Limited data exist regarding the real-world practices and clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEFs).Using nationwide registry data from South Korea, we aimed to investigate long-term outcomes and clinical practices, especially implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) implantation, in patients with reduced LVEFs at least 40 days after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Of 13,056 patients with AMI between 2011 and 2015, we analyzed 350 (median age, 66 years [interquartile range, 56-75]) who had LVEFs <40% on follow-up transthoracic echocardiogram 40 days after the index event. The primary outcome was cardiac-cause mortality at 3 years. Secondary outcomes comprised major cardiovascular events as well as outcomes defined by the use of ICDs, cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-Ds), and electrophysiology studies. Among 350 patients, 39 (11.1%) died from cardiac causes during 3 years of follow-up. Eleven (3.1%) were hospitalized for ventricular tachycardia. The rate of ICD or CRT-D implantation up to 3 years was 5.7% (20/350). Cox time-to-event analysis revealed older age, LVEF <30%, diabetes mellitus, and previous MI or revascularization as positively associated with cardiac death, whereas the use of statins and body weight <67 kg were negatively associated. This nationwide Korean registry demonstrated that only 5.7% of patients who had reduced LVEFs after 40 days of AMI underwent ICD implantations over 3 years. Considering the high mortality, concerted efforts are needed to improve clinical outcomes for patients who may have been candidates for ICD implantation.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition characterized by hyperglycemia. While lifestyle modifications and oral medications are initial treatments, many patients require injectable therapies like insulin and incretin-based drugs. Insulin therapy, a cornerstone treatment for T2DM, can effectively control blood sugar but is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. Incretin-based therapies, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists offer improved glycemic control, weight loss, and reduced cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have shown the superiority of incretin-based therapies over basal insulin. Among these, GLP-1/GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) receptor dual agonists like tirzepatide have demonstrated significant weight loss and improved glycemic control. Selection of injectable therapy should be individualized based on factors like glycemic goals, cardiovascular risk, hypoglycemia risk, and patient preference. While insulin remains a useful option, incretin-based therapies, especially newer agents, offer promising therapeutic benefits for many patients with T2DM.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition characterized by hyperglycemia. While lifestyle modifications and oral medications are initial treatments, many patients require injectable therapies like insulin and incretin-based drugs. Insulin therapy, a cornerstone treatment for T2DM, can effectively control blood sugar but is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. Incretin-based therapies, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists offer improved glycemic control, weight loss, and reduced cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have shown the superiority of incretin-based therapies over basal insulin. Among these, GLP-1/GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) receptor dual agonists like tirzepatide have demonstrated significant weight loss and improved glycemic control. Selection of injectable therapy should be individualized based on factors like glycemic goals, cardiovascular risk, hypoglycemia risk, and patient preference. While insulin remains a useful option, incretin-based therapies, especially newer agents, offer promising therapeutic benefits for many patients with T2DM.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition characterized by hyperglycemia. While lifestyle modifications and oral medications are initial treatments, many patients require injectable therapies like insulin and incretin-based drugs. Insulin therapy, a cornerstone treatment for T2DM, can effectively control blood sugar but is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. Incretin-based therapies, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists offer improved glycemic control, weight loss, and reduced cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have shown the superiority of incretin-based therapies over basal insulin. Among these, GLP-1/GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) receptor dual agonists like tirzepatide have demonstrated significant weight loss and improved glycemic control. Selection of injectable therapy should be individualized based on factors like glycemic goals, cardiovascular risk, hypoglycemia risk, and patient preference. While insulin remains a useful option, incretin-based therapies, especially newer agents, offer promising therapeutic benefits for many patients with T2DM.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition characterized by hyperglycemia. While lifestyle modifications and oral medications are initial treatments, many patients require injectable therapies like insulin and incretin-based drugs. Insulin therapy, a cornerstone treatment for T2DM, can effectively control blood sugar but is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. Incretin-based therapies, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists offer improved glycemic control, weight loss, and reduced cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have shown the superiority of incretin-based therapies over basal insulin. Among these, GLP-1/GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) receptor dual agonists like tirzepatide have demonstrated significant weight loss and improved glycemic control. Selection of injectable therapy should be individualized based on factors like glycemic goals, cardiovascular risk, hypoglycemia risk, and patient preference. While insulin remains a useful option, incretin-based therapies, especially newer agents, offer promising therapeutic benefits for many patients with T2DM.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Background and Objectives: The Fractional Flow Reserve and Intravascular UltrasoundGuided Intervention Strategy for Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Intermediate Stenosis (FLAVOUR) trial demonstrated non-inferiority of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI. We sought to investigate the cost-effectiveness of FFR-guided PCI compared to IVUS-guided PCI in Korea. Methods: A 2-part cost-effectiveness model, composed of a short-term decision tree model and a long-term Markov model, was developed for patients who underwent PCI to treat intermediate stenosis (40% to 70% stenosis by visual estimation on coronary angiography).The lifetime healthcare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated from the healthcare system perspective. Transition probabilities were mainly referred from the FLAVOUR trial, and healthcare costs were mainly obtained through analysis of Korean National Health Insurance claims data. Health utilities were mainly obtained from the Seattle Angina Questionnaire responses of FLAVOUR trial participants mapped to EQ-5D. Results: From the Korean healthcare system perspective, the base-case analysis showed that FFR-guided PCI was 2,451 U.S. dollar lower in lifetime healthcare costs and 0.178 higher in QALYs compared to IVUS-guided PCI. FFR-guided PCI remained more likely to be cost-effective over a wide range of willingness-to-pay thresholds in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Based on the results from the FLAVOUR trial, FFR-guided PCI is projected to decrease lifetime healthcare costs and increase QALYs compared with IVUS-guided PCI in intermediate coronary lesion, and it is a dominant strategy in Korea.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition characterized by hyperglycemia. While lifestyle modifications and oral medications are initial treatments, many patients require injectable therapies like insulin and incretin-based drugs. Insulin therapy, a cornerstone treatment for T2DM, can effectively control blood sugar but is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. Incretin-based therapies, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists offer improved glycemic control, weight loss, and reduced cardiovascular risk. Recent studies have shown the superiority of incretin-based therapies over basal insulin. Among these, GLP-1/GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) receptor dual agonists like tirzepatide have demonstrated significant weight loss and improved glycemic control. Selection of injectable therapy should be individualized based on factors like glycemic goals, cardiovascular risk, hypoglycemia risk, and patient preference. While insulin remains a useful option, incretin-based therapies, especially newer agents, offer promising therapeutic benefits for many patients with T2DM.