1.Erratum to: Corrigendum: 2023 Korean Society of Menopause -Osteoporosis Guidelines Part I
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(3):179-179
3.Erratum to: Corrigendum: 2023 Korean Society of Menopause -Osteoporosis Guidelines Part I
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(3):179-179
5.The 2024 Guidelines for Osteoporosis - Korean Society of Menopause
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong- Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(1):1-23
6.The 2024 Guidelines for Osteoporosis - Korean Society of Menopause: Part II
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(2):55-77
7.Corrigendum: 2023 Korean Society of Menopause - Osteoporosis Guidelines Part I
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(2):126-126
8.Erratum to: Corrigendum: 2023 Korean Society of Menopause -Osteoporosis Guidelines Part I
Dong Ock LEE ; Yeon Hee HONG ; Moon Kyoung CHO ; Young Sik CHOI ; Sungwook CHUN ; Youn-Jee CHUNG ; Seung Hwa HONG ; Kyu Ri HWANG ; Jinju KIM ; Hoon KIM ; Dong-Yun LEE ; Sa Ra LEE ; Hyun-Tae PARK ; Seok Kyo SEO ; Jung-Ho SHIN ; Jae Yen SONG ; Kyong Wook YI ; Haerin PAIK ; Ji Young LEE
Journal of Menopausal Medicine 2024;30(3):179-179
10.Neoadjuvant Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy Followed by Selective Bladder Preservation Chemoradiotherapy in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Post Hoc Analysis of Two Prospective Studies
Sung Wook CHO ; Sung Hee LIM ; Ghee Young KWON ; Chan Kyo KIM ; Won PARK ; Hongryull PYO ; Jae Hoon CHUNG ; Wan SONG ; Hyun Hwan SUNG ; Byong Chang JEONG ; Se Hoon PARK
Cancer Research and Treatment 2024;56(3):893-897
Purpose:
Bladder preservation chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with a clinical complete response (cCR) following cisplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is a promising treatment strategy for muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinoma (MIBC). A combined analysis of raw data from two prospective phase II studies was performed to better evaluate the feasibility of selective bladder preservation CRT.
Materials and Methods:
The analysis was based on primary efficacy data from two independent studies, including 76 MIBC patients receiving NAC followed by bladder preservation CRT. The efficacy data included metastasis-free survival (MFS) and disease-free survival (DFS). For the present analysis, starting point of survival was defined as the date of commencing CRT.
Results:
Among 76 patients, 66 had a cCR following NAC. Sixty-four patients received gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC) combination chemotherapy in neoadjuvant setting, and 12 received nivolumab plus GC. Bladder preservation CRT following NAC was generally well-tolerated, with low urinary tract symptoms being the most common late complication. With a median follow-up of 64 months, recurrence was recorded in 43 patients (57%): intravesical only (n=20), metastatic only (n=16), and both (n=7). In 27 patients with intravesical recurrence, transurethral resection, and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin treatment was given to 17 patients. Salvage cystectomy was performed in 10 patients. Median DFS was 46.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 25.1 to 67.5) months, and the median MFS was not reached. Neither DFS nor MFS appeared to be affected by any of the baseline characteristics. However, DFS was significantly longer in patients with a cCR than in those without (hazard ratio, 0.465; 95% CI, 0.222 to 0.976).
Conclusion
The strategy of NAC followed by selective bladder preservation CRT based on the cCR is feasible in the treatment of MIBC. A standardized definition of cCR is needed to better assess disease status post-NAC.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail