Purpose: This study aimed to report the real-world outcomes of intravesical gemcitabine for bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG)–unresponsive, high-risk, non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) in Korean patients who were unable or unwilling to undergo radical cystectomy (RC). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 131 patients (median age, 69 years; 88.5% men) treated with intravesical gemcitabine for BCG-unresponsive HR-NMIBC at nine centers between May 2019 and April 2022. The primary endpoint was 1-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary endpoints included factors influencing RFS, progression-free survival (PFS), cystectomy- free survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors for recurrence were assessed using Cox regression models. Results: Patients were followed up for a median duration of 25 months, with carcinoma in situ (CIS) in 41.9% of the patients. The 1-year and 2-year RFS rates were 68% and 42%, while the 1-year and 2-year PFS rates were 87% and 77%, respectively. No significant factors influencing RFS were identified. Seventeen patients underwent RC during a median follow-up of 16 months, with the condition in three patients progressing to muscle-invasive disease on final pathological analysis. The 2-year CSS and OS rates were 98% and 97%, respectively. Intravesical gemcitabine was well-tolerated, with only seven patients (5.3%) unable to complete the full induction course. Conclusion Our research highlights the potential of intravesical gemcitabine as a viable bladder-sparing treatment option for BCG-unresponsive HR-NMIBC, providing real-world evidence on its safety, efficacy, and tolerability.

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive cancer with a high recurrence risk due to micrometastases. Standard treatment, neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy, is not suitable for all patients, with many being ineligible or experiencing recurrence, alongside significant toxicity concerns.Current Concepts: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into the perioperative setting —including neoadjuvant ICI use in cisplatin-ineligible patients, adjuvant ICI use in high-risk individuals, and chemoimmunotherapy in either the preoperative or postoperative period—has demonstrated promising clinical outcomes. Additionally, bladder preservation strategies are currently under investigation in select patients who exhibit favorable treatment responses, aiming to maintain quality of life without compromising oncologic outcomes. Nevertheless, challenges such as overtreatment, long-term toxicity, and immune-related adverse events remain significant, underscoring the necessity for precise patient selection.Discussion and Conclusion: To personalize perioperative management of MIBC, it is essential to develop and clinically implement robust predictive biomarkers. Assessment of molecular residual disease using circulating tumor DNA is emerging as a promising method to stratify risk, guide adjuvant treatment decisions, and monitor therapeutic response in real time. Future research should prioritize the validation of these biomarkers, refinement of patient selection criteria for bladder preservation strategies, and evaluation of novel therapeutic agents such as antibody-drug conjugates and fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors in the perioperative setting. Ultimately, adopting a precision oncology approach will be critical for balancing oncologic efficacy with toxicity management and achieving patient-centered outcomes.

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive cancer with a high recurrence risk due to micrometastases. Standard treatment, neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy, is not suitable for all patients, with many being ineligible or experiencing recurrence, alongside significant toxicity concerns.Current Concepts: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into the perioperative setting —including neoadjuvant ICI use in cisplatin-ineligible patients, adjuvant ICI use in high-risk individuals, and chemoimmunotherapy in either the preoperative or postoperative period—has demonstrated promising clinical outcomes. Additionally, bladder preservation strategies are currently under investigation in select patients who exhibit favorable treatment responses, aiming to maintain quality of life without compromising oncologic outcomes. Nevertheless, challenges such as overtreatment, long-term toxicity, and immune-related adverse events remain significant, underscoring the necessity for precise patient selection.Discussion and Conclusion: To personalize perioperative management of MIBC, it is essential to develop and clinically implement robust predictive biomarkers. Assessment of molecular residual disease using circulating tumor DNA is emerging as a promising method to stratify risk, guide adjuvant treatment decisions, and monitor therapeutic response in real time. Future research should prioritize the validation of these biomarkers, refinement of patient selection criteria for bladder preservation strategies, and evaluation of novel therapeutic agents such as antibody-drug conjugates and fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors in the perioperative setting. Ultimately, adopting a precision oncology approach will be critical for balancing oncologic efficacy with toxicity management and achieving patient-centered outcomes.

Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is an aggressive cancer with a high recurrence risk due to micrometastases. Standard treatment, neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy, is not suitable for all patients, with many being ineligible or experiencing recurrence, alongside significant toxicity concerns.Current Concepts: The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into the perioperative setting —including neoadjuvant ICI use in cisplatin-ineligible patients, adjuvant ICI use in high-risk individuals, and chemoimmunotherapy in either the preoperative or postoperative period—has demonstrated promising clinical outcomes. Additionally, bladder preservation strategies are currently under investigation in select patients who exhibit favorable treatment responses, aiming to maintain quality of life without compromising oncologic outcomes. Nevertheless, challenges such as overtreatment, long-term toxicity, and immune-related adverse events remain significant, underscoring the necessity for precise patient selection.Discussion and Conclusion: To personalize perioperative management of MIBC, it is essential to develop and clinically implement robust predictive biomarkers. Assessment of molecular residual disease using circulating tumor DNA is emerging as a promising method to stratify risk, guide adjuvant treatment decisions, and monitor therapeutic response in real time. Future research should prioritize the validation of these biomarkers, refinement of patient selection criteria for bladder preservation strategies, and evaluation of novel therapeutic agents such as antibody-drug conjugates and fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors in the perioperative setting. Ultimately, adopting a precision oncology approach will be critical for balancing oncologic efficacy with toxicity management and achieving patient-centered outcomes.

Background and Objectives: A comprehensive survey of congenital heart disease (CHD) prevalence has not yet been conducted in South Korea. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of CHDs in Korean children and lay the foundation for national CHD epidemiology. Methods: Target patients were infantile crucial CHDs, which include critical CHDs (requiring urgent procedures after birth with common hypoxemic defects) and diverse categorical defects excluding simple shunt defects. Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service over a 5-year period (2014–2018). Birth prevalence (new cases per 1,000 live births) of CHDs in Korea was analyzed and compared with that of other countries. Results: The birth prevalences of right heart obstructive defects (pulmonary valve stenosis and pulmonary atresia), conus anomalies (tetralogy of Fallot and double outlet right ventricle), and total anomalous pulmonary venous return showed significant increases in the East Asian group (P<0.001), whereas those of left heart obstructive defects (coarctation of aorta, aortic stenosis, and hypoplastic left heart syndrome), truncus anomalies (D-transposition of great artery and persistent truncus arteriosus), atrioventricular septal defect, and hypoplastic right heart syndrome were significantly decreased in the East Asian group (P<0.001). Conclusions The overall birth prevalence of crucial CHDs in Korea was similar to that of critical CHDs in previous studies from other countries. Some subtypes of right heart obstructive defects, left heart obstructive defects, and conotruncal anomalies showed significant differences between East Asian and Western populations. This study contributes to a foundation for national CHD epidemiology in Korean children.

Background and Objectives: A comprehensive survey of congenital heart disease (CHD) prevalence has not yet been conducted in South Korea. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of CHDs in Korean children and lay the foundation for national CHD epidemiology. Methods: Target patients were infantile crucial CHDs, which include critical CHDs (requiring urgent procedures after birth with common hypoxemic defects) and diverse categorical defects excluding simple shunt defects. Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service over a 5-year period (2014–2018). Birth prevalence (new cases per 1,000 live births) of CHDs in Korea was analyzed and compared with that of other countries. Results: The birth prevalences of right heart obstructive defects (pulmonary valve stenosis and pulmonary atresia), conus anomalies (tetralogy of Fallot and double outlet right ventricle), and total anomalous pulmonary venous return showed significant increases in the East Asian group (P<0.001), whereas those of left heart obstructive defects (coarctation of aorta, aortic stenosis, and hypoplastic left heart syndrome), truncus anomalies (D-transposition of great artery and persistent truncus arteriosus), atrioventricular septal defect, and hypoplastic right heart syndrome were significantly decreased in the East Asian group (P<0.001). Conclusions The overall birth prevalence of crucial CHDs in Korea was similar to that of critical CHDs in previous studies from other countries. Some subtypes of right heart obstructive defects, left heart obstructive defects, and conotruncal anomalies showed significant differences between East Asian and Western populations. This study contributes to a foundation for national CHD epidemiology in Korean children.

Background: s/Aims: Reported incidence of extrahepatic bile duct cancer is higher in Asians than in Western populations. Korea, in particular, is one of the countries with the highest incidence rates of extrahepatic bile duct cancer in the world. Although research and innovative therapeutic modalities for extrahepatic bile duct cancer are emerging, clinical guidelines are currently unavailable in Korea. The Korean Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery in collaboration with related societies (Korean Pancreatic and Biliary Surgery Society, Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology, Korean Society of Medical Oncology, Korean Society of Radiation Oncology, Korean Society of Pathologists, and Korean Society of Nuclear Medicine) decided to establish clinical guideline for extrahepatic bile duct cancer in June 2021. Methods: Contents of the guidelines were developed through subgroup meetings for each key question and a preliminary draft was finalized through a Clinical Guidelines Committee workshop. Results: In November 2021, the finalized draft was presented for public scrutiny during a formal hearing. Conclusions The extrahepatic guideline committee believed that this guideline could be helpful in the treatment of patients.

Purpose: Perspectives of radiation oncologists on oligometastatic disease was investigated using multi-layered survey. Materials and Methods: Online survey on the oligometastatic disease was distributed to the board-certified regular members of the Korean Society for Radiation Oncology. The questionnaire consisted of four domains: five questions on demographics; five on the definition of oligometastatic disease; four on the role of local therapy; and three on the oligometastatic disease classification, respectively. Results: A total of 135 radiation oncologists participated in the survey. The median length of practice after board certification was 22.5 years (range, 1 to 44 years), and the vast majority (94.1%) answered affirmatively to the clinical experience in oligometastatic disease management. Nearly two-thirds of the respondents considered the number of involved organs as an independent factor in defining oligometastasis. Most frequently perceived upper limit on the numerical definition of oligometastasis was 5 (64.2%), followed by 3 (26.0%), respectively. Peritoneal and brain metastasis were nominated as the sites to be excluded from oligometastastic disease by 56.3% and 12.6% of the participants, respectively. Vast majority (82.1%) agreed on the role of local treatment in the management of oligometastatic disease. Majority (72%) of the participants acknowledged the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)–European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) classification of oligometastatic disease, however, only 43.3% answered that they applied this classification in their clinical practice. Underlying reasons against the clinical use were ‘too complicated’ (66.0%), followed by ‘insufficient supporting evidence’ (30.0%), respectively. Conclusion While most radiation oncologists supported the role of local therapy in oligometastatic disease, there were several inconsistencies in defining and categorizing oligometastatic disease. Continued education and training on oligometastatic disease would be also required to build consensus among participating caregivers.

Background and Objectives: A comprehensive survey of congenital heart disease (CHD) prevalence has not yet been conducted in South Korea. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of CHDs in Korean children and lay the foundation for national CHD epidemiology. Methods: Target patients were infantile crucial CHDs, which include critical CHDs (requiring urgent procedures after birth with common hypoxemic defects) and diverse categorical defects excluding simple shunt defects. Data were obtained from the National Health Insurance Service over a 5-year period (2014–2018). Birth prevalence (new cases per 1,000 live births) of CHDs in Korea was analyzed and compared with that of other countries. Results: The birth prevalences of right heart obstructive defects (pulmonary valve stenosis and pulmonary atresia), conus anomalies (tetralogy of Fallot and double outlet right ventricle), and total anomalous pulmonary venous return showed significant increases in the East Asian group (P<0.001), whereas those of left heart obstructive defects (coarctation of aorta, aortic stenosis, and hypoplastic left heart syndrome), truncus anomalies (D-transposition of great artery and persistent truncus arteriosus), atrioventricular septal defect, and hypoplastic right heart syndrome were significantly decreased in the East Asian group (P<0.001). Conclusions The overall birth prevalence of crucial CHDs in Korea was similar to that of critical CHDs in previous studies from other countries. Some subtypes of right heart obstructive defects, left heart obstructive defects, and conotruncal anomalies showed significant differences between East Asian and Western populations. This study contributes to a foundation for national CHD epidemiology in Korean children.

Background/Aims: Risk factors for progression to critical illness in hospital-acquired coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain unknown. Here, we assessed the incidence and risk factors for progression to critical illness and determined their effects on clinical outcomes in patients with hospital-acquired COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients admitted to the tertiary hospital between January 2020 and June 2022 with confirmed hospital-acquired COVID-19. The primary outcome was the progression to critical illness of hospital- acquired COVID-19. Patients were stratified into high-, intermediate-, or low-risk groups by the number of risk factors for progression to critical illness. Results: In total, 204 patients were included and 37 (18.1%) progressed to critical illness. In the multivariable logistic analysis, patients with preexisting respiratory disease (OR, 3.90; 95% CI, 1.04–15.18), preexisting cardiovascular disease (OR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.11–11.27), immunocompromised status (OR, 3.18; 95% CI, 1.11–9.16), higher sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.28–1.96), and higher clinical frailty scale (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.62–4.13) showed significantly increased risk of progression to critical illness. As the risk of the groups increased, patients were significantly more likely to progress to critical illness and had higher 28-day mortality. Conclusions Among patients with hospital-acquired COVID-19, preexisting respiratory disease, preexisting cardiovascular disease, immunocompromised status, and higher clinical frailty scale and SOFA scores at baseline were risk factors for progression to critical illness. Patients with these risk factors must be prioritized and appropriately isolated or treated in a timely manner, especially in pandemic settings.