Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) offers substantial advantages in the management of degenerative spinal diseases, including accelerated postoperative recovery. However, its technical complexity and steep learning curve pose risks for nerve root injury. Optimizing nerve root protection in full-endoscopic facet-sparing TLIF (FE fs-TLIF) and full-endoscopic facet-resecting TLIF (FE fr-TLIF) is essential for enhancing surgical safety. This study aimed to improve the nerve root protection in FE fs-TLIF and FE fr-TLIF by optimizing cage glider selection and insertion techniques based on the specific cage shape—banana-shaped or bullet-shaped. The goal was to ensure safe cage positioning and mitigate nerve root injury during discectomy, endplate preparation, and cage insertion. These strategies were validated through cadaveric simulations and clinical implementation. In FE fr-TLIF utilizing bullet-shaped (straight) cages, one-tip and two-tip cage gliders effectively protected the traversing nerve root by facilitating medial cage entry, thereby minimizing irritation of the exiting nerve root. Conversely, in FE fr-TLIF with banana-shaped cages, the lateral tilt of the cage holder during implantation required the use of a two-tip cage glider to protect the traversing and exiting nerve roots, thereby mitigating the potential risk of nerve irritation. In FE fs-TLIF, a one-tip cage glider is preferred for safeguarding the exiting nerve root, while the traversing root is inherently protected by the medial wall of the facet joint. The use of a two-tip cage glider in FE fs-TLIF can cause injury to the nerve root during glider insertion. In addition to the selection of cage gliders, improper cage insertion steps can also contribute to postoperative neurapraxia. The appropriate selection of cage gliders with corresponding insertion techniques is critical for nerve root protection in endoscopic TLIF. Tailoring these choices to the specific approach (FE fs-TLIF or FE fr-TLIF) and cage type (banana or bullet) enhances surgical safety and clinical outcomes.

Objective:To explore the influences of FibroScan detection on the pregnancy outcomes of pregnant rats transfected with hepatitis B virus and the growth of their offspring rats.Methods:Sixty SPF-grade SD rats with a male-to-female ratio of 5∶1 were selected，randomly divided the female rats into the groups of mid-pregnancy with hepatitis B，late-pregnancy with hepatitis B，normal mid-pregnancy，normal late-pregnancy，and control group，and the rats in the mid-pregnancy and late-pregnancy groups were subjected to FibroScan testing on the 10th and 15th days of gestation respectively. The number of offspring rats in each group was randomly reduced to 10 on the 3rd day after delivery，and the offspring rats were divided into the groups of mid-pregnancy with hepatitis B，late-pregnancy with hepatitis B，normal mid-pregnancy，normal late-pregnancy，and control group. The pregnancy outcome levels of pregnant rats were observed by adopting a stratified analysis strategy，including differences in weight changes，number of deliveries，fetal rat outcomes，lactation conditions，litter size，and litter weight. The growth levels of offspring rats，including differences in weight，body length，tail length，and the time of fur growth，tooth eruption，eye opening，and ear standing on the 21st day were observed，and the survival rate of the offspring rats was compared.Results:With regard to the pregnancy outcome levels of the pregnant rats，there were no statistically significant differences in weight changes during pregnancy among the five groups of pregnant rats［ F（4，45）=2.627，Adjusted P=0.222］. There were also no statistically significant differences in the number of deliveries，fetal rat outcomes，and lactation conditions（Adjusted P=1.000）. The number of deliveries［ F（4，21.095）=2.280，Adjusted P=0.222］and litter weight［ F（4，20.128）=2.159，Adjusted P=0.222］showed no statistically significant differences. After correction using the BH method，none of the indicators showed significant differences（ P>0.05）. In terms of the growth levels of the offspring rats，among the five groups of offspring rats，there were no statistically significant differences in body weight on the 21st day［H（4）=11.623，Adjusted P=0.135］，body length on the 21st day［H（4）=10.962，Adjusted P=0.135］，and tail length on the 21st day［H（4）=9.126，Adjusted P=0.058］. Besides，the differences in the time of fur growth，tooth eruption，eye opening，and ear standing［H（4）=0.000，Adjust P=1.000］showed no statistical significance. The survival rate on the 7th day，14th day，and 21st day was 100%，with no significant differences（Adjusted P=1.000）. After correction using the BH method，none of the indicators showed significant differences（ P>0.05）. Conclusion:FibroScan detection had no significant influences on the pregnancy outcomes of pregnant rats with hepatitis B or on the growth of their offspring rats in multiple stages，dimensions，and indicators，indicating that FibroScan detection is safe for pregnant rats. This research provides an animal experimental basis for the safe use of FibroScan in pregnant women with chronic HBV infection.

Objective:To explore the influences of FibroScan detection on the pregnancy outcomes of pregnant rats transfected with hepatitis B virus and the growth of their offspring rats.Methods:Sixty SPF-grade SD rats with a male-to-female ratio of 5∶1 were selected，randomly divided the female rats into the groups of mid-pregnancy with hepatitis B，late-pregnancy with hepatitis B，normal mid-pregnancy，normal late-pregnancy，and control group，and the rats in the mid-pregnancy and late-pregnancy groups were subjected to FibroScan testing on the 10th and 15th days of gestation respectively. The number of offspring rats in each group was randomly reduced to 10 on the 3rd day after delivery，and the offspring rats were divided into the groups of mid-pregnancy with hepatitis B，late-pregnancy with hepatitis B，normal mid-pregnancy，normal late-pregnancy，and control group. The pregnancy outcome levels of pregnant rats were observed by adopting a stratified analysis strategy，including differences in weight changes，number of deliveries，fetal rat outcomes，lactation conditions，litter size，and litter weight. The growth levels of offspring rats，including differences in weight，body length，tail length，and the time of fur growth，tooth eruption，eye opening，and ear standing on the 21st day were observed，and the survival rate of the offspring rats was compared.Results:With regard to the pregnancy outcome levels of the pregnant rats，there were no statistically significant differences in weight changes during pregnancy among the five groups of pregnant rats［ F（4，45）=2.627，Adjusted P=0.222］. There were also no statistically significant differences in the number of deliveries，fetal rat outcomes，and lactation conditions（Adjusted P=1.000）. The number of deliveries［ F（4，21.095）=2.280，Adjusted P=0.222］and litter weight［ F（4，20.128）=2.159，Adjusted P=0.222］showed no statistically significant differences. After correction using the BH method，none of the indicators showed significant differences（ P>0.05）. In terms of the growth levels of the offspring rats，among the five groups of offspring rats，there were no statistically significant differences in body weight on the 21st day［H（4）=11.623，Adjusted P=0.135］，body length on the 21st day［H（4）=10.962，Adjusted P=0.135］，and tail length on the 21st day［H（4）=9.126，Adjusted P=0.058］. Besides，the differences in the time of fur growth，tooth eruption，eye opening，and ear standing［H（4）=0.000，Adjust P=1.000］showed no statistical significance. The survival rate on the 7th day，14th day，and 21st day was 100%，with no significant differences（Adjusted P=1.000）. After correction using the BH method，none of the indicators showed significant differences（ P>0.05）. Conclusion:FibroScan detection had no significant influences on the pregnancy outcomes of pregnant rats with hepatitis B or on the growth of their offspring rats in multiple stages，dimensions，and indicators，indicating that FibroScan detection is safe for pregnant rats. This research provides an animal experimental basis for the safe use of FibroScan in pregnant women with chronic HBV infection.

Objective:To study the correlation between miR-122 and early HBV infection and analyze its application value in early infection of voluntary blood donors.Methods:A total of 150 samples from voluntary blood donors in Fujian Blood Center from May 2021 to July 2022 were collected and divided into group N(normal group),group E(ELISA single positive group),and group D(both ELISA and nucleic acid positive group),and the general information of the three groups of blood donors was collected.Total RNA was extracted from the three groups of samples,and the expression level of miR-122 was detected by qRT-PCR.The expression differences of miR-122 among the three groups of samples were statistically analyzed,and the correlation between the expression level of miR-122 in group D and its HBV DNA copy number was analyzed.The miRNA database was used to predict the potential target genes of miRNA and perform bioinformatics analysis.Results:There was no statistical difference in gender,education level,and occupation distribution among the three groups,but the age distribution and number of blood donations among different groups were statistically significant.Compared with group N,the relative expression levels of miR-122 in the plasma of group E and group D were significantly downregulated(P＜0.05);the relative expression level of miR-122 in group D was more significantly downregulated than that in group E(P＜0.001).Pearson correlation analysis showed that the expression level of miR-122 in group D was negatively correlated with the HBV-DNA copy number(R2=-0.804,P＜0.01).Two potential target genes were screened using the miRNA database:ALDOA(aldolase A)and PKM(pyruvate kinase).GO analysis results showed that the potential target genes of miRNA mainly involved in biological processes including cell homeostasis and regulation of transcriptional processes.Conclusion:Downregulation of miR-122 expression is closely related to early HBV infection and replication activity.

This video presents a case of L4–5 unstable spondylolisthesis treated with full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF), emphasizing the GUARD (Glider Used as a Rotary Device) technique for nerve root protection. This innovative approach involves controlled rotation of the cage glider before cage insertion to minimize the risk of nerve root injury, a significant complication in Endo-TLIF procedures. The GUARD technique, validated in previous cadaveric studies, provides enhanced safety during cage insertion by protecting the nerve root. A 48-year-old woman with a 3-year history of progressive low back pain and bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy (right-sided predominance) was diagnosed with L4–5 unstable spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. After failure of conservative management, she underwent uniportal full-endoscopic facet-resecting transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the GUARD technique. Postoperatively, the patient experienced significant symptomatic improvement and resolution of radiculopathy, without any intraoperative nerve root injury or postoperative neurological deficits. This case demonstrates the effectiveness of the GUARD technique in reducing neurological complications and improving patient outcomes.

Objective: Uniportal full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (FE-TLIF) carries a unique risk of nerve traction and abrasion injury during cage insertion. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the GUARD technique and delayed ligamentum flavectomy in reducing postoperative radicular pain and neurapraxia in patients undergoing uniportal FE-TLIF. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 45 patients with an average age of 53.9±12.4 years who underwent either FE facet-sparing TLIF (FE fs-TLIF) or FE facet-resecting TLIF (FE fr-TLIF). Patients were divided into 2 groups: the sentinel group (21 patients) using traditional sentinel pin techniques, and the GUARD group (24 patients) using the GUARD technique with delayed ligamentum flavectomy. Patient-reported outcomes included the visual analogue scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, and Oswestry Disability Index. Complication rates, including incidental durotomy, postoperative neurapraxia, and hematoma, were also documented. Results: Postoperative radicular pain in the legs was significantly reduced at 6 weeks in the GUARD group compared to the sentinel group (VAS: 2.201 vs. 3.267, p=0.021). The incidence of postoperative neurapraxia was markedly lower in the GUARD group (0% vs. 19%, p=0.047). Both groups showed similar improvements in disc height, segmental lordosis, and lumbar lordosis at the 1-year follow-up, with no significant differences in endplate injury or fusion rates. Conclusion The GUARD technique and delayed ligamentum flavectomy significantly enhance patient safety by reducing postoperative radicular pain and neurapraxia without incurring additional costs. These techniques are easy to learn and integrate into existing surgical workflows, offering a valuable improvement for surgeons performing FE-TLIF procedures.

This video presents a case of L4–5 unstable spondylolisthesis treated with full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF), emphasizing the GUARD (Glider Used as a Rotary Device) technique for nerve root protection. This innovative approach involves controlled rotation of the cage glider before cage insertion to minimize the risk of nerve root injury, a significant complication in Endo-TLIF procedures. The GUARD technique, validated in previous cadaveric studies, provides enhanced safety during cage insertion by protecting the nerve root. A 48-year-old woman with a 3-year history of progressive low back pain and bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy (right-sided predominance) was diagnosed with L4–5 unstable spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. After failure of conservative management, she underwent uniportal full-endoscopic facet-resecting transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the GUARD technique. Postoperatively, the patient experienced significant symptomatic improvement and resolution of radiculopathy, without any intraoperative nerve root injury or postoperative neurological deficits. This case demonstrates the effectiveness of the GUARD technique in reducing neurological complications and improving patient outcomes.

Objective: Uniportal full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (FE-TLIF) carries a unique risk of nerve traction and abrasion injury during cage insertion. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the GUARD technique and delayed ligamentum flavectomy in reducing postoperative radicular pain and neurapraxia in patients undergoing uniportal FE-TLIF. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 45 patients with an average age of 53.9±12.4 years who underwent either FE facet-sparing TLIF (FE fs-TLIF) or FE facet-resecting TLIF (FE fr-TLIF). Patients were divided into 2 groups: the sentinel group (21 patients) using traditional sentinel pin techniques, and the GUARD group (24 patients) using the GUARD technique with delayed ligamentum flavectomy. Patient-reported outcomes included the visual analogue scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, and Oswestry Disability Index. Complication rates, including incidental durotomy, postoperative neurapraxia, and hematoma, were also documented. Results: Postoperative radicular pain in the legs was significantly reduced at 6 weeks in the GUARD group compared to the sentinel group (VAS: 2.201 vs. 3.267, p=0.021). The incidence of postoperative neurapraxia was markedly lower in the GUARD group (0% vs. 19%, p=0.047). Both groups showed similar improvements in disc height, segmental lordosis, and lumbar lordosis at the 1-year follow-up, with no significant differences in endplate injury or fusion rates. Conclusion The GUARD technique and delayed ligamentum flavectomy significantly enhance patient safety by reducing postoperative radicular pain and neurapraxia without incurring additional costs. These techniques are easy to learn and integrate into existing surgical workflows, offering a valuable improvement for surgeons performing FE-TLIF procedures.

This video presents a case of L4–5 unstable spondylolisthesis treated with full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF), emphasizing the GUARD (Glider Used as a Rotary Device) technique for nerve root protection. This innovative approach involves controlled rotation of the cage glider before cage insertion to minimize the risk of nerve root injury, a significant complication in Endo-TLIF procedures. The GUARD technique, validated in previous cadaveric studies, provides enhanced safety during cage insertion by protecting the nerve root. A 48-year-old woman with a 3-year history of progressive low back pain and bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy (right-sided predominance) was diagnosed with L4–5 unstable spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. After failure of conservative management, she underwent uniportal full-endoscopic facet-resecting transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using the GUARD technique. Postoperatively, the patient experienced significant symptomatic improvement and resolution of radiculopathy, without any intraoperative nerve root injury or postoperative neurological deficits. This case demonstrates the effectiveness of the GUARD technique in reducing neurological complications and improving patient outcomes.

Objective: Uniportal full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (FE-TLIF) carries a unique risk of nerve traction and abrasion injury during cage insertion. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of the GUARD technique and delayed ligamentum flavectomy in reducing postoperative radicular pain and neurapraxia in patients undergoing uniportal FE-TLIF. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 45 patients with an average age of 53.9±12.4 years who underwent either FE facet-sparing TLIF (FE fs-TLIF) or FE facet-resecting TLIF (FE fr-TLIF). Patients were divided into 2 groups: the sentinel group (21 patients) using traditional sentinel pin techniques, and the GUARD group (24 patients) using the GUARD technique with delayed ligamentum flavectomy. Patient-reported outcomes included the visual analogue scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, and Oswestry Disability Index. Complication rates, including incidental durotomy, postoperative neurapraxia, and hematoma, were also documented. Results: Postoperative radicular pain in the legs was significantly reduced at 6 weeks in the GUARD group compared to the sentinel group (VAS: 2.201 vs. 3.267, p=0.021). The incidence of postoperative neurapraxia was markedly lower in the GUARD group (0% vs. 19%, p=0.047). Both groups showed similar improvements in disc height, segmental lordosis, and lumbar lordosis at the 1-year follow-up, with no significant differences in endplate injury or fusion rates. Conclusion The GUARD technique and delayed ligamentum flavectomy significantly enhance patient safety by reducing postoperative radicular pain and neurapraxia without incurring additional costs. These techniques are easy to learn and integrate into existing surgical workflows, offering a valuable improvement for surgeons performing FE-TLIF procedures.