We updated the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of ovarian cancer as version 5.1. The ovarian cancer guideline team of the KSGO published announced the fifth version (version 5.0) of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of ovarian cancer in December 2023. In version 5.0, the selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on the data available up to December 2022.Therefore, we updated the guidelines version 5.0 with newly accumulated clinical data and added 5 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of ovarian cancer between 2023 and 2024. For each question, recommendation was provided together with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

We updated the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of ovarian cancer as version 5.1. The ovarian cancer guideline team of the KSGO published announced the fifth version (version 5.0) of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of ovarian cancer in December 2023. In version 5.0, the selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on the data available up to December 2022.Therefore, we updated the guidelines version 5.0 with newly accumulated clinical data and added 5 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of ovarian cancer between 2023 and 2024. For each question, recommendation was provided together with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

We updated the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) practice guideline for the management of ovarian cancer as version 5.1. The ovarian cancer guideline team of the KSGO published announced the fifth version (version 5.0) of its clinical practice guidelines for the management of ovarian cancer in December 2023. In version 5.0, the selection of the key questions and the systematic reviews were based on the data available up to December 2022.Therefore, we updated the guidelines version 5.0 with newly accumulated clinical data and added 5 new key questions reflecting the latest insights in the field of ovarian cancer between 2023 and 2024. For each question, recommendation was provided together with corresponding level of evidence and grade of recommendation, all established through expert consensus.

Background: Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is a histochemical technique used to detect tissue-bound autoantibodies and diagnose various immune-mediated skin diseases. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of DIF for each disorder, and the consistency between clinical, histopathological, and DIF results. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 194 patients who underwent skin biopsy and DIF testing at our hospital between January 2011 and December 2021. An antibody panel against immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, IgM, C3, C1q, and fibrinogen was used. The concordance rate and κ-coefficient between the clinical, histopathological, and DIF results were evaluated. Results: DIF was observed to be positive in 87 cases; 51 cases of immune-mediated bullous diseases, seven cases of connective tissue diseases (CTDs), 25 cases of vasculitis, and four cases of other diseases. The overall sensitivity of DIF for immune-mediated bullous diseases was 71.8%, which was higher than that of histopathology (64.8%). In CTDs and vasculitis, the overall sensitivities of DIF were 30.4% and 65.8%, respectively, which were lower than those of histopathology (73.9% and 84.2%, respectively). In addition, good concordance among the clinical, histological, and DIF results was observed. Conclusion DIF is a useful diagnostic method, especially for immune-mediated bullous diseases, lupus erythematosus, and Henoch-Schonlein purpura. However, in other CTDs and vasculitis cases, the sensitivity of DIF is relatively low. Therefore, the diagnostic value of DIF along with clinical and histopathological findings will be maximized only when the DIF test is performed for appropriate diseases.

Eosinophilic dermatosis of hematological malignancy (EDHM) is a rare condition associated with various hematologic malignancies, characterized by pruritic skin eruptions. We present a case of a 66-year-old woman with follicular lymphoma who developed urticarial and vesicular lesions indicative of EDHM following chemotherapy.The diagnosis was confirmed through histological analysis, revealing eosinophilic infiltration. Treatment included additional chemotherapy sessions and topical corticosteroids, resulting in complete resolution of skin lesions and lymphoma. EDHM requires careful differentiation based on clinical and histological findings. The pathogenesis remains unclear, but addressing underlying hematologic malignancies appears crucial in management. Early recognition of EDHM is essential for appropriate intervention due to its limited therapeutic options.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and aggressive lymphoma with an overall incidence of 0.04 cases per 100,000 people. BPDCN is a hematopoietic clonal neoplasm that originates from plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors. A 63-year-old man presented with multiple erythematous nodules over his whole body, including his face, trunk, and both upper and lower extremities that appeared 1 month ago. Skin biopsy showed diffuse dermal infiltration by monomorphic atypical lymphocytes with large, irregular nuclei and scant cytoplasms. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for CD4, CD56, and CD123. The karyotype test showed abnormalities in male chromosomes 47, XY, ＋8 [2]/46, and XY [25], and mutations in DNMT3A, TET2, SRSF2, and ATRX genes were identified in a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based acute myeloid leukemia gene panel test. The patient was diagnosed with BPDCN and treated with a KALLA 1406 regimen; however, he died on the 17th day of treatment.

Background: This study aimed to investigate the recent prevalence, management, and comorbidities of diabetes among Korean adults aged ≥30 years by analyzing nationally representative data. Methods: This study used data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2016 to 2018, and the percentage and total number of people ≥30 years of age with diabetes and impaired fasting glucose (IFG) were estimated. Results: In 2018, 13.8% of Korean adults aged ≥30 years had diabetes, and adults aged ≥65 years showed a prevalence rate of 28%. The prevalence of IFG was 26.9% in adults aged ≥30 years. From 2016 to 2018, 35% of the subjects with diabetes were not aware of their condition. Regarding comorbidities, 53.2% and 61.3% were obese and hypertensive, respectively, and 72% had hypercholesterolemia as defined by low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≥100 mg/dL in people with diabetes. Of the subjects with diabetes, 43.7% had both hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. With regard to glycemic control, only 28.3% reached the target level of <6.5%. Moreover, only 11.5% of subjects with diabetes met all three targets of glycosylated hemoglobin, blood pressure, and LDL-C. The percentage of energy intake from carbohydrates was higher in diabetes patients than in those without diabetes, while that from protein and fat was lower in subjects with diabetes. Conclusion The high prevalence and low control rate of diabetes and its comorbidities in Korean adults were confirmed. More stringent efforts are needed to improve the comprehensive management of diabetes to reduce diabetes-related morbidity and mortality.

Clinical practice guidelines for gynecologic cancers have been developed by many organizations. Although these guidelines have much in common in terms of the practice of standard of care for uterine corpus cancer, practice guidelines that reflect the characteristics of patients and healthcare and insurance systems are needed for each country. The Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology (KSGO) published the first edition of practice guidelines for gynecologic cancer treatment in late 2006; the second edition was released in July 2010 as an evidence-based recommendation. The Guidelines Revision Committee was established in 2015 and decided to produce the third edition of the guidelines as an advanced form based on evidence-based medicine, considering up-to-date clinical trials and abundant qualified Korean data. These guidelines cover screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment, and advanced and recurrent disease with respect to endometrial carcinoma and uterine sarcoma. The committee members and many gynecologic oncologists derived key questions from the discussion, and a number of relevant scientific literatures were reviewed in advance. Recommendations for each specific question were developed by the consensus conference, and they are summarized here, together with other details. The objective of these practice guidelines is to establish standard policies on issues in clinical areas related to the management of uterine corpus cancer based on the findings in published papers to date and the consensus of experts as a KSGO Consensus Statement.
Committee Membership ; Consensus* ; Delivery of Health Care ; Drug Therapy ; Endometrial Neoplasms ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Female ; Humans ; Insurance ; Korea* ; Mass Screening ; Sarcoma ; Standard of Care

BACKGROUND: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) affects not only an individual's health but also their family. This study was conducted to examine effects of a spouse's AUD on family functioning and family communication. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study using data from 890 participants (445 couples) in a Korean family cohort in primary care. Participants with Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test in Korea scores of 8 or greater were classified into an AUD group. Family functioning was classified into three groups (balanced, midrange, and extreme) using the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale (FACES)-III questionnaire, and then reclassified into two groups (appropriate and extreme groups) for binominal analyses. Family communication was classified into three groups (high, moderate, and low) using the Family Communication Scale, FACES-IV, and also reclassified into two groups (good and poor). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in adaptability and cohesion between both male and female participants with a spouse with AUD and participants with a spouse without AUD. Using multivariate logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders, there was no significant difference in family type and communication between the two groups in males. However, there was a significant decrease in family communication (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.29 to 3.58) in females with a spouse with AUD compared to females with a spouse without AUD, even after adjusting for the participant's own AUD. CONCLUSION: In females, family communication is significantly worse when spouses have AUD. This suggests that a husband's alcohol consumption has negative effects on his wife's family communication.
Alcohol Drinking ; Cohort Studies ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Korea ; Logistic Models ; Male ; Primary Health Care ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Spouses