1.Erratum to: Corrigendum: 2023 Korean Society of Menopause -Osteoporosis Guidelines Part I
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(3):179-179
2.Erratum to: Corrigendum: 2023 Korean Society of Menopause -Osteoporosis Guidelines Part I
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(3):179-179
3.Erratum to: Corrigendum: 2023 Korean Society of Menopause -Osteoporosis Guidelines Part I
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(3):179-179
4.The 2024 Guidelines for Osteoporosis - Korean Society of Menopause
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong- Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(1):1-23
5.The 2024 Guidelines for Osteoporosis - Korean Society of Menopause: Part II
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(2):55-77
6.Corrigendum: 2023 Korean Society of Menopause - Osteoporosis Guidelines Part I
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(2):126-126
7.Lectin histochemistry in the small intestines of piglets naturally infected with porcine epidemic diarrhea virus
Bohye KIM ; Sungwoong JANG ; Hyewon JANG ; Joong-Sun KIM ; Tae-Il JEON ; Jun-Gyu PARK ; In-Sik SHIN ; Kyoung-Oh CHO ; Changjong MOON
Journal of Veterinary Science 2024;25(5):e66-
Objective:
This work aimed to examine the alterations in glycoconjugates in the small intestines of piglets naturally infected with PEDV using lectin histochemistry.
Methods:
Six piglets including three PEDV-infected and three non-infected piglets were evaluated. Small intestinal samples were histopathologically examined, and lectin histochemistry was performed.
Results:
Piglets infected with PEDV had significant histological abnormalities in their small intestines, such as pronounced villous atrophy, varying degrees of villous fusion, and diverse mucosal alterations. Specific regions of the duodenum, jejunum, and ileum showed discernible variations in glycoconjugate distribution, as determined by lectin histochemistry.Compared with the controls, the PEDV-infected piglets showed significant changes in N-acetylglucosamine- and galactose-binding lectins (particularly wheat germ agglutinin and Arachis hypogaea (peanut) agglutinin) in multiple intestinal regions.
Conclusions
and Relevance: These findings can enhance understanding of how viruses such as PEDV impact the glycoconjugate composition of the small intestines and emphasize the potential connection between the pathogenesis of PEDV and glycoconjugate.
8.Geriatric risk model for older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (GERIAD): a prospective multicenter cohort study
Ho-Young YHIM ; Yong PARK ; Jeong-A KIM ; Ho-Jin SHIN ; Young Rok DO ; Joon Ho MOON ; Min Kyoung KIM ; Won Sik LEE ; Dae Sik KIM ; Myung-Won LEE ; Yoon Seok CHOI ; Seong Hyun JEONG ; Kyoung Ha KIM ; Jinhang KIM ; Chang-Hoon LEE ; Ga-Young SONG ; Deok-Hwan YANG ; Jae-Yong KWAK
The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine 2024;39(3):501-512
Background/Aims:
Optimal risk stratification based on simplified geriatric assessment to predict treatment-related toxicity and survival needs to be clarified in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).
Methods:
This multicenter prospective cohort study enrolled newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL (≥ 65 yr) between September 2015 and April 2018. A simplified geriatric assessment was performed at baseline using Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental ADL (IADL), and Charlson’s Comorbidity Index (CCI). The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS).
Results:
The study included 249 patients, the median age was 74 years (range, 65-88), and 125 (50.2%) were female. In multivariable Cox analysis, ADL, IADL, CCI, and age were independent factors for EFS; an integrated geriatric score was derived and the patients stratified into three geriatric categories: fit (n = 162, 65.1%), intermediate-fit (n = 25, 10.0%), and frail (n = 62, 24.9%). The established geriatric model was significantly associated with EFS (fit vs. intermediate-fit, HR 2.61, p < 0.001; fit vs. frail, HR 4.61, p < 0.001) and outperformed each covariate alone or in combination. In 87 intermediate-fit or frail patients, the relative doxorubicin dose intensity (RDDI) ≥ 62.4% was significantly associated with worse EFS (HR, 2.15, 95% CI 1.30–3.53, p = 0.002). It was related with a higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 symptomatic non-hematologic toxicities (63.2% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.001) and earlier treatment discontinuation (34.5% vs. 8.0%, p < 0.001) in patients with RDDI ≥ 62.4% than in those with RDDI < 62.4%.
Conclusions
This model integrating simplified geriatric assessment can risk-stratify older patients with DLBCL and identify those who are highly vulnerable to standard dose-intensity chemoimmunotherapy.
9.Outcomes in Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Results from Two Prospective Korean Cohorts
Jun Ho YI ; Seong Hyun JEONG ; Seok Jin KIM ; Dok Hyun YOON ; Hye Jin KANG ; Youngil KOH ; Jin Seok KIM ; Won-Sik LEE ; Deok-Hwan YANG ; Young Rok DO ; Min Kyoung KIM ; Kwai Han YOO ; Yoon Seok CHOI ; Whan Jung YUN ; Yong PARK ; Jae-Cheol JO ; Hyeon-Seok EOM ; Jae-Yong KWAK ; Ho-Jin SHIN ; Byeong Bae PARK ; Seong Yoon YI ; Ji-Hyun KWON ; Sung Yong OH ; Hyo Jung KIM ; Byeong Seok SOHN ; Jong Ho WON ; Dae-Sik HONG ; Ho-Sup LEE ; Gyeong-Won LEE ; Cheolwon SUH ; Won Seog KIM
Cancer Research and Treatment 2023;55(1):325-333
Purpose:
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common hematologic malignancy worldwide. Although substantial improvement has been achieved by the frontline rituximab-based chemoimmunotherapy, up to 40%-50% of patients will eventually have relapsed or refractory disease, whose prognosis is extremely dismal.
Materials and Methods:
We have carried out two prospective cohort studies that include over 1,500 DLBCL patients treated with rituximab plus CHOP (#NCT01202448 and #NCT02474550). In the current report, we describe the outcomes of refractory DLBCL patients. Patients were defined to have refractory DLBCL if they met one of the followings, not achieving at least partial response after 4 or more cycles of R-CHOP; not achieving at least partial response after 2 or more cycles of salvage therapy; progressive disease within 12 months after autologous stem cell transplantation.
Results:
Among 1,581 patients, a total of 260 patients met the criteria for the refractory disease after a median time to progression of 9.1 months. The objective response rate of salvage treatment was 26.4%, and the complete response rate was 9.6%. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval, 6.4 to 8.6), and the 2-year survival rate was 22.1%±2.8%. The median OS for each refractory category was not significantly different (p=0.529).
Conclusion
In line with the previous studies, the outcomes of refractory DLBCL patients were extremely poor, which necessitates novel approaches for this population.
10.Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach
Tae-Han KIM ; In-Ho KIM ; Seung Joo KANG ; Miyoung CHOI ; Baek-Hui KIM ; Bang Wool EOM ; Bum Jun KIM ; Byung-Hoon MIN ; Chang In CHOI ; Cheol Min SHIN ; Chung Hyun TAE ; Chung sik GONG ; Dong Jin KIM ; Arthur Eung-Hyuck CHO ; Eun Jeong GONG ; Geum Jong SONG ; Hyeon-Su IM ; Hye Seong AHN ; Hyun LIM ; Hyung-Don KIM ; Jae-Joon KIM ; Jeong Il YU ; Jeong Won LEE ; Ji Yeon PARK ; Jwa Hoon KIM ; Kyoung Doo SONG ; Minkyu JUNG ; Mi Ran JUNG ; Sang-Yong SON ; Shin-Hoo PARK ; Soo Jin KIM ; Sung Hak LEE ; Tae-Yong KIM ; Woo Kyun BAE ; Woong Sub KOOM ; Yeseob JEE ; Yoo Min KIM ; Yoonjin KWAK ; Young Suk PARK ; Hye Sook HAN ; Su Youn NAM ; Seong-Ho KONG ;
Journal of Gastric Cancer 2023;23(1):3-106
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail