Burning mouth syndrome remains a frequent source of diagnostic delay, repeated consultations, and fragmented care because it has long been treated as a “diagnosis of exclusion.” Recent updates in orofacial pain classification and research diagnostic frameworks support a practical shift: from an exclusionary label toward a structured diagnostic algorithm and staged, phenotype-guided management. This narrative, algorithm-focused clinical review aims to summarize clinically actionable evidence and to propose a “minimum sufficient workup” that prioritizes safety, efficiency, and patient-centered communication.We first outline pragmatic diagnostic criteria and key symptom patterns, then integrate current concepts of mixed mechanisms—peripheral neuropathic features, centralociplastic amplification, and psychosocial modulators—that account for symptom fluctuation and discordance between symptom severity and objective findings. The core of this review is a one-page stepwise algorithm: (1) confirm chronicity and absence of visible mucosal disease, (2) screen for red flags requiring urgent evaluation, (3) address common local contributors (e.g., candidiasis, irritants, contact allergy, xerostomia), (4) perform a targeted systemic/medication/deficiency panel, and (5) phenotype patients to guide staged treatment choices and follow-up. Finally, we provide a practical management framework emphasizing education, trigger control, and individualized combinations of topical, systemic, and behavioral interventions with predefined reassessment intervals. Future priorities include phenotype-stratified randomized trials and implementation outcomes that quantify reductions in diagnostic delay, misdiagnosis, and unnecessary testing.

Objectives: . Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) has a favorable prognosis. However, indeterminate lymph nodes (LNs) are common, making it challenging to distinguish recurrent from persistent DTC. Previous studies have not specifically compared the prognosis between recurrent and persistent DTC. Therefore, we aimed to compare prognosis and oncologic characteristics between these two groups. Methods: . This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single tertiary care institution and included 265 patients with DTC (recurrent, 109; persistent, 156) who underwent reoperation between November 1, 1999, and August 31, 2018, for structural disease. Patients with distant metastasis at the time of initial diagnosis were excluded. Clinical and oncological characteristics, patterns of LN metastasis, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. For DFS, time zero was defined as the date of the second operation. Results: . Recurrent DTC had a higher incidence of central LN metastasis (P=0.003), infield recurrence (P<0.001), and distant metastasis (P<0.001). In contrast, persistent DTC more frequently exhibited lateral LN metastasis (P=0.003) and outfield recurrence (P<0.001). The most common site of neck LN metastasis was ipsilateral level VI/VII (51.4%) in recurrent DTC and ipsilateral level IV (43.0%) in persistent DTC. Ten-year DFS was significantly lower in recurrent DTC than in persistent DTC (41.0% vs. 67.9%; P<0.001). Recurrent DTC, older age, a higher number of metastatic LNs at the second operation (first reoperation), and R1/R2 resection at the second operation were associated with decreased DFS. OS did not significantly differ between recurrent and persistent DTC (P=0.160). Conclusion . Recurrent DTC is associated with poorer DFS than persistent DTC, although OS does not significantly differ between the two groups.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Background: Complete revascularization has demonstrated better outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and multivessel disease. However, in the case of left main (LM) culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease, there is limited evidence to suggest that complete revascularization is better. Methods: We reviewed 16,831 patients in the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry who were treated from July 2016 to June 2020, and 399 patients were enrolled with LM culprit lesion AMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. We categorized the patients as those treated with complete revascularization (n=295) or incomplete revascularization (n=104). The study endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, stent thrombosis, and stroke. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) and analyzed the incidence of MACCE at 1 year. Results: After PSM, the two groups were well balanced. There was no significant difference between the two groups in MACCE at 1 year (12.1% vs. 15.2%; hazard ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.60–2.74; p=0.524) after PSM. The components of MACCE and major bleeding were also not significantly different. Conclusion There was no significant difference in clinical outcomes between the groups treated with complete or incomplete revascularization for LM culprit lesion AMI with multivessel disease.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and the optimal cutoff value of ADC for predicting NAC response. Materials and Methods: Among 582 patients who underwent radical cystectomy between December 2011 and December 2024, we included 146 patients who received preoperative NAC and pretreatment MRI. Pathologic response was determined based on the surgical pathology results: patients with pathologic stage >pT2 and/or presence of nodal involvement (N+) were classified as nonresponders, while those with ≤pT2 and no nodal involvement (N0) were classified as responders. MRI-derived ADC values were compared between the 2 groups. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal cutoff value for predicting NAC response. Multivariate logistic regression analysis using preoperative parameter was performed and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were utilized to assess overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) according to NAC response. Results: Among the 146 patients, 90 (61.6%) were classified as responders, 56 (38.4%) were nonresponders. The mean ADC value was significantly higher in responders (1,100.35±249.12 mm2/sec) than in nonresponders (763.95±118.97 mm2/sec, p<0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.69, with an optimal cutoff value of 845.0 mm2/sec. Multivariate logistic regression identified ADC value as an independent predictor of NAC response (odds ratio, 1.025; 95% confidence interval, 1.006–1.043; p=0.008). During median follow-up 30.3 months, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that responders had significantly better 5-year OS (80.8% vs. 45.9%) and 5-year CSS (92.6% vs. 54.5%), with log-rank test p<0.001. Conclusion MRI-derived ADC values are a reliable imaging biomarker for predicting pathologic response to NAC in MIBC. Further validation in large-scale prospective studies is required to confirm these findings.