INTRODUCTION: A successful vaccination programme forms the cornerstone of controlling coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The unprecedented speed of COVID-19 vaccine development and lack of long-term data have raised fears regarding its safety and efficacy. Vaccine hesitancy can undermine the uptake, and hence success of the vaccination programme. Given the high complication rates of COVID-19 infections in kidney transplant recipients, it is particularly important to identify and address vaccine hesitancy in this population. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among kidney transplant recipients attending transplant clinic between 5 April and 5 May 2021. The survey assessed attitudes towards COVID-19, willingness/hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccination, vaccination concerns and prompts to vaccination. This was scored on a Likert scale with scores ranging from 'strongly disagree' - 1 point to 'strongly agree' - 5 points. RESULTS: One hundred and one completed responses were captured. Of these, 86% respondents reported to agree or strongly agree to vaccination. This was despite significant concerns of allograft rejection (mean score 4.12, standard deviation [SD] 0.97) and decreased immunosuppressant efficacy (mean score 4.14, SD 0.96) with vaccination. Multivariable model showed a positive association with transplant vintage of ≥ 5 years (median 2.41), lower educational levels of secondary school or less (median 5.82) and healthcare provider advocacy (median 1.88) in predicting vaccine acceptance. CONCLUSIONS Vaccine acceptance rate was high among kidney transplant recipients. Vaccine hesitancy remains a concern in those with a transplant vintage of less than 5 years and those with tertiary educational level. Healthcare provider advocacy is important in improving vaccine acceptance rates.
Humans ; Kidney Transplantation ; Singapore/epidemiology* ; Male ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; COVID-19 Vaccines ; COVID-19/epidemiology* ; Middle Aged ; Adult ; Transplant Recipients/psychology* ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data* ; Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology* ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Vaccination/psychology* ; Aged ; SARS-CoV-2

BACKGROUND: Effective interventions during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic require an understanding of patients' knowledge and perceptions that influence their behaviour. Our study assessed knowledge of COVID-19 among kidney transplant recipients and donors, hitherto unevaluated. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 325 kidney transplant recipients and 172 donors between 1 May 2020 and 30 June 2020. The survey questionnaire assessed knowledge levels of COVID-19, sociodemographic data, health status, psychosocial impact of COVID-19 and precautionary behaviours during the pandemic. RESULTS: The mean COVID-19 knowledge score of the study population was 7.5 (standard deviation: 2.2) out of 10. The mean score was significantly higher among kidney recipients compared to kidney donors (7.9 [1.9] vs. 6.7 [2.6]; P <0.001). Younger age (21-49 vs. ≥50 years) and higher education (diploma and higher vs. secondary and lower) were associated with significantly higher knowledge scores in donors, but not among recipients ( P -interactions ≤0.01). In both kidney recipients and donors, financial concerns and/or social isolation were associated with lower knowledge levels. CONCLUSIONS Concerted efforts are needed to improve COVID-19 knowledge in kidney transplant recipients and donors, particularly older donors, donors with lower education and patients with financial concerns or feelings of social isolation. Intensive patient education may mitigate the impact of education levels on COVID-19 knowledge levels.
Humans ; COVID-19/epidemiology* ; Kidney Transplantation ; Middle Aged ; Singapore/epidemiology* ; Male ; Female ; Adult ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Transplant Recipients/psychology* ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tissue Donors/psychology* ; SARS-CoV-2 ; Young Adult ; Aged ; Pandemics

OBJECTIVES: End stage renal disease (ESRD) is a major disease that seriously threatens the health of young people, and kidney transplantation is an effective treatment method to improve its prognosis.Young ESRD patients at a critical stage of life development often face significant physical and psychological challenges while waiting for kidney transplantation. Their psychological state directly affects treatment compliance and transplantation outcomes.This study aims to explore the psychological experiences of young patients with end stage renal disease during the waiting period for kidney transplantation, and provide a reference for formulating relevant psychological intervention measures. METHODS: A descriptive qualitative research design was adopted. Using purposive sampling, 20 young ESRD patients awaiting for kidney transplantation at the Transplantation Center of Xiangya Third Hospital, Central South University, from June to August 2024, were recruited. Based on the socio-ecological systems theory, a semi-structured interview outline was developed, and directed content analysis was applied to analyze the interview data. RESULTS: According to the results of qualitative interviews, 3 themes and 9 sub-themes were summarized as follows: Microsystem (disease pain experience, anxiety during transplantation waiting period, cognitive differentiation and coping differences), mesosystem (imbalance of family roles and dependent guilt, physician-patient trust dynamics, ambivalence toward peer support), and macrosystem (decision-making powerlessness caused by information asymmetry, sociocultural stigma and public bias, institutional dependence and passive behavior). CONCLUSIONS Young ESRD patients experience complex psychological experiences during the waiting period for kidney transplantation. Healthcare providers should explore corresponding intervention measures based on patients' psychological status to improve their waiting period experience and promote both physical and mental health.
Humans ; Kidney Transplantation/psychology* ; Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery* ; Qualitative Research ; Female ; Male ; Adult ; Adaptation, Psychological ; Waiting Lists ; Young Adult ; Adolescent ; Anxiety/psychology*

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the psychosocial status of candidates for deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT) in South Korea and identify factors associated with high-risk psychosocial status.METHODS: The descriptive cross-sectional design included application of a standardized transplantation-specific assessment tool, the Psychosocial Assessment Candidacy Transplantation (PACT) instrument, and review of candidates' medical records. A total of 157 patients awaiting DDKT were recruited from a Korean organ transplantation center. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and binary logistic regression. Candidates were divided into high- and low-psychosocial risk groups using 3 as the cutoff point of PACT.RESULTS: The mean score for the PACT final rating was 2.10, and the lowest average subscale score was 2.30 for understanding the processes of transplantation and follow up. Poor physical candidacy, especially due to comorbidities, and older age were associated with high psychosocial risk.CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed that the psychosocial status of Korean DDKT candidates was problematic. Development of systematic management programs for effective clinical strategies in the care of candidates is crucial to maintain their desirable psychosocial status in case of an emergency DDKT operation and improve post-transplantation outcomes. Continuous education is absolutely necessary to enhance understanding of the transplantation process for high-risk psychosocial candidates. Additionally, nurses and transplantation professionals should screen candidates with high-risk psychosocial status early in the process using transplantation-specific assessment tools and provide intensive interventions, particularly for poor physical candidacy patients and older candidates.
Comorbidity ; Education ; Emergencies ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation ; Kidney ; Korea ; Logistic Models ; Medical Records ; Nursing Assessment ; Organ Transplantation ; Psychology ; Tissue Donors ; Transplants ; Waiting Lists

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to develop an Empowerment Education Program (EEP) for kidney transplant patients and to test the program's effects on uncertainty, self-care ability, and compliance. METHODS: The research was conducted using a nonequivalent control group with a pretest-posttest design. The participants were 53 outpatients (experimental group: 25, control group: 28) who were receiving hospital treatment after kidney transplants. After the pre-test, patients in the experimental group underwent a weekly EEP for six weeks. The post-test was conducted immediately after, and four weeks after the program's completion in the same manner as the pre-test. For the control group, we conducted a post-test six and ten weeks after the pre-test, without and program intervention. A repeated measure ANOVA was performed to compare the change scores on main outcomes. RESULTS: Uncertainty was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group, both immediately after (t=-3.84, p=<.001) and 4 weeks after (t=-4.51 p=<.001) the program, whereas self-care ability (t=5.81, p=<.001), (t=5.84, p=<.001) and compliance (t=5.07, p=<.001), (t=5.45, p=<.001) were significantly higher. CONCLUSION: Kidney transplant patients who underwent an EEP showed a decrease in uncertainty and an improvement in self-care ability and compliance. Thus, our findings confirmed that an EEP can be an independent intervention method for improving and maintaining the health of kidney transplant patients.
Compliance ; Education* ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation* ; Kidney* ; Methods ; Outpatients ; Patient Compliance ; Power (Psychology)* ; Self Care ; Uncertainty

Duplicated ureters are the most common congenital malformation of the upper urinary tract, but there are few reports on the transplantation of kidneys with duplicated ureters. We introduce different techniques for the ureteroneocystostomy of double ureters and long-term results. We specifically detail the experience of two patients with duplicated ureters at Bong Seng Memorial Hospital from March 1995 to May 2012. In our first case, the top technique of spatulating and suturing duplicated ureters was applied with the bottom technique for double ureteroneocystostomy. The operation time was 4 hours and 45 minutes, while the ureteroneocystostomy took 32 minutes. In the second case a double-armed 4.0 Vicryl suture was placed on each tip of the ureter and both needles passed from the inside out through the bladder wall. The ureters were pulled into the bladder and the suture was tied on the serosa of the bladder. The operation time was 3 hours and 50 minutes, while the ureteroneocystostomy took 15 minutes. Neither urological complications nor urinary tract infections were observed in the follow-up period and no double-J stent was needed. We therefore conclude that these two techniques are available procedures for handling duplicated ureters, with the technique applied in the second case particularly time-effective.
Follow-Up Studies ; Handling (Psychology) ; Humans ; Kidney ; Kidney Transplantation ; Needles ; Polyglactin 910 ; Serous Membrane ; Stents ; Sutures ; Transplants ; Ureter ; Urinary Bladder ; Urinary Tract ; Urinary Tract Infections

The repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in patients with functioning renal transplant is critical because it is important to avoid ischemic and reperfusion injury to the transplanted kidney. Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) avoids aortic cross clamping and can prevent renal graft ischemia. Here we report the endovascular management and outcome of AAA in two renal transplant patients using a bifurcated aortic stent graft. One patient underwent EVAR using a small amount of contrast (30 mL) due to decreased renal function resulting from chronic rejection. Another patient had EVAR performed with iliac conduit because of the heavily calcified, stenotic lesion of external iliac artery. EVAR in patients with a renal transplant is a feasible option without impairing renal arterial flow.
Aneurysm ; Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal ; Constriction ; Endovascular Procedures ; Humans ; Iliac Artery ; Ischemia ; Kidney ; Kidney Transplantation ; Rejection (Psychology) ; Reperfusion Injury ; Stents ; Transplants

BACKGROUND: Steroid pulse therapy has been used for patients with acute rejection after kidney transplantation. The ABCB1 gene codes for P-glycoprotein, a transporter that is involved in the metabolism of steroids. However, the role of ABCB1 polymorphisms has not been investigated in patients with acute rejection after kidney transplantation. METHODS: Among 763 patients that received kidney or simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation at Seoul National University Hospital between May 1996 and July 2009, 684 patients agreed to genetic sampling for polymorphisms. Acute rejection was defined as biopsy-proven, acute cellular rejection with increased serum creatinine, or in the context of delayed or slow graft function. Steroid-resistance was defined as no improvement in serum creatinine, need for additional OKT3 or ATG treatment, or repeated acute rejection within 30 days. Three polymorphisms of ABCB1 gene (C1236T, C3435T, G2677T/A) were assessed. RESULTS: C allele frequency of C3435T was 59.3% and of C1236T 40.1%. Patients who were steroid-resistant (n=37) had higher serum creatinine at kidney biopsy compared to those who were steroid-sensitive (n=49, P<0.001). The frequency of ABCB1 gene polymorphisms (C1236T and C3435T) did not differ significantly between patients who were steroid-sensitive and those who were resistant. An association with G2677T/A could not be analyzed due to a high failure rate of genotyping. CONCLUSIONS: ABCB1 gene polymorphisms (C1236T and C3435T) were not associated with steroid resistance in patients with acute cellular rejection after kidney transplantation.
Biopsy ; Creatinine ; Gene Frequency ; Humans ; Kidney ; Kidney Transplantation ; Muromonab-CD3 ; P-Glycoprotein ; Rejection (Psychology) ; Steroids ; Transplants

C4d is produced from the direct interaction between antibodies and tissue injury at an antibody binding site in a graft. C4d deposition along peritubular capillaries (PTCs) in a renal allograft is a characteristic finding of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), and is a useful diagnostic tool of AMR. The C4d along PTCs is associated with poor graft survival. Therefore C4d is regarded as a biomarker of AMR and was included in the diagnosis criteria of AMR at 2007 Banff conference. However, although C4d assay is widely used, it has several limitations. ABO-incompatible transplantations develop C4d along the PTCs in the majority of grafts but this seems to be graft accommodation rather than AMR. Recent studies reported that more than half of renal allograft biopsies with chronic AMR were C4d-negative. Without treatment, the C4d-negative AMR can cause scarring within the graft, transplant glomerulopathy (TG) or even graft loss. C4d is not a certain indicator of antibody-mediated rejection and C4d staining is not always highly sensitive for detecting AMR. Measuring endothelial gene expression in kidney graft biopsies with alloantibody can be another sensitive and specific method to diagnose AMR and predict graft outcomes. Because of these complexities, at the 2011 Banff meeting, criteria for diagnosis of chronic AMR in the kidney were refined, and the need for inclusion of C4d-negative AMR in the Banff classification was investigated.
Antibodies ; Binding Sites, Antibody ; Biopsy ; Capillaries ; Cicatrix ; Factor IX ; Gene Expression ; Graft Survival ; Kidney ; Rejection (Psychology) ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Transplants

The limited donor organ supply is a main problem for transplant surgeons in Korea, and forces them to use organs from extended sources. In one such case, we reused a transplanted kidney allograft in August 2012. This was the first successful case involving the reuse of a transplanted kidney allograft in Korea. The kidney donor was a 44-year-old man brain-dead due to spontaneous subdural hemorrhage. He received a kidney transplant from his sister in 2006. The second recipient was a 59-year-old man who had been receiving hemodialysis for 11 years. There were full human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matches between the first donor and the first recipient, and two HLA mismatches between the first donor and the second recipient. Fortunately, we were able to perform a crossmatch test between the first donor and the second recipient as well as the first recipient and the second recipient (with the first donor's agreement). We used the left iliac artery for perfusion instead of the aorta during organ procurement. The cold ischemic time was 4 hours and the initial kidney function was excellent. The patient has been doing well, without any significant complications or rejections, for 3 weeks. His last serum creatinine level was 0.91 mg/dL. Our case shows that the reuse of kidney allografts could be a possible solution for the shortage of donor kidneys. However, this method requires careful consideration and an agreement among participants before its performance.
Aorta ; Brain Death ; Cold Ischemia ; Creatinine ; Hematoma, Subdural ; Humans ; Iliac Artery ; Kidney ; Kidney Transplantation ; Korea ; Leukocytes ; Perfusion ; Rejection (Psychology) ; Renal Dialysis ; Siblings ; Tissue and Organ Procurement ; Tissue Donors ; Transplantation, Homologous ; Transplants