Purpose: Feeding intolerance (FI) is a prevalent clinically sequential condition in preterm infants. To clarify its relationship with the gut microbiota, we compared microbial diversity and taxonomic composition at 2 and 4 weeks of age in infants born before 32 weeks of gestation. Methods: Between August 2021 and December 2022, we prospectively enrolled infants who delivered before 32 weeks of gestation and were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at CHA Bundang Medical Center. Forty-four preterm infants were grouped based on the presence (n=16) or absence (n=28) of FI. Fecal samples were obtained at 2 and 4 weeks after birth and analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to determine microbial profiles. Results: Microbial α-diversity and β-diversity did not differ significantly between groups at either time point. At the genus level, Staphylococcus was significantly more abundant in the FI group than in the feeding tolerance group at 2 weeks postnatal age (P=0.016). Linear discriminant analysis effect size revealed that Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Escherichia were markedly enriched in the FI group at all time points. Conclusion Early colonization by potentially pathogenic genera, particularly Staphylococcus, may precede the development of FI in preterm infants. These findings highlight the potential microbial composition associated with FI and may provide preliminary insights for future microbiome-targeted research in neonatal care.

Purpose: Feeding intolerance (FI) is a prevalent clinically sequential condition in preterm infants. To clarify its relationship with the gut microbiota, we compared microbial diversity and taxonomic composition at 2 and 4 weeks of age in infants born before 32 weeks of gestation. Methods: Between August 2021 and December 2022, we prospectively enrolled infants who delivered before 32 weeks of gestation and were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at CHA Bundang Medical Center. Forty-four preterm infants were grouped based on the presence (n=16) or absence (n=28) of FI. Fecal samples were obtained at 2 and 4 weeks after birth and analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to determine microbial profiles. Results: Microbial α-diversity and β-diversity did not differ significantly between groups at either time point. At the genus level, Staphylococcus was significantly more abundant in the FI group than in the feeding tolerance group at 2 weeks postnatal age (P=0.016). Linear discriminant analysis effect size revealed that Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Escherichia were markedly enriched in the FI group at all time points. Conclusion Early colonization by potentially pathogenic genera, particularly Staphylococcus, may precede the development of FI in preterm infants. These findings highlight the potential microbial composition associated with FI and may provide preliminary insights for future microbiome-targeted research in neonatal care.

Purpose: Feeding intolerance (FI) is a prevalent clinically sequential condition in preterm infants. To clarify its relationship with the gut microbiota, we compared microbial diversity and taxonomic composition at 2 and 4 weeks of age in infants born before 32 weeks of gestation. Methods: Between August 2021 and December 2022, we prospectively enrolled infants who delivered before 32 weeks of gestation and were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at CHA Bundang Medical Center. Forty-four preterm infants were grouped based on the presence (n=16) or absence (n=28) of FI. Fecal samples were obtained at 2 and 4 weeks after birth and analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to determine microbial profiles. Results: Microbial α-diversity and β-diversity did not differ significantly between groups at either time point. At the genus level, Staphylococcus was significantly more abundant in the FI group than in the feeding tolerance group at 2 weeks postnatal age (P=0.016). Linear discriminant analysis effect size revealed that Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Escherichia were markedly enriched in the FI group at all time points. Conclusion Early colonization by potentially pathogenic genera, particularly Staphylococcus, may precede the development of FI in preterm infants. These findings highlight the potential microbial composition associated with FI and may provide preliminary insights for future microbiome-targeted research in neonatal care.

Purpose: Feeding intolerance (FI) is a prevalent clinically sequential condition in preterm infants. To clarify its relationship with the gut microbiota, we compared microbial diversity and taxonomic composition at 2 and 4 weeks of age in infants born before 32 weeks of gestation. Methods: Between August 2021 and December 2022, we prospectively enrolled infants who delivered before 32 weeks of gestation and were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at CHA Bundang Medical Center. Forty-four preterm infants were grouped based on the presence (n=16) or absence (n=28) of FI. Fecal samples were obtained at 2 and 4 weeks after birth and analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to determine microbial profiles. Results: Microbial α-diversity and β-diversity did not differ significantly between groups at either time point. At the genus level, Staphylococcus was significantly more abundant in the FI group than in the feeding tolerance group at 2 weeks postnatal age (P=0.016). Linear discriminant analysis effect size revealed that Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Escherichia were markedly enriched in the FI group at all time points. Conclusion Early colonization by potentially pathogenic genera, particularly Staphylococcus, may precede the development of FI in preterm infants. These findings highlight the potential microbial composition associated with FI and may provide preliminary insights for future microbiome-targeted research in neonatal care.

Purpose: Feeding intolerance (FI) is a prevalent clinically sequential condition in preterm infants. To clarify its relationship with the gut microbiota, we compared microbial diversity and taxonomic composition at 2 and 4 weeks of age in infants born before 32 weeks of gestation. Methods: Between August 2021 and December 2022, we prospectively enrolled infants who delivered before 32 weeks of gestation and were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit at CHA Bundang Medical Center. Forty-four preterm infants were grouped based on the presence (n=16) or absence (n=28) of FI. Fecal samples were obtained at 2 and 4 weeks after birth and analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing to determine microbial profiles. Results: Microbial α-diversity and β-diversity did not differ significantly between groups at either time point. At the genus level, Staphylococcus was significantly more abundant in the FI group than in the feeding tolerance group at 2 weeks postnatal age (P=0.016). Linear discriminant analysis effect size revealed that Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas, and Escherichia were markedly enriched in the FI group at all time points. Conclusion Early colonization by potentially pathogenic genera, particularly Staphylococcus, may precede the development of FI in preterm infants. These findings highlight the potential microbial composition associated with FI and may provide preliminary insights for future microbiome-targeted research in neonatal care.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term care facilities (LTCFs) are communal environments for patients with chronic diseases or older adults, making them particularly susceptible to significant harm during infectious disease outbreaks. Nonetheless, LTCFs have historically been subject to less stringent infection prevention and control (IPC) mandates. This study aimed to assess the current state of LTCFs and to develop an IPC system tailored for these facilities following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of 11,366 LTCFs in Korea from December 30, 2022 to January 20, 2023, to evaluate the components of IPC in LTCFs. The infectious diseases targeted for IPC included COVID-19, influenza, and scabies. Additionally, we compared institution-based and home-based long-term care insurance facilities. RESULTS: Overall, 3,537 (31.1%) LTCFs responded to the survey, comprising 1,819 (51.4%) institution-based and 1,718 (48.6%) home-based facilities. A majority (87.4%, 2,376/2,720) of these facilities experienced COVID-19 outbreaks. However, only 42.2% of home-based facilities, in contrast to 90.6% of institution-based facilities, were equipped to manage concurrent COVID-19 cases. Similarly, while 92.1% of institution-based facilities were capable of managing influenza, only 50.5% of home-based facilities could do the same. The incidence of scabies was significantly higher in institution-based facilities than in home-based ones (26.1 vs. 4.3%). Additionally, 88.7% of institution-based facilities managed scabies cases effectively, compared to only 42.1% of home-based facilities. CONCLUSIONS Approximately half of the LTCFs had a basic capacity to respond to infectious diseases. However, there were differences in response capabilities between institution-based facilities and home-based facilities.

Purpose: As introduced, multimodal pain management bundle for ileostomy reversal may be considered to reduce postoperative pain and hospital stay. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of perioperative multimodal pain bundle for ileostomy. Methods: Medical records of patients who underwent ileostomy reversal after rectal cancer surgery from April 2017 to March 2020 were analyzed. Sixty-seven patients received multimodal pain bundle protocol with ileostomy reversal (group A) and 41 patients underwent closure of ileostomy with conventional pain management (group B). Results: Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, diabetes mellitus, and smoking history, were not significantly different between the groups. The pain score on postoperative day 1 was significant lower in group A (visual analog scale, 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 3.2 ± 1.2; P = 0.013). Overall consumption of opioid in group A was significant less than group B (9.7 ± 9.5 vs. 21.2 ± 8.8, P < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in group A (2.3 ± 1.5 days vs. 4.1 ± 1.5 days, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative complication rate. Conclusion Multimodal pain protocol for ileostomy reversal could reduce postoperative pain, usage of opioid and hospital stay compared to conventional pain management.