Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.

Background: Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) is a histochemical technique used to detect tissue-bound autoantibodies and diagnose various immune-mediated skin diseases. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of DIF for each disorder, and the consistency between clinical, histopathological, and DIF results. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in 194 patients who underwent skin biopsy and DIF testing at our hospital between January 2011 and December 2021. An antibody panel against immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgA, IgM, C3, C1q, and fibrinogen was used. The concordance rate and κ-coefficient between the clinical, histopathological, and DIF results were evaluated. Results: DIF was observed to be positive in 87 cases; 51 cases of immune-mediated bullous diseases, seven cases of connective tissue diseases (CTDs), 25 cases of vasculitis, and four cases of other diseases. The overall sensitivity of DIF for immune-mediated bullous diseases was 71.8%, which was higher than that of histopathology (64.8%). In CTDs and vasculitis, the overall sensitivities of DIF were 30.4% and 65.8%, respectively, which were lower than those of histopathology (73.9% and 84.2%, respectively). In addition, good concordance among the clinical, histological, and DIF results was observed. Conclusion DIF is a useful diagnostic method, especially for immune-mediated bullous diseases, lupus erythematosus, and Henoch-Schonlein purpura. However, in other CTDs and vasculitis cases, the sensitivity of DIF is relatively low. Therefore, the diagnostic value of DIF along with clinical and histopathological findings will be maximized only when the DIF test is performed for appropriate diseases.

Eosinophilic dermatosis of hematological malignancy (EDHM) is a rare condition associated with various hematologic malignancies, characterized by pruritic skin eruptions. We present a case of a 66-year-old woman with follicular lymphoma who developed urticarial and vesicular lesions indicative of EDHM following chemotherapy.The diagnosis was confirmed through histological analysis, revealing eosinophilic infiltration. Treatment included additional chemotherapy sessions and topical corticosteroids, resulting in complete resolution of skin lesions and lymphoma. EDHM requires careful differentiation based on clinical and histological findings. The pathogenesis remains unclear, but addressing underlying hematologic malignancies appears crucial in management. Early recognition of EDHM is essential for appropriate intervention due to its limited therapeutic options.

Background: The use of small grafts, defined by a graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) less than 0.8, is possibly associated with an increased risk of graft loss in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). This study aims to validate risk factors for graft loss in LDLT with GRWR<0.8 using single-center data. Methods: LDLT recipients, who received GRWR<0.8 graft at Severance Hospital, between July 2007 and December 2022, were categorized based on the number of risk factors identified in previous Korean multicentric study: recipient age ≥60 years, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥15, and male donor. Baseline characteristics and graft survival were compared among these groups. Results: The median GRWR was 0.74 (interquartile range 0.69–0.78) and minimum was 0.49. Recipients with more risk factors exhibited lower graft survival rates: 100% at 5 years in the Risk 0 group (n=18), 72.7% in the Risk 1 group (n=20), and 54.5% in the Risk≥2 group (n=18, p=0.015). This trend was similar in subgroups of right lobe graft and the others (left lobe plus right posterior lobe), although not statistically significant. Donor age did not significantly affect graft survival in GRWR<0.8 transplants (78.9% for donor age≥45 vs. 69.2% for donor age<45, p=0.25). Conclusion This study confirms that the number of risk factors, including recipient age, MELD score, and donor sex, significantly impacts graft survival in LDLT with GRWR<0.8. These findings highlight the need for careful recipient and donor selection to improve outcomes in LDLT.

Blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm (BPDCN) is a rare and aggressive lymphoma with an overall incidence of 0.04 cases per 100,000 people. BPDCN is a hematopoietic clonal neoplasm that originates from plasmacytoid dendritic cell precursors. A 63-year-old man presented with multiple erythematous nodules over his whole body, including his face, trunk, and both upper and lower extremities that appeared 1 month ago. Skin biopsy showed diffuse dermal infiltration by monomorphic atypical lymphocytes with large, irregular nuclei and scant cytoplasms. Immunohistochemical staining was positive for CD4, CD56, and CD123. The karyotype test showed abnormalities in male chromosomes 47, XY, ＋8 [2]/46, and XY [25], and mutations in DNMT3A, TET2, SRSF2, and ATRX genes were identified in a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based acute myeloid leukemia gene panel test. The patient was diagnosed with BPDCN and treated with a KALLA 1406 regimen; however, he died on the 17th day of treatment.

Objective: Dysphagia is a common clinical condition characterized by difficulty in swallowing. It is sub-classified into oropharyngeal dysphagia, which refers to problems in the mouth and pharynx, and esophageal dysphagia, which refers to problems in the esophageal body and esophagogastric junction. Dysphagia can have a significant negative impact one’s physical health and quality of life as its severity increases. Therefore, proper assessment and management of dysphagia are critical for improving swallowing function and preventing complications. Thus a guideline was developed to provide evidence-based recommendations for assessment and management in patients with dysphagia. Methods: Nineteen key questions on dysphagia were developed. These questions dealt with various aspects of problems related to dysphagia, including assessment, management, and complications. A literature search for relevant articles was conducted using Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and one domestic database of KoreaMed, until April 2021. The level of evidence and recommendation grade were established according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Results: Early screening and assessment of videofluoroscopic swallowing were recommended for assessing the presence of dysphagia. Therapeutic methods, such as tongue and pharyngeal muscle strengthening exercises and neuromuscular electrical stimulation with swallowing therapy, were effective in improving swallowing function and quality of life in patients with dysphagia. Nutritional intervention and an oral care program were also recommended. Conclusion This guideline presents recommendations for the assessment and management of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia, including rehabilitative strategies.

Background and Objectives: Identifying patients with high bleeding risk (HBR) is important when making decisions for antiplatelet therapy strategy. This study evaluated the impact of ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) according to HBR in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients treated with drug eluting stents (DESs). Methods: In this post-hoc analysis of the TICO trial, HBR was defined by 2 approaches: meeting Academic Research Consortium for HBR (ARC-HBR) criteria or Predicting Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Stent Implantation and Subsequent DAPT (PRECISEDAPT) score ≥25. The primary outcome was a 3–12 months net adverse clinical event (composite of major bleeding and adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events). Results: Of the 2,980 patients without adverse events during the first 3 months after DES implantation, 453 (15.2%) were HBR by ARC-HBR criteria and 504 (16.9%) were HBR by PRECISE-DAPT score. The primary outcome rate was higher in HBR versus non-HBR patients (by ARC-HBR criteria: hazard ratio [HR], 2.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.76– 4.69; p<0.001; by PRECISE-DAPT score: HR, 3.09; 95% CI, 1.92–4.98; p<0.001). Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT was associated with lower primary outcome rate than ticagrelor-based 12-month DAPT regardless of HBR by ARC-HBR criteria, with similar magnitudes of therapy effect for HBR and non-HBR patients (p-interaction=0.400). Results were consistent by PRECISE-DAPT score (p-interaction=0.178). Conclusions In ACS patients treated with DESs, ticagrelor monotherapy after 3-month DAPT was associated with lower rate of adverse clinical outcomes regardless of HBR, with similar magnitudes of therapy effect between HBR and non-HBR.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02494895

Laryngotracheal separation (LTS) is one of the treatment options for intractable aspiration. Here, we present two cases of LTS with successful prevention of intractable aspiration.The first case was a 60-year-old man with severe hypoxic brain damage caused by hydrogen sulfide (H2S) intoxication; he was admitted to our department for comprehensive rehabilitation. Frequent tracheal suction was required due to the excess secretion from saliva aspiration. Matters were complicated when he suffered frequent regurgitation and vomiting, which was followed by tracheal aspiration. In the second case, a 78-year-old man presented with a severe traumatic brain injury. He had experienced recurrent aspiration pneumonia, which was unresponsive to conventional therapy. In both cases, LTS was performed to prevent intractable aspiration pneumonia. Subsequent to the LTS procedure, videofluoroscopic swallowing study showed complete prevention of the aspiration in both patients. Moreover, tracheal secretion was reduced, and tracheal suction was no longer required. Post-surgery, there was no development of aspiration pneumonia during their hospital stays.

Background/Aims: Surgical resection, transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are generally accepted as amenable treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently drug-eluting beads (DEB) which had several treatment advantages were introduced for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of DEB-TACE compared with RFA for the treatment of single small HCC. Methods: In this pilot non-randomized trial, we assessed retrospective data of 40 patients who underwent DEB-TACE (n=21) or RFA (n=19) for single small (≤3 centimeter in greatest dimension) HCC. The primary outcomes were tumor response and time to recurrence. The secondary outcome was treatment-related complications. Results: Complete response rate to DEB-TACE and RFA after first follow-up assessment was 90.5% and 94.7%, respectively (P=1.000). During mean follow-up of 87.6 months (95% confidence interval: 74.4-102), 7 patients experienced local recurrence. The 6- and 12-month cumulative local recurrence rate was 5.0% and 21.8% in DEB-TACE vs. 11.1% and 17.0% in RFA group (P=0.877). A total 14 distant intrahepatic recurrences were developed and 12- and 24-month cumulative distant intrahepatic recurrence rate was 20.6% and 42.7% in DEBTACE vs. 17.2% and 36.3% in RFA group (P=0.844). Two patients experienced gangrenous cholecystitis after DEB-TACE requiring cholecystectomy as treatment-related adverse event. Conclusions Tumor response and recurrence rate after single session of DEB-TACE or RFA were similar. DEB-TACE could be applied selectively in patients with a single small HCC if the other therapeutic modality is unfeasible.