1.Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry-measured fat mass and lean mass indices and cardiometabolic diseases in elderly Japanese men: the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) study.
Katsuyasu KOUDA ; Yuki FUJITA ; Yuki MURAKAMI ; Kumiko OHARA ; Takahiro TACHIKI ; Junko TAMAKI ; Jong-Seong MOON ; Etsuko KAJITA ; Akemi NITTA ; Nami IMAI ; Kazuhiro UENISHI ; Masayuki IKI
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 2025;30():59-59
BACKGROUND:
High visceral fat mass (FM) is associated with a high risk of cardiometabolic morbidity. Meanwhile, loss of skeletal muscle (lean mass, LM) has been suggested to contribute to metabolic diseases.
METHODS:
We investigated associations between cardiometabolic diseases and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-measured body composition indices, including the FM index (FM/height2), percent body fat, trunk-to-appendicular fat ratio (TAR), trunk-to-leg fat ratio (TLR), LM index (LM/height2) and FM-to-LM ratio in 595 community-dwelling elderly Japanese men (mean age, 74 years; standard deviation, 6; range, 65 to 94). Hypertension was identified as high blood pressure and/or the use of antihypertensive drugs. Diabetes was identified as high hemoglobin A1c and/or the use of antidiabetic drugs. The ability of DXA-based indices to discriminate between the presence and absence of cardiometabolic diseases was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC) calculated by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.
RESULTS:
Body mass index, FM index, percent body fat, TAR, TLR and FM-to-LM ratio were significantly associated with hypertension (P < 0.05). TAR and TLR, but not body mass index, FM index, percent body fat, LM index and FM-to-LM ratio, showed significant positive associations with diabetes. The AUC for the LM index was significantly lower than those for the FM index, percent body fat and FM-to-LM ratio. No associations were observed between the LM index and hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes.
CONCLUSION
The association between cardiometabolic function and LM, which includes skeletal muscle, may not be as pronounced or stronger than associations between cardiometabolic function and FM. Further detailed studies are needed to clarify how skeletal muscle contributes to cardiometabolic disease.
Humans
;
Male
;
Absorptiometry, Photon
;
Aged
;
Japan/epidemiology*
;
Body Composition
;
Aged, 80 and over
;
Hypertension/epidemiology*
;
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology*
;
Body Mass Index
;
Muscle, Skeletal
;
Osteoporosis/epidemiology*
;
Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology*
;
Risk Factors
;
East Asian People
2.Effects of Topical N-Acetylcysteine on Skin Hydration/Transepidermal Water Loss in Healthy Volunteers and Atopic Dermatitis Patients.
Kozo NAKAI ; Kozo YONEDA ; Yumi MURAKAMI ; Ayako KOURA ; Reiko MAEDA ; Asuka TAMAI ; Emiko ISHIKAWA ; Ikumi YOKOI ; Junko MORIUE ; Tetsuya MORIUE ; Yasuo KUBOTA
Annals of Dermatology 2015;27(4):450-451
No abstract available.
Acetylcysteine*
;
Dermatitis, Atopic*
;
Healthy Volunteers*
;
Humans
;
Skin*
;
Water Loss, Insensible
3.Problems in the Evaluation of Medical Interviewing Skills with Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: How Can Reasonable Objectivity Be Ensured?
Junko MURAKAMI ; Hideo TAKENAKA ; Akira HORIKOSHI ; Umihiko SAWADA ; Mitsugu SATO ; Hiroyuki OHI ; Masato MURAKAMI ; Mitsuru YANAI ; Jin TAKEUCHI ; Kazunari KUMASAKA ; Seiji YAZAKI
Medical Education 2001;32(4):231-237
Students' interviewing skills are now commonly evaluated with standardized patient-based assessment methods. Four pairs of instructors at Nihon University School of Medicine used objective structured clinical examinations to evaluate the medical interviewing skills of 122 fifth-year medical students. The results were then analyzed to improve the accuracy of rating with objective structured clinical examinations. Interrater variability was significant among the two pairs of instructors. Variability was greatest when instructors evaluated a student's performance but was minimal when they judged whether a student had carried out a task. The number of standardized patients was 8, with the average score of each standardized patient ranging from 52.5 to 73.3 (full score, 100). These results suggest that the rating process for each item should be further refined and that the standard for evaluation should be clarified.


Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail