BACKGROUND: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) is responsible for cardiovascular effects mediated by angiotensin II. This study aimed to investigate the impact of antibodies directed against AT1R (anti-AT1R) in renal allograft rejection. METHODS: We evaluated 53 patients who had biopsy-proven rejection including antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (N=22), T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) (N=29), and mixed AMR and TCMR (N=2). Donor specific HLA antibodies (DSA) and anti-AT1Rs were simultaneously determined. RESULTS: Anti-AT1Rs were detected in 9.4% (5/53) of rejection patients (one with acute AMR, two with chronic active AMR, one with acute TCMR, and one with mixed acute AMR & TCMR). HLA antibodies and DSA were detected in 75.5% (40/53) and 49.1% (26/53) of patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in transplant characteristics between anti-AT1R(+) and anti-AT1R(-) patients except for the association of HLA class-I DSA(+) and anti-AT1R(+). Four of five anti-AT1R(+) patients had DSA and were also found to have AMR. A single anti-AT1R(+)/DSA(-) patient developed acute TCMR. Detection rates of DSA, HLA antibodies, or anti-AT1R were not different between AMR and TCMR. However, DSA(+)/anti-AT1R(+) was more frequently found in AMR than in TCMR (P=0.036). Patients with anti-AT1R showed a greater tendency to develop high-grade rejection as Banff IIA/IIB or AMR. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of anti-AT1R was significantly associated with HLA class-I DSA in renal allograft rejection patients. Both anti-AT1R and DSA positivity was associated with AMR in patients with renal allograft rejection.
Adult ; Antibodies/blood ; Female ; Graft Rejection/*etiology ; HLA Antigens/immunology ; Humans ; Kidney/pathology ; Kidney Transplantation/*adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Receptor, Angiotensin, Type 1/*immunology ; Tissue Donors ; Transplantation, Homologous

BACKGROUND: Manual slide review (MSR) is usually triggered by the results of automated hematolgy analyzers, but each laboaratory has different ciriteria for MSR. This study was carried out to investigate the current status of MSR criteria of automated complete blood cell count (CBC) and white blood cell (WBC) differential results and to propose a basic guideline for MSR. METHODS: Total 111 laboratories were surveyed regarding MSR using questionnaires. The questionnaire asked: kinds of automated hematology analyzers used and the presence of criteria triggering MSR in seven categories: 1) CBC results, 2) 5 differential WBC counts, 3) 3 differential WBC counts, 4) automated reticulocyte counts, 5) delta check, 6) instrument flags (or messages), 7) clinical information (wards or diseases). Based on the survey results, we determined basic and extended criteria for MSR. With these criteria, we consulted nine hematology experts to get a consensus. RESULTS: All 111 laboratories had their own MSR criteria. Among 111 laboratories, 98 (88.3%) used more than three criteria for MSR including CBC results and 5-part WBC differential count results and 95 (85.6%) had criteria of flags triggering MSR. For MSR criteria with numeric values, the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles of upper and lower threshold values were obtained. The basic guideline for MSR was made. CONCLUSIONS: We proposed a basic guideline for MSR. This guideline would be helpful to hematology laboratories for their daily operation and providing more rapid and accurate CBC and WBC differential results.
Automation ; Blood Cell Count/instrumentation/*methods/standards ; Humans ; Laboratories, Hospital ; Leukocyte Count/instrumentation/*methods/standards ; Quality Control ; Questionnaires

BACKGROUND: Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a well-known causative agent of various diseases including post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Although the level of EBV viral load in donors is expected to have a direct effect on recipients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), little has been studied providing a clear evidence for that. We performed EBV DNA quantitation in donors and analyzed the effect of donors' EBV viral load on the recipients after HSCT. METHODS: EBV DNA quantitation of peripheral blood in 94 healthy HSCT donors was performed by real-time PCR. We analyzed the distribution of EBV viral load in HSCT donors and EBV positivity in the recipients transplanted from donors who had detectable EBV. RESULTS: Fifteen HSCT donors (16%) showed positive results in EBV real-time quantitative PCR. EBV viral load was below 500 copies/mL in 5 donors and above 500 (680-11,300) copies/mL in 10 donors. Five of the recipients (33.3%) transplanted from these 15 donors showed positivity in EBV PCR after HSCT. All of the EBV PCR positive recipients were transplanted from donors with viral load of >1,000 copies/mL, and 5 (71%) of 7 donors with viral load of >1,000 copies/mL was associated with posttansplant EBV PCR positivity in the recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of EBV viral load in donors appear to be associated with EBV transmission to recipients in HSCT. EBV real-time quantitative PCR may be needed for screening EBV DNA level in HSCT donors.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Child ; DNA, Viral/*blood ; Female ; *Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Herpesvirus 4, Human/*genetics ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Polymerase Chain Reaction/*methods ; Tissue Donors ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Viral Load

BACKGROUND: The JAK2 V617F mutation has been noted in the cases of polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis patients. This mutation occurs less frequently in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and other hematologic diseases, such as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS); myelodysplatic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm, unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U); and refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts with thrombocytosis (RARS-T). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with hematologic diseases other than MPN who visited Seoul St Mary's Hospital from January 2007 to February 2010 were selected. A total of 43 patients were enrolled in this study: 12 MDS, 9 MDS/MPN-U, 7 RARS-T, and 15 AML patients. The diseases were diagnosed according to the 2008 WHO classification criteria. Data obtained from JAK2 V617F mutation analysis and cytogenetic study as well as complete blood count and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 43 patients, 6 (13.9%) harbored the JAK2 V617F mutation. The incidence of the JAK2 V617F mutation in each patient group was as follows: 8.3% (1/12), MDS; 22.2% (2/9), MDS/MPN-U; 14.3% (1/7), RARS-T; and 13.3%, (2/15) AML. The platelet count was higher than 450x10(9)/L in 3 of the 6 patients (50%) harboring the JAK2 V617F mutation, and it was in the normal range in the remaining 3 patients. Among the 6 patients, 1 MDS and 1 MDS/MPN-U patients had the 46,XX,del(20)(q11.2) karyotype. CONCLUSION: The JAK2 V617F mutation is associated with an increased platelet count in MDS, MDS/MPN-U, RARS-T, and AML patients. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(20)(q11.2) occurred in 1/3 of patients with the JAK2 V617F mutation but further studies are required to confirm this association.
Anemia, Refractory ; Blood Cell Count ; Chromosome Aberrations ; Cytogenetics ; Hematologic Diseases ; Humans ; Incidence ; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute ; Myelodysplastic Syndromes ; Platelet Count ; Polycythemia Vera ; Primary Myelofibrosis ; Reference Values ; Thrombocythemia, Essential ; Thrombocytosis

Successful preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in transplant patients depends on the availability of sensitive, specific, and timely diagnostic tests for CMV infection. Although the pp65 antigenemia assay has been widely used for this purpose, real-time quantification of CMV DNA has recently been recognized as an alternative diagnostic approach. However, the guidelines for antiviral therapy based on real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) have yet to be established. From November 2004 to March 2005, a total of 555 whole blood samples from 131 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients were prospectively collected. RQ-PCR was conducted using an Artus(R) CMV LC PCR kit (QIAGEN). Both qualitative and quantitative correlations were drawn between the two methods. Exposure to the antiviral agent influenced the results of the two assays. Additionally, the discrepancy was observed at low levels of antigenemia and CMV DNA load. Via ROC curve analysis, the tentative cutoff value for preemptive therapy was determined to be approximately 2x10(4) copies/mL (sensitivity, 80.0%; specificity, 50.0%) in the high risk patients, and approximately 3x10(4) copies/mL (sensitivity, 90.0%; specificity, 70.0%) in the patients at low risk for CMV disease. Further study to validate the optimal cutoff value for the initiation of preemptive therapy is currently underway.
Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cytomegalovirus/genetics/*isolation & purification ; Cytomegalovirus Infections/*diagnosis/therapy ; DNA, Viral/*blood ; Female ; *Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Phosphoproteins/analysis/immunology ; Polymerase Chain Reaction/*methods ; ROC Curve ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Viral Matrix Proteins/analysis/immunology

BACKGROUND: Real-time PCR for quantification of JAK2 V617F has recently been introduced and used to evaluate the importance of mutant allele burden in both diagnosis and disease progression in myeloproliferative diseases (MPDs). We evaluated the usefulness of JAK2 MutaScreen(TM) kit that uses a real-time semiquantitative PCR method and has been designed to screen JAK2 V617F mutant allele burden. METHODS: Forty MPD patients were included in this study. We screened JAK2 V617F and determined the mutant allele burden using JAK2 MutaScreen(TM) kit. The mutant allele burden was estimated by six-scaled standards of JAK2 V617F mutant allele (2%, 5%, 12.5%, 31%, 50%, and 78%). For evaluation of test performance, an allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) was carried out in all samples by using Seeplex JAK2 Genotyping kit. We assessed the clinical differences in distinct disease entities of MPDs according to JAK2 V617F mutant allele burden. RESULTS: JAK2 V617F mutation was detected in 30 cases, including 10 of 11 cases (91%) of polycythemia vera (PV), 13 of 20 cases (65%) of essential thrombocythemia (ET), and 2 of 3 cases (67%) of chronic idiopathic myelofibrosis (CIMF). The concordance rate between the two tests was 95% (38/40). JAK2 V617F mutant allele burden was greater than 50% in 17 cases, and 10 of them (59%) were PV. In contrast, mutant allele burden was less than 50% in 13 cases and 11 of them (85%) were ET. CONCLUSIONS: JAK2 MutaScreen(TM) kit that utilizes a real-time semi-quantitative PCR method is a useful tool for diagnosing MPDs precisely. It can be used to assess the grade of mutant allele burden as well as to screen JAK2 V617F simultaneously.
Adult ; Aged ; *Alleles ; Amino Acid Substitution ; DNA Mutational Analysis ; Disease Progression ; Female ; Humans ; Janus Kinase 2/*genetics ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mutation ; Myeloproliferative Disorders/*diagnosis/genetics ; Polymerase Chain Reaction/*methods ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic

BACKGROUND: For the detection of HLA antibodies, solid-phase tests using purified HLA antigens are increasingly used. In this study, we analyzed the panel reactive antibody (PRA) test results using ELISA and Luminex methods, and the results were compared with those of crossmatch test. METHODS: A total of 111 sera including 90 sera from kidney transplanted patients were tested. ELISA-PRA was performed using Lambda Antigen Tray Class I and II Mixed kits (One Lambda Inc., USA) and additional test was performed to identify HLA specificities. Luminex-PRA tests were performed using LABScreen Mixed kits (One Lambda Inc., USA) and LIFECODES LifeScreen Deluxe kits (Tepnel Co., USA). RESULTS: The positive rates of PRA were higher in Tepnel (P=0.006) and One Lambda Luminex (P<0.001) methods than ELISA, without significant difference between two Luminex methods (P=0.087). The overall concordance rate among the three PRA tests was 62.2% (69/111). The positive and negative predictive values of PRA tests for the flow cytometric crossmatch were 33.3-45.7% and 85.7-89.5%, respectively. Of the two Luminex methods, One Lambda showed higher positive rate than Tepnel for the detection of class I antibodies. The sensitivity of pretransplant PRA for the detection of posttransplant acute rejection episodes was higher in Luminex (P=0.007 for Tepnel, P=0.003 for One lambda) than ELISA method. CONCLUSIONS: Different methods used to detect HLA antibodies showed discrepant results. As the Luminex method was more sensitive than ELISA for the detection of HLA antibodies, it can be used as a routine test in the transplantation laboratory.
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/*methods ; Flow Cytometry ; Histocompatibility Antigens Class I/*immunology ; Histocompatibility Antigens Class II/*immunology ; Humans ; Isoantibodies/*blood ; Kidney Transplantation/immunology ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic ; Sensitivity and Specificity

BACKGROUND: Free light chain (FLC) is widely used to evaluate B-cell proliferative diseases. Herein, we estimated the clinical usefulness of serum FLC in multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: Fifty-one patients were enrolled. We performed FLC analysis, protein electrophoresis (PEP), and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE). FLC was measured using Toshiba 200 FR Neo with FREELITE(TM), and kappa/lambda (kappa/lambda) ratio was calculated. We compared these parameters in 41 patients with increased FLC before and after bortezomib treatment. Complete response (CR) was defined as the disappearance of monoclonal (M) protein in serum and/or urine as measured by IFE. Partial response (PR) was defined as > or =50% reduction of serum M protein. Early objective response (EOR) included both CR and PR. Minimal response (MR) was defined as 25-49% reduction of M protein and stable disease (SD) as <25% reduction. RESULTS: Forty-one (80.4%) of the 51 patients studied revealed increment of FLC and the five patients with no increment revealed an abnormal kappa/lambda ratio. Especially, all of the light chain myeloma and non-secretory myeloma showed increased FLC concentrations. Among the patients with EOR, 72.4% (21/29) showed a normal or subnormal FLC concentration after the first cycle of treatment. Otherwise, PEP and IFE normalized in 24.1% (7/29) and 24.1% (7/29), respectively. The ratio of decreased FLC after the first cycle of treatment was significantly different between EOR and other response groups (MR, SD) (90.6% vs 51.8%, P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: FLC was considered as a good diagnostic method in complement with PEP and IFE in MM, especially in light chain myeloma or non-secretory myeloma. Moreover, FLC is a useful monitoring tool because it reflects therapy results more rapidly owing to a short serum half-life.
Adult ; Aged ; Boronic Acids/therapeutic use ; Female ; Humans ; Immunoelectrophoresis ; Immunoglobulin Light Chains/*blood/urine ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple Myeloma/*diagnosis/therapy ; Pyrazines/therapeutic use ; Reagent Kits, Diagnostic

PURPOSE: Identification of antibody specificity is difficult using a multiple antigen PRA (MA-PRA) assay. The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical impact of single antigen PRA (SA-PRA) ELISA assay on the transplant outcome and to analyze the clinical significance of SA-PRA compared with CDC-AHG, flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) and MA-PRA. METHODS: A total of 151 kidney transplanted patients were tested for the presence of HLA antibodies in the pre- and posttransplant period. The HLA specificities were classified as donor-specific antibodies (DSA) including donor private antigen specific (DS-HLA) or donor public antigen specific (DS-cross reactive group (CREG)), and nondonor specific HLA antibodies. RESULTS: Of the 151 recipients, 28 patients experienced acute rejection episodes (ARE). The pretransplant CDC-AHG, FCXM and MA-PRA tests were positive in 2, 8 and 18 patients, respectively and the concordance between FCXM and MA-PRA was 89.4% (135/151). Of the 47 sera which were tested with both MA-PRA and SA-PRA, 4 sera were SA-PRA positive and MA-PRA negative. The HLA specificities which were not determined with MA-PRA were detected with SA-PRA test. The patients with DSA showed higher incidence of ARE (7/12, 58% vs. 21/139, 15%; P<0.001) and lower glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 6 posttransplant months (54.9+/-10.2 vs. 66.2+/-19.3; P=0.023) than the patients without DSA. The patients with ARE had higher incidence of posttransplant DS-HLA (6 (21%) vs. 0 (0%); P<0.001), DS- CREG (7 (25%) vs. 0 (0%); P<0.001), de novo HLA antibody (6 (21%) vs. 0 (0%); P<0.001) than the patients without ARE. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that analysis of HLA specificities using the SA-PRA may be useful as a supportive crossmatch test or as a monitoring test after transplantation for early detection of patients at risk of poor clinical outcome.
Antibodies ; Antibody Specificity ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay ; Glomerular Filtration Rate ; Humans ; Incidence ; Kidney ; Rejection (Psychology) ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants

BACKGROUND: It has been known that the increase of reticulated platelets indicates the increase of thrombopoiesis in platelet consumptive diseases or the impending platelet recovery in patients with thrombocytopenic conditions. A new rapid automated method to assess reticulated platelets, the immature platelet fraction (IPF), was recently introduced. We evaluated the usefulness of the IPF for the prediction of platelet recovery in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and cytotoxic chemotherapy. METHODS: Thirty one healthy volunteers and 59 patients formed 3 groups: the allogenic HSCT group (n=23, an ABO major-mismatch 6 of 23), the autologous HSCT group (n=8) and the cytotoxic chemotherapy group (n=28). The platelet count, % of IPF and the % of reticulocytes were checked every day by using a Sysmex XE-2100. RESULTS: The IPF in the healthy volunteers was a mean of 2.2+/-1.6% (range: 0.3~6.7%), and the maximum level of the IPF in the patient group was 6.1+/-1.7% (range: 3.3~13.5%). The ideal cut-off value of the IPF increase to discriminate the platelet recovery group was 5.1%. When this cut-off value is used, the positive predictive value is 90.9% in the HSCT groups and 87.5% for the total patients. The 4 patients who showed an IPF higher than 5.1% without platelet recovery were in platelet consumptive conditions. It took 8.0+/-8.3 days to show platelet recovery after elevation of the IPF over 5.1% and an ABO major mismatch HSCT doesnt affect platelet recovery. CONCLUSION: The IPF is thought to be a useful parameter for the prediction of platelet recovery after HSCT and cytotoxic chemotherapy, but the problem of the patient' conditions affects the accuracy of the IPF, and the variable intervals between the increase of the IPF and platelet recovery is thought to be improved.
Blood Platelets* ; Drug Therapy ; Healthy Volunteers ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Humans ; Platelet Count ; Platelet Transfusion* ; Reticulocytes ; Thrombopoiesis