Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine whether a combined exercise (EX), including aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training, reduces fatigue and dyspnea, improves physical fitness, and if increased physical fitness after exercise is associated with attenuating symptoms in young adults with mild long coronavirus disease (COVID) symptoms. Methods: Twenty-eight young adults (aged 23±4 years) with long COVID were randomly assigned to either the EX group (n=14), which underwent aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training three times per week for 8 weeks, or the control (CON) group (n=14). Symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue were assessed using self-report questionnaires.Cardiorespiratory fitness was directly measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, while muscle strength was measured by isokinetic muscle testing. These variables were measured before and after the exercise intervention. Results: Compared to the CON group, the EX group showed improvements in symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2peak ), and peak torque, with significant interaction effects observed (p＜ 0.05). The EX group exhibited a mean difference of 2.9 mL/kg/min in VO2peak (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8−4.0) and 13.0 Nm (95% CI, 6.1−19.8) in peak torque compared to the CON group (p＜0.05). Improvements in VO2peak were negatively associated with attenuations in both fatigue and dyspnea after the exercise intervention (p＜0.05). Conclusion These findings indicate that EX training can effectively alleviate symptoms and improve physical fitness in young adults with mild long COVID. Structured exercise training may serve as an effective intervention to improve the health of those with long COVID.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine whether a combined exercise (EX), including aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training, reduces fatigue and dyspnea, improves physical fitness, and if increased physical fitness after exercise is associated with attenuating symptoms in young adults with mild long coronavirus disease (COVID) symptoms. Methods: Twenty-eight young adults (aged 23±4 years) with long COVID were randomly assigned to either the EX group (n=14), which underwent aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training three times per week for 8 weeks, or the control (CON) group (n=14). Symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue were assessed using self-report questionnaires.Cardiorespiratory fitness was directly measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, while muscle strength was measured by isokinetic muscle testing. These variables were measured before and after the exercise intervention. Results: Compared to the CON group, the EX group showed improvements in symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2peak ), and peak torque, with significant interaction effects observed (p＜ 0.05). The EX group exhibited a mean difference of 2.9 mL/kg/min in VO2peak (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8−4.0) and 13.0 Nm (95% CI, 6.1−19.8) in peak torque compared to the CON group (p＜0.05). Improvements in VO2peak were negatively associated with attenuations in both fatigue and dyspnea after the exercise intervention (p＜0.05). Conclusion These findings indicate that EX training can effectively alleviate symptoms and improve physical fitness in young adults with mild long COVID. Structured exercise training may serve as an effective intervention to improve the health of those with long COVID.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine whether a combined exercise (EX), including aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training, reduces fatigue and dyspnea, improves physical fitness, and if increased physical fitness after exercise is associated with attenuating symptoms in young adults with mild long coronavirus disease (COVID) symptoms. Methods: Twenty-eight young adults (aged 23±4 years) with long COVID were randomly assigned to either the EX group (n=14), which underwent aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training three times per week for 8 weeks, or the control (CON) group (n=14). Symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue were assessed using self-report questionnaires.Cardiorespiratory fitness was directly measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, while muscle strength was measured by isokinetic muscle testing. These variables were measured before and after the exercise intervention. Results: Compared to the CON group, the EX group showed improvements in symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2peak ), and peak torque, with significant interaction effects observed (p＜ 0.05). The EX group exhibited a mean difference of 2.9 mL/kg/min in VO2peak (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8−4.0) and 13.0 Nm (95% CI, 6.1−19.8) in peak torque compared to the CON group (p＜0.05). Improvements in VO2peak were negatively associated with attenuations in both fatigue and dyspnea after the exercise intervention (p＜0.05). Conclusion These findings indicate that EX training can effectively alleviate symptoms and improve physical fitness in young adults with mild long COVID. Structured exercise training may serve as an effective intervention to improve the health of those with long COVID.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine whether a combined exercise (EX), including aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training, reduces fatigue and dyspnea, improves physical fitness, and if increased physical fitness after exercise is associated with attenuating symptoms in young adults with mild long coronavirus disease (COVID) symptoms. Methods: Twenty-eight young adults (aged 23±4 years) with long COVID were randomly assigned to either the EX group (n=14), which underwent aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training three times per week for 8 weeks, or the control (CON) group (n=14). Symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue were assessed using self-report questionnaires.Cardiorespiratory fitness was directly measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, while muscle strength was measured by isokinetic muscle testing. These variables were measured before and after the exercise intervention. Results: Compared to the CON group, the EX group showed improvements in symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2peak ), and peak torque, with significant interaction effects observed (p＜ 0.05). The EX group exhibited a mean difference of 2.9 mL/kg/min in VO2peak (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8−4.0) and 13.0 Nm (95% CI, 6.1−19.8) in peak torque compared to the CON group (p＜0.05). Improvements in VO2peak were negatively associated with attenuations in both fatigue and dyspnea after the exercise intervention (p＜0.05). Conclusion These findings indicate that EX training can effectively alleviate symptoms and improve physical fitness in young adults with mild long COVID. Structured exercise training may serve as an effective intervention to improve the health of those with long COVID.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine whether a combined exercise (EX), including aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training, reduces fatigue and dyspnea, improves physical fitness, and if increased physical fitness after exercise is associated with attenuating symptoms in young adults with mild long coronavirus disease (COVID) symptoms. Methods: Twenty-eight young adults (aged 23±4 years) with long COVID were randomly assigned to either the EX group (n=14), which underwent aerobic, resistance, and inspiratory muscle training three times per week for 8 weeks, or the control (CON) group (n=14). Symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue were assessed using self-report questionnaires.Cardiorespiratory fitness was directly measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, while muscle strength was measured by isokinetic muscle testing. These variables were measured before and after the exercise intervention. Results: Compared to the CON group, the EX group showed improvements in symptoms of fatigue and dyspnea, maximal oxygen consumption (VO2peak ), and peak torque, with significant interaction effects observed (p＜ 0.05). The EX group exhibited a mean difference of 2.9 mL/kg/min in VO2peak (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8−4.0) and 13.0 Nm (95% CI, 6.1−19.8) in peak torque compared to the CON group (p＜0.05). Improvements in VO2peak were negatively associated with attenuations in both fatigue and dyspnea after the exercise intervention (p＜0.05). Conclusion These findings indicate that EX training can effectively alleviate symptoms and improve physical fitness in young adults with mild long COVID. Structured exercise training may serve as an effective intervention to improve the health of those with long COVID.

Objective:To describe the current status and trends in the outcomes and care practices of extremely preterm infants at 22-25 weeks′ gestation age from the Chinese Neonatal Network (CHNN) from 2019 to 2021.Methods:This cross-sectional study used data from the CHNN cohort of very preterm infants. All 963 extremely preterm infants with gestational age between 22-25 weeks who were admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICU) of the CHNN from 2019 to 2021 were included. Infants admitted after 24 hours of life or transferred to non-CHNN hospitals were excluded. Perinatal care practices, survival rates, incidences of major morbidities, and NICU treatments were described according to different gestational age groups and admission years. Comparison among gestational age groups was conducted using χ2 and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Trends by year were evaluated by Cochran-Armitage and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests for trend. Results:Of the 963 extremely preterm infants enrolled, 588 extremely preterm infants (61.1%) were male. The gestational age was 25.0 (24.4, 25.6) weeks, with 29 extremely preterm infants (3.0%), 88 extremely preterm infants (9.1%), 264 extremely preterm infants (27.4%), and 582 extremely preterm infants (60.4%) at 22, 23, 24, and 25 weeks of gestation age, respectively. The birth weight was 770 (680, 840) g. From 2019 to 2021, the number of extremely preterm infants increased each year (285, 312, and 366 extremely preterm infants, respectively). Antenatal steroids and magnesium sulfate were administered to 67.7% (615/908) and 51.1% (453/886) mothers of extremely preterm infants. In the delivery room, 20.8% (200/963) and 69.5% (669/963) extremely preterm infants received noninvasive positive end-expiratory pressure support and endotracheal intubation. Delayed cord clamping and cord milking were performed in 19.0% (149/784) and 30.4% (241/794) extremely preterm infants. From 2019 to 2021, there were significant increases in the usage of antenatal steroids, antenatal magnesium sulfate, and delivery room noninvasive positive-end expiratory pressure support (all P<0.05). Overall, 349 extremely preterm infants (36.2%) did not receive complete care, 392 extremely preterm infants (40.7%) received complete care and survived to discharge, and 222 extremely preterm infants (23.1%) received complete care but died in hospital. The survival rates for extremely preterm infants at 22, 23, 24 and 25 weeks of gestation age were 10.3% (3/29), 23.9% (21/88), 33.0% (87/264) and 48.3% (281/582), respectively. From 2019 to 2021, there were no statistically significant trends in complete care, survival, and mortality rates (all P>0.05). Only 11.5% (45/392) extremely preterm infants survived without major morbidities. Moderate to severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (67.3% (264/392)) and severe retinopathy of prematurity (61.5% (241/392)) were the most common morbidities among survivors. The incidences of severe intraventricular hemorrhage or periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis, and sepsis were 15.3% (60/392), 5.9% (23/392) and 19.1% (75/392), respectively. Overall, 83.7% (328/392) survivors received invasive ventilation during hospitalization, with a duration of 22 (10, 42) days. The hospital stay for survivors was 97 (86, 116) days. Conclusions:With the increasing number of extremely preterm infants at 22-25 weeks′ gestation admitted to CHNN NICU, the survival rate remained low, especially the rate of survival without major morbidities. Further quality improvement initiatives are needed to facilitate the implementation of evidence-based care practices.

Objective:To investigate the current status, trends, and differences among institutions in the application of delivery room continuous positive airway pressure (DRCPAP) for very preterm infants treated in the institutions in the Chinese Neonatal Network (CHNN). Also, to explore the impact of DRCPAP on the outcomes of very preterm infants in China.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Based on the CHNN very preterm infant cohort, very preterm infants (gestational ages ranging from 25 weeks +0 to 31 weeks +6) born in-hospital and treated in 79 tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) participating in the CHNN from 2019 to 2021 were included. The usage rates of DRCPAP in different hospitals, as well as gestational ages and years, were described. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test) or t-test. A multivariate logistic regression model was established to explore the correlation between DRCPAP and clinical outcomes. Results:(1) A total of 18 048 very preterm infants were included. Among them, 3 666 (20.3%) received DRCPAP, and 14 382 (79.7%) did not. (2) The usage rate of DRCPAP for very preterm infants among different institutions is from 0.0% to 94.5%. Fourteen institutions did not use DRCPAP, and 55 institutions had a usage rate below 30%. The usage rate of DRCPAP in very preterm infants increased annually, from 13.8% (818/5 916) in 2019 to 26.0% (1 583/6 097) in 2021 ( χ2trend=122.00, P<0.001). (3) The DRCPAP group had higher rates of maternal assisted reproductive technology pregnancy, chorioamnionitis, a full course of antenatal corticosteroids, gestational diabetes, fetal distress, antenatal magnesium sulfate use, and cesarean delivery compared to the non-DRCPAP group [20.3% (744/3 665) vs. 17.6% (2 529/14 369), χ2=14.45; 23.0% (695/3 021) vs. 16.4% (1 956/11 926), χ2=72.57; 57.1% (2 090/3 660) vs. 54.3% (7 766/14 302), χ2=9.55; 23.0% (844/3 669) vs. 20.7% (2 969/14 342), χ2=9.77; 8.7% (319/3 666) vs. 7.0% (1 006/14 371), χ2=12.51; 87.1% (3 186/3 657) vs. 82.0% (11 736/14 312), χ2=81.38; 63.5% (2 327/3 664) vs. 60.7% (8 722/14 369), χ2=9.59; all P<0.05]. While the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and the proportion of infants not using antenatal corticosteroids were lower in the non-DRCPAP group [17.1% (626/3 660) vs. 22.6% (3 183/14 084), χ2=44.70; 14.2% (520/3 661) vs. 19.7% (2 814/14 284), χ2=57.34; all P<0.05]. The DRCPAP group had lower birth weight and gestational age, higher 1 min and 5 min Apgar scores, and lower neonatal transport stabilization index scores [(1 308±314) g vs. (1 325±315) g, t=2.90; (29.5±1.7) weeks vs. (29.7±1.6) weeks, t=3.96; (7.9±1.8) scores vs. (7.6±1.9) scores, t=－9.80; (9.0±1.1) scores vs. (8.7±1.3) scores, t=－13.01; (11.0±9.4) scores vs. (13.1±9.8) scores, t=11.31; all P<0.05]. The incidence of early-onset sepsis was higher in the DRCPAP group than in the non-DRCPAP group [1.8% (68/3 578) vs. 1.3% (193/14 296), adjusted OR (95% CI): 1.417 (1.028-1.955)], while the rates of tracheal intubation within 72 hours, PS use, invasive mechanical ventilation, mortality, admission hypothermia, grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ intracranial hemorrhage, and stage≥3 ROP were all lower in the DRCPAP group compared to the non-DRCPAP group [22.6% (830/3 666) vs. 36.9% (5 310/14 374), adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.499 (0.448-0.555); 53.1% (1 947/3 666) vs. 58.3% (8 388/14 377), adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.764 (0.697-0.836); 30.1% (1 104/3 662) vs. 43.9% (6 307/14 366), adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.539 (0.487-0.595); 7.4% (274/3 666) vs. 10.6% (1 526/14 342), adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.709 (0.601-0.836); 57.5% (2 103/3 657) vs. 66.5% (9 501/14 287), adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.722 (0.661-0.788); 3.0% (101/3 366) vs. 5.9% (763/12 932)], adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.525 (0.412-0.669); 2.2% (65/2 954) vs. 3.3% (367/11 121), adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.692 (0.505-0.947); all P<0.05]. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the incidence rates of BPD at a corrected gestational age of 36 weeks, patent ductus arteriosus ligation, spontaneous intestinal perforation, and pneumothorax. Conclusions:Domestically, the application of DRCPAP might be related to a decrease in the demand for invasive ventilation, the use of surfactants, and mortality, but it might not reduce the occurrence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, at a corrected gestational age of 36 weeks. In recent years, the use of DRCPAP in very premature infants in China has increased, but the overall usage rate is still low, and there are significant differences between units, requiring continuous quality improvement.

Objective:To investigate the current status, trends, and differences among institutions in the application of delivery room continuous positive airway pressure (DRCPAP) for very preterm infants treated in the institutions in the Chinese Neonatal Network (CHNN). Also, to explore the impact of DRCPAP on the outcomes of very preterm infants in China.Methods:A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Based on the CHNN very preterm infant cohort, very preterm infants (gestational ages ranging from 25 weeks +0 to 31 weeks +6) born in-hospital and treated in 79 tertiary neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) participating in the CHNN from 2019 to 2021 were included. The usage rates of DRCPAP in different hospitals, as well as gestational ages and years, were described. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square test (or Fisher's exact test) or t-test. A multivariate logistic regression model was established to explore the correlation between DRCPAP and clinical outcomes. Results:(1) A total of 18 048 very preterm infants were included. Among them, 3 666 (20.3%) received DRCPAP, and 14 382 (79.7%) did not. (2) The usage rate of DRCPAP for very preterm infants among different institutions is from 0.0% to 94.5%. Fourteen institutions did not use DRCPAP, and 55 institutions had a usage rate below 30%. The usage rate of DRCPAP in very preterm infants increased annually, from 13.8% (818/5 916) in 2019 to 26.0% (1 583/6 097) in 2021 ( χ2trend=122.00, P<0.001). (3) The DRCPAP group had higher rates of maternal assisted reproductive technology pregnancy, chorioamnionitis, a full course of antenatal corticosteroids, gestational diabetes, fetal distress, antenatal magnesium sulfate use, and cesarean delivery compared to the non-DRCPAP group [20.3% (744/3 665) vs. 17.6% (2 529/14 369), χ2=14.45; 23.0% (695/3 021) vs. 16.4% (1 956/11 926), χ2=72.57; 57.1% (2 090/3 660) vs. 54.3% (7 766/14 302), χ2=9.55; 23.0% (844/3 669) vs. 20.7% (2 969/14 342), χ2=9.77; 8.7% (319/3 666) vs. 7.0% (1 006/14 371), χ2=12.51; 87.1% (3 186/3 657) vs. 82.0% (11 736/14 312), χ2=81.38; 63.5% (2 327/3 664) vs. 60.7% (8 722/14 369), χ2=9.59; all P<0.05]. While the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and the proportion of infants not using antenatal corticosteroids were lower in the non-DRCPAP group [17.1% (626/3 660) vs. 22.6% (3 183/14 084), χ2=44.70; 14.2% (520/3 661) vs. 19.7% (2 814/14 284), χ2=57.34; all P<0.05]. The DRCPAP group had lower birth weight and gestational age, higher 1 min and 5 min Apgar scores, and lower neonatal transport stabilization index scores [(1 308±314) g vs. (1 325±315) g, t=2.90; (29.5±1.7) weeks vs. (29.7±1.6) weeks, t=3.96; (7.9±1.8) scores vs. (7.6±1.9) scores, t=－9.80; (9.0±1.1) scores vs. (8.7±1.3) scores, t=－13.01; (11.0±9.4) scores vs. (13.1±9.8) scores, t=11.31; all P<0.05]. The incidence of early-onset sepsis was higher in the DRCPAP group than in the non-DRCPAP group [1.8% (68/3 578) vs. 1.3% (193/14 296), adjusted OR (95% CI): 1.417 (1.028-1.955)], while the rates of tracheal intubation within 72 hours, PS use, invasive mechanical ventilation, mortality, admission hypothermia, grade Ⅲ-Ⅳ intracranial hemorrhage, and stage≥3 ROP were all lower in the DRCPAP group compared to the non-DRCPAP group [22.6% (830/3 666) vs. 36.9% (5 310/14 374), adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.499 (0.448-0.555); 53.1% (1 947/3 666) vs. 58.3% (8 388/14 377), adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.764 (0.697-0.836); 30.1% (1 104/3 662) vs. 43.9% (6 307/14 366), adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.539 (0.487-0.595); 7.4% (274/3 666) vs. 10.6% (1 526/14 342), adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.709 (0.601-0.836); 57.5% (2 103/3 657) vs. 66.5% (9 501/14 287), adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.722 (0.661-0.788); 3.0% (101/3 366) vs. 5.9% (763/12 932)], adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.525 (0.412-0.669); 2.2% (65/2 954) vs. 3.3% (367/11 121), adjusted OR (95% CI): 0.692 (0.505-0.947); all P<0.05]. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the incidence rates of BPD at a corrected gestational age of 36 weeks, patent ductus arteriosus ligation, spontaneous intestinal perforation, and pneumothorax. Conclusions:Domestically, the application of DRCPAP might be related to a decrease in the demand for invasive ventilation, the use of surfactants, and mortality, but it might not reduce the occurrence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia, at a corrected gestational age of 36 weeks. In recent years, the use of DRCPAP in very premature infants in China has increased, but the overall usage rate is still low, and there are significant differences between units, requiring continuous quality improvement.

Objective: To describe the current status and trends in the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) among very preterm infants (VPI) admitted to the neonatal intensive care units (NICU) of the Chinese Neonatal Network (CHNN) from 2019 to 2021, and to compare the differences in PDA treatment among these units. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study based on the CHNN VPI cohort, all of 22 525 VPI (gestational age<32 weeks) admitted to 79 tertiary NICU within 3 days of age from 2019 to 2021 were included. The overall PDA treatment rates were calculated, as well as the rates of infants with different gestational ages (≤26, 27-28, 29-31 weeks), and pharmacological and surgical treatments were described. PDA was defined as those diagnosed by echocardiography during hospitalization. The PDA treatment rate was defined as the number of VPI who had received medication treatment and (or) surgical ligation of PDA divided by the number of all VPI. Logistic regression was used to investigate the changes in PDA treatment rates over the 3 years and the differences between gestational age groups. A multivariate Logistic regression model was constructed to compute the standardized ratio (SR) of PDA treatment across different units, to compare the rates after adjusting for population characteristics. Results: A total of 22 525 VPI were included in the study, with a gestational age of 30.0 (28.6, 31.0) weeks and birth weight of 1 310 (1 100, 1 540) g; 56.0% (12 615) of them were male. PDA was diagnosed by echocardiography in 49.7% (11 186/22 525) of all VPI, and the overall PDA treatment rate was 16.8% (3 795/22 525). Of 3 762 VPI who received medication treatment, the main first-line medication used was ibuprofen (93.4% (3 515/3 762)) and the postnatal day of first medication treatment was 6 (4, 10) days of age; 59.3% (2 231/3 762) of the VPI had been weaned from invasive respiratory support during the first medication treatment, and 82.2% (3 092/3 762) of the infants received only one course of medication treatment. A total of 143 VPI underwent surgery, which was conducted on 32 (22, 46) days of age. Over the 3 years from 2019 to 2021, there was no significant change in the PDA treatment rate in these VPI (P=0.650). The PDA treatment rate decreased with increasing gestational age (P<0.001). The PDA treatment rates for VPI with gestational age ≤26, 27-28, and 29-31 weeks were 39.6% (688/1 737), 25.9% (1 319/5 098), and 11.4% (1 788/15 690), respectively. There were 61 units having a total number of VPI≥100 cases, and their rates of PDA treatment were 0 (0/116)-47.4% (376/793). After adjusting for population characteristics, the range of standardized ratios for PDA treatment in the 61 units was 0 (95%CI 0-0.3) to 3.4 (95%CI 3.1-3.8). Conclusions: From 2019 to 2021, compared to the peers in developed countries, VPI in CHNN NICU had a different PDA treatment rate; specifically, the VPI with small birth gestational age had a lower treatment rate, while the VPI with large birth gestational age had a higher rate. There are significant differences in PDA treatment rates among different units.
Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Male ; Humans ; Female ; Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/drug therapy* ; Infant, Premature ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Ibuprofen/therapeutic use* ; Infant, Very Low Birth Weight ; Persistent Fetal Circulation Syndrome ; Infant, Premature, Diseases/therapy*

Long COVID has emerged as a global medical challenge, characterized by persistent symptoms such as fatigue, dyspnea, and exercise intolerance following a coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) infection. The protracted nature of these symptoms necessitates the development of effective therapeutic approaches to alleviate the burden on individuals’ well-being and the healthcare system at large. While current pharmacological interventions offer limited efficacy, the exploration of alternative strategies becomes imperative. Exercise training has demonstrated promise in ameliorating long COVID symptoms, yet consensus regarding the optimal exercise modalities remains elusive. In light of this, the present review aims to elucidate the impact of exercise on long COVID symptoms and shed light on exercise prescriptions that have exhibited proven efficacy in the treatment and management of this syndrome.