Objective To address the need for rapid review of automated organ-at-risk (OAR) contouring for head-and-neck cancer in online adaptive radiotherapy, this study used dosimetric indices as the reference standard to evaluate the suitability of geometric similarity metrics and to develop a rapid screening model that balances the risk of missed errors with review efficiency. Methods This retrospective study included 29 patients with head-and-neck radiotherapy, yielding 243 pairs of OAR contours (auto-generated vs. manual). Geometric similarity metrics, including the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice), the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and the maximum Hausdorff distance (HD100), were computed between the two contour sets. Using the dose distributions from clinical treatment plans, dosimetric differences between the two contour sets were calculated for key indices, including mean dose (D_mean) and maximum dose (D_max). Correlations between geometric metrics and dosimetric differences were analyzed. Dosimetric discrepancy events were defined as Y_3Gy using a threshold of 3 Gy. Within a univariable logistic regression triage framework, each geometric metric was used as an independent variable to estimate the probability of Y_3Gy. Discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and precision-recall (PR) curves, with the area under the curve (AUC) including ROC-AUC and PR-AUC. Practical operating thresholds were determined via threshold sweeping. Results Geometric similarity metrics showed weak-to-moderate correlations with dosimetric differences; compared with maximum dose, correlations with mean dose differences were more consistent. Among the evaluated metrics, HD95 achieved the best classification performance for Y_3Gy. Threshold sweeping suggested that an HD95 threshold in the range of 4-9 mm can balance the risk of missed discrepancies with the efficiency of automated contour quality assurance (QA). Conclusion Several geometric similarity metrics demonstrated only weak-to-moderate associations with dosimetric differences. For head-and-neck OAR contour QA in this study, HD95 provided the best discriminative performance and can support rapid triage of automated contours, with a practical operating threshold range of 4-9 mm, potentially improving the efficiency of adaptive radiotherapy workflows.

Objective To address the need for rapid review of automated organ-at-risk (OAR) contouring for head-and-neck cancer in online adaptive radiotherapy, this study used dosimetric indices as the reference standard to evaluate the suitability of geometric similarity metrics and to develop a rapid screening model that balances the risk of missed errors with review efficiency. Methods This retrospective study included 29 patients with head-and-neck radiotherapy, yielding 243 pairs of OAR contours (auto-generated vs. manual). Geometric similarity metrics, including the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice), the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and the maximum Hausdorff distance (HD100), were computed between the two contour sets. Using the dose distributions from clinical treatment plans, dosimetric differences between the two contour sets were calculated for key indices, including mean dose (D_mean) and maximum dose (D_max). Correlations between geometric metrics and dosimetric differences were analyzed. Dosimetric discrepancy events were defined as Y_3Gy using a threshold of 3 Gy. Within a univariable logistic regression triage framework, each geometric metric was used as an independent variable to estimate the probability of Y_3Gy. Discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and precision-recall (PR) curves, with the area under the curve (AUC) including ROC-AUC and PR-AUC. Practical operating thresholds were determined via threshold sweeping. Results Geometric similarity metrics showed weak-to-moderate correlations with dosimetric differences; compared with maximum dose, correlations with mean dose differences were more consistent. Among the evaluated metrics, HD95 achieved the best classification performance for Y_3Gy. Threshold sweeping suggested that an HD95 threshold in the range of 4-9 mm can balance the risk of missed discrepancies with the efficiency of automated contour quality assurance (QA). Conclusion Several geometric similarity metrics demonstrated only weak-to-moderate associations with dosimetric differences. For head-and-neck OAR contour QA in this study, HD95 provided the best discriminative performance and can support rapid triage of automated contours, with a practical operating threshold range of 4-9 mm, potentially improving the efficiency of adaptive radiotherapy workflows.

Objective To address the need for rapid review of automated organ-at-risk (OAR) contouring for head-and-neck cancer in online adaptive radiotherapy, this study used dosimetric indices as the reference standard to evaluate the suitability of geometric similarity metrics and to develop a rapid screening model that balances the risk of missed errors with review efficiency. Methods This retrospective study included 29 patients with head-and-neck radiotherapy, yielding 243 pairs of OAR contours (auto-generated vs. manual). Geometric similarity metrics, including the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice), the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and the maximum Hausdorff distance (HD100), were computed between the two contour sets. Using the dose distributions from clinical treatment plans, dosimetric differences between the two contour sets were calculated for key indices, including mean dose (D_mean) and maximum dose (D_max). Correlations between geometric metrics and dosimetric differences were analyzed. Dosimetric discrepancy events were defined as Y_3Gy using a threshold of 3 Gy. Within a univariable logistic regression triage framework, each geometric metric was used as an independent variable to estimate the probability of Y_3Gy. Discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and precision-recall (PR) curves, with the area under the curve (AUC) including ROC-AUC and PR-AUC. Practical operating thresholds were determined via threshold sweeping. Results Geometric similarity metrics showed weak-to-moderate correlations with dosimetric differences; compared with maximum dose, correlations with mean dose differences were more consistent. Among the evaluated metrics, HD95 achieved the best classification performance for Y_3Gy. Threshold sweeping suggested that an HD95 threshold in the range of 4-9 mm can balance the risk of missed discrepancies with the efficiency of automated contour quality assurance (QA). Conclusion Several geometric similarity metrics demonstrated only weak-to-moderate associations with dosimetric differences. For head-and-neck OAR contour QA in this study, HD95 provided the best discriminative performance and can support rapid triage of automated contours, with a practical operating threshold range of 4-9 mm, potentially improving the efficiency of adaptive radiotherapy workflows.

Objective To explore the feasibility and clinical experience of the middle hepatic vein splitting-reconstruction technique in split liver transplantation from low-age donor livers. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on the cases of two low-age donor livers that underwent middle hepatic vein splitting-reconstruction, which were transplanted into four child recipients at the Liver Transplantation Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from January 2017 to July 2023. The surgical and postoperative conditions were summarized and analyzed. Results Donor 1 was a 6-year-old and 4-month-old girl with a body weight of 21 kg, and the obtained donor liver weighed 496 g. After splitting, the left and right liver weights were 201 g and 280 g, and transplanted into a 9-month-old boy weighing 6.5 kg and a 9-month-old boy weighing 7.5 kg, respectively. The graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR) was 3.09% and 3.73%, respectively. Donor 2 was a 5-year-old and 8-month-old boy with a body weight of 19 kg, and the donor liver weighed 673 g. After splitting, the left and right liver weights were 230 g and 400 g, and transplanted into a 13-month-old girl weighing 9.5 kg and a 15-month-old boy weighing 12 kg. The GRWR was 2.42% and 3.33%, respectively. Both donor livers were split ex vivo, with the middle hepatic vein being completely split in the middle and reconstructed using allogeneic iliac vein and iliac artery vascular patches. According to GRWR, none of the 4 transplant livers were reduced in volume. Among the 4 recipients, one died due to postoperative portal vein thrombosis and non-function of the transplant liver, while the other three cases recovered smoothly without early or late complications. Regular follow-up was conducted until July 31, 2023, and liver function recovered well. Conclusions Under the premise of detailed assessment of the donor liver and meticulous intraoperative operation, as well as matching with suitable child recipients, low-age donor livers may be selected for splitting. The complete splitting and reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein in the middle may effectively ensure the adequate venous return of the left and right liver and provide sufficient functional liver volume.

Objective To explore the technical process and clinical application of laparoscopic combined upper midline incision minimally invasive liver transplantation. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 30 cases of laparoscopic combined upper midline incision minimally invasive liver transplantation. The cases were divided into cirrhosis group (15 cases) and liver failure group (15 cases) based on the primary disease. The surgical and postoperative conditions of the two groups were compared. Results All patients successfully underwent laparoscopic "clockwise" liver resection, with no cases of passive conversion to open surgery or intolerance to pneumoperitoneum. In 6 cases, the right lobe was relatively large, and the right hepatic ligaments could not be completely mobilized. One case required an additional reverse "L" incision during open surgery. All patients successfully completed the liver transplantation, with no major intraoperative bleeding, cardiovascular events, or other occurrences in the 30 patients. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score in the cirrhosis group was lower than that in the liver failure group (P<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, surgical time, blood loss, anhepatic phase, or cold ischemia time (all P>0.05). During the perioperative period, there was 1 case of hepatic artery embolism, 1 case of portal vein anastomotic stenosis, no complications of hepatic vein and inferior vena cava, and 3 cases of biliary anastomotic stenosis, all of which occurred in the liver failure group. Conclusions In strictly selected cases, the minimally invasive liver transplantation technique combining laparoscopic hepatectomy with upper midline incision for graft implantation has the advantages of smaller incisions, less bleeding, relatively easier operation, and faster postoperative recovery, which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Split liver transplantation(SLT)has become an indispensable method for expanding the donor liver pool.However,advanced age in recipients can have significant adverse effects on prognosis.We report the case of an 82-year-old man with chronic liver failure and polycystic liver disease who underwent in vivo split right triple lobe donor liver transplantation on October 29,2021.The patient made a remarkable recovery and was discharged 1 month after surgery.To date,he has been followed up for 32 months,with favorable laboratory and imaging test results,and no significant abnormalities or complications.Currently,this patient may be the oldest SLT recipient in the world.With comprehensive preoperative evaluation,optimized surgical techniques,and individually tailored postoperative care,older adults can safely undergo SLT.Therefore,advanced age should not be considered an absolute contraindication for this procedure.

Objective:By systematically evaluate the implementation of GBZ 2.1, so as to provide technical basis for the future revisions of this standard.Methods:From May to October 2023, Based on the pre survey questionnaire, the semi-structured interview method was used to interviews with experts from CDC, Occupational disease prevention and control hospital institutes, employers, occupational hygiene technical service intermediaries and universities, and the inductive method was used to extract the topics and relevant suggestions.Results:Generally, GBZ 2.1 is scientific, practical, progressiveness and operable. There are still some issues such as OELs overlapping and the correspondence between Chinese and English names. The outstanding problem is the coordination with other standard contents.Conclusion:The technical indicators in GBZ 2.1 could adapt to the needs of current practical work. The coordination between standards needs to be clarified, and the new recommended content needs further promotion and exploration on how to implement it.

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCFs)are common orthopedic conditions that can lead to spinal pain and deformity,which greatly affects the quality of life of patients.Currently,there are various treatment methods for OVCFs,but there is still a lack of standards for optimal treatment modalities.Therefore,this article introduces the current treatment methods and character-istics of epidemiology for OVCFs,in order to improve the awareness of this disease among clinicians and provide a reference for select-ing more appropriate treatment regimens.Conservative treatment measures,such as bracing and analgesia,are the basic treatment mea-sures for OVCFs,and anti-osteoporosis drugs play a crucial role in management.Minimally invasive procedures,including percutane-ous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty,remain the primary surgical interventions,and traditional open surgeries are also an important part of treatment,such as anterior spinal fusion,combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion,posterior spinal fusion with three-column osteotomy,and posterior spinal fusion with vertebroplasty.Furthermore,surgeons should focus on the accumulation of related surgical techniques and skills during surgery to effectively address the challenges and complications associated with surgical interventions.Finally,scientific and appropriate treatment methods should be selected for patients,in order to improve long-term treat-ment outcomes and increase the degree of satisfaction among pa-tients.

Objective:By systematically evaluate the implementation of GBZ 2.1, so as to provide technical basis for the future revisions of this standard.Methods:From May to October 2023, Based on the pre survey questionnaire, the semi-structured interview method was used to interviews with experts from CDC, Occupational disease prevention and control hospital institutes, employers, occupational hygiene technical service intermediaries and universities, and the inductive method was used to extract the topics and relevant suggestions.Results:Generally, GBZ 2.1 is scientific, practical, progressiveness and operable. There are still some issues such as OELs overlapping and the correspondence between Chinese and English names. The outstanding problem is the coordination with other standard contents.Conclusion:The technical indicators in GBZ 2.1 could adapt to the needs of current practical work. The coordination between standards needs to be clarified, and the new recommended content needs further promotion and exploration on how to implement it.

Objective To investigate the diagnosis and treatment strategy of the portal vein complications in children undergoing split liver transplantation. Methods The clinical data of 88 pediatric recipients who underwent split liver transplantation were retrospectively analyzed. Intraoperative anastomosis at the bifurcating site of the portal vein or donor iliac vein bypass anastomosis was performed depending on the internal diameter and development of the recipient's portal vein. A normalized portal venous blood stream monitoring was performed during the perioperative stage. After operation, heparin sodium was used to bridge warfarin for anticoagulation therapy. After portal vein stenosis or thrombosis was identified with enhanced CT or portography, managements including embolectomy, systemic anticoagulation, interventional thrombus removal, balloon dilatation and/or stenting were performed. Results Among the 88 recipients, a total of 10 children were diagnosed with portal vein complications, of which 4 cases were diagnosed with portal vein stenosis at 1 d, 2 months, 8 months, and 11 months after surgery, and 6 cases were diagnosed with portal vein thrombosis at intraoperative, 2 d, 3 d (n=2), 6 d, and 11 months after surgery, respectively. One patient with portal vein stenosis and one patient with portal vein thrombosis died perioperatively. The fatality related to portal vein complications was 2% (2/88). Of the remaining 8 patients, 1 underwent systemic anticoagulation, 2 underwent portal venous embolectomy, 1 underwent interventional balloon dilatation, and 4 underwent interventional balloon dilatation plus stenting. No portal venous related symptoms were detected during postoperative long term follow up, and the retested portal venous blood stream parameters were normal. Conclusions The normalized intra- and post-operative portal venous blood stream monitoring is a useful tool for the early detection of portal vein complications, the early utilization of useful managements such as intraoperative portal venous embolectomy, interventional balloon dilatation and stenting may effectively treat the portal vein complications, thus minimizing the portal vein complication related graft loss and recipient death.