in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (11.94% vs 29.10%, χ2=12.102, P<0.05). Conclusion： 3D LRP has obvious advantages in surgical clarity and precision, which reduces the risk of postoperative complications and improves urinary control ability and sexual function of patients.
Humans ; Male ; Prostatectomy/methods* ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Urination ; Middle Aged ; Aged

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of sutureless approach to the dorsal venous complex (DVC) combined with robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy on sexual function of patients with prostatic cancer. METHODS: This study included 114 prostate cancer patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at our hospital from January 2021 to January 2024. The patients were randomly divided into a control group (n=57) and an observation group (n=57). The control group received conventional "figure-of-eight" suture ligation of the dorsal venous complex (DVC), while the observation group underwent direct DVC transection using monopolar electrocautery scissors after increasing pneumoperitoneum pressure.Surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, positive surgical margin rates, and positive apical margin rates were recorded. The continence rates and rates of morning erections at 1, 3 and 6 months after the operation were compared between groups. Sexual function was assessed pre-operatively and at 6 months post-operation by using the IIEF-5 and PEDT. RESULTS: The operative time in the observation group was significantly longer than that in the control group (［115.71 ± 19.42］ min vs ［103.42 ± 12.78］ min， P<0.05). While no significant differences were observed in intraoperative blood loss, positive surgical margin rate, or positive apical margin rate between the two groups (P>0.05). At 3 and 6 months after the operation, the observation group exhibited higher urinary continence rates and morning erection recovery rates compared to the control group （P<0.05). Furthermore, at 6 months postoperatively, the observation group demonstrated significantly higher IIEF-5 scores and lower PEDT scores than those of control group(P<0.05). CONCLUSION The use of a sutureless DVC technique in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy protects the post-operative sexual function in patients.
Humans ; Male ; Prostatectomy/methods* ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery* ; Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods* ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Aged

With advancements in surgical technology, minimally invasive and function- preserving approaches have become fundamental objectives of both patients and physicians. In recent years, laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) has gained increasing attention for its significant role in achieving these goals. However, a notable gap remains in the availability of evidence-based guidelines to standardize the clinical implementation of LECS for gastrointestinal tumors. This guideline is collaboratively developed by the Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Committee of the Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Chinese Gastric Cancer Association, the NOTES Group of the Digestive Endoscopy Branch of the Chinese Medical Association, and the Greater Bay Area Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery Alliance. Through integrating the current best evidence and experts' opinions, we developed 22 recommendations on 16 clinical questions, including the LECS indications, use of antibiotics, enhanced recovery after surgery, wound suture, and surgical training. This guideline provides comprehensive guidance and recommendations for LECS, aimed at promoting the precise, minimally invasive and function-preserving treatment of gastrointestinal tumors.
Humans ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/surgery* ; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods* ; China

The incidence of hiatal hernia is on the rise due to population aging and improved awareness of the disease. Laparoscopic repair is the main treatment modality; however, there remains a lack of consensus on the selection of mesh materials and operative specifications. Based on high-level evidence, this expert consensus has formulated 11 recommendations regarding the indications for mesh application, material selection, and operative methods: For patients with giant hiatal hernias (defect area >10 cm², hiatal diameter ≥ 5 cm, or over 1/3 of the gastric body entering the thoracic cavity), complex hernias, recurrent hernias, or those with weak diaphragmatic crura, mesh-reinforced repair is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence. Synthetic meshes are suitable for giant/complex hernias; biological meshes help reduce foreign body reactions; and bioabsorbable synthetic meshes combine mechanical strength with safety. The preferred shape of the mesh is U-shaped, and fixation methods (non-absorbable sutures, absorbable staplers, or medical adhesives) are selected based on hernia size and anatomical features. For suturing the diaphragmatic crura, non-absorbable sutures are recommended, with the choice between interrupted or continuous suturing techniques tailored to patient characteristics. The method of fundoplication is determined according to esophageal pH measurement and lower esophageal sphincter pressure, and non-absorbable sutures are recommended for plication.
Humans ; Hernia, Hiatal/surgery* ; Laparoscopy/methods* ; Surgical Mesh ; Herniorrhaphy/methods*