1.Effect of genetic polymorphisms of aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 on the efficacy of intermittent parathyroid hormone treatment and bone mineral density: A retrospective multicenter study
Hinako OBARA ; Takafumi TAJIMA ; Manabu TSUKAMOTO ; Yoshiaki YAMANAKA ; Hitoshi SUZUKI ; Masato NAGASHIMA ; Satoshi NISHIDA ; Satoshi IKEDA ; Kazumichi MAEKAWA ; Akinori SAKAI
Osteoporosis and Sarcopenia 2026;12(1):26-33
Objectives:
In a mouse model, aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH2) knockout resulted in lower bone mineral density; however, higher parathyroid hormone receptor expression than wild-type mice. This study aimed to investigate whether ALDH2 polymorphisms influence efficacy of intermittent parathyroid hormone therapy and bone mineral density changes in humans.
Methods:
Eighty-two patients with primary osteoporosis treated with parathyroid hormone for > 1 year were divided into wild-type ALDH2 (ALDH2*1) and variant (ALDH2*2) groups. Bone mineral densities were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Changes in bone mineral density, treatment response, bone turnover markers, and new fracture incidence were evaluated. Furthermore, bone mineral density was analyzed using a mixed-effects model.
Results:
Femoral neck bone mineral density increased by 1.0 ± 7.4% in the ALDH2*1 group and 4.3 ± 8.1% in the ALDH2*2 group (P < 0.05), whereas lumbar spine bone mineral density increased by 5.7 ± 8.2% and 9.4 ± 9.1% without significance. Treatment success rates were higher in ALDH2*2 group (femoral neck 38.7%, lumbar spine 68.8%) compared with ALDH2*1 (16.3%, 51.0%). Statistical significance was observed only at the femoral neck. Bone turnover markers and fracture incidence were comparable between groups. Mixed-effects analysis adjusting for confounders showed a significant ALDH2 genotype × duration interaction for femoral neck, indicating genotype-related differences in the rate of bone mineral density increase over time. For lumbar spine, the genotype main effect was significant, whereas the interaction was not.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that ALDH2 polymorphisms may influence the therapeutic response to PTH treatment and highlight the need for larger future studies.
2.Is glue embolization safe and effective for gastrointestinal bleeding?
Shinsaku YATA ; Yasufumi OHUCHI ; Akira ADACHI ; Masayuki ENDO ; Shohei TAKASUGI ; Kazumichi TSUKAMOTO ; Kensuke MATSUMOTO ; Mika KODANI ; Jun MAKISHIMA ; Shinya FUJII
Gastrointestinal Intervention 2018;7(3):158-161
Transcatheter arterial embolization using N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) for gastrointestinal arterial bleeding enables higher cessation rate and lower recurrent bleeding rate compared with conventional embolic materials including gelatin sponge, metallic coil, and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particle. Glue embolization is particularly effective in patients with coagulopathy. Even in the lower gastrointestinal tract, ischemic bowel complications by glue embolization are comparable to other agents. Glue embolization is also effective for arterial esophageal bleeding without any serious ischemic complications although the anatomy of the esophageal artery is complex and varied. For bleeding after abdominal surgery such as pancreaticoduodenectomy or hepatic lobectomy, interventional radiologists should be careful with indicating glue embolization because the presence of fewer collateral vessels can easily result in serious ischemic complications. Modified glue such as Glubran 2 (NBCA associated with methacryloxyfulfolane) can reduce the risk of ischemic complication due to its less thermal reaction, but the outcomes seem unsatisfactory.
Adhesives
;
Arteries
;
Cyanoacrylates
;
Embolization, Therapeutic
;
Enbucrilate
;
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
;
Gelatin
;
Hemorrhage
;
Humans
;
Lower Gastrointestinal Tract
;
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
;
Polyvinyl Alcohol
;
Porifera

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail