1.Incidence and risk factors for recurrence of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing endoscopic extraction without prophylactic biliary stenting and subsequent cholecystectomy: a retrospective study in Japan
Hidehito SUMIYA ; Takahisa OGAWA ; Shinsuke KOSHITA ; Yoshihide KANNO ; Hiroaki KUSUNOSE ; Toshitaka SAKAI ; Keisuke YONAMINE ; Kazuaki MIYAMOTO ; Fumisato KOZAKAI ; Haruka OKANO ; Yuto MATSUOKA ; Kento HOSOKAWA ; Kei ITO
Clinical Endoscopy 2026;59(1):124-131
Background/Aims:
In patients undergoing endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones (CBDs) and subsequent cholecystectomy, CBDs sometimes recur during the preoperative and perioperative periods. In this study, the incidence and risk factors for CBDs recurrence were investigated.
Methods:
A total of 245 patients (mean age: 66 years; 138 men) who underwent cholecystectomy within 180 days of CBDs extraction between October 2017 and June 2023 were included. Recurrence was defined as the detection of the CBDs during the preoperative or perioperative period using imaging modalities such as computed tomography or re-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, regardless of the presence of cholangitis.
Results:
CBDs recurrence occurred in 4.1% of the patients (10/245). The median time to recurrence was 40 days. Preoperative recurrence was observed in nine patients, and only one patient had postoperative recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified cystic duct stones as the only significant risk factor for CBDs recurrence (hazard ratio, 15.6; 95% confidence interval, 3.7–66; p<0.001).
Conclusions
The risk of CBDs recurrence after endoscopic extraction during the pre and perioperative periods is high in patients with cystic duct stones. Prophylactic biliary stenting may be considered in high-risk patients.
2.Predictive factors for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: a retrospective study in Japan
Keisuke YONAMINE ; Shinsuke KOSHITA ; Yoshihide KANNO ; Takahisa OGAWA ; Hiroaki KUSUNOSE ; Toshitaka SAKAI ; Kazuaki MIYAMOTO ; Fumisato KOZAKAI ; Haruka OKANO ; Yuto MATSUOKA ; Kento HOSOKAWA ; Hidehito SUMIYA ; Yutaka NODA ; Kei ITO
Clinical Endoscopy 2025;58(3):457-464
Background/Aims:
The factors affecting the detection rate of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) in patients with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) have not been thoroughly studied. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to identify the predictive factors for histologically detecting level 1 or 2 LPSP using EUS-TA.
Methods:
Fifty patients with AIP were included in this study, and the primary outcome measures were the predictive factors for histologically detecting level 1 or 2 LPSP using EUS-TA.
Results:
Multivariate analysis identified the use of fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles as a significant predictive factor for LPSP detection (odds ratio, 15.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.62–141; ¬¬p=0.017). The rate of good-quality specimens (specimen adequacy score ≥4) was significantly higher for the FNB needle group than for the fine needle aspiration (FNA) needle group (97% vs. 56%; p<0.01), and the FNB needle group required significantly fewer needle passes than the FNA needle group (median, 2 vs. 3; p<0.01).
Conclusions
The use of FNB needles was the most important factor for the histological confirmation of LPSP using EUS-TA in patients with type 1 AIP.
3.Predictive factors for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: a retrospective study in Japan
Keisuke YONAMINE ; Shinsuke KOSHITA ; Yoshihide KANNO ; Takahisa OGAWA ; Hiroaki KUSUNOSE ; Toshitaka SAKAI ; Kazuaki MIYAMOTO ; Fumisato KOZAKAI ; Haruka OKANO ; Yuto MATSUOKA ; Kento HOSOKAWA ; Hidehito SUMIYA ; Yutaka NODA ; Kei ITO
Clinical Endoscopy 2025;58(3):457-464
Background/Aims:
The factors affecting the detection rate of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) in patients with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) have not been thoroughly studied. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to identify the predictive factors for histologically detecting level 1 or 2 LPSP using EUS-TA.
Methods:
Fifty patients with AIP were included in this study, and the primary outcome measures were the predictive factors for histologically detecting level 1 or 2 LPSP using EUS-TA.
Results:
Multivariate analysis identified the use of fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles as a significant predictive factor for LPSP detection (odds ratio, 15.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.62–141; ¬¬p=0.017). The rate of good-quality specimens (specimen adequacy score ≥4) was significantly higher for the FNB needle group than for the fine needle aspiration (FNA) needle group (97% vs. 56%; p<0.01), and the FNB needle group required significantly fewer needle passes than the FNA needle group (median, 2 vs. 3; p<0.01).
Conclusions
The use of FNB needles was the most important factor for the histological confirmation of LPSP using EUS-TA in patients with type 1 AIP.
4.Predictive factors for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: a retrospective study in Japan
Keisuke YONAMINE ; Shinsuke KOSHITA ; Yoshihide KANNO ; Takahisa OGAWA ; Hiroaki KUSUNOSE ; Toshitaka SAKAI ; Kazuaki MIYAMOTO ; Fumisato KOZAKAI ; Haruka OKANO ; Yuto MATSUOKA ; Kento HOSOKAWA ; Hidehito SUMIYA ; Yutaka NODA ; Kei ITO
Clinical Endoscopy 2025;58(3):457-464
Background/Aims:
The factors affecting the detection rate of lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP) using endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) in patients with type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) have not been thoroughly studied. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to identify the predictive factors for histologically detecting level 1 or 2 LPSP using EUS-TA.
Methods:
Fifty patients with AIP were included in this study, and the primary outcome measures were the predictive factors for histologically detecting level 1 or 2 LPSP using EUS-TA.
Results:
Multivariate analysis identified the use of fine needle biopsy (FNB) needles as a significant predictive factor for LPSP detection (odds ratio, 15.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.62–141; ¬¬p=0.017). The rate of good-quality specimens (specimen adequacy score ≥4) was significantly higher for the FNB needle group than for the fine needle aspiration (FNA) needle group (97% vs. 56%; p<0.01), and the FNB needle group required significantly fewer needle passes than the FNA needle group (median, 2 vs. 3; p<0.01).
Conclusions
The use of FNB needles was the most important factor for the histological confirmation of LPSP using EUS-TA in patients with type 1 AIP.
5.Prophylactic endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting to prevent acute cholecystitis induced after metallic stent placement for malignant biliary strictures: a retrospective study in Japan
Fumisato KOZAKAI ; Yoshihide KANNO ; Shinsuke KOSHITA ; Takahisa OGAWA ; Hiroaki KUSUNOSE ; Toshitaka SAKAI ; Keisuke YONAMINE ; Kazuaki MIYAMOTO ; Haruka OKANO ; Yuto MATSUOKA ; Kento HOSOKAWA ; Hidehito SUMIYA ; Kei ITO
Clinical Endoscopy 2024;57(5):647-655
Background/Aims:
Endoscopic biliary drainage using self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) for malignant biliary strictures occasionally induces acute cholecystitis (AC). This study evaluated the efficacy of prophylactic gallbladder stents (GBS) during SEMS placement.
Methods:
Among 158 patients who underwent SEMS placement for malignant biliary strictures between January 2018 and March 2023, 30 patients who attempted to undergo prophylactic GBS placement before SEMS placement were included.
Results:
Technical success was achieved in 21 cases (70.0%). The mean diameter of the cystic duct was more significant in the successful cases (6.5 mm vs. 3.7 mm, p<0.05). Adverse events occurred for 7 patients (23.3%: acute pancreatitis in 7; non-obstructive cholangitis in 1; perforation of the cystic duct in 1 with an overlap), all of which improved with conservative treatment. No patients developed AC when the GBS placement was successful, whereas 25 of the 128 patients (19.5%) without a prophylactic GBS developed AC during the median follow-up period of 357 days (p=0.043). In the multivariable analysis, GBS placement was a significant factor in preventing AC (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval, 0.37–0.99; p=0.045).
Conclusions
GBS may contribute to the prevention of AC after SEMS placement for malignant biliary strictures.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail