1.Decisional Trade-offs in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study of Radical Prostatectomy, Radiation Therapy, and Active Surveillance
Hyunho HAN ; Youngdeuk CHOI ; Woong Kyu HAN ; Jihee JUNG ; Ayoung YOO ; Hyunji YOON ; Siyeong LEE ; Changhwa HYUN ; Woong Sub KOOM ; Ik Jae LEE ; Chan Woo WEE ; Jeongmi LEE ; Jae Young JEONG ; Hyung Ho LEE ; Young Ae KIM ; Jung Eun KIM ; Songhee EUN ; Sung Uk LEE ; Jinha JEONG ; Moonsoo RA
Journal of Urologic Oncology 2025;23(2):112-118
Purpose:
To evaluate patient‐reported experiences of 3 primary treatments for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer—radical prostatectomy (RP), radiation therapy (RT), and active surveillance (AS)—based on cross‐sectional data from a prospective registry, and to explore how these findings can inform a structured shared decision making (SDM) framework.
Materials and Methods:
Men with clinical stage cT3aN0M0 or lower were enrolled. Those who underwent RP or RT were surveyed 6–24 months posttreatment; men on AS had 6–60 months of follow‐up. All participants completed the EORTC QLQ‐PR25 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Prostate Cancer Module), capturing urinary, bowel, hormonal, and sexual function. The Kruskal‐Wallis test evaluated group differences, with significance set at p<0.05.
Results:
Among 542 patients, 435 underwent RP, 73 received RT (43% with androgen deprivation therapy), and 34 were on AS. RP patients reported higher rates of urinary incontinence and sexual dysfunction, whereas RT patients had more severe urinary irritative and bowel symptoms. AS generally preserved baseline sexual function but still involved some urinary complaints and anxiety regarding disease progression. These findings underscore the distinct trade‐offs among the 3 management strategies, emphasizing the importance of individualized SDM that accounts for functional priorities and patient values.
Conclusion
Each treatment modality poses unique impacts on quality of life. Incorporating these patient‐reported data into SDM discussions can improve alignment between clinical recommendations and patient preferences, potentially reducing decisional regret and enhancing long‐term outcomes.
2.A Urologist’s Perspective: Initial Experiences With SpaceOAR Hydrogel Insertion for Prostate Cancer Patients
Hyunho HAN ; Ik Jae LEE ; Woong Sub KOOM ; Chan Woo WEE ; Woong Kyu HAN
Journal of Urologic Oncology 2025;23(1):20-29
Purpose:
To evaluate the placement accuracy and learning curve of SpaceOAR hydrogel and gold fiducial marker insertion in Korean prostate cancer patients undergoing carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT), performed by a single urologist without prior experience.
Materials and Methods:
In this retrospective observational study, 104 prostate cancer patients scheduled for CIRT at Severance Hospital between November 2022 and October 2023 underwent simultaneous SpaceOAR hydrogel insertion and 2 gold fiducial markers placement under transrectal ultrasound guidance. Postprocedural magnetic resonance imaging scans assessed spacer placement accuracy using the SpaceOAR Symmetry Score. Complications were documented and graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Statistical analyses evaluated the impact of age, prostate volume, and operative time on complication rates and procedural efficiency.
Results:
Spacer placement was successful in all cases, achieving SpaceOAR Symmetry Score of 2.0 or less in 85.58% of the cases. The average operative time for the first 50 cases was 12.70±3.40 minutes, while for the latter 54 cases was 12.50±5.35 minutes, which suggests no significant learnig curve exist. Complications occurred in 25 of patients (24.0%), with constipation (9.6%), weak urinary stream (4.8%) and perianal pain (3.8%) being the most common. Acute urinary retention (grade 2) occurred in 3 patients and was not related to patient age or the presence of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Other complications were rare and mostly mild (grade 1).
Conclusions
SpaceOAR hydrogel insertion with gold fiducial marker placement is a reliable and efficient procedure that can be effectively performed by urologists without prior experience in patients undergoing CIRT. The procedure demonstrates a significant learning curve, with operative efficiency improving over time, supporting its feasibility and potential for widespread adoption.
3.Breast Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2021
Chihwan David CHA ; Chan Sub PARK ; Hee-Chul SHIN ; Jaihong HAN ; Jung Eun CHOI ; Joo Heung KIM ; Kyu-Won JUNG ; Sae Byul LEE ; Sang Eun NAM ; Tae In YOON ; Young-Joon KANG ; Zisun KIM ; So-Youn JUNG ; Hyun-Ah KIM ;
Journal of Breast Cancer 2024;27(6):351-361
The Korean Breast Cancer Society (KBCS) has collected nationwide registry data on clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment since 1996. This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of breast cancer in Korea and assess changes in breast cancer statistics for 2021 using data from the KBCS registry and the Korean Central Cancer Registry. In 2021, 34,628 women were newly diagnosed with breast cancer. The median age of women diagnosed with breast cancer was 53.4 years, with the highest incidence occurring in the 40–49 age group. The most common molecular subtype was hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, accounting for 69.1% of cases, while HER2-positive subtypes comprised 19.3%. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the national breast cancer screening rate declined. However, the incidence of early-stage breast cancer (stages 0 and I) continued to increase, accounting for 65.6% of newly diagnosed cases in 2021. Our results showed that the overall survival rate for patients with breast cancer has improved, primarily due to a rise in early-stage diagnoses and advancements in treatment.
4.Clinical impact of a multimodal pain management protocol for loop ileostomy reversal
Jeong Sub KIM ; Chul Seung LEE ; Jung Hoon BAE ; Seung Rim HAN ; Do Sang LEE ; In Kyu LEE ; Yoon Suk LEE ; In Kyeong KIM
Annals of Coloproctology 2024;40(3):210-216
Purpose:
As introduced, multimodal pain management bundle for ileostomy reversal may be considered to reduce postoperative pain and hospital stay. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of perioperative multimodal pain bundle for ileostomy.
Methods:
Medical records of patients who underwent ileostomy reversal after rectal cancer surgery from April 2017 to March 2020 were analyzed. Sixty-seven patients received multimodal pain bundle protocol with ileostomy reversal (group A) and 41 patients underwent closure of ileostomy with conventional pain management (group B).
Results:
Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, diabetes mellitus, and smoking history, were not significantly different between the groups. The pain score on postoperative day 1 was significant lower in group A (visual analog scale, 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 3.2 ± 1.2; P = 0.013). Overall consumption of opioid in group A was significant less than group B (9.7 ± 9.5 vs. 21.2 ± 8.8, P < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in group A (2.3 ± 1.5 days vs. 4.1 ± 1.5 days, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative complication rate.
Conclusion
Multimodal pain protocol for ileostomy reversal could reduce postoperative pain, usage of opioid and hospital stay compared to conventional pain management.
5.Breast Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2021
Chihwan David CHA ; Chan Sub PARK ; Hee-Chul SHIN ; Jaihong HAN ; Jung Eun CHOI ; Joo Heung KIM ; Kyu-Won JUNG ; Sae Byul LEE ; Sang Eun NAM ; Tae In YOON ; Young-Joon KANG ; Zisun KIM ; So-Youn JUNG ; Hyun-Ah KIM ;
Journal of Breast Cancer 2024;27(6):351-361
The Korean Breast Cancer Society (KBCS) has collected nationwide registry data on clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment since 1996. This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of breast cancer in Korea and assess changes in breast cancer statistics for 2021 using data from the KBCS registry and the Korean Central Cancer Registry. In 2021, 34,628 women were newly diagnosed with breast cancer. The median age of women diagnosed with breast cancer was 53.4 years, with the highest incidence occurring in the 40–49 age group. The most common molecular subtype was hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, accounting for 69.1% of cases, while HER2-positive subtypes comprised 19.3%. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the national breast cancer screening rate declined. However, the incidence of early-stage breast cancer (stages 0 and I) continued to increase, accounting for 65.6% of newly diagnosed cases in 2021. Our results showed that the overall survival rate for patients with breast cancer has improved, primarily due to a rise in early-stage diagnoses and advancements in treatment.
6.Breast Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2021
Chihwan David CHA ; Chan Sub PARK ; Hee-Chul SHIN ; Jaihong HAN ; Jung Eun CHOI ; Joo Heung KIM ; Kyu-Won JUNG ; Sae Byul LEE ; Sang Eun NAM ; Tae In YOON ; Young-Joon KANG ; Zisun KIM ; So-Youn JUNG ; Hyun-Ah KIM ;
Journal of Breast Cancer 2024;27(6):351-361
The Korean Breast Cancer Society (KBCS) has collected nationwide registry data on clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment since 1996. This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of breast cancer in Korea and assess changes in breast cancer statistics for 2021 using data from the KBCS registry and the Korean Central Cancer Registry. In 2021, 34,628 women were newly diagnosed with breast cancer. The median age of women diagnosed with breast cancer was 53.4 years, with the highest incidence occurring in the 40–49 age group. The most common molecular subtype was hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, accounting for 69.1% of cases, while HER2-positive subtypes comprised 19.3%. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, the national breast cancer screening rate declined. However, the incidence of early-stage breast cancer (stages 0 and I) continued to increase, accounting for 65.6% of newly diagnosed cases in 2021. Our results showed that the overall survival rate for patients with breast cancer has improved, primarily due to a rise in early-stage diagnoses and advancements in treatment.
7.Breast Cancer Statistics in Korea, 2019
Jung Eun CHOI ; Zisun KIM ; Chan Sub PARK ; Eun Hwa PARK ; Sae Byul LEE ; Se Kyung LEE ; Young Jin CHOI ; Jaihong HAN ; Kyu-Won JUNG ; Hee Jeong KIM ; Hyun-Ah KIM ;
Journal of Breast Cancer 2023;26(3):207-220
This article provides an annual update of Korean breast cancer statistics, including the incidence, tumor stage, type of surgical treatment, and mortality. The data was collected from the Korean Breast Cancer Society registry system and Korean Central Cancer Registry.In 2019, 29,729 women were newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Breast cancer has continued to increase in incidence since 2002 and been the most common cancer in Korean women since 2019. Of the newly diagnosed cases in 2019, 24,820 (83.5%) were of invasive carcinomas, and 4,909 (16.5%) were of carcinoma in situ. The median age of women with breast cancer was 52.8 years, and breast cancer was most commonly diagnosed in the age group of 40–49 years. The number of patients who have undergone breast conserving surgery has continued to increase since 2016, with 68.6% of patients undergoing breast conserving surgery in 2019. The incidence of early-stage breast cancer continues to increase, with stage 0 or I breast cancer accounting for 61.6% of cases. The most common subtype of breast cancer is the hormone receptor-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative subtype (63.1%). The 5-year relative survival rate of patients with breast cancer from 2015 to 2019 was 93.6%, with an increase of 14.3% compared to that from 1993 to 1995. This report improves our understanding of breast cancer characteristics in South Korea.
8.Delays in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Management Is Associated with Hematoma Expansion and Worse Outcomes: Changes in COVID-19 Era
Hyun Jin HAN ; Keun Young PARK ; Junhyung KIM ; Woosung LEE ; Yun Ho LEE ; Chang Ki JANG ; Kwang-Chun CHO ; Sang Kyu PARK ; Joonho CHUNG ; Young Sub KWON ; Yong Bae KIM ; Jae Whan LEE ; So Yeon KIM
Yonsei Medical Journal 2021;62(10):911-917
Purpose:
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted the emergency medical care system worldwide. We analyzed the changes in the management of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and compared the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 eras.
Materials and Methods:
From March to October of the COVID-19 era (2020), 83 consecutive patients with ICH were admitted to four comprehensive stroke centers. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients and compared the treatment workflow metrics, treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes with the patients admitted during the same period of pre-COVID-19 era (2017–2019).
Results:
Three hundred thirty-eight patients (83 in COVID-19 era and 255 in pre-COVID-19 era) were included in this study. Symptom onset/detection-to-door time [COVID-19; 56.0 min (34.0–106.0), pre-COVID-19; 40.0 min (27.0–98.0), p=0.016] and median door to-intensive treatment time differed between the two groups [COVID-19; 349.0 min (177.0–560.0), pre-COVID-19; 184.0 min (134.0–271.0), p<0.001]. Hematoma expansion was detected more significantly in the COVID-19 era (39.8% vs. 22.1%, p=0.002). At 3-month follow-up, clinical outcomes of patients were worse in the COVID-19 era (Good modified Rankin Scale; 33.7% in COVID-19, 46.7% in pre-COVID-19, p=0.039).
Conclusion
During the COVID-19 era, delays in management of ICH was associated with hematoma expansion and worse outcomes.
9.Delays in Intracerebral Hemorrhage Management Is Associated with Hematoma Expansion and Worse Outcomes: Changes in COVID-19 Era
Hyun Jin HAN ; Keun Young PARK ; Junhyung KIM ; Woosung LEE ; Yun Ho LEE ; Chang Ki JANG ; Kwang-Chun CHO ; Sang Kyu PARK ; Joonho CHUNG ; Young Sub KWON ; Yong Bae KIM ; Jae Whan LEE ; So Yeon KIM
Yonsei Medical Journal 2021;62(10):911-917
Purpose:
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted the emergency medical care system worldwide. We analyzed the changes in the management of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and compared the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 eras.
Materials and Methods:
From March to October of the COVID-19 era (2020), 83 consecutive patients with ICH were admitted to four comprehensive stroke centers. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients and compared the treatment workflow metrics, treatment modalities, and clinical outcomes with the patients admitted during the same period of pre-COVID-19 era (2017–2019).
Results:
Three hundred thirty-eight patients (83 in COVID-19 era and 255 in pre-COVID-19 era) were included in this study. Symptom onset/detection-to-door time [COVID-19; 56.0 min (34.0–106.0), pre-COVID-19; 40.0 min (27.0–98.0), p=0.016] and median door to-intensive treatment time differed between the two groups [COVID-19; 349.0 min (177.0–560.0), pre-COVID-19; 184.0 min (134.0–271.0), p<0.001]. Hematoma expansion was detected more significantly in the COVID-19 era (39.8% vs. 22.1%, p=0.002). At 3-month follow-up, clinical outcomes of patients were worse in the COVID-19 era (Good modified Rankin Scale; 33.7% in COVID-19, 46.7% in pre-COVID-19, p=0.039).
Conclusion
During the COVID-19 era, delays in management of ICH was associated with hematoma expansion and worse outcomes.
10.The Development of Evidence-Based Guideline for Diagnosis and Management of Headache in Korea
Sun Mi KIM ; Young Hoon KO ; Seoyoung YOON ; Won Sub KANG ; Hye Geum KIM ; Hye Youn PARK ; Cheolmin SHIN ; Yoo Hyun UM ; Soyoung YOUN ; Jae Hon LEE ; Seung Ho JANG ; Sang Won JEON ; Hong Jun JEON ; Seockhoon CHUNG ; Jae Won CHOI ; Kyu Man HAN ; Sang Yeol LEE
Psychiatry Investigation 2019;16(3):199-205
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop the clinical guideline for headache by the systematic review and synthesis of existing evidence-based guidelines. The purpose of developing the guideline was to improve the appropriateness of diagnosis and treatment of headache disorder, and consequently, to improve patients’ pain control and quality of life. The guideline broadly covers the differential diagnosis and treatment of tension-type headache, migraine, cluster headache, and medication-overuse headache. METHODS: This is a methodological study based on the ADAPTE methodology, including a systematic review of the literature, quality assessment of the guidelines using the Appraisal of Clinical Guidelines for REsearch & Evaluation II (AGREE II) Instrument, as well as an external review using a Delphi technique. The inclusion criteria for systematic search were as follows: topic-relevant, up-to-date guidelines including evidence from within 5 years, evidence-based guidelines, guidelines written in English or Korean, and guidelines issued by academic institutions or government agencies. RESULTS: We selected five guidelines and conducted their quality assessment using the AGREE II Instrument. As a result, one guideline was found to be eligible for adaptation. For 13 key questions, a total of 39 recommendations were proposed with the grading system and revised using the nominal group technique. CONCLUSION: Recommendations should be applied to actual clinical sites to achieve the ultimate goal of this guideline; therefore, follow-up activities, such as monitoring of guideline usage and assessment of applicability of the recommendations, should be performed in the future. Further assessment of the effectiveness of the guideline in Korea is needed.
Cluster Headache
;
Delphi Technique
;
Diagnosis
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Government Agencies
;
Headache Disorders
;
Headache
;
Korea
;
Methods
;
Migraine Disorders
;
Quality of Life
;
Tension-Type Headache

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail