Background: This study evaluated the use of brainstem score (BSS) on pre-procedural diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to predict outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) patients and compared its predictive effectiveness to the critical area perfusion score (CAPS) on perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using RAPID. Methods: This study focused on ABAO patients who underwent MT after MRI at Dong-A University Hospital from 2013 to 2023. Ischemic lesion volume and DWI BSS were measured for all. For the group that underwent perfusion MRI using RAPID, CAPS were measured. The primary end point was a poor outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin scale [mRS], >2). Results: 71 patients had ABAO and underwent MT after MRI. The poor outcome group (66.2%) had significantly larger ischemic lesion volume and higher DWI BSS compared with the good outcome group. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, DWI BSS (odds ratio, 8.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.93-35.50; p<0.01) was an independent predictor of poor outcomes. In 26 patients, CAPS was measured on perfusion MRI. In this subgroup, poor outcome group (50.0%) had higher DWI BSS and CAPS than the good outcome group. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, DWI BSS remained a valid independent predictor for predicting outcomes, but CAPS did not function as an independent predictor. Conclusion In this study, the DWI BSS before MT in ABAO patients emerged as a useful imaging marker for predicting post-procedural outcomes. Its predictive ability is not only comparable to but even superior to CAPS on perfusion MRI.

Background: This study evaluated the use of brainstem score (BSS) on pre-procedural diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to predict outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) patients and compared its predictive effectiveness to the critical area perfusion score (CAPS) on perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using RAPID. Methods: This study focused on ABAO patients who underwent MT after MRI at Dong-A University Hospital from 2013 to 2023. Ischemic lesion volume and DWI BSS were measured for all. For the group that underwent perfusion MRI using RAPID, CAPS were measured. The primary end point was a poor outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin scale [mRS], >2). Results: 71 patients had ABAO and underwent MT after MRI. The poor outcome group (66.2%) had significantly larger ischemic lesion volume and higher DWI BSS compared with the good outcome group. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, DWI BSS (odds ratio, 8.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.93-35.50; p<0.01) was an independent predictor of poor outcomes. In 26 patients, CAPS was measured on perfusion MRI. In this subgroup, poor outcome group (50.0%) had higher DWI BSS and CAPS than the good outcome group. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, DWI BSS remained a valid independent predictor for predicting outcomes, but CAPS did not function as an independent predictor. Conclusion In this study, the DWI BSS before MT in ABAO patients emerged as a useful imaging marker for predicting post-procedural outcomes. Its predictive ability is not only comparable to but even superior to CAPS on perfusion MRI.

This study explores the development, roles, and key initiatives of the Regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea, detailing their evolution through four distinct phases and their impact on environmental health policy and local governance. It chronicles the establishment and transformation of these centers from their inception in May 2007, through four developmental stages. Originally named Environmental Disease Research Centers, they were subsequently renamed Environmental Health Centers following legislative changes. The analysis includes the expansion in the number of centers, the transfer of responsibilities to local governments, and the launch of significant projects such as the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS ). During the initial phase (May 2007–February 2009), the 10 centers concentrated on research-driven activities, shifting from a media-centered to a receptor-centered approach. In the second phase, prompted by the enactment of the Environmental Health Act, six additional centers were established, broadening their scope to address national environmental health issues. The third phase introduced Ko-CHENS, a 20-year national cohort project designed to influence environmental health policy by integrating research findings into policy frameworks. The fourth phase marked a decentralization of authority, empowering local governments and redefining the centers' roles to focus on regional environmental health challenges. The Regional Environmental Health Centers have significantly evolved and now play a crucial role in addressing local environmental health issues and supporting local government policies. Their capacity to adapt and respond to region-specific challenges is essential for the effective implementation of environmental health policies, reflecting geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic differences.

This study explores the development, roles, and key initiatives of the Regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea, detailing their evolution through four distinct phases and their impact on environmental health policy and local governance. It chronicles the establishment and transformation of these centers from their inception in May 2007, through four developmental stages. Originally named Environmental Disease Research Centers, they were subsequently renamed Environmental Health Centers following legislative changes. The analysis includes the expansion in the number of centers, the transfer of responsibilities to local governments, and the launch of significant projects such as the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS ). During the initial phase (May 2007–February 2009), the 10 centers concentrated on research-driven activities, shifting from a media-centered to a receptor-centered approach. In the second phase, prompted by the enactment of the Environmental Health Act, six additional centers were established, broadening their scope to address national environmental health issues. The third phase introduced Ko-CHENS, a 20-year national cohort project designed to influence environmental health policy by integrating research findings into policy frameworks. The fourth phase marked a decentralization of authority, empowering local governments and redefining the centers' roles to focus on regional environmental health challenges. The Regional Environmental Health Centers have significantly evolved and now play a crucial role in addressing local environmental health issues and supporting local government policies. Their capacity to adapt and respond to region-specific challenges is essential for the effective implementation of environmental health policies, reflecting geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic differences.

This study explores the development, roles, and key initiatives of the Regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea, detailing their evolution through four distinct phases and their impact on environmental health policy and local governance. It chronicles the establishment and transformation of these centers from their inception in May 2007, through four developmental stages. Originally named Environmental Disease Research Centers, they were subsequently renamed Environmental Health Centers following legislative changes. The analysis includes the expansion in the number of centers, the transfer of responsibilities to local governments, and the launch of significant projects such as the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS ). During the initial phase (May 2007–February 2009), the 10 centers concentrated on research-driven activities, shifting from a media-centered to a receptor-centered approach. In the second phase, prompted by the enactment of the Environmental Health Act, six additional centers were established, broadening their scope to address national environmental health issues. The third phase introduced Ko-CHENS, a 20-year national cohort project designed to influence environmental health policy by integrating research findings into policy frameworks. The fourth phase marked a decentralization of authority, empowering local governments and redefining the centers' roles to focus on regional environmental health challenges. The Regional Environmental Health Centers have significantly evolved and now play a crucial role in addressing local environmental health issues and supporting local government policies. Their capacity to adapt and respond to region-specific challenges is essential for the effective implementation of environmental health policies, reflecting geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic differences.

Background: This study evaluated the use of brainstem score (BSS) on pre-procedural diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to predict outcomes after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) patients and compared its predictive effectiveness to the critical area perfusion score (CAPS) on perfusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using RAPID. Methods: This study focused on ABAO patients who underwent MT after MRI at Dong-A University Hospital from 2013 to 2023. Ischemic lesion volume and DWI BSS were measured for all. For the group that underwent perfusion MRI using RAPID, CAPS were measured. The primary end point was a poor outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin scale [mRS], >2). Results: 71 patients had ABAO and underwent MT after MRI. The poor outcome group (66.2%) had significantly larger ischemic lesion volume and higher DWI BSS compared with the good outcome group. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, DWI BSS (odds ratio, 8.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.93-35.50; p<0.01) was an independent predictor of poor outcomes. In 26 patients, CAPS was measured on perfusion MRI. In this subgroup, poor outcome group (50.0%) had higher DWI BSS and CAPS than the good outcome group. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, DWI BSS remained a valid independent predictor for predicting outcomes, but CAPS did not function as an independent predictor. Conclusion In this study, the DWI BSS before MT in ABAO patients emerged as a useful imaging marker for predicting post-procedural outcomes. Its predictive ability is not only comparable to but even superior to CAPS on perfusion MRI.

This study explores the development, roles, and key initiatives of the Regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea, detailing their evolution through four distinct phases and their impact on environmental health policy and local governance. It chronicles the establishment and transformation of these centers from their inception in May 2007, through four developmental stages. Originally named Environmental Disease Research Centers, they were subsequently renamed Environmental Health Centers following legislative changes. The analysis includes the expansion in the number of centers, the transfer of responsibilities to local governments, and the launch of significant projects such as the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS ). During the initial phase (May 2007–February 2009), the 10 centers concentrated on research-driven activities, shifting from a media-centered to a receptor-centered approach. In the second phase, prompted by the enactment of the Environmental Health Act, six additional centers were established, broadening their scope to address national environmental health issues. The third phase introduced Ko-CHENS, a 20-year national cohort project designed to influence environmental health policy by integrating research findings into policy frameworks. The fourth phase marked a decentralization of authority, empowering local governments and redefining the centers' roles to focus on regional environmental health challenges. The Regional Environmental Health Centers have significantly evolved and now play a crucial role in addressing local environmental health issues and supporting local government policies. Their capacity to adapt and respond to region-specific challenges is essential for the effective implementation of environmental health policies, reflecting geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic differences.

This study explores the development, roles, and key initiatives of the Regional Environmental Health Centers in Korea, detailing their evolution through four distinct phases and their impact on environmental health policy and local governance. It chronicles the establishment and transformation of these centers from their inception in May 2007, through four developmental stages. Originally named Environmental Disease Research Centers, they were subsequently renamed Environmental Health Centers following legislative changes. The analysis includes the expansion in the number of centers, the transfer of responsibilities to local governments, and the launch of significant projects such as the Korean Children’s Environmental Health Study (Ko-CHENS ). During the initial phase (May 2007–February 2009), the 10 centers concentrated on research-driven activities, shifting from a media-centered to a receptor-centered approach. In the second phase, prompted by the enactment of the Environmental Health Act, six additional centers were established, broadening their scope to address national environmental health issues. The third phase introduced Ko-CHENS, a 20-year national cohort project designed to influence environmental health policy by integrating research findings into policy frameworks. The fourth phase marked a decentralization of authority, empowering local governments and redefining the centers' roles to focus on regional environmental health challenges. The Regional Environmental Health Centers have significantly evolved and now play a crucial role in addressing local environmental health issues and supporting local government policies. Their capacity to adapt and respond to region-specific challenges is essential for the effective implementation of environmental health policies, reflecting geographical, socioeconomic, and demographic differences.