1.Clinical Analysis of Sinonasal Malignant Lymphoma: Treatment Modalities and Prognostic Factors
Seo Young KIM ; Jeong Kyou KIM ; Young Chul KIM ; Joonsik YOON ; Soo Min KIM ; Jeeyeon PARK ; Doo Hyun SONG ; Hyun Jik KIM
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2024;67(9):482-487
Background and Objectives:
Sinonasal malignant lymphoma is rare and aggressive. Its low incidence has made detailed studies on epidemiology, survival, and consensus treatment modalities a challenge, and also has limited developing standardized protocols for diagnosis and management. This study analyzes the clinical factors of patients diagnosed with sinonasal malignant lymphoma and their treatment modalities to understand therapeutic outcome and prognostic factors.Subjects and Method The medical records of patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2020 as sinonasal (SN) malignant lymphoma (extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma [ENKTL]/diffuse large B cell lymphoma [DLBCL]) in Seoul national university hospital were retrospectively reviewed.
Results:
A total 42 patients were included in the study. Of those, 30 patients were SN-ENKTL, 12 patients were SN-DLBCL. The mean age of SN-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL groups was 52.8±14.4, 60.8±12.4, respectively. The main chief complaint was nasal obstruction (54%). Approximately 75% were diagnosed as stage II (Ann-Arbor staging system) and most of the patients received multi-agent chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The 3-year overall survival rate for SN-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL groups was roughly 90%, 88.9%, respectively and the average of disease-free survival period was approximately 41.1 and 22.1 months, respectively, after initiation of treatment.
Conclusion
We found that sinonasal malignant lymphoma is highly responsive to chemo or chemoradiotherapy. Early accurate diagnosis is important as early-stage patients receiving therapy may benefit from chemo or chemoradiotherapy. Our clinical data showed that in ambiguous situations, wide excision should be considered for diagnosis.
2.Clinical Analysis of Sinonasal Malignant Lymphoma: Treatment Modalities and Prognostic Factors
Seo Young KIM ; Jeong Kyou KIM ; Young Chul KIM ; Joonsik YOON ; Soo Min KIM ; Jeeyeon PARK ; Doo Hyun SONG ; Hyun Jik KIM
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2024;67(9):482-487
Background and Objectives:
Sinonasal malignant lymphoma is rare and aggressive. Its low incidence has made detailed studies on epidemiology, survival, and consensus treatment modalities a challenge, and also has limited developing standardized protocols for diagnosis and management. This study analyzes the clinical factors of patients diagnosed with sinonasal malignant lymphoma and their treatment modalities to understand therapeutic outcome and prognostic factors.Subjects and Method The medical records of patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2020 as sinonasal (SN) malignant lymphoma (extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma [ENKTL]/diffuse large B cell lymphoma [DLBCL]) in Seoul national university hospital were retrospectively reviewed.
Results:
A total 42 patients were included in the study. Of those, 30 patients were SN-ENKTL, 12 patients were SN-DLBCL. The mean age of SN-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL groups was 52.8±14.4, 60.8±12.4, respectively. The main chief complaint was nasal obstruction (54%). Approximately 75% were diagnosed as stage II (Ann-Arbor staging system) and most of the patients received multi-agent chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The 3-year overall survival rate for SN-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL groups was roughly 90%, 88.9%, respectively and the average of disease-free survival period was approximately 41.1 and 22.1 months, respectively, after initiation of treatment.
Conclusion
We found that sinonasal malignant lymphoma is highly responsive to chemo or chemoradiotherapy. Early accurate diagnosis is important as early-stage patients receiving therapy may benefit from chemo or chemoradiotherapy. Our clinical data showed that in ambiguous situations, wide excision should be considered for diagnosis.
3.Clinical Analysis of Sinonasal Malignant Lymphoma: Treatment Modalities and Prognostic Factors
Seo Young KIM ; Jeong Kyou KIM ; Young Chul KIM ; Joonsik YOON ; Soo Min KIM ; Jeeyeon PARK ; Doo Hyun SONG ; Hyun Jik KIM
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2024;67(9):482-487
Background and Objectives:
Sinonasal malignant lymphoma is rare and aggressive. Its low incidence has made detailed studies on epidemiology, survival, and consensus treatment modalities a challenge, and also has limited developing standardized protocols for diagnosis and management. This study analyzes the clinical factors of patients diagnosed with sinonasal malignant lymphoma and their treatment modalities to understand therapeutic outcome and prognostic factors.Subjects and Method The medical records of patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2020 as sinonasal (SN) malignant lymphoma (extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma [ENKTL]/diffuse large B cell lymphoma [DLBCL]) in Seoul national university hospital were retrospectively reviewed.
Results:
A total 42 patients were included in the study. Of those, 30 patients were SN-ENKTL, 12 patients were SN-DLBCL. The mean age of SN-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL groups was 52.8±14.4, 60.8±12.4, respectively. The main chief complaint was nasal obstruction (54%). Approximately 75% were diagnosed as stage II (Ann-Arbor staging system) and most of the patients received multi-agent chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The 3-year overall survival rate for SN-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL groups was roughly 90%, 88.9%, respectively and the average of disease-free survival period was approximately 41.1 and 22.1 months, respectively, after initiation of treatment.
Conclusion
We found that sinonasal malignant lymphoma is highly responsive to chemo or chemoradiotherapy. Early accurate diagnosis is important as early-stage patients receiving therapy may benefit from chemo or chemoradiotherapy. Our clinical data showed that in ambiguous situations, wide excision should be considered for diagnosis.
4.Clinical Analysis of Sinonasal Malignant Lymphoma: Treatment Modalities and Prognostic Factors
Seo Young KIM ; Jeong Kyou KIM ; Young Chul KIM ; Joonsik YOON ; Soo Min KIM ; Jeeyeon PARK ; Doo Hyun SONG ; Hyun Jik KIM
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2024;67(9):482-487
Background and Objectives:
Sinonasal malignant lymphoma is rare and aggressive. Its low incidence has made detailed studies on epidemiology, survival, and consensus treatment modalities a challenge, and also has limited developing standardized protocols for diagnosis and management. This study analyzes the clinical factors of patients diagnosed with sinonasal malignant lymphoma and their treatment modalities to understand therapeutic outcome and prognostic factors.Subjects and Method The medical records of patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2020 as sinonasal (SN) malignant lymphoma (extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma [ENKTL]/diffuse large B cell lymphoma [DLBCL]) in Seoul national university hospital were retrospectively reviewed.
Results:
A total 42 patients were included in the study. Of those, 30 patients were SN-ENKTL, 12 patients were SN-DLBCL. The mean age of SN-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL groups was 52.8±14.4, 60.8±12.4, respectively. The main chief complaint was nasal obstruction (54%). Approximately 75% were diagnosed as stage II (Ann-Arbor staging system) and most of the patients received multi-agent chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The 3-year overall survival rate for SN-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL groups was roughly 90%, 88.9%, respectively and the average of disease-free survival period was approximately 41.1 and 22.1 months, respectively, after initiation of treatment.
Conclusion
We found that sinonasal malignant lymphoma is highly responsive to chemo or chemoradiotherapy. Early accurate diagnosis is important as early-stage patients receiving therapy may benefit from chemo or chemoradiotherapy. Our clinical data showed that in ambiguous situations, wide excision should be considered for diagnosis.
5.Clinical Analysis of Sinonasal Malignant Lymphoma: Treatment Modalities and Prognostic Factors
Seo Young KIM ; Jeong Kyou KIM ; Young Chul KIM ; Joonsik YOON ; Soo Min KIM ; Jeeyeon PARK ; Doo Hyun SONG ; Hyun Jik KIM
Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 2024;67(9):482-487
Background and Objectives:
Sinonasal malignant lymphoma is rare and aggressive. Its low incidence has made detailed studies on epidemiology, survival, and consensus treatment modalities a challenge, and also has limited developing standardized protocols for diagnosis and management. This study analyzes the clinical factors of patients diagnosed with sinonasal malignant lymphoma and their treatment modalities to understand therapeutic outcome and prognostic factors.Subjects and Method The medical records of patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2020 as sinonasal (SN) malignant lymphoma (extranodal NK/T cell lymphoma [ENKTL]/diffuse large B cell lymphoma [DLBCL]) in Seoul national university hospital were retrospectively reviewed.
Results:
A total 42 patients were included in the study. Of those, 30 patients were SN-ENKTL, 12 patients were SN-DLBCL. The mean age of SN-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL groups was 52.8±14.4, 60.8±12.4, respectively. The main chief complaint was nasal obstruction (54%). Approximately 75% were diagnosed as stage II (Ann-Arbor staging system) and most of the patients received multi-agent chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. The 3-year overall survival rate for SN-DLBCL and SN-DLBCL groups was roughly 90%, 88.9%, respectively and the average of disease-free survival period was approximately 41.1 and 22.1 months, respectively, after initiation of treatment.
Conclusion
We found that sinonasal malignant lymphoma is highly responsive to chemo or chemoradiotherapy. Early accurate diagnosis is important as early-stage patients receiving therapy may benefit from chemo or chemoradiotherapy. Our clinical data showed that in ambiguous situations, wide excision should be considered for diagnosis.
6.The diagnostic usefulness and correlation of nasal eosinophil count and percentage in children with rhinitis
Kyou Hyun YOON ; Kyunghoon KIM ; Jong Seo YOON ; Hyun Hee KIM
Allergy, Asthma & Respiratory Disease 2020;8(1):15-19
PURPOSE: Allergic rhinitis is the most common atopic disease and the most common chronic disease of children. Eosinophil count and percentage in nasal smear are useful for differential diagnosis of allergic rhinitis. The aim of this study is to investigate the correlation between nasal eosinophil count and percentage.METHODS: Between January 2017 and August 2018, 221 children patients with a clinical history of rhinitis were tested at the outpatient respiratory and allergy unit of the Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea. Nasal secretion was collected by swabbing a children's nasal inferior turbinate 3–4 times with a cotton swab and then placed on to a glass slide. Later, the smear was stained by Giemsa stain.RESULTS: This is the first study to assess the comparison of nasal eosinophil count and percent. There is a positive correlation between nasal eosinophil count and percent Y=1.02 X+2.82 (Y=Eosinophil count, X=Eosinophil percentage). To determine the usefulness of nasal eosinophil count and percentage in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis, we analyzed receiver operating characteristic curves. The cutoff value of the nasal eosinophil count was 6.5/high-power field, and that of the nasal eosinophil ratio was 3% for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis.CONCLUSION: In patients with suspected rhinitis, one of the values of nasal eosinophil count or percentage can be used in clinical practice.
Azure Stains
;
Child
;
Chronic Disease
;
Diagnosis
;
Diagnosis, Differential
;
Eosinophils
;
Glass
;
Humans
;
Hypersensitivity
;
Korea
;
Outpatients
;
Pediatrics
;
Rhinitis
;
Rhinitis, Allergic
;
ROC Curve
;
Turbinates
7.Early Rehabilitation after Total Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction with Tissue Expander Insertion in Breast Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Case-control Study
Kyou Hyun KIM ; Seung Mi YEO ; In Yae CHEONG ; Yoon KIM ; Byung Joon JEON ; Ji Hye HWANG
Journal of Breast Cancer 2019;22(3):472-483
PURPOSE: To prevent surgical site complications, many plastic surgeons use the so-called “conventional protocol,” which immobilizes the shoulder and upper arm for 1 month after reconstruction. In an effort to improve the shoulder mobility of patients who received immediate breast reconstruction with tissue expander insertion (TEI), we introduced an early rehabilitation protocol with a short-term immobilization period of 2 weeks. This study aims to compare this early rehabilitation exercise program with the conventional protocol and to determine factors affecting shoulder mobility and quality of life of patients after immediate breast reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 115 patients with breast cancer who underwent reconstructive surgery were retrospectively reviewed. For patients who underwent reconstruction before January 2017, the conventional protocol was followed with immobilization of their shoulder for over 4 weeks. Patients who underwent reconstruction after January 2017 were educated to undergo a self-exercise program after a short-term immobilization period of 2 weeks. We compared shoulder mobility, pain, quality of life, and complications at postoperative 1 and 2 months between the groups. RESULTS: Patients who received early rehabilitation showed greater shoulder flexion and abduction range at postoperative 1 month than those who received the conventional protocol. This increased shoulder abduction range continued until postoperative 2 months. There were no significant surgical site problems in both groups during the 2 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: To enhance the recovery of shoulder mobility, early rehabilitation with a shorter immobilization period should be recommended to patients with breast cancer undergoing reconstruction surgery with TEI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03541161
Arm
;
Breast Neoplasms
;
Breast
;
Case-Control Studies
;
Female
;
Follow-Up Studies
;
Humans
;
Immobilization
;
Mammaplasty
;
Mastectomy, Simple
;
Plastics
;
Quality of Life
;
Range of Motion, Articular
;
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
;
Rehabilitation
;
Retrospective Studies
;
Shoulder
;
Surgeons
;
Tissue Expansion Devices
8.Correlation between the Severity of Bone Pain and the Amount of CD34+ Cells after Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization.
Ji Weon SEO ; Ji Seon CHOI ; Yang Hyun KIM ; Sung Soo YOON ; Seonyang PARK ; Kyou Sup HAN
Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion 2015;26(2):123-131
BACKGROUND: Peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are mobilized by granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), which causes several side effects in allogeneic donors. We report on side effects of G-CSF administration and determine which side effects could be used in predicting the amount of harvested CD34+ cells. METHODS: Data from the first PBSC collections of 155 healthy donors between 2007 and 2010 were analyzed. Side effects were assessed using adverse event inventory, which was graded from 1 (mild) to 3 (severe) or 4 (disabling). RESULTS: G-CSF administration caused an elevation of WBC counts (mean 44,834/microL) and 86% of them were neutrophils. The mean mononuclear cells in apheresis products was 6.6x10(8)/kg and mean CD34+ cells was 6.0x10(6)/kg. Bone pain was reported by 151 healthy donors (97%) and severe bone pain was related to more CD34+ cells in apheresis products (P=0.041): 39 for grade 1 (5.1x10(6) CD34+cells/kg), 86 for grade 2 (6.0x10(6)), and 26 for grade 3 (7.1x10(6)). In addition, the percentage of collecting more than 5.0x10(6) CD34+cells/kg during the first leukapheresis showed correlation with the severity of bone pain. CONCLUSION: Bone pain was the most common side effect of G-CSF mobilization and more CD34+ cells were harvested in cases of severe bone pain.
Blood Component Removal
;
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor
;
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization*
;
Humans
;
Leukapheresis
;
Neutrophils
;
Stem Cells*
;
Tissue Donors
9.Performance of Four Anti-Heparin/Platelet Factor 4 Immunoassays for the Diagnosis of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia.
Jae Hyeon PARK ; Ji Eun KIM ; Hyun Ju YOO ; Ja Yoon GU ; Kyou Sup HAN ; Hyun Kyung KIM
Journal of Laboratory Medicine and Quality Assurance 2015;37(2):84-91
BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a significant complication of heparin therapy induced by antibodies to heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexes. We investigated the diagnostic performance of four commercial immunoassays that detect the anti-heparin/PF4 antibody. METHODS: Four different anti-heparin/PF4 antibody assays were performed in 39 patients with suspected HIT: HemosIL AcuStar HIT-IgG, HemosIL AcuStar HIT-total antibody (Ab) (Instrumentation Laboratory, USA), STic Expert HIT (Diagnostica Stago, France), and PF4 Enhanced (Immucor GTI Diagnostics, USA). Patients were diagnosed with HIT when the Chong score was > or =5. RESULTS: The estimated sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of HIT were 33.3% and 80.0% for AcuStar HIT-IgG, 55.6% and 53.3% for AcuStar HIT-total Ab, 100.0% and 37.9% for STic Expert HIT, and 33.3% and 66.7% for PF4 Enhanced. All specificities significantly increased when 4Ts scores were included in the diagnosis. The areas under the curves (AUCs) for predicting thrombosis in the AcuStar HIT-IgG, AcuStar HIT-total Ab, and PF4 Enhanced assays were 0.639, 0.522, and 0.681, respectively. When the results of each assay were analysed along with 4Ts scores, the AUC increased to 0.927 in the AcuStar HIT-IgG assay and 0.944 in the AcuStar HIT-total Ab and PF4 Enhanced assays. CONCLUSIONS: The STic Expert HIT assay had high sensitivity but low specificity for diagnosis of HIT. The performances of the three other immunoassays were comparable to each other. Specificity significantly increased when assay data were combined with 4Ts scores. Differences in the diagnostic performance of the four immunoassays were not evident, and simultaneous consideration of clinical scoring systems improved performance.
Antibodies
;
Area Under Curve
;
Diagnosis*
;
Heparin
;
Humans
;
Immunoassay*
;
Sensitivity and Specificity
;
Thrombocytopenia*
;
Thrombosis
10.Checking Perceived Blood Group of the Patient Upon Phlebotomy: Additional Approach for Accurate Patient Identification and ABO Testing.
Kyung Mi JO ; Yousun CHUNG ; Sue SHIN ; Eun Youn ROH ; Jong Hyun YOON ; Kyou Sup HAN
Korean Journal of Blood Transfusion 2014;25(1):10-17
BACKGROUND: Accurate patient identification is fundamental in transfusion medicine. Our hypothesis is that an open question about patients' ABO blood group would be helpful for accurate identification of the patient and for accurate laboratory testing. METHODS: We added some blanks, including the patient's ABO blood group on the tube label, which should be filled in by the phlebotomist on the spot. From Aug 1, 2012 to May 31, 2013, we analyzed the effect of the additional step for identification of a misidentification 'incident' in 31,454 tests of 14,864 patients. We surveyed on 21 phlebotomists with regard to whether the changed label reinforces patient identification. In addition, the discrepancy rate between the ABO blood group perceived by the patient and the test result was analyzed. RESULTS: Patient-misidentification error rate during this study was 0.022%, and 81.0% of the phlebotomists answered that the changed label reinforces patient identification. The total discrepancy rate was 1.93%. Patients without previous results showed a higher discrepancy rate (3.08%) than patients with previous results (0.35%). Males (2.48%) showed a higher discrepancy rate than females (1.38%). Patients older than 50 years showed a higher discrepancy rate (2.87%) than patients younger than 50 years (0.82%). According to ABO blood group, group O showed the lowest discrepancy rate (0.87%). CONCLUSION: Checking ABO blood group known by the patient helped phlebotomists to correctly identify the intended patient. Active corrective action by the transfusion laboratory when discrepancies exist could increase test reliability and pave the way for safe transfusion, which will ultimately improve the quality of transfusion medicine.
Female
;
Humans
;
Male
;
Phlebotomy*
;
Transfusion Medicine

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail