Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the detection ability of quality of life (QoL) changes and responsiveness of the KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS)-40 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ). Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate QoL changes after various gastrectomies between January 2021 and April 2022. Participants were instructed to complete the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. QoL changes over time and QoL responsiveness were assessed for each questionnaire. Results: Data from 491 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer at 22 institutions were analyzed. The summary scores of the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-STO22 showed significant differences between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.044 and p=0.038, respectively), but no difference was observed for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Dysphagia on the KOQUSS-40 was significantly different between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.031); however, dysphagia on the EORTC QLQ-STO22 did not differ. The responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 was similar to that of the EORTC QLQ in patients who experienced ≥ 10% body weight loss, but approximately 10% less in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy than the EORTC QLQ. Conclusion KOQUSS-40 has several advantages over EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 when comparing QoL between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups. The findings provide information for researchers investigating the QoL of patients who have undergone curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Purpose: The male predominance in the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is established; however, sex differences in the prognosis of GC remain controversial. As such, this study analyzed the prognosis of patients with GC based on age and sex. Materials and Methods: Data from 14,739 patients diagnosed with GC at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between 2003 and 2023 were analyzed. Baseline characteristics, histological types of GC, overall and GC-specific survival rates (age and stage stratification), and associated risk factors were analyzed. Results: Females were significantly younger (p < 0.001) and exhibited more gastric body cancers (p < 0.001) and tumors with diffuse-type or poorly differentiated histology (p < 0.001) than males. Females exhibited an advantage over males in terms of overall survival (p=0.004), but not in GC-specific survival. However, age stratification revealed significant sex differences, that females < 50 years of age exhibited survival disadvantages (p < 0.001); however, this trend was reversed with age, and females > 60 years exhibited survival advantages (p < 0.001) for both overall and GC-specific survival. This may be explained by the lower ratio of diffuse-type GC as females age. Furthermore, in the analysis according to stage, females with stage IV disease exhibited significant survival disadvantages, with significantly younger age and a higher proportion of diffuse-type GC which exhibits aggressive features, resulting in poorer survival than in males. Conclusion Age and stage stratification revealed significant differences in survival between the sexes, which can be helpful for public health strategies.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and current status of reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (RLDG) compared with multiport laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (MLDG) based on a 2019 nationwide survey of surgical gastric cancer treatments by the Korean Gastric Cancer Association (KGCA). Materials and Methods: The study was conducted retrospectively from March to December 2020 using data from the 2019 KGCA nationwide survey database. To compare RLDG and MLDG based on age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, histological type, tumor invasion, and lymph node metastasis, propensity score matching was performed. Results: Of the 14,076 registered patients with gastric cancer, the five-port approach was the most favored for multiport gastrectomy, accounting for 6,396 (70.9%) cases, followed by the four-port approach, with 1,462 (16.2%) cases. The single-port approach was used in 303 (3.4%) cases, the two-port approach in 95 (1.1%) cases, and the three-port approach in 731 (8.1%) cases. RLDG was performed in 805 patients (6.4%), MLDG was conducted in 4,831 patients (34.3%), and 804 patients were 1:1 matched in each group. The average operation time was shorter in the RLDG (168.2±49.1 min vs. 179.5±61.5 min, P<0.001). No significant difference was found in blood loss (84.8±115.9 cc vs. 75.5±119.6 cc, P=0.152), overall complication rates (11.3% vs. 13.1%, P=0.254), or complications ≥ to grade IIIa (3.2% vs. 4.4%, P=0.240). Conclusions This study revealed that RLDG is a safe and effective surgical option for gastric cancer with the potential to offer shorter operation times without increasing the risk of complications.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Background: Extensive spinal fusion inevitably results in loss of mobility, which may induce stiffness-related disability (SRD) during activities of daily living. Few studies have examined SRD after surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study aimed to investigate SRD following surgical treatment in AIS patients particularly with respect to the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Methods: Patients who underwent surgical correction for AIS between 2014 and 2021 and were followed up for 2 years were included. The degree of SRD was evaluated using the Stiffness-Related Disability Index (SRDI), which consists of 4 categories, each containing 3 questions, giving a total of 12 components of the questionnaire. The SRDI scores were compared according to the LIV level. Correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between the SRDI and legacy health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurements. Results: This study included 174 patients (47 men and 127 women) with a mean age of 13.8 years. Among the 12 items of the SRDI, the scores of 9 items showed a significant increase after surgery. The total sum of the SRDI scores also significantly increased after surgery. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the SRDI scores were significantly correlated with Oswestry disability index, nearly all domains, and the total sum of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire, and 36-Item Short Form Survey.No differences in the SRDI score were found among cases with the LIV between T12 and L3. However, the SRDI scores of patients with LIV at L4 were significantly higher than those of patients with other LIV levels. Conclusions Various degrees of SRD occurred after spinal fusion for AIS. The SRDI was significantly correlated with the HRQOL measurements. The SRDI score was highest in patients with the LIV at L4 when compared to those with other LIV levels. Fusion can be safely extended to L3 without significantly increasing SRD.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: Extensive spinal fusion inevitably results in loss of mobility, which may induce stiffness-related disability (SRD) during activities of daily living. Few studies have examined SRD after surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study aimed to investigate SRD following surgical treatment in AIS patients particularly with respect to the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Methods: Patients who underwent surgical correction for AIS between 2014 and 2021 and were followed up for 2 years were included. The degree of SRD was evaluated using the Stiffness-Related Disability Index (SRDI), which consists of 4 categories, each containing 3 questions, giving a total of 12 components of the questionnaire. The SRDI scores were compared according to the LIV level. Correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between the SRDI and legacy health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurements. Results: This study included 174 patients (47 men and 127 women) with a mean age of 13.8 years. Among the 12 items of the SRDI, the scores of 9 items showed a significant increase after surgery. The total sum of the SRDI scores also significantly increased after surgery. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the SRDI scores were significantly correlated with Oswestry disability index, nearly all domains, and the total sum of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire, and 36-Item Short Form Survey.No differences in the SRDI score were found among cases with the LIV between T12 and L3. However, the SRDI scores of patients with LIV at L4 were significantly higher than those of patients with other LIV levels. Conclusions Various degrees of SRD occurred after spinal fusion for AIS. The SRDI was significantly correlated with the HRQOL measurements. The SRDI score was highest in patients with the LIV at L4 when compared to those with other LIV levels. Fusion can be safely extended to L3 without significantly increasing SRD.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.

Background: Extensive spinal fusion inevitably results in loss of mobility, which may induce stiffness-related disability (SRD) during activities of daily living. Few studies have examined SRD after surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This study aimed to investigate SRD following surgical treatment in AIS patients particularly with respect to the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV). Methods: Patients who underwent surgical correction for AIS between 2014 and 2021 and were followed up for 2 years were included. The degree of SRD was evaluated using the Stiffness-Related Disability Index (SRDI), which consists of 4 categories, each containing 3 questions, giving a total of 12 components of the questionnaire. The SRDI scores were compared according to the LIV level. Correlation analysis was performed to examine the relationship between the SRDI and legacy health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measurements. Results: This study included 174 patients (47 men and 127 women) with a mean age of 13.8 years. Among the 12 items of the SRDI, the scores of 9 items showed a significant increase after surgery. The total sum of the SRDI scores also significantly increased after surgery. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the SRDI scores were significantly correlated with Oswestry disability index, nearly all domains, and the total sum of Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire, and 36-Item Short Form Survey.No differences in the SRDI score were found among cases with the LIV between T12 and L3. However, the SRDI scores of patients with LIV at L4 were significantly higher than those of patients with other LIV levels. Conclusions Various degrees of SRD occurred after spinal fusion for AIS. The SRDI was significantly correlated with the HRQOL measurements. The SRDI score was highest in patients with the LIV at L4 when compared to those with other LIV levels. Fusion can be safely extended to L3 without significantly increasing SRD.

Background: and Purpose: This clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for treatment of dementia, focusing on cholinesterase inhibitors and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other types of dementia. Methods: Using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) framework, we developed key clinical questions and conducted systematic literature reviews. A multidisciplinary panel of experts, organized by the Korean Dementia Association, evaluated randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Recommendations were graded for evidence quality and strength using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results: Three main recommendations are presented: (1) For AD, cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine) are strongly recommended for improving cognition and daily function based on moderate evidence; (2) Cholinesterase inhibitors are conditionally recommended for vascular dementia and Parkinson’s disease dementia, with a strong recommendation for Lewy body dementia; (3) For moderate to severe AD, NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine) is strongly recommended, demonstrating significant cognitive and functional improvements. Both drug classes showed favorable safety profiles with manageable side effects. Conclusions This guideline offers standardized, evidence-based pharmacologic recommendations for dementia management, with specific guidance on cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists. It aims to support clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes in dementia care. Further updates will address emerging treatments, including amyloid-targeting therapies, to reflect advances in dementia management.