Clonorchis sinensis primarily lives in the host liver and biliary system, leading to serious health issues, such as hepatobiliary lesions and cholangiocarcinoma. Establishment of rapid, sensitive and specific tools is of great significance for early diagnosis and management of clonorchiasis. Recently, molecular biological techniques have been widely used for detection of C. sinensis infections. This review summarizes the advances in the major molecular assays for detection of C. sinensis infections in intermediate and definite hosts, including PCR, loop-mediated isothermal amplification, clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated proteins system, and high-throughput sequencing, and summarizes the characteristics and application prospects of these assays, so as to provide precision detection and management of C. sinensis infection.

BACKGROUND:Some studies have shown that the double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is not superior to the single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and stil has some deficiencies difficult to overcome. Which is better, double-bundle reconstruction or single-bundle reconstruction? There is no uniform conclusion. OBJECTIVE:To perform a prospective cohort study on the clinical efficacy and safety of autologous single- and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. METHODS:Totaly 81 patients with posterior cruciate ligament injury were randomly divided into single-bundle reconstruction group (n=41) and double-bundle reconstruction group (n=40). The knee stability, Lysholm score, Tegner score, hospital stay, operation time, fever days and number of puncture cases were compared between the two groups before and 24 months after reconstruction. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION:Compared with the single-bundle reconstruction group, the knee stability was significantly worse in the double-bundle reconstruction group (F=4.362,P=0.000); the operation time, hospital stay and number of puncture cases were also higher in the double-bundle reconstruction group (P < 0.05). At 24 months after reconstruction, the Lysholm and Tegner scores were both increased significantly in the two groups (P < 0.05), but there was no difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). These findings indicate that both single- and double-bundle reconstruction under arthroscopy is safe and effective treatment for posterior cruciate ligament injury, but the double-bundle reconstruction is not recommended as the preferred surgical procedure because of longer time and larger trauma.