Objective: Although high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is inversely associated with hematologic malignancies, modification by smoking has not been reported. We investigated how smoking and menopausal status modify these association. Methods: This population-based cohort study enrolled cancer-free individuals who underwent a national cancer screening in 2010 and followed up until December 2017. HDL-C levels were classified into eight groups based on 10 mg/dL intervals: (<30, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, or ≥90 mg/dL). Results: Among 4,517,892 participants, 5887 had lymphoma, 3348 had leukemia, and 12151 had unspecified hematologic malignancies. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for the lowest HDL-C levels compared to the 70–79 mg/dL range were 1.83 (1.45–2.31) for lymphoma, 3.14 (2.41–4.08) for leukemia, and 2.34 (2.01–2.72) for unspecified hematologic malignancy.The effects of low HDL-C levels on hematologic malignancies were similar in both men and women. Low HDL-C levels were associated with a higher risk of leukemia regardless of smoking status, but extremely high HDL-C levels were linked to a higher risk of leukemia (aHR, 2.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.18–4.55) only in current smokers.The hazardous effect of low HDL-C levels on lymphoma was significant only in never smokers (aHR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.51–2.68). Hazardous effects of low HDL-C levels on leukemia were observed only in post-menopausal women (aHR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.69–5.11). Conclusion Low HDL-C levels were associated with a higher risk of leukemia and lymphoma, with discrepancies based on smoking and menopausal status.

Objective: Although high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is inversely associated with hematologic malignancies, modification by smoking has not been reported. We investigated how smoking and menopausal status modify these association. Methods: This population-based cohort study enrolled cancer-free individuals who underwent a national cancer screening in 2010 and followed up until December 2017. HDL-C levels were classified into eight groups based on 10 mg/dL intervals: (<30, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, or ≥90 mg/dL). Results: Among 4,517,892 participants, 5887 had lymphoma, 3348 had leukemia, and 12151 had unspecified hematologic malignancies. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for the lowest HDL-C levels compared to the 70–79 mg/dL range were 1.83 (1.45–2.31) for lymphoma, 3.14 (2.41–4.08) for leukemia, and 2.34 (2.01–2.72) for unspecified hematologic malignancy.The effects of low HDL-C levels on hematologic malignancies were similar in both men and women. Low HDL-C levels were associated with a higher risk of leukemia regardless of smoking status, but extremely high HDL-C levels were linked to a higher risk of leukemia (aHR, 2.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.18–4.55) only in current smokers.The hazardous effect of low HDL-C levels on lymphoma was significant only in never smokers (aHR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.51–2.68). Hazardous effects of low HDL-C levels on leukemia were observed only in post-menopausal women (aHR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.69–5.11). Conclusion Low HDL-C levels were associated with a higher risk of leukemia and lymphoma, with discrepancies based on smoking and menopausal status.

Objective: Although high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is inversely associated with hematologic malignancies, modification by smoking has not been reported. We investigated how smoking and menopausal status modify these association. Methods: This population-based cohort study enrolled cancer-free individuals who underwent a national cancer screening in 2010 and followed up until December 2017. HDL-C levels were classified into eight groups based on 10 mg/dL intervals: (<30, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, or ≥90 mg/dL). Results: Among 4,517,892 participants, 5887 had lymphoma, 3348 had leukemia, and 12151 had unspecified hematologic malignancies. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for the lowest HDL-C levels compared to the 70–79 mg/dL range were 1.83 (1.45–2.31) for lymphoma, 3.14 (2.41–4.08) for leukemia, and 2.34 (2.01–2.72) for unspecified hematologic malignancy.The effects of low HDL-C levels on hematologic malignancies were similar in both men and women. Low HDL-C levels were associated with a higher risk of leukemia regardless of smoking status, but extremely high HDL-C levels were linked to a higher risk of leukemia (aHR, 2.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.18–4.55) only in current smokers.The hazardous effect of low HDL-C levels on lymphoma was significant only in never smokers (aHR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.51–2.68). Hazardous effects of low HDL-C levels on leukemia were observed only in post-menopausal women (aHR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.69–5.11). Conclusion Low HDL-C levels were associated with a higher risk of leukemia and lymphoma, with discrepancies based on smoking and menopausal status.

Objective: Although high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) is inversely associated with hematologic malignancies, modification by smoking has not been reported. We investigated how smoking and menopausal status modify these association. Methods: This population-based cohort study enrolled cancer-free individuals who underwent a national cancer screening in 2010 and followed up until December 2017. HDL-C levels were classified into eight groups based on 10 mg/dL intervals: (<30, 30–39, 40–49, 50–59, 60–69, 70–79, 80–89, or ≥90 mg/dL). Results: Among 4,517,892 participants, 5887 had lymphoma, 3348 had leukemia, and 12151 had unspecified hematologic malignancies. The adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for the lowest HDL-C levels compared to the 70–79 mg/dL range were 1.83 (1.45–2.31) for lymphoma, 3.14 (2.41–4.08) for leukemia, and 2.34 (2.01–2.72) for unspecified hematologic malignancy.The effects of low HDL-C levels on hematologic malignancies were similar in both men and women. Low HDL-C levels were associated with a higher risk of leukemia regardless of smoking status, but extremely high HDL-C levels were linked to a higher risk of leukemia (aHR, 2.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.18–4.55) only in current smokers.The hazardous effect of low HDL-C levels on lymphoma was significant only in never smokers (aHR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.51–2.68). Hazardous effects of low HDL-C levels on leukemia were observed only in post-menopausal women (aHR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.69–5.11). Conclusion Low HDL-C levels were associated with a higher risk of leukemia and lymphoma, with discrepancies based on smoking and menopausal status.

Objective: Bariatric surgery effectively treats non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). The glutamate-serine-glycine (GSG) index has emerged as a non-invasive diagnostic marker for NAFLD, but its ability to monitor treatment response remains unclear. This study investigates the GSG index's ability to monitor NAFLD's response to bariatric surgery. Methodology: Ten NAFLD participants were studied at baseline and 6 months post-bariatric surgery. Blood samples were collected for serum biomarkers and metabolomic profiling. Hepatic steatosis [proton density fat fraction (PDFF)] and fibroinflammation (cT1) were quantified with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and hepatic stiffness with magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Amino acids and acylcarnitines were measured with mass spectrometry. Statistical analyses included paired Student’s t-test, Wilcoxon-signed rank test, and Pearson’s correlation. Results: Eight participants provided complete data. At baseline, all had hepatic steatosis (BMI 39.3 ± 5.6 kg/m2, PDFF ≥ 5%). Post-surgery reductions in PDFF (from 12.4 ± 6.7% to 6.2 ± 2.8%, p = 0.013) and cT1 (from 823.3 ± 85.4ms to 757.5 ± 41.6ms, p = 0.039) were significant, along with the GSG index (from 0.272 ± 0.03 to 0.157 ± 0.05, p = 0.001). Conclusion The GSG index can potentially be developed as a marker for monitoring the response of patients with NAFLD to bariatric surgery.
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease ; Amino Acids ; Metabolomics

Background/Aims: The proposed eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) endoscopic reference score serves to diagnose and evaluate treatment responses in EoE.Nevertheless, the validated reference score thresholds for diagnosis and treatment response in Asian patients are yet to be established.This study aims to establish these thresholds for the first time among Asian patients with EoE. Methods: Patients presenting with ≥ 15 eosinophils/high power field and esophageal dysfunction symptoms between August 2007 andNovember 2021 were included. Age- and sex-matched non-EoE controls were also enrolled. Baseline characteristics, endoscopic reference score features, and scores were compared between patients and controls. Among patients, endoscopic reference score features and scores, along with peak eosinophil counts, were evaluated both before and after treatment. The optimal threshold was determined based on sensitivity, specificity, and the Youden index. Results: Overall, 102 patients were enrolled (74.5% men; mean age, 46.9 years). The mean endoscopic reference score was 2.65 and 0.52 for patients and controls, respectively (P < 0.001). An endoscopic reference score ≥ 2 was identified as the optimal diagnostic threshold for EoE (sensitivity, 0.79; specificity, 0.86; Youden index, 0.66). Post-treatment data regarding endoscopic findings and histology wereavailable for 30 patients. Regarding histologic response, an endoscopic reference score of ≤ 3 demonstrated the optimal threshold(sensitivity, 0.95; specificity, 0.88; Youden index, 0.83). Conclusions The optimal diagnostic and treatment response thresholds were determined to be endoscopic reference scores of ≥ 2 and ≤ 3,respectively. Further studies involving a larger patient cohort are necessary to validate these findings.

Background: We aimed to examine the feasibility of intensive lifestyle habituation with a subsequent home program, including forest-based exercise, as an alternative approach to conventional cardiac rehabilitation for both primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods: A total of 28 participants were included in a 1-week intensive education program aimed at fostering desirable lifestyle habits in the study: 17 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and 11 participants at high risk of CAD. Subsequently, they engaged in a self-directed, home-based program that included unstructured exercise in an urban forest. The terrain of the urban forest was analyzed to estimate metabolic equivalent levels and to assess safety and accessibility for patient exercise. Results: Throughout the program, no adverse cardiac events were reported. Additionally, risk factors for CAD—including body composition, blood sugar levels, hemodynamic variables, total cholesterol levels, and cardiorespiratory endurance—showed significant improvement in both groups. Conclusions Intensive lifestyle habituation and unstructured, self-directed exercise in the forest were as effective and safe as conventional cardiac rehabilitation for patients with CAD. The study demonstrated that an urban forest could serve as a safe exercise environment in both primary and secondary prevention strategies for CAD.

Background/Aims: The proposed eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) endoscopic reference score serves to diagnose and evaluate treatment responses in EoE.Nevertheless, the validated reference score thresholds for diagnosis and treatment response in Asian patients are yet to be established.This study aims to establish these thresholds for the first time among Asian patients with EoE. Methods: Patients presenting with ≥ 15 eosinophils/high power field and esophageal dysfunction symptoms between August 2007 andNovember 2021 were included. Age- and sex-matched non-EoE controls were also enrolled. Baseline characteristics, endoscopic reference score features, and scores were compared between patients and controls. Among patients, endoscopic reference score features and scores, along with peak eosinophil counts, were evaluated both before and after treatment. The optimal threshold was determined based on sensitivity, specificity, and the Youden index. Results: Overall, 102 patients were enrolled (74.5% men; mean age, 46.9 years). The mean endoscopic reference score was 2.65 and 0.52 for patients and controls, respectively (P < 0.001). An endoscopic reference score ≥ 2 was identified as the optimal diagnostic threshold for EoE (sensitivity, 0.79; specificity, 0.86; Youden index, 0.66). Post-treatment data regarding endoscopic findings and histology wereavailable for 30 patients. Regarding histologic response, an endoscopic reference score of ≤ 3 demonstrated the optimal threshold(sensitivity, 0.95; specificity, 0.88; Youden index, 0.83). Conclusions The optimal diagnostic and treatment response thresholds were determined to be endoscopic reference scores of ≥ 2 and ≤ 3,respectively. Further studies involving a larger patient cohort are necessary to validate these findings.

Background/Aims: The proposed eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) endoscopic reference score serves to diagnose and evaluate treatment responses in EoE.Nevertheless, the validated reference score thresholds for diagnosis and treatment response in Asian patients are yet to be established.This study aims to establish these thresholds for the first time among Asian patients with EoE. Methods: Patients presenting with ≥ 15 eosinophils/high power field and esophageal dysfunction symptoms between August 2007 andNovember 2021 were included. Age- and sex-matched non-EoE controls were also enrolled. Baseline characteristics, endoscopic reference score features, and scores were compared between patients and controls. Among patients, endoscopic reference score features and scores, along with peak eosinophil counts, were evaluated both before and after treatment. The optimal threshold was determined based on sensitivity, specificity, and the Youden index. Results: Overall, 102 patients were enrolled (74.5% men; mean age, 46.9 years). The mean endoscopic reference score was 2.65 and 0.52 for patients and controls, respectively (P < 0.001). An endoscopic reference score ≥ 2 was identified as the optimal diagnostic threshold for EoE (sensitivity, 0.79; specificity, 0.86; Youden index, 0.66). Post-treatment data regarding endoscopic findings and histology wereavailable for 30 patients. Regarding histologic response, an endoscopic reference score of ≤ 3 demonstrated the optimal threshold(sensitivity, 0.95; specificity, 0.88; Youden index, 0.83). Conclusions The optimal diagnostic and treatment response thresholds were determined to be endoscopic reference scores of ≥ 2 and ≤ 3,respectively. Further studies involving a larger patient cohort are necessary to validate these findings.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Korea and the third leading cause of death from cancer. Treatment outcomes for colon cancer are steadily improving due to national health screening programs with advances in diagnostic methods, surgical techniques, and therapeutic agents.. The Korea Colon Cancer Multidisciplinary (KCCM) Committee intends to provide professionals who treat colon cancer with the most up-to-date, evidence-based practice guidelines to improve outcomes and help them make decisions that reflect their patients’ values and preferences. These guidelines have been established by consensus reached by the KCCM Guideline Committee based on a systematic literature review and evidence synthesis and by considering the national health insurance system in real clinical practice settings. Each recommendation is presented with a recommendation strength and level of evidence based on the consensus of the committee.