Purpose: We examined the progression of experimental peri-implantitis in sites that underwent either alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) or spontaneous healing (SH), comparing infected teeth (IT) and non-infected teeth (NIT). This investigation is a secondary analysis of a preclinical study aimed at exploring the correlation between newly formed bone and implant stability quotient (ISQ), as well as the association between newly formed bone and the progression of experimental peri-implantitis. Methods: The bilateral mandibular third or fourth premolars of 6 beagle dogs were randomly assigned to 4 groups: IT/SH, IT/ARP, NIT/SH, and NIT/ARP. Following implant placement, core biopsies were retrieved from each site, and the ISQ value was measured. A 3-month period was allowed for peri-implantitis induction, followed by an additional 3 months for the spontaneous progression of peri-implantitis, with radiographs taken at each time point. Results: During the spontaneous progression of peri-implantitis, no statistically significant differences were observed among the groups in terms of mean ISQ values and radiographic marginal bone loss. Similarly, the percentages of bone substitute, newly formed bone, and fibrovascular connective tissue in core biopsies did not differ significantly among the groups.Linear regression analysis revealed no significant linear correlation between newly formed bone and ISQ in any group (P>0.05). However, a weak linear correlation between newly formed bone and marginal bone loss during the spontaneous progression of peri-implantitis was noted in the IT/SH group alone (P=0.036). Conclusions Within the limitations of this study, we were unable to demonstrate that ARP could improve newly formed bone or primary implant stability. Furthermore, neither ARP nor SH significantly influenced the spontaneous progression of experimental peri-implantitis.

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the bone regeneration and biosorption patterns of different bone substitutes in a rabbit skull defect model. Methods: Four circular 8 mm-defects were created in the cranium of 12 New Zealand white rabbits, each weighing approximately 3 kg. Each defect was randomly assigned to one of 4 treatment groups: cortical deproteinized porcine bone mineral (DPBM), cancellous DPBM, biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) with a 6:4 ratio of hydroxyapatite (HA) to β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) (TCP4), and BCP with a 2:8 ratio of HA to β-TCP (TCP8). The rabbits were euthanized at either 6 weeks (n=6) or 12 weeks (n=6) post-surgery. The harvested specimens were then analyzed both radiographically and histomorphometrically. Results: In the micro-computed tomography analysis, no statistically significant differences were observed among the 4 groups, except in the bone graft volume/tissue volume (GV/TV) at 12 weeks. Cortical DBPM exhibited a higher GV/TV ratio than cancellous DBPM at the same time point. The histomorphometric analysis revealed increased biosorption in cancellous DBPM compared to cortical DBPM at 12 weeks. However, the percentage of newly formed bone did not significantly differ among the 4 groups. Conclusions All types of bone substitutes demonstrated similar patterns of bone regeneration at both 6 and 12 weeks of observation. However, cancellous DPBM exhibited a higher rate of bioabsorption compared to other bone substitutes, suggesting that it may have different indications or applications in guided bone regeneration protocols.

Purpose: Microbiota manipulation through selected probiotics may be a promising tool to prevent cancer development as well as onset, to improve clinical efficacy for cancer treatments. The purpose of this study was to evaluate change in microbiota composition after-probiotics supplementation and assessed the efficacy of probiotics in improving quality of life (QOL) in postoperative cancer patients. Methods: Stool samples were collected from 30 cancer patients from February to October 2020 before (group I) and after (group II) 8 weeks of probiotics supplementation. We performed 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing to evaluate differences in gut microbiota between groups by comparing gut microbiota diversity, overall composition, and taxonomic signature abundance. The health-related QOL was evaluated through the EORTC Quality of life Questionnaire Core 30 questionnaire. Results: Statistically significant differences were noted in group II; increase of Shannon and Simpson index (P = 0.004 and P = 0.001), decrease of Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria at the phylum level (P = 0.032 and P = 0.014, retrospectively), increased of beneficial bacteria such as Weissella (0.096% vs. 0.361%, P < 0.004), Lactococcus (0.023% vs. 0.16%, P < 0.001), and Catenibacterium (0.0% vs. 0.005%, P < 0.042) at the genus level. There was a significant improvement in sleep disturbance (P = 0.039) in group II. Conclusion Gut microbiota in cancer patients can be manipulated by specific probiotic strains, result in an altered microbiota. Microbiota modulation by probiotics can be considered as part of a supplement that helps to increase gut microbiota diversity and improve QOL in cancer patients after surgery.

PURPOSE: For the treatment of acute appendicitis, a conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has been widely performed. Recently, the use of single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is increasing because it is believed to have advantages over conventional laparoscopic surgery. In this study, we compared SILS and a conventional LA. METHODS: We analyzed the 217 patients who received laparoscopy-assisted appendectomies between August 2010 and April 2012 at Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital. One hundred-twelve patients underwent SILS, and 105 patients underwent LA. For the two groups, we compared the operation times, postoperative laboratory results, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: The patients' demographics, including body mass index, were not significantly different between the two groups. There were 6 perforated appendicitis cases in the SILS group and 5 cases in the LA group. The mean operative time in the SILS group was 65.88 +/- 22.74 minutes whereas that in the LA group was 61.70 +/- 22.27 minutes (P = 0.276). There were no significant differences in the mean hospital stays, use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, and wound infections between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Postoperative pain, complications and hospital stay showed no statistically significant differences between the SILS and the LA groups. However, our SILS method uses a single trocar and two latex tubes, so cost savings and reduced interference during surgery are expected.
Appendectomy ; Appendicitis ; Body Mass Index ; Cost Savings ; Demography ; Humans ; Laparoscopes ; Laparoscopy ; Latex ; Length of Stay ; Operative Time ; Pain, Postoperative ; Surgical Instruments ; Wound Infection