Purpose: This study aimed to develop pilot clinical skills assessment (CSA) modules for Korean medicine-specific procedures and to examine their preliminary appropriateness, perceived necessity, and feasibility as a foundation for future licensing-related assessment development. Methods: A participatory action research framework, supplemented by qualitative interviews, was used to develop 4 CSA modules—acupuncture, Chuna manual therapy, pulse diagnosis, and constitutional diagnosis—in collaboration with expert evaluators, students, and standardized patients. The modules were implemented as formative examinations for third-year Korean medicine students, after which semi-structured interviews were conducted to obtain feedback on module content, implementation processes, and scoring procedures. Each module was also reviewed using the RUMBA checklist (Realistic, Understandable, Measurable, Behavioral, and Achievable), together with ratings of perceived necessity and feasibility for possible future use in licensing-related assessment. Interview data were analyzed inductively at the level of individual responses and then compared across modules and participant groups. Results: Qualitative analysis yielded 3 themes: content and scoring criteria, physical environment or simulators, and education or training. Participants emphasized the need to make key aspects of performance more observable, improve authenticity through simulators or task trainers, and strengthen the capacity of scoring systems to distinguish between levels of student performance. Across all modules, mean RUMBA scores were high in the understandable, behavioral, and achievable domains, whereas measurability was more problematic, especially for pulse diagnosis. Conclusion These pilot findings clarify both the strengths and the limitations of Korean medicine-specific CSA modules. The modules received favorable ratings for understandability and achievability, whereas lower ratings for measurability and realism identified priorities for refinement before wider use. This study provides preliminary guidance for the continued development and broader evaluation of Korean medicine-specific performance assessments.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the healthcare election promises made by political parties whose members participate in the Health and Welfare Committee of the 22nd National Assembly. We evaluated whether Korea’s major political parties address various components of the health system, pursue balanced goals for healthcare improvement, and utilize diverse instruments to reform the health sector. Methods: We identified healthcare promises from the top 10 promises submitted by each political party to the National Election Commission, focusing on those classified under “health and welfare” or containing relevant healthcare content. The unit of analysis was the implementation methods within each promise. These promises were then classified using the WHO’s six building blocks of a health system, the quintuple aim for healthcare improvement, and the five control knobs for health sector reform. Results: A total of 33 election promises were identified. Promises related to regional health services and the health workforce were most common, followed closely by caregiving. In terms of the health system building blocks, service delivery was the dominant focus, and among the quintuple aims, improving the patient experience prevailed. Regulation emerged as the most frequently used control knob. Conclusion Healthcare promises mirror societal demands concerning the health workforce, regional healthcare disparities, and caregiving burdens. Although the content varied among parties, significant commonalities were observed. A balanced approach to healthcare financing, along with a broader range of policy reform instruments beyond regulation, is necessary to address health system challenges.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the healthcare election promises made by political parties whose members participate in the Health and Welfare Committee of the 22nd National Assembly. We evaluated whether Korea’s major political parties address various components of the health system, pursue balanced goals for healthcare improvement, and utilize diverse instruments to reform the health sector. Methods: We identified healthcare promises from the top 10 promises submitted by each political party to the National Election Commission, focusing on those classified under “health and welfare” or containing relevant healthcare content. The unit of analysis was the implementation methods within each promise. These promises were then classified using the WHO’s six building blocks of a health system, the quintuple aim for healthcare improvement, and the five control knobs for health sector reform. Results: A total of 33 election promises were identified. Promises related to regional health services and the health workforce were most common, followed closely by caregiving. In terms of the health system building blocks, service delivery was the dominant focus, and among the quintuple aims, improving the patient experience prevailed. Regulation emerged as the most frequently used control knob. Conclusion Healthcare promises mirror societal demands concerning the health workforce, regional healthcare disparities, and caregiving burdens. Although the content varied among parties, significant commonalities were observed. A balanced approach to healthcare financing, along with a broader range of policy reform instruments beyond regulation, is necessary to address health system challenges.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify the healthcare election promises made by political parties whose members participate in the Health and Welfare Committee of the 22nd National Assembly. We evaluated whether Korea’s major political parties address various components of the health system, pursue balanced goals for healthcare improvement, and utilize diverse instruments to reform the health sector. Methods: We identified healthcare promises from the top 10 promises submitted by each political party to the National Election Commission, focusing on those classified under “health and welfare” or containing relevant healthcare content. The unit of analysis was the implementation methods within each promise. These promises were then classified using the WHO’s six building blocks of a health system, the quintuple aim for healthcare improvement, and the five control knobs for health sector reform. Results: A total of 33 election promises were identified. Promises related to regional health services and the health workforce were most common, followed closely by caregiving. In terms of the health system building blocks, service delivery was the dominant focus, and among the quintuple aims, improving the patient experience prevailed. Regulation emerged as the most frequently used control knob. Conclusion Healthcare promises mirror societal demands concerning the health workforce, regional healthcare disparities, and caregiving burdens. Although the content varied among parties, significant commonalities were observed. A balanced approach to healthcare financing, along with a broader range of policy reform instruments beyond regulation, is necessary to address health system challenges.

Japanese encephalitis (JE) cases have been increasingly reported recently especially in Seoul and its vicinity. Pigs are known as amplifying host of JE virus (JEV), but do not play an important role in these recent events because pig-breeding is not common in Seoul. The distribution and the density of migratory birds are correlated with JE cases in cities and they might be highly potential hosts contributing to transmit JEV in metropolitan areas. JE genotype and sero-prevalence in birds should be determined for the verification of the transmission route of JEV in the recent sporadic occurrence of JE cases in Seoul.
Asian Continental Ancestry Group ; Birds ; Encephalitis, Japanese ; Genotype ; Humans ; Korea ; Seoul ; Swine