Purpose: Relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) is a syndrome of physiological and/or psychological functioning experienced by female and male athletes that is caused by exposure to problematic low energy availability. For the prevention and intervention of REDs, awareness of REDs among sports physicians is important, but it is largely unknown. This study aimed to survey the awareness and clinical treatment experience of REDs in sports physicians. Methods: We conducted an online survey to assess awareness of the triad and REDs among sports physicians and members of The Korean Society of Sports Medicine. Results: A total of 69 members (62.2% male, including sports physicians) to this survey. Most participants (84.1%) were aware of the triad compared to fewer with awareness regarding REDs (23.2%). People who knew about the difference between REDs and triad was 33.3%, which was lower than those who did not (66.6%). Only 10.1% of the study subjects had experience treating REDs patients, and the biggest difficulty in treating patients was a lack of information and education (50.7%). It appeared that the most information about REDs was obtained from academic conferences (59.4%). Conclusion This survey found relatively low awareness of REDs among physicians treating athletes and sports professionals. Considering the various negative effects of REDs on athlete health and performance, education and promotion are needed to increase awareness among sports physicians and sports professionals.

Purpose: Relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) is a syndrome of physiological and/or psychological functioning experienced by female and male athletes that is caused by exposure to problematic low energy availability. For the prevention and intervention of REDs, awareness of REDs among sports physicians is important, but it is largely unknown. This study aimed to survey the awareness and clinical treatment experience of REDs in sports physicians. Methods: We conducted an online survey to assess awareness of the triad and REDs among sports physicians and members of The Korean Society of Sports Medicine. Results: A total of 69 members (62.2% male, including sports physicians) to this survey. Most participants (84.1%) were aware of the triad compared to fewer with awareness regarding REDs (23.2%). People who knew about the difference between REDs and triad was 33.3%, which was lower than those who did not (66.6%). Only 10.1% of the study subjects had experience treating REDs patients, and the biggest difficulty in treating patients was a lack of information and education (50.7%). It appeared that the most information about REDs was obtained from academic conferences (59.4%). Conclusion This survey found relatively low awareness of REDs among physicians treating athletes and sports professionals. Considering the various negative effects of REDs on athlete health and performance, education and promotion are needed to increase awareness among sports physicians and sports professionals.

Purpose: Relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) is a syndrome of physiological and/or psychological functioning experienced by female and male athletes that is caused by exposure to problematic low energy availability. For the prevention and intervention of REDs, awareness of REDs among sports physicians is important, but it is largely unknown. This study aimed to survey the awareness and clinical treatment experience of REDs in sports physicians. Methods: We conducted an online survey to assess awareness of the triad and REDs among sports physicians and members of The Korean Society of Sports Medicine. Results: A total of 69 members (62.2% male, including sports physicians) to this survey. Most participants (84.1%) were aware of the triad compared to fewer with awareness regarding REDs (23.2%). People who knew about the difference between REDs and triad was 33.3%, which was lower than those who did not (66.6%). Only 10.1% of the study subjects had experience treating REDs patients, and the biggest difficulty in treating patients was a lack of information and education (50.7%). It appeared that the most information about REDs was obtained from academic conferences (59.4%). Conclusion This survey found relatively low awareness of REDs among physicians treating athletes and sports professionals. Considering the various negative effects of REDs on athlete health and performance, education and promotion are needed to increase awareness among sports physicians and sports professionals.

Purpose: Relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) is a syndrome of physiological and/or psychological functioning experienced by female and male athletes that is caused by exposure to problematic low energy availability. For the prevention and intervention of REDs, awareness of REDs among sports physicians is important, but it is largely unknown. This study aimed to survey the awareness and clinical treatment experience of REDs in sports physicians. Methods: We conducted an online survey to assess awareness of the triad and REDs among sports physicians and members of The Korean Society of Sports Medicine. Results: A total of 69 members (62.2% male, including sports physicians) to this survey. Most participants (84.1%) were aware of the triad compared to fewer with awareness regarding REDs (23.2%). People who knew about the difference between REDs and triad was 33.3%, which was lower than those who did not (66.6%). Only 10.1% of the study subjects had experience treating REDs patients, and the biggest difficulty in treating patients was a lack of information and education (50.7%). It appeared that the most information about REDs was obtained from academic conferences (59.4%). Conclusion This survey found relatively low awareness of REDs among physicians treating athletes and sports professionals. Considering the various negative effects of REDs on athlete health and performance, education and promotion are needed to increase awareness among sports physicians and sports professionals.

Purpose: Relative energy deficiency in sport (REDs) is a syndrome of physiological and/or psychological functioning experienced by female and male athletes that is caused by exposure to problematic low energy availability. For the prevention and intervention of REDs, awareness of REDs among sports physicians is important, but it is largely unknown. This study aimed to survey the awareness and clinical treatment experience of REDs in sports physicians. Methods: We conducted an online survey to assess awareness of the triad and REDs among sports physicians and members of The Korean Society of Sports Medicine. Results: A total of 69 members (62.2% male, including sports physicians) to this survey. Most participants (84.1%) were aware of the triad compared to fewer with awareness regarding REDs (23.2%). People who knew about the difference between REDs and triad was 33.3%, which was lower than those who did not (66.6%). Only 10.1% of the study subjects had experience treating REDs patients, and the biggest difficulty in treating patients was a lack of information and education (50.7%). It appeared that the most information about REDs was obtained from academic conferences (59.4%). Conclusion This survey found relatively low awareness of REDs among physicians treating athletes and sports professionals. Considering the various negative effects of REDs on athlete health and performance, education and promotion are needed to increase awareness among sports physicians and sports professionals.

Kidney transplantation (KTP) lowers the mortality and morbidity of patients with end-stage renal disease. Post-transplantation infection and antibody mediated rejection (AMR) are the most common complications. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive carrier donors and high anti A/B antibody titer ABO incompatible KTP could lead to recipient hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and AMR. Here, we report a case of successful KTP in a 41-year-old male with a high titer of ABO incompatible and HBsAg positive donor. He underwent seven rounds of plasmapheresis, low dose intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab treatment to inhibit antibody production and remove antibodies from the serum, after which he was administered anti-viral agent for HBV prophylaxis. The recipient maintained successful allograft function for 6 months after transplantation; therefore, we report that desensitization and anti-viral treatment achieved successful outcome in a 1:512 anti A/B antibody titer ABO incompatible and hepatitis B carrier donor KTP.
Adult ; Allografts ; Antibodies ; Antibody Formation ; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens ; Hepatitis B virus ; Hepatitis B* ; Hepatitis* ; Humans ; Immunoglobulins ; Kidney Failure, Chronic ; Kidney Transplantation* ; Kidney* ; Male ; Mortality ; Plasmapheresis ; Rituximab ; Tissue Donors

Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is an important cause of hypertension, allograft dysfunction, and graft loss. Patient and allograft survival rates are lower in patients with TRAS. Causes of TRAS include acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, atherosclerosis of recipient, and/or donor. Technical problems due to surgery are a common cause of early TRAS. A 62-year-old male in end stage renal disease received kidney transplant surgery. There was 5/6 mismatch of human leukocyte antigen and the panel reactive antibody of patient was class I 0% and class II 0%. End to side anastomosis was done between the graft's renal artery and the patient's common iliac artery. His serum creatinine was measured at 6.4 mg/dL before transplantation but his serum creatinine level did not fall below 2.6 mg/dL at 5 days postoperative. His blood pressures was 160/90~180/100 mmHg. There was a significant TRAS (about 80% luminal narrowing) at the arterial anastomosis site on the renal magnetic resonance angiography. We performed percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the stenotic lesion. The balloon angioplasty was done with a 5 mm balloon and low pressure (8 mmHg, nominal pressure was 10 mmHg) at the stenotic lesion. The arterial pressure gradient was 8 mmHg (recipient's common iliac arterial pressure, 147/73 mmHg; poststenotic segmental renal arterial pressure, 139/70 mmHg) just before the balloon angioplasty. After PTA, the arterial pressure gradient became 3 mmHg (recipient's common iliac arterial pressure, 157/66 mmHg; poststenotic segmental renal arterial pressure, 154/65 mmHg). The arterial size and blood flow recovered to within normal range and serum creatinine level was normal after PTA. PTA using low pressure and a small balloon was safe and effective modality in treating early TRAS.
Allografts ; Angioplasty ; Angioplasty, Balloon* ; Arterial Pressure ; Atherosclerosis ; Calcineurin ; Creatinine ; Cytomegalovirus Infections ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Iliac Artery ; Kidney ; Kidney Failure, Chronic ; Kidney Transplantation ; Leukocytes ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Phenobarbital ; Reference Values ; Renal Artery Obstruction* ; Renal Artery* ; Survival Rate ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants

Acute antibody-mediated rejection is the major cause of graft failure in the early stage of kidney transplantation. Preoperative treatment and early diagnosis of acute rejection is very important to prevent graft loss in sensitized patients. High panel reactive antibody (PRA) means a likelihood of acute rejection, and the recipient of high PRA needs adequate pretreatment for kidney transplantation. However, there is not sufficient time and chances for desensitization in deceased kidney transplants. We report a successful renal transplant outcome in a 47-year-old-woman with high PRA levels (Class I 97.5%, Class II 36.7%). The cross match was negative on the CDC (ELISA) and flowcytometric methods. Plasma exchange was performed on the recipient before transplantation (fresh frozen plasma replacement, 1.3 plasma volume) and immediately after plasma exchange she was given 200 mg of rituximab. She received basiliximab and methyl prednisolone induction therapy and was maintained on steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and tacrolimus. Graft function was normal immediately after transplantation, but decreased urinary output and elevated serum creatinine was noted on POD 5. On POD 6, a graft biopsy revealed acute cellular rejection (Type IIa) and antibody-mediated rejection (Type II). On 9~13 days after transplantation, additional plasma exchange was performed every other day, and steroid pulse therapy was performed 3 times. After normalization of urinary output and serum creatinine, the patient was discharged and is being followed up on. In conclusion, immunologically careful preparation and pretransplant treatment may be needed on the negative cross match in cadaveric kidney recipients with high levels of PRA.
Antibodies, Monoclonal ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived ; Biopsy ; Cadaver ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) ; Creatinine ; Early Diagnosis ; Graft Rejection ; Humans ; Immunization ; Kidney ; Kidney Transplantation ; Mycophenolic Acid ; Plasma ; Plasma Exchange ; Prednisolone ; Recombinant Fusion Proteins ; Rejection (Psychology) ; Rituximab ; Steroids ; Tacrolimus ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants

Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) developing simultaneously with acute cellular rejection has been rarely reported as a long-term complication of renal transplantation, and it can present on top of another chronic pathology affecting the graft. A 51-year-old female patient with chronic kidney disease of unknown etiology received renal transplantation 12 years ago from a living unrelated donor with 3 HLA mismatches. She received induction therapy with methylprednisolone and was maintained on steroids, mycophenolate mofetil and cyclosporine A (CsA). For a period of twelve years post-transplantation, she was clinically and biochemically stable. She presented with a rise in serum creatinine (SCr.) from 1.3 mg/dL to 2.4 mg/dL but did not have proteinuria. Graft biopsy revealed findings suggestive of acute cellular rejection on top of antibody-mediated rejection (type II) and chronic calcineurin inhibitor toxicity. Panel reactive antibody (PRA) test levels were 3.6%, 91.7% for class I and II respectively. The patient was treated with high-dose methylprednisolone for 3 days but serum creatinine was not fully normalised. After 2 weeks from initial methyl-PDS pulse therapy, she received intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange and anti-CD20 (rituximab). Cyclosporine was changed to tacrolimus. She achieved a complete response, and SCr. was maintained at 1.3 mg/dL without proteinuria. Follow-up PRA test levels were 0%, 75% for class I and II. Current therapies have had considerable success in reversing mixed, acute humoral and cellular rejection since it is being identified quickly and treated aggressively. The best use of rituximab to treat AMR should be evaluated in controlled trials using dosing strategies that include longer courses or retreatment schedules.
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived ; Appointments and Schedules ; Biopsy ; Calcineurin ; Creatinine ; Cyclosporine ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Graft Rejection ; Humans ; Immunoglobulins ; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous ; Kidney Transplantation ; Methylprednisolone ; Middle Aged ; Mycophenolic Acid ; Plasma Exchange ; Plasmapheresis ; Proteinuria ; Rejection (Psychology) ; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic ; Retreatment ; Rituximab ; Steroids ; Tacrolimus ; Transplants ; Unrelated Donors

PURPOSE: The presence of C4d in peritubular capillaries (C4d (PTC)) as a diagnostic in-situ marker of acute humoral rejection and CD20 as marker of B-cell deposition in graft kidney has been reported to be related to steroid resistance and poor outcome. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the clinical significance of C4d and CD20 in allograft renal biopsies by immunohistochemistry technique. And we also evaluated the relationships between C4d and CD20 positive B lymphocytes. METHODS: We studied 22 patients who had been biopsied for suspected acute rejection. Biopsies were classified by updated Banff 97 criteria. Of the 22 cases, borderline rejection and Banff 1A were 11 cases respectively and no case had a vascular lesion. Paraffin sections were stained with monoclonal antibodies (anti-C4d and -CD20) using an immunohistochemistry technique and the results of immunohistochemistry were analyzed by clinical data. RESULTS: Of the 22 cases, 22.7% (5/22) showed diffuse and 40.9% (9/22) showed focal C4d positivity in peritubular capillaries. The grafts failed to survive in 20% (1/5) of the diffuse (P), 44.4% (4/9) of the focal, and 0% (0/8) of the negative group for 2 years since postbiopsies, however, the C4d staining was not statistically related to graft loss and graft survival rates (P=0.091, P=0.106 respectively). The C4d positivity was significantly related to the level of serum creatinine (P=0.042) and to steroid pulsing therapy resistance (P=0.030). However C4d deposition was not associated with recipient gender, age, type of donor (living vs deceased), HLA matching, induction, and Banff classification. On the CD20 immunostaining, 50.0% (11/22) showed negative reactivity, 9.1% (2/22) one nodule, 40.9% (9/22) 2 nodules. The presence and the number of CD20 positive nodules were not correlated to the C4d clinical data. But, the degree of C4d staining was statistically related with the presence of CD20 positive nodules (P=0.029). CONCLUSION: The peritubular capillary C4d is clinically important however, not likely a significant predictor of grafts survival rates in mild rejection. The clinical implication of CD20 positive B lymphocyte nodules in acute rejection was not demonstrated in this study. But, CD20 positive B lymphocyte may be a positive linkage with C4d and participate in humoral rejection.
Antibodies, Monoclonal ; B-Lymphocytes ; Biopsy ; Capillaries ; Creatinine ; Graft Survival ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Kidney ; Lymphocytes ; Paraffin ; Rejection (Psychology) ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Tissue Donors ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Transplants