Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in the management of diabetes and obesity; however, their potential association with acute pancreatitis has been debated since their early clinical use. Numerous cases of suspected GLP-1 RA-related pancreatitis have been reported in the literature and pharmacovigilance databases, raising concerns about their safety. This review aims to examine the clinical and mechanistic evidence linking GLP-1 RA use to acute pancreatitis, including recent clinical studies, meta-analyses, and pathophysiological investigations. Based on the latest clinical evidence and practice guidelines, we propose strategies for the safe and appropriate use of GLP-1 RAs in clinical practice.

Background/Aims: Helicobacter pylori is a pathogen that causes chronic gastritis and peptic ulcer diseases and is a carcinogen responsible for the development of malignancies, including gastric cancer. In the current era of high antimicrobial resistance, rifabutin-based triple therapy is recommended as a salvage therapy. Bismuth has not only a strong bacteriostatic effect but also a synergic effect when combined with antibiotics. Our study aimed to compare and evaluate the eradication rates between rifabutin-based triple therapy and rifabutin with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy as salvage treatments. Methods: In this single-center study, patients who received rifabutin-based triple therapy and rifabutin with bismuth-containing quadruple therapy after failure of conventional therapy, including first- and second-line treatment, between January 2016 and July 2024, were retrospectively investigated. A total of 53 patients who received rifabutin-based triple therapy and 50 who received bismuth-containing quadruple therapy were included. Results: In the rifabutin-based triple therapy group, eradication was achieved in 32 out of 53 patients (60.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 46.8% to 74.0%). In the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy group, eradication was achieved in 40 out of 50 patients (80.0%; 95% CI, 68.5% to 91.5%), demonstrating significant therapeutic benefit (p=0.030). Adverse events, including nausea, epigastric discomfort, and lethargy, were significantly more frequent in the bismuth-containing quadruple therapy group (p=0.007), but they were mild and tolerable enough not to affect compliance (p=0.329). Conclusions Rifabutin with bismuth-containing quadruple regimen as a salvage treatment achieved significantly superior eradication efficacy over the rifabutin-based triple regimen. Further multicenter prospective studies are needed to provide additional supporting evidence.

Background: s/Aims: Microwave ablation (MWA) is an emerging ablative therapy that surpasses previous methods by achieving higher temperatures and creating larger ablation zones within shorter periods. This study compared the therapeutic outcomes of MWA with those of liver resection in real-world clinical practice. Methods: A total of 178 patients with 259 nodules who underwent MWA or liver resection between January 2015 and July 2023 were enrolled. Local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival, overall progression (OP)-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were assessed based on the treatment modality for the index nodule. Results: Of the 178 patients, 134 with 214 nodules underwent MWA, and 44 with 45 nodules underwent liver resection. The median follow-up period was 2.0±1.5 years. The annual incidence of LTP was 3.7% for MWA and 1.4% for liver resection. Treatment modality did not significantly affect LTP-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-2.69; P=0.511). For nodules larger than 3 cm, LTP-free survival was not affected by the treatment modality. Similarly, OP-free survival and OS were not influenced by treatment modality. Conclusions MWA and liver resection demonstrated comparable treatment outcomes in terms of local tumor control, overall recurrence, and survival. MWA may be an alternative treatment option for select patients; however, further studies are necessary to generalize these findings.

Background: s/Aims: Microwave ablation (MWA) is an emerging ablative therapy that surpasses previous methods by achieving higher temperatures and creating larger ablation zones within shorter periods. This study compared the therapeutic outcomes of MWA with those of liver resection in real-world clinical practice. Methods: A total of 178 patients with 259 nodules who underwent MWA or liver resection between January 2015 and July 2023 were enrolled. Local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival, overall progression (OP)-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were assessed based on the treatment modality for the index nodule. Results: Of the 178 patients, 134 with 214 nodules underwent MWA, and 44 with 45 nodules underwent liver resection. The median follow-up period was 2.0±1.5 years. The annual incidence of LTP was 3.7% for MWA and 1.4% for liver resection. Treatment modality did not significantly affect LTP-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-2.69; P=0.511). For nodules larger than 3 cm, LTP-free survival was not affected by the treatment modality. Similarly, OP-free survival and OS were not influenced by treatment modality. Conclusions MWA and liver resection demonstrated comparable treatment outcomes in terms of local tumor control, overall recurrence, and survival. MWA may be an alternative treatment option for select patients; however, further studies are necessary to generalize these findings.

Background: s/Aims: Microwave ablation (MWA) is an emerging ablative therapy that surpasses previous methods by achieving higher temperatures and creating larger ablation zones within shorter periods. This study compared the therapeutic outcomes of MWA with those of liver resection in real-world clinical practice. Methods: A total of 178 patients with 259 nodules who underwent MWA or liver resection between January 2015 and July 2023 were enrolled. Local tumor progression (LTP)-free survival, overall progression (OP)-free survival, and overall survival (OS) were assessed based on the treatment modality for the index nodule. Results: Of the 178 patients, 134 with 214 nodules underwent MWA, and 44 with 45 nodules underwent liver resection. The median follow-up period was 2.0±1.5 years. The annual incidence of LTP was 3.7% for MWA and 1.4% for liver resection. Treatment modality did not significantly affect LTP-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-2.69; P=0.511). For nodules larger than 3 cm, LTP-free survival was not affected by the treatment modality. Similarly, OP-free survival and OS were not influenced by treatment modality. Conclusions MWA and liver resection demonstrated comparable treatment outcomes in terms of local tumor control, overall recurrence, and survival. MWA may be an alternative treatment option for select patients; however, further studies are necessary to generalize these findings.

Atypical femoral fractures (AFFs) are a rare but serious complication of prolonged anti-resorptive therapy for osteoporosis. This study aimed to develop consensus-based recommendations for the clinical management of AFFs across the Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies (AFOS), for harmonizing practice and improving patient outcomes.A structured questionnaire covering ten key domains related to AFFs was distributed to expert representatives from the 10 AFOS member countries or regions. Responses were analyzed to identify areas of consensus and variation in regional practice. A concurrent narrative review of the literature was conducted to inform evidencebased recommendations. Survey responses were obtained from 8 of 10 participating AFOS member nations or regions. Among these, Thailand, Malaysia, South Korea, and Hong Kong reported established national guidelines or position statements on AFFs. Contributing risk factors include extended anti-resorptive therapy, femoral geometry, comorbidities, and specific pharmacologic exposures. Diagnosis depends on clinical suspicion and multimodal imaging, with high concordance in diagnostic criteria across regions. Screening emphasizes full-length femoral imaging in highrisk individuals. Incomplete AFFs are managed conservatively or with prophylactic fixation, while complete AFFs typically require intramedullary nailing, tailored to anatomic variations such as femoral bowing. Post-fracture care involves discontinuation of anti-resorptives, assessment for secondary osteoporosis, and potential initia tion of anabolic therapy, including teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab.This AFOS-led initiative highlights the importance for early detection, individualized management, and region-specific strategies. A multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach—encompassing risk assessment, im aging surveillance, surgical intervention, and tailored pharmacologic treatment—is crucial to reduce AFFs impact and improve skeletal health outcomes across Asia.

Purpose: Esophagojejunostomy leakage (EJL) remains one of the most critical complications following total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the evolving therapeutic approaches and clinical outcomes of EJL using data from a large-scale multicenter retrospective cohort. Methods: Among 6,577 patients who underwent total gastrectomy or proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction at nine institutions from 2003 to 2024, 196 (3.0%) developed EJL. Of these, 162 patients with comprehensive clinical data were included in the final analysis. The study examined treatment modalities, changes in management over time, patient characteristics, surgical variables, and clinical outcomes. Four groups were defined according to treatment approach: conservative, endoscopic, reoperation, and multimodal (combined) therapy. Results: Endoscopic therapy was first introduced in 2011 and has progressively supplanted reoperation, now comprising 32.5% of cases. The average time to EJL diagnosis was 8.4 days after surgery. Overall in-hospital mortality was 6.1% (10/162). When conservative management was excluded, endoscopic treatment demonstrated the highest rate of therapeutic success (94.3%, p = 0.004). Both the duration until diet resumption and length of hospital stay were notably reduced in the endoscopic and conservative groups compared with reoperation and multimodal therapy (p < 0.001). Moreover, although the highest post-leakage hospitalization costs were observed with multimodal treatment (p < 0.001), overall hospitalization expenses were significantly lower for patients managed conservatively or with endoscopic intervention (p < 0.001). Conclusion Over the past two decades, management of EJL has shifted toward endoscopic approaches. Endoscopic therapies yield superior clinical outcomes and should be considered a primary option for appropriate candidates.

Purpose: In Korea, the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service (HIRA) mandates patient participation in outpatient multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings as part of national cancer quality assessment. However, the necessity of involving patients and families in MDT discussions remains debatable. This study explored international expert perspectives on patient participation in gastric cancer MDTs. Methods: A cross-national expert survey was conducted in September 2021 among 15 gastric cancer specialists from Korea, China, Japan, Singapore, and the United States. The survey assessed the frequency of patient and family member attendance, perceived pros and cons, and preferences regarding mandatory versus selective involvement. Additionally, MDT structures and policies were reviewed by countries. Results: Most respondents reported that patients and families rarely or never attend MDT meetings: nine stated that patients are never included, three reported “usually not,” and three indicated “sometimes.” None consistently included patients. The most cited benefits were sharing opinions with patients and families simultaneously, followed by improved explanation of treatment and legal protection. Major concerns included hindered discussion, inefficiency, and logistical challenges. Only four respondents supported routine participation, while 11 favored case-dependent involvement. Conclusion International experts do not widely support mandatory patient participation in MDT meetings. A flexible approach that allows MDTs to operate with or without patient involvement may better reflect actual clinical practice.

Background: Islet transplantation holds promise for treating selected type 1 diabetes mellitus patients, yet the scarcity of human donor organs impedes widespread adoption. Porcine islets, deemed a viable alternative, recently demonstrated successful longterm survival without zoonotic risks in a clinically relevant pig-to-non-human primate islet transplantation model. This success prompted the development of a clinical trial protocol for porcine islet xenotransplantation in humans. Methods: A single-center, open-label clinical trial initiated by the sponsor will assess the safety and efficacy of porcine islet transplantation for diabetes patients at Gachon Hospital. The protocol received approval from the Gachon Hospital Institutional Review Board (IRB) and the Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) under the Investigational New Drug (IND) process. Two diabetic patients, experiencing inadequate glycemic control despite intensive insulin treatment and frequent hypoglycemic unawareness, will be enrolled. Participants and their family members will engage in deliberation before xenotransplantation during the screening period. Each patient will receive islets isolated from designated pathogen-free pigs. Immunosuppressants and systemic infection prophylaxis will follow the program schedule. The primary endpoint is to confirm the safety of porcine islets in patients, and the secondary endpoint is to assess whether porcine islets can reduce insulin dose and the frequency of hypoglycemic unawareness. Conclusion A clinical trial protocol adhering to global consensus guidelines for porcine islet xenotransplantation is presented, facilitating streamlined implementation of comparable human trials worldwide.

Background: Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) has a poorer prognosis than differentiated thyroid cancers; however, comprehensive data on the long-term outcomes of MTC remain scarce. This study investigated the extended clinical outcomes of MTC and aimed to identify prognostic factors. Methods: Patients diagnosed with MTC between 1980 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Their clinical characteristics, longterm clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors for recurrence and mortality were analyzed. Results: The study included 226 patients (144 women, 82 men). The disease-specific survival (DSS) rates for all MTC patients at 5-, 10-, 20-, and 30-year intervals were 92.7%, 89.4%, 74.3%, and 68.1%, respectively. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 71.1%, 56.1%, 40.2%, and 32.1% at these intervals. DSS was comparable between the groups from 1980–2009 and 2010–2020 (P=0.995); however, the 1980–2009 group had significantly lower RFS rates (P=0.031). The 2010–2020 group exhibited greater extents of surgical and lymph node dissection (P=0.003) and smaller tumors (P=0.003). Multivariate analysis identified extrathyroidal extension as the strongest prognostic factor for both RFS and DSS. Age >55 years and tumor size of ≥2 cm were also significant prognostic factors for DSS, while hereditary disease and lymph node metastasis were significant for RFS. Survival analysis after propensity-score matching of rearranged during transfection (RET)-negative and non-screened RET-positive groups showed comparable DSS but longer RFS in the RET-negative group. Conclusion Extrathyroidal extension was identified as the strongest prognostic factor for RFS and DSS. Older age and larger tumor size were associated with decreased DSS, while RET mutation and lymph node metastasis significantly impacted RFS.