Objective:To comparatively evaluate the efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23 biologics as the first-line treatment in Crohn′s disease (CD).Methods:From January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2024, at the Department of Gastroenterology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, the clinical data of patients with CD treated with anti-TNF-α (infliximab or adalimumab) or anti-IL-12/23 biologics (ustekinumab) as first-line treatment were retrospectively collected. All the patients were followed up for 1 year since the initiation of first-line biologic treatment, with the follow-up concluding on December 31, 2024. The primary outcomes were the clinical efficacy (including clinical response rate and clinical remission rate) of anti-TNF-α or anti-IL-12/23 treatment at week 24 and week 48, and the endoscopic efficacy(including endoscopic response rate and endoscopic remission rate) at week 48. The clinical efficacy was assessed based on Crohn′s disease activity index(CDAI). The clinical response was defined as a reduction in CDAI by ≥ 70 from baseline (week 0), and clinical remission was defined as CDAI < 150. The endoscopic efficacy was assessed based on simple endoscopic score for Crohn′s disease (SES-CD), the endoscopic response was defined as a reduction in SES-CD by ≥50% from baseline (week 0), and endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤2. Chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test was used for statistical analysis.Results:A total of 215 CD patients were enrolled, including 160 males and 55 females, with the age of (31.88±11.55) years old. Among them, 179 patients completed the clinical efficacy evaluation, 110 cases were treated with anti-TNF-α, 69 cases were treated with anti-IL-12/23. The clinical response rates of patients treated with anti-TNF-α and anti-IL-12/23 at week 24 were 95.5%(105/110) and 95.7%(66/69), respectively, and the clinical remission rates at week 24 were 86.4%(95/110) and 85.5%(59/69), respectively; the clinical response rates at week 48 were 95.5%(105/110) and 97.1%(67/69), respectively, and the clinical remission rates at week 48 were 89.1%(98/110) and 88.4%(61/69), respectively; and the differences were not statistically significant(Fisher′s exact test, χ2=0.03, Fisher′s exact test, χ2=0.02; P=1.000, 0.708, 0.872, and 0.887). A total of 76 patients completed endoscopic efficacy evaluation, among which 55 cases were treated with anti-TNF-α, and 21 cases were treated with anti-IL-12/23. The endoscopic response rates of patients treated with anti-TNF-α and anti-IL-12/23 were 74.5%(41/55) and 66.7%(14/21), respectively, and the endoscopic remission rates at week 48 were 49.1%(27/55) and 28.6%(6/21), respectively; and the differences were not statistically significant( χ2=0.47 and 2.60, P=0.492 and 0.107). Conclusion:Both anti-TNF-α and anti-IL-12/23 are effective as first-line biological therapies for CD, and there are no significant differences in both clinical and endoscopic efficacy between these 2 biologics.

Objective:To compare the role of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and dual-energy CT enterography (DCTE) in evaluating the clinical characteristics of Crohn′s disease (CD).Methods:From July 1, 2016 to November 1, 2023, 72 patients with CD who underwent both DBE and DCTE (with an interval of less than 3 months) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were enrolled in this retropective study. Among them, 4 patients underwent both DBE and DCTE twice (a total of 76 cases). The data of DBE and DCTE in the diagnosis of 76 CD cases were analyzed, including the diagnostic rate of CD, the consistency of the 2 methods in detecting the lesion location (ileocecal, colonic, ileocolonic, and upper gastrointestinal tract involvement), and the detection rates of stenosis, ulcer and the location, long ulcer (long-diameter≥2 cm), and fistula. Kappa test was performed for the consistency analysis, and Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.Results:The diagnostic rate of CD by DBE was higher than that by DCTE (80.3% (61/76) vs. 65.8% (50/76)), and the diagnostic rate of combination of the 2 methods (89.5% (68/76)) was higher than that by DCTE alone, and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=4.04 and 12.28, P=0.044 and <0.001). The result of Kappa consistency test showed that the consistency of CD lesion location detected by DBE and DCTE was poor (Kappa value=0.29, t=3.17, P=0.002). The detection rate of stenosis by DBE was higher than that by DCTE (46.1% (35/76) vs. 13.2% (10/76)), the detection rate of stenosis by combination of the 2 methods (52.6% (40/76)) was higher than that by DCTE alone, and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=19.73 and 26.82, both P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the detection rates of fistula among DBE, DCTE, and the combination of the 2 methods (3.9%(3/76), 2.6% (2/76), 5.3% (4/76); all P>0.05). The detection rate of ulcer by DBE was higher than that by DCTE(73.7% (56/76) vs. 7.9% (6/76)), the detection rate of ulcer by combination of the 2 methods (76.3%(58/56)) was higher than that by DCTE alone, and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=68.10 and 72.98, both P<0.001). The detection rates of long ulcer and non-terminal ileum ulcer by DBE were both 17.9% (10/56). All the 6 cases with ulcer detected by DCTE were located in the terminal ileum, and no long ulcers were observed. Conclusions:In the diagnosis of CD, as well as in the detection of stenosis and ulcer, DBE and the combination of DBE and DCTE have more advantages over DCTE alone. The consistency between DBE and DCTE in identifying the location of lesion is poor. DBE has advantages in detecting long ulcer and non-terminal ileum ulcer.

This article reports the diagnosis and treatment process of a case of iron deficiency anemia in a patient with Crohn's disease who has a poor response to iron supplementation therapy. It reviews relevant literature reports to enhance clinicians' understanding of iron deficiency anemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who have a poor response to iron supplementation therapy, and to provide timely effective treatment and regular follow-up and monitoring for the patient after analyzing the causes of anemia.

Cap polyposis is a rare benign gastrointestinal disorder characterized by distinctive endoscopic and pathological manifestions. It primarily affects the rectum and sigmoid colon, with diverse clinical manifestations that often lead to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. This article reports a case of cap polyposis successfully treated with infliximab. Through the literature review, we aim to enhance clinicians' understanding and capabilities of diagnosis and treatmet for this rare disease.

This article reports the diagnosis and treatment process of a case of iron deficiency anemia in a patient with Crohn's disease who has a poor response to iron supplementation therapy. It reviews relevant literature reports to enhance clinicians' understanding of iron deficiency anemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease who have a poor response to iron supplementation therapy, and to provide timely effective treatment and regular follow-up and monitoring for the patient after analyzing the causes of anemia.

Cap polyposis is a rare benign gastrointestinal disorder characterized by distinctive endoscopic and pathological manifestions. It primarily affects the rectum and sigmoid colon, with diverse clinical manifestations that often lead to misdiagnosis and delayed treatment. This article reports a case of cap polyposis successfully treated with infliximab. Through the literature review, we aim to enhance clinicians' understanding and capabilities of diagnosis and treatmet for this rare disease.

Objective:To comparatively evaluate the efficacy of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and anti-interleukin (IL)-12/23 biologics as the first-line treatment in Crohn′s disease (CD).Methods:From January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2024, at the Department of Gastroenterology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, the clinical data of patients with CD treated with anti-TNF-α (infliximab or adalimumab) or anti-IL-12/23 biologics (ustekinumab) as first-line treatment were retrospectively collected. All the patients were followed up for 1 year since the initiation of first-line biologic treatment, with the follow-up concluding on December 31, 2024. The primary outcomes were the clinical efficacy (including clinical response rate and clinical remission rate) of anti-TNF-α or anti-IL-12/23 treatment at week 24 and week 48, and the endoscopic efficacy(including endoscopic response rate and endoscopic remission rate) at week 48. The clinical efficacy was assessed based on Crohn′s disease activity index(CDAI). The clinical response was defined as a reduction in CDAI by ≥ 70 from baseline (week 0), and clinical remission was defined as CDAI < 150. The endoscopic efficacy was assessed based on simple endoscopic score for Crohn′s disease (SES-CD), the endoscopic response was defined as a reduction in SES-CD by ≥50% from baseline (week 0), and endoscopic remission was defined as SES-CD ≤2. Chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test was used for statistical analysis.Results:A total of 215 CD patients were enrolled, including 160 males and 55 females, with the age of (31.88±11.55) years old. Among them, 179 patients completed the clinical efficacy evaluation, 110 cases were treated with anti-TNF-α, 69 cases were treated with anti-IL-12/23. The clinical response rates of patients treated with anti-TNF-α and anti-IL-12/23 at week 24 were 95.5%(105/110) and 95.7%(66/69), respectively, and the clinical remission rates at week 24 were 86.4%(95/110) and 85.5%(59/69), respectively; the clinical response rates at week 48 were 95.5%(105/110) and 97.1%(67/69), respectively, and the clinical remission rates at week 48 were 89.1%(98/110) and 88.4%(61/69), respectively; and the differences were not statistically significant(Fisher′s exact test, χ2=0.03, Fisher′s exact test, χ2=0.02; P=1.000, 0.708, 0.872, and 0.887). A total of 76 patients completed endoscopic efficacy evaluation, among which 55 cases were treated with anti-TNF-α, and 21 cases were treated with anti-IL-12/23. The endoscopic response rates of patients treated with anti-TNF-α and anti-IL-12/23 were 74.5%(41/55) and 66.7%(14/21), respectively, and the endoscopic remission rates at week 48 were 49.1%(27/55) and 28.6%(6/21), respectively; and the differences were not statistically significant( χ2=0.47 and 2.60, P=0.492 and 0.107). Conclusion:Both anti-TNF-α and anti-IL-12/23 are effective as first-line biological therapies for CD, and there are no significant differences in both clinical and endoscopic efficacy between these 2 biologics.

Objective:To compare the role of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and dual-energy CT enterography (DCTE) in evaluating the clinical characteristics of Crohn′s disease (CD).Methods:From July 1, 2016 to November 1, 2023, 72 patients with CD who underwent both DBE and DCTE (with an interval of less than 3 months) in the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were enrolled in this retropective study. Among them, 4 patients underwent both DBE and DCTE twice (a total of 76 cases). The data of DBE and DCTE in the diagnosis of 76 CD cases were analyzed, including the diagnostic rate of CD, the consistency of the 2 methods in detecting the lesion location (ileocecal, colonic, ileocolonic, and upper gastrointestinal tract involvement), and the detection rates of stenosis, ulcer and the location, long ulcer (long-diameter≥2 cm), and fistula. Kappa test was performed for the consistency analysis, and Chi-square test was used for statistical analysis.Results:The diagnostic rate of CD by DBE was higher than that by DCTE (80.3% (61/76) vs. 65.8% (50/76)), and the diagnostic rate of combination of the 2 methods (89.5% (68/76)) was higher than that by DCTE alone, and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=4.04 and 12.28, P=0.044 and <0.001). The result of Kappa consistency test showed that the consistency of CD lesion location detected by DBE and DCTE was poor (Kappa value=0.29, t=3.17, P=0.002). The detection rate of stenosis by DBE was higher than that by DCTE (46.1% (35/76) vs. 13.2% (10/76)), the detection rate of stenosis by combination of the 2 methods (52.6% (40/76)) was higher than that by DCTE alone, and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=19.73 and 26.82, both P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the detection rates of fistula among DBE, DCTE, and the combination of the 2 methods (3.9%(3/76), 2.6% (2/76), 5.3% (4/76); all P>0.05). The detection rate of ulcer by DBE was higher than that by DCTE(73.7% (56/76) vs. 7.9% (6/76)), the detection rate of ulcer by combination of the 2 methods (76.3%(58/56)) was higher than that by DCTE alone, and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=68.10 and 72.98, both P<0.001). The detection rates of long ulcer and non-terminal ileum ulcer by DBE were both 17.9% (10/56). All the 6 cases with ulcer detected by DCTE were located in the terminal ileum, and no long ulcers were observed. Conclusions:In the diagnosis of CD, as well as in the detection of stenosis and ulcer, DBE and the combination of DBE and DCTE have more advantages over DCTE alone. The consistency between DBE and DCTE in identifying the location of lesion is poor. DBE has advantages in detecting long ulcer and non-terminal ileum ulcer.

Background::Histological healing is closely associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes and lowered relapses in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we developed a novel diagnostic criterion for assessing histological healing in UC patients.Methods::We conducted a retrospective cohort study in UC patients, whose treatment was iteratively optimized to achieve mucosal healing at Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital of Tongji University from January 2017 to May 2022. We identified an inflammatory cell enumeration index (ICEI) for assessing histological healing based on the proportions of eosinophils, CD177 + neutrophils, and CD40L + T cells in the colonic lamina propria under high power field (HPF), and the outcomes (risks of symptomatic relapses) of achieving histological remission vs. persistent histological inflammation using Kaplan-Meier curves. Intrareader reliability and inter-reader reliability were evaluated by each reader. The relationships to the changes in the Nancy index and the Geboes score were also assessed for responsiveness. The ICEI was further validated in a new cohort of UC patients from other nine university hospitals. Results::We developed an ICEI for clinical diagnosis of histological healing, i.e., Y = 1.701X 1 + 0.758X 2 + 1.347X 3 - 7.745 (X 1, X 2, and X 3 represent the proportions of CD177 + neutrophils, eosinophils, and CD40L + T cells, respectively, in the colonic lamina propria under HPF). The receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis revealed that Y <-0.391 was the cutoff value for the diagnosis of histological healing and that an area under the curve (AUC) was 0.942 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.905-0.979) with a sensitivity of 92.5% and a specificity of 83.6% ( P <0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the intrareader reliability was 0.855 (95% CI: 0.781-0.909), and ICEI had good inter-reader reliability of 0.832 (95% CI: 0.748-0.894). During an 18-month follow-up, patients with histological healing had a substantially better outcome compared with those with unachieved histological healing ( P <0.001) using ICEI. During a 12-month follow-up from other nine hospitals, patients with histological healing also had a lower risk of relapse than patients with unachieved histological healing. Conclusions::ICEI can be used to predict histological healing and identify patients with a risk of relapse 12 months and 18 months after clinical therapy. Therefore, ICEI provides a promising, simplified approach to monitor histological healing and to predict the prognosis of UC.Registration::Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, No. ChiCTR2300077792.

Hepatitis C is distributed worldwide and possesses a hidden characteristic. The traditional methods of screening and diagnosis of hepatitis C infection commonly used in clinics are based on anti-HCV antibody and HCV RNA detection. Advances in HCV antigen detection technologies can apparently reduce the window period for anti-HCV antibodies, providing new clinical evidence for the early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of HCV infection. This article is a current review of HCV antigen detection methodologies, clinical applications, and detection strategies.