[Purpose]To investigate the choice of medical institutions for the first-treatment of can-cer patients after diagnosis and the factors influencing it,so as to provide a reference basis for the rational allocation of health resources and the promotion of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment of cancer.[Methods]A total of 1 140 common cancer patients from 1 provincial,3 municipal and 6 county-level medical institutions in Shandong Province were included in the study,and a ques-tionnaire survey was conducted on their basic personal information and the selection of medical institutions.Chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used to compare different groups,and mul-ti-classification unordered Logistic regression were used to explore the factors influencing the se-lection of cancer patients.[Results]1 077 valid questionnaires were collected.The selection rates of first-treatment institutions for cancer patients were county hospitals(29.90％),city hospitals(35.28％),and provincial hospitals(34.82％),and the high level of medical care was the main reason for the selection of first-treatment institutions for cancer patients.The results of multi-clas-sification unordered Logistic regression showed that when choosing municipal and county medical institutions as the first treatment institution compared to choosing a county medical institution for the first treatment as a reference,compared to patients with stage Ⅰ tumors,patients with tumor stages at stage Ⅲ(OR=1.789,95％CI:1.014～3.158)and stage Ⅳ(OR=2.005,95％CI:1.179～3.409)were more likely to choose municipal medical institutions;and patients with annual house-hold income of 10 000～＜50 000 CNY(OR=0.625,95％CI:0.414～0.943)were less likely to choose mu-nicipal medical institutions compared to those with an annual household income of＜10 000 CNY.When choosing provincial and county medical institutions as the first treatment institution com-pared to patients in stage Ⅲ(OR=2.885,95％C1:1.549～5.372)and stage Ⅳ(OR=3.104,95％CI:1.724～5.586)compared to patients with stage Ⅰ tumors when choosing a county medical institu-tion for the first treatment was used as a reference;married(OR=2.248,95％CI:1.127～4.484)patients were more likely to choose provincial healthcare organizations than unmarried/divorced/widowed patients;patients with a family history of cancer compared to patients without a family history of cancer(OR=1.650,95％CI:1.115～2.441)were more inclined to choose provincial healthcare institutions;compared with patients＜45 years old,patients over 60 years old(OR=0.483,95％CI:0.242～0.962)were less inclined to choose provincial hospitals;and compared with patients who were not aware of knowledge related to cancer,those who were aware of knowledge related to cancer(OR=0.613,95％CI:0.441～0.852)patients were less inclined to choose provin-cial hospitals.[Conclusion]Vigorously carrying out publicity on cancer prevention and treatment knowledge,improving the cancer prevention and treatment literacy of cancer patients.strengthen-ing vertical cooperation among medical institutions at all levels,improving the provincial-munici-pal-county cancer prevention and treatment network,and promoting the sinking of high-quality medical resources are important ways to improve the cancer prevention and treatment capacity of counties and promote the work of hierarchical medical system.

[Purpose]To investigate the choice of medical institutions for the first-treatment of can-cer patients after diagnosis and the factors influencing it,so as to provide a reference basis for the rational allocation of health resources and the promotion of hierarchical diagnosis and treatment of cancer.[Methods]A total of 1 140 common cancer patients from 1 provincial,3 municipal and 6 county-level medical institutions in Shandong Province were included in the study,and a ques-tionnaire survey was conducted on their basic personal information and the selection of medical institutions.Chi-square test and Fisher exact test were used to compare different groups,and mul-ti-classification unordered Logistic regression were used to explore the factors influencing the se-lection of cancer patients.[Results]1 077 valid questionnaires were collected.The selection rates of first-treatment institutions for cancer patients were county hospitals(29.90％),city hospitals(35.28％),and provincial hospitals(34.82％),and the high level of medical care was the main reason for the selection of first-treatment institutions for cancer patients.The results of multi-clas-sification unordered Logistic regression showed that when choosing municipal and county medical institutions as the first treatment institution compared to choosing a county medical institution for the first treatment as a reference,compared to patients with stage Ⅰ tumors,patients with tumor stages at stage Ⅲ(OR=1.789,95％CI:1.014～3.158)and stage Ⅳ(OR=2.005,95％CI:1.179～3.409)were more likely to choose municipal medical institutions;and patients with annual house-hold income of 10 000～＜50 000 CNY(OR=0.625,95％CI:0.414～0.943)were less likely to choose mu-nicipal medical institutions compared to those with an annual household income of＜10 000 CNY.When choosing provincial and county medical institutions as the first treatment institution com-pared to patients in stage Ⅲ(OR=2.885,95％C1:1.549～5.372)and stage Ⅳ(OR=3.104,95％CI:1.724～5.586)compared to patients with stage Ⅰ tumors when choosing a county medical institu-tion for the first treatment was used as a reference;married(OR=2.248,95％CI:1.127～4.484)patients were more likely to choose provincial healthcare organizations than unmarried/divorced/widowed patients;patients with a family history of cancer compared to patients without a family history of cancer(OR=1.650,95％CI:1.115～2.441)were more inclined to choose provincial healthcare institutions;compared with patients＜45 years old,patients over 60 years old(OR=0.483,95％CI:0.242～0.962)were less inclined to choose provincial hospitals;and compared with patients who were not aware of knowledge related to cancer,those who were aware of knowledge related to cancer(OR=0.613,95％CI:0.441～0.852)patients were less inclined to choose provin-cial hospitals.[Conclusion]Vigorously carrying out publicity on cancer prevention and treatment knowledge,improving the cancer prevention and treatment literacy of cancer patients.strengthen-ing vertical cooperation among medical institutions at all levels,improving the provincial-munici-pal-county cancer prevention and treatment network,and promoting the sinking of high-quality medical resources are important ways to improve the cancer prevention and treatment capacity of counties and promote the work of hierarchical medical system.

Objective To analyze the influence of liraglutide intervention combined percutanous coronary intervention(PCI) therapy on acute myocardial infarction( AMI) with type 2 diabetes( T2DM) patients'myocardial injury, ventricular remodeling( VR), and cardiac function. Methods Eighty patients with AMI and T2DM were included in the study, and they were randomly divided into observation group and control group according to the random number table, each with 40 patients. The patients in the control group received metformin and conventional insulin combined PCI treatment, and the patients in the observation group received metformin and liraglutide combined PCI treatment. The changes in the values of ventricular remodeling indexes, cardiac function and serum related indexes were compared after 3 months treatment between the two groups. Results ( 1) The body weight and fasting blood glucose levels of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group( P＜0.05), and fasting insulin levels were significantly higher than those of the control group(P＜0.01). (2)The levels of N-terminal-pro-B- type natriuretic peptide ( NT-proBNP ), creatine kinase isoenzymes-MB ( CK-MB), and troponin I ( TnI) in the observation group 3 months after treatment were significantly lower than those in the control group(P＜0.05). (3)The levels of serum hypersensitive C-reactive protein(hs-CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α), and interleukin-6(IL-6) in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group 3 months after treatment( P＜0. 05). ( 4) The values of left ventricular end systolic diameter ( LVESD ), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), interventricular septum thickness ( IVST), left ventricular posterior wall thickness ( LVPWT), left ventricular mass index ( LVMI), left ventricular end systolic volume ( LVESV), and left ventricular end diastolic volume(LVEDV) in the observation group were lower than those in the control group; the values of left ventricular fraction shortening(LVFS), left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF), and mitral valve early diastolic blood flow rate (VE)/atrial systolic flow velocity ( VA), all were higher than those of the control group ( P＜0. 05). Conclusion Lraglutide intervention combined with PCI therapy on AMI with T2DM patients may reduce myocardial injury, induce ventricular remodeling, enhance cardiac function, and improve prognosis.