Objective:To evaluate the clinical outcomes of applying an enhanced workflow in robotic-assisted total hip revision arthroplasty.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the 25 consecutive patients who had undergone robotic-assisted total hip revision arthroplasty in which an enhanced workflow was applied at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from September 2021 to October 2024. The cohort consisted of 8 males and 17 females with an age of (64.0±12.8) years. The left side was affected in 18 cases and the right side in 7 cases. The time from initial total hip arthroplasty to revision was (159.6±86.7) months. In all patients, no significant difference was found in the preoperative femoral cortical thickness between the healthy and the affected sides. The enhanced workflow included preoperative CT modeling and planning, intraoperative registration, prosthetic removal and reconstruction, and verification of prosthesis position. A total of 18 patients underwent total hip revision involving both the acetabular and the femoral sides; 6 patients underwent simple acetabular reconstruction with retention of the original femoral stem and replacement of the femoral head; 1 patient underwent femoral revision with retention of the acetabular cup and replacement of the acetabular liner. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for hip pain at the final follow-up, and follow-up complications were recorded.Results:All patients successfully completed robotic registration during surgery, with no case of intraoperative robotic termination. For the 25 patients, the operative time was (152.2±43.8) minutes, the intraoperative blood loss 600 (400, 1,000) mL, and the follow-up time 12.0 (6.0, 31.5) months. At the final follow-up, their mHHS improved from 66.0 (26.4, 75.6) points preoperatively to 93.5 (80.3, 98.9) points, and their VAS pain score decreased from 5.0 (3.0, 7.0) points preoperatively to 0.0 (0.0, 2.0) point ( P<0.05). Follow-ups revealed no case of reoperation, prosthetic loosening, joint dislocation, periprosthetic infection, or periprosthetic fracture. Conclusion:The enhanced workflow can achieve satisfactory outcomes in robotic-assisted total hip revision for patients with adequate proximal femoral bone stock.

Objective:To evaluate the clinical outcomes of applying an enhanced workflow in robotic-assisted total hip revision arthroplasty.Methods:A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the 25 consecutive patients who had undergone robotic-assisted total hip revision arthroplasty in which an enhanced workflow was applied at Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from September 2021 to October 2024. The cohort consisted of 8 males and 17 females with an age of (64.0±12.8) years. The left side was affected in 18 cases and the right side in 7 cases. The time from initial total hip arthroplasty to revision was (159.6±86.7) months. In all patients, no significant difference was found in the preoperative femoral cortical thickness between the healthy and the affected sides. The enhanced workflow included preoperative CT modeling and planning, intraoperative registration, prosthetic removal and reconstruction, and verification of prosthesis position. A total of 18 patients underwent total hip revision involving both the acetabular and the femoral sides; 6 patients underwent simple acetabular reconstruction with retention of the original femoral stem and replacement of the femoral head; 1 patient underwent femoral revision with retention of the acetabular cup and replacement of the acetabular liner. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for hip pain at the final follow-up, and follow-up complications were recorded.Results:All patients successfully completed robotic registration during surgery, with no case of intraoperative robotic termination. For the 25 patients, the operative time was (152.2±43.8) minutes, the intraoperative blood loss 600 (400, 1,000) mL, and the follow-up time 12.0 (6.0, 31.5) months. At the final follow-up, their mHHS improved from 66.0 (26.4, 75.6) points preoperatively to 93.5 (80.3, 98.9) points, and their VAS pain score decreased from 5.0 (3.0, 7.0) points preoperatively to 0.0 (0.0, 2.0) point ( P<0.05). Follow-ups revealed no case of reoperation, prosthetic loosening, joint dislocation, periprosthetic infection, or periprosthetic fracture. Conclusion:The enhanced workflow can achieve satisfactory outcomes in robotic-assisted total hip revision for patients with adequate proximal femoral bone stock.