ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and feasibility of intra-biliary drainage tube placement after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in elderly patients with choledocholithiasis， and to provide more options for surgical procedures in the clinical management of elderly patients with choledocholithiasis. MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed for the clinical data of 52 elderly patients with choledocholithiasis who were admitted to Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery， Affiliated Dalian Friendship Hospital of Dalian Medical University， from November 2021 to October 2024. According to the biliary drainage method after surgery， the patients were divided into internal drainage group with 24 patients and T-tube drainage group with 28 patients， and there were 19 patients in each group after propensity score matching. The two groups were compared in terms of perioperative parameters and postoperative complications. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for comparison of continuous data between two groups， and the chi-square test or the Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison of categorical data between two groups. ResultsCompared with the T-tube drainage group， the internal drainage group had a significantly shorter length of postoperative hospital stay and a significantly lower volume of postoperative bile loss （Z=-2.845 and -5.633， both P<0.05）， while there were no significant differences between the two groups in time of operation， intraoperative blood loss， and drainage tube indwelling time （all P>0.05）. There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative bile leak， stone recurrence， biliary stricture， and drainage tube-related complications， and the internal drainage group had a significantly lower total complication rate than the T-tube drainage group ［1 （5.3%） vs 7 （36.8%）， P<0.05］. ConclusionFor elderly patients with choledocholithiasis， intra-biliary drainage tube placement after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration can shorten the length of postoperative hospital stay， reduce bile loss， and lower the incidence rate of postoperative complications， thereby helping to accelerate postoperative recovery.

The chronic use of morphine and other opioids is associated with opioid-induced hypersensitivity (OIH) and analgesic tolerance. Among the different forms of OIH and tolerance, the opioid receptors and cell types mediating opioid-induced mechanical allodynia and anti-allodynic tolerance remain unresolved. Here we demonstrated that the loss of peripheral μ-opioid receptors (MORs) or MOR-expressing neurons attenuated thermal tolerance, but did not affect the expression and maintenance of morphine-induced mechanical allodynia and anti-allodynic tolerance. To confirm this result, we made dorsal root ganglia-dorsal roots-sagittal spinal cord slice preparations and recorded low-threshold Aβ-fiber stimulation-evoked inputs and outputs in superficial dorsal horn neurons. Consistent with the behavioral results, peripheral MOR loss did not prevent the opening of Aβ mechanical allodynia pathways in the spinal dorsal horn. Therefore, the peripheral MOR signaling pathway may not be an optimal target for preventing mechanical OIH and analgesic tolerance. Future studies should focus more on central mechanisms.
Humans ; Morphine/pharmacology* ; Hyperalgesia/metabolism* ; Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology* ; Neurons/metabolism* ; Signal Transduction

Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of intra-biliary drainage versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) for choledocholithiasis.Methods:The clinical data of 50 patients undergoing LCBDE for choledocholithiasis in Dalian Friendship Hospital of Dalian Medical University from January 2018 to October 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, including 23 males and 27 females, aged (61.3±16.2) years old. Patients were divided into the intra-biliary drainage group and T-tube drainage group. Propensity score matching was used to match the baseline data of the two groups at a 1∶1 ratio. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, abdominal drainage tube indwelling time, postoperative bile drainage volume and postoperative complications were compared between the groups.Results:Compared with the T-tube group, the operative time [(155.0±36.5) min vs. (194.4±55.8) min], length of postoperative hospital stay [8.0(7.0, 8.0) d vs. 11.0(8.0, 13.0) d], and abdominal drainage tube indwelling time [5.0(4.0, 6.0) d vs. 6.0(5.0, 8.0) d] were all shorter in the intra-biliary drainage tube group (all P<0.05). The postoperative bile drainage volume was reduced [0 ml vs. 431.4(344.7, 484.3) ml]. No postoperative bile leakage occurred in either group. The intraoperative blood loss, proportion of postoperative residual stone, stone recurrence and biliary stricture were comparable between the two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusion:Intra-biliary tube drainage following LCBDE could be safe and effective for choledocholithiasis. Compared to the classic procedure of T-tube drainage, it may be superior in the operation time, postoperative hospital stay, abdominal drainage tube indwelling time, postoperative bile drainage volume.