Objective To address the need for rapid review of automated organ-at-risk (OAR) contouring for head-and-neck cancer in online adaptive radiotherapy, this study used dosimetric indices as the reference standard to evaluate the suitability of geometric similarity metrics and to develop a rapid screening model that balances the risk of missed errors with review efficiency. Methods This retrospective study included 29 patients with head-and-neck radiotherapy, yielding 243 pairs of OAR contours (auto-generated vs. manual). Geometric similarity metrics, including the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice), the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and the maximum Hausdorff distance (HD100), were computed between the two contour sets. Using the dose distributions from clinical treatment plans, dosimetric differences between the two contour sets were calculated for key indices, including mean dose (D_mean) and maximum dose (D_max). Correlations between geometric metrics and dosimetric differences were analyzed. Dosimetric discrepancy events were defined as Y_3Gy using a threshold of 3 Gy. Within a univariable logistic regression triage framework, each geometric metric was used as an independent variable to estimate the probability of Y_3Gy. Discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and precision-recall (PR) curves, with the area under the curve (AUC) including ROC-AUC and PR-AUC. Practical operating thresholds were determined via threshold sweeping. Results Geometric similarity metrics showed weak-to-moderate correlations with dosimetric differences; compared with maximum dose, correlations with mean dose differences were more consistent. Among the evaluated metrics, HD95 achieved the best classification performance for Y_3Gy. Threshold sweeping suggested that an HD95 threshold in the range of 4-9 mm can balance the risk of missed discrepancies with the efficiency of automated contour quality assurance (QA). Conclusion Several geometric similarity metrics demonstrated only weak-to-moderate associations with dosimetric differences. For head-and-neck OAR contour QA in this study, HD95 provided the best discriminative performance and can support rapid triage of automated contours, with a practical operating threshold range of 4-9 mm, potentially improving the efficiency of adaptive radiotherapy workflows.

Objective To address the need for rapid review of automated organ-at-risk (OAR) contouring for head-and-neck cancer in online adaptive radiotherapy, this study used dosimetric indices as the reference standard to evaluate the suitability of geometric similarity metrics and to develop a rapid screening model that balances the risk of missed errors with review efficiency. Methods This retrospective study included 29 patients with head-and-neck radiotherapy, yielding 243 pairs of OAR contours (auto-generated vs. manual). Geometric similarity metrics, including the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice), the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and the maximum Hausdorff distance (HD100), were computed between the two contour sets. Using the dose distributions from clinical treatment plans, dosimetric differences between the two contour sets were calculated for key indices, including mean dose (D_mean) and maximum dose (D_max). Correlations between geometric metrics and dosimetric differences were analyzed. Dosimetric discrepancy events were defined as Y_3Gy using a threshold of 3 Gy. Within a univariable logistic regression triage framework, each geometric metric was used as an independent variable to estimate the probability of Y_3Gy. Discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and precision-recall (PR) curves, with the area under the curve (AUC) including ROC-AUC and PR-AUC. Practical operating thresholds were determined via threshold sweeping. Results Geometric similarity metrics showed weak-to-moderate correlations with dosimetric differences; compared with maximum dose, correlations with mean dose differences were more consistent. Among the evaluated metrics, HD95 achieved the best classification performance for Y_3Gy. Threshold sweeping suggested that an HD95 threshold in the range of 4-9 mm can balance the risk of missed discrepancies with the efficiency of automated contour quality assurance (QA). Conclusion Several geometric similarity metrics demonstrated only weak-to-moderate associations with dosimetric differences. For head-and-neck OAR contour QA in this study, HD95 provided the best discriminative performance and can support rapid triage of automated contours, with a practical operating threshold range of 4-9 mm, potentially improving the efficiency of adaptive radiotherapy workflows.

Objective To address the need for rapid review of automated organ-at-risk (OAR) contouring for head-and-neck cancer in online adaptive radiotherapy, this study used dosimetric indices as the reference standard to evaluate the suitability of geometric similarity metrics and to develop a rapid screening model that balances the risk of missed errors with review efficiency. Methods This retrospective study included 29 patients with head-and-neck radiotherapy, yielding 243 pairs of OAR contours (auto-generated vs. manual). Geometric similarity metrics, including the Dice similarity coefficient (Dice), the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and the maximum Hausdorff distance (HD100), were computed between the two contour sets. Using the dose distributions from clinical treatment plans, dosimetric differences between the two contour sets were calculated for key indices, including mean dose (D_mean) and maximum dose (D_max). Correlations between geometric metrics and dosimetric differences were analyzed. Dosimetric discrepancy events were defined as Y_3Gy using a threshold of 3 Gy. Within a univariable logistic regression triage framework, each geometric metric was used as an independent variable to estimate the probability of Y_3Gy. Discriminative performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and precision-recall (PR) curves, with the area under the curve (AUC) including ROC-AUC and PR-AUC. Practical operating thresholds were determined via threshold sweeping. Results Geometric similarity metrics showed weak-to-moderate correlations with dosimetric differences; compared with maximum dose, correlations with mean dose differences were more consistent. Among the evaluated metrics, HD95 achieved the best classification performance for Y_3Gy. Threshold sweeping suggested that an HD95 threshold in the range of 4-9 mm can balance the risk of missed discrepancies with the efficiency of automated contour quality assurance (QA). Conclusion Several geometric similarity metrics demonstrated only weak-to-moderate associations with dosimetric differences. For head-and-neck OAR contour QA in this study, HD95 provided the best discriminative performance and can support rapid triage of automated contours, with a practical operating threshold range of 4-9 mm, potentially improving the efficiency of adaptive radiotherapy workflows.

Objective To evaluate the accuracy of multiparametric imaging on the dual-source CT through acceptance and commissioning testing, and to provide a reference for standardized clinical application. Methods Both the adult and pediatric dual-source CT scanning modes were used to scan the electron density phantom, and identical multiparametric image reconstruction tasks were performed, including the conventional CT images, the mixed CT images, the virtual monoenergetic images, the iodine images, the electron density images, and the effective atomic number images. Results In the adult scanning mode, the virtual monoenergetic CT numbers showed the greatest difference for the cortical bone (1722 HU at 40 keV vs. 30 HU at 80 keV), with smaller differences observed for other materials as their atomic numbers decreased. The pediatric scanning mode exhibited a similar trend, with the largest difference occurring at 40 keV (1393 HU). In the adult scanning mode, the deviations between the theoretical and measured iodine concentration values were all within 5%, whereas in the pediatric scanning mode, the largest deviation was 15% for an iodine concentration of 2.0 mg/mL. For the electron density, the largest deviation between the theoretical and measured values occurred in the LN450 lung (9.18% in the adult scanning mode and 8.96% in the pediatric scanning mode); the deviations for the LN300 lung were all below 7.2%, for aluminum below 6.3%, and for other tissues within 3%. For the effective atomic number, the deviations between the theoretical and measured values were all within 5% in both scanning modes. Conclusion To ensure the accuracy and reproducibility of the dual-source CT applications, a comprehensive acceptance testing protocol should be established to guarantee the safety and precision of the CT localization process.

Objective To quantitatively compare the dosimetric differences among 4 volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT)plans by analyzing the number of arcs and collimator angle settings,aiming to establish a standardized planning template for hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation(HS-PCI)in clinic and improve both planning quality and clinical efficiency.Methods Twenty HS-PCI patients were enrolled,with 4 VMAT plans(V2c,V2p,V3,and V4)for each patient.The differences in target dose,organs-at-risk dose,and monitor units were compared.Results V4 plan had the highest PTV D98%and V95%,and the differences of PTV D98%in V2c vs V2p,V2c vs V4,and PTV V95%in V2c vs V4 were statistically significant(P<0.05).Meanwhile,V4 plan had the lowest PTV Dmax and Dmin doses.Specifically,statistically significant differences were observed in PTV Dmax in V4 vs V2c,V4 vs V2p,V4 vs V3,as well as PTV Dmin in V2c vs V2p,V2c vs V3,V2c vs V4,V2p vs V4(P<0.05).The PTV Dmean was the highest in V2p plan,with statistically significant differences observed in V2c vs V2p,V2c vs V4,V2p vs V3,and V3 vs V4(P<0.05).The highest PTV D2%dose was observed in V2p plan,and the differences in V2c vs V2p,V2c vs V4,V2p vs V3,V3 vs V4 were statistically significant(P<0.05).The homogeneity index and conformity index were close in 4 plans(P=0.946,P=0.380).V4 plan had the lowest Dmax,Dmean,and Dmin of the hippocampus,with significant differences in hippocampal Dmax in V4 vs V2c,V4 vs V2p,hippocampal Dmean in V4 vs V2c,V4 vs V2p,V3 vs V2c,and hippocampal Dmin in V2c vs V2p/V3/V4,and V4 vs V2p(P<0.05).V3 plan had the lowest Dmax for bilateral lenses,and V4 plan showed the lowest Dmax for lenses with a 3 mm expansion,with significant differences between V2c and V2p/V3/V4(P<0.05).V4 plan had the lowest dose for the right optic nerve,with significant differences in V4 vs V2p,and V4 vs V3(P<0.05).No significant differences were observed for the left optic nerve and optic chiasm.The monitor units in V2p plan was the lowest.Conclusion When differences in organs-at-risk doses and plan quality parameters are insignificant,V2p plan is recommended as it can ensure treatment quality while reducing delivery time.

Objective:By systematically evaluate the implementation of GBZ 2.1, so as to provide technical basis for the future revisions of this standard.Methods:From May to October 2023, Based on the pre survey questionnaire, the semi-structured interview method was used to interviews with experts from CDC, Occupational disease prevention and control hospital institutes, employers, occupational hygiene technical service intermediaries and universities, and the inductive method was used to extract the topics and relevant suggestions.Results:Generally, GBZ 2.1 is scientific, practical, progressiveness and operable. There are still some issues such as OELs overlapping and the correspondence between Chinese and English names. The outstanding problem is the coordination with other standard contents.Conclusion:The technical indicators in GBZ 2.1 could adapt to the needs of current practical work. The coordination between standards needs to be clarified, and the new recommended content needs further promotion and exploration on how to implement it.

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures(OVCFs)are common orthopedic conditions that can lead to spinal pain and deformity,which greatly affects the quality of life of patients.Currently,there are various treatment methods for OVCFs,but there is still a lack of standards for optimal treatment modalities.Therefore,this article introduces the current treatment methods and character-istics of epidemiology for OVCFs,in order to improve the awareness of this disease among clinicians and provide a reference for select-ing more appropriate treatment regimens.Conservative treatment measures,such as bracing and analgesia,are the basic treatment mea-sures for OVCFs,and anti-osteoporosis drugs play a crucial role in management.Minimally invasive procedures,including percutane-ous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty,remain the primary surgical interventions,and traditional open surgeries are also an important part of treatment,such as anterior spinal fusion,combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion,posterior spinal fusion with three-column osteotomy,and posterior spinal fusion with vertebroplasty.Furthermore,surgeons should focus on the accumulation of related surgical techniques and skills during surgery to effectively address the challenges and complications associated with surgical interventions.Finally,scientific and appropriate treatment methods should be selected for patients,in order to improve long-term treat-ment outcomes and increase the degree of satisfaction among pa-tients.

Objective To quantitatively compare the dosimetric differences among 4 volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT)plans by analyzing the number of arcs and collimator angle settings,aiming to establish a standardized planning template for hippocampal-sparing prophylactic cranial irradiation(HS-PCI)in clinic and improve both planning quality and clinical efficiency.Methods Twenty HS-PCI patients were enrolled,with 4 VMAT plans(V2c,V2p,V3,and V4)for each patient.The differences in target dose,organs-at-risk dose,and monitor units were compared.Results V4 plan had the highest PTV D98%and V95%,and the differences of PTV D98%in V2c vs V2p,V2c vs V4,and PTV V95%in V2c vs V4 were statistically significant(P<0.05).Meanwhile,V4 plan had the lowest PTV Dmax and Dmin doses.Specifically,statistically significant differences were observed in PTV Dmax in V4 vs V2c,V4 vs V2p,V4 vs V3,as well as PTV Dmin in V2c vs V2p,V2c vs V3,V2c vs V4,V2p vs V4(P<0.05).The PTV Dmean was the highest in V2p plan,with statistically significant differences observed in V2c vs V2p,V2c vs V4,V2p vs V3,and V3 vs V4(P<0.05).The highest PTV D2%dose was observed in V2p plan,and the differences in V2c vs V2p,V2c vs V4,V2p vs V3,V3 vs V4 were statistically significant(P<0.05).The homogeneity index and conformity index were close in 4 plans(P=0.946,P=0.380).V4 plan had the lowest Dmax,Dmean,and Dmin of the hippocampus,with significant differences in hippocampal Dmax in V4 vs V2c,V4 vs V2p,hippocampal Dmean in V4 vs V2c,V4 vs V2p,V3 vs V2c,and hippocampal Dmin in V2c vs V2p/V3/V4,and V4 vs V2p(P<0.05).V3 plan had the lowest Dmax for bilateral lenses,and V4 plan showed the lowest Dmax for lenses with a 3 mm expansion,with significant differences between V2c and V2p/V3/V4(P<0.05).V4 plan had the lowest dose for the right optic nerve,with significant differences in V4 vs V2p,and V4 vs V3(P<0.05).No significant differences were observed for the left optic nerve and optic chiasm.The monitor units in V2p plan was the lowest.Conclusion When differences in organs-at-risk doses and plan quality parameters are insignificant,V2p plan is recommended as it can ensure treatment quality while reducing delivery time.

The risk factors for thromboembolism caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection include severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia，elevated D-dimer levels，abnormal inflammatory markers，platelet abnormalities，lung consolidation，lung necrosis and pleural effusion，and so on.In terms of treatment，tetracycline and quinolone antibiotics have shown new advantages in addressing the recent prevalence of macrolide resistant mycoplasma.Regarding anticoagulant therapy，direct oral anticoagulants represented by rivaroxaban have significant advantages and are safe in children's medication.In addition，the application of traditional Chinese medicine for promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis needs to be developed.The identification and intervention of risk factors related to coagulation disorders and thromboembolism caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection can help improve treatment effectiveness.

The risk factors for thromboembolism caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection include severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia，elevated D-dimer levels，abnormal inflammatory markers，platelet abnormalities，lung consolidation，lung necrosis and pleural effusion，and so on.In terms of treatment，tetracycline and quinolone antibiotics have shown new advantages in addressing the recent prevalence of macrolide resistant mycoplasma.Regarding anticoagulant therapy，direct oral anticoagulants represented by rivaroxaban have significant advantages and are safe in children's medication.In addition，the application of traditional Chinese medicine for promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis needs to be developed.The identification and intervention of risk factors related to coagulation disorders and thromboembolism caused by Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection can help improve treatment effectiveness.