Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are an important treatment option for ulcerative colitis, providing rapid onset of action, oral administration, and efficacy even after biologic failure. The 3 approved agents—tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib—differ in JAK isoform selectivity, leading to clinically meaningful differences in efficacy and safety. Evidence from network meta-analyses, clinical trials, and real-world studies consistently shows that upadacitinib provides the highest efficacy for induction and maintenance of remission, whereas filgotinib demonstrates the most favorable safety profile. The strong efficacy of upadacitinib and tofacitinib is particularly relevant in patients with severe disease, including acute severe ulcerative colitis, and upadacitinib maintains high efficacy regardless of prior advanced therapy exposure. JAK inhibitors also benefit extraintestinal manifestations. Although risks such as herpes zoster, serious infection, thromboembolism, and major cardiovascular events differ among agents, long-term data suggest generally acceptable safety when used appropriately. Intraclass JAK-to-JAK cycling is feasible, with about half of patients achieving steroid-free clinical remission in retrospective cohorts. Based on mechanistic, clinical, and real-world evidence, filgotinib may be a first-line option for patients with lower disease activity or when safety is a priority, whereas upadacitinib or tofacitinib may be preferred in higher disease activity. Strategically selecting agents may improve durability and outcomes.

Background: This study investigated the prognostic value of bilaterality and multifocality in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) recurrence, aiming to inform optimal surgical strategies. Methods: In this retrospective cohort, 1,966 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy for PTC (2011–2014) were categorized into four groups according to tumor multifocality and bilaterality confirmed by postoperative histopathology: group 1, unilateral solitary; group 2, unilateral multifocal; group 3, bilateral solitary; group 4, bilateral multifocal. Clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes were compared across these groups. Results: Group 4 exhibited the highest prevalence of BRAFV600E positivity, nodal metastases, and recurrence. Both bilaterality and multifocality were associated with more aggressive clinicopathologic characteristics. Recurrence risk increased with the number of tumor foci, with the odds ratio (OR) significantly elevated for more than five foci. Satellite pattern was strongly linked to recurrence (OR, 19.49; P<0.001). While tumor multifocality (≥5 foci) and bilaterality were associated with recurrence in univariate analyses, these associations were not independent after adjustment. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated the lowest recurrence-free survival (RFS) in group 4. Patients with bilateral disease had significantly lower RFS than those with unilateral disease (P=0.003), whereas multifocality did not significantly affect RFS compared to solitary disease (P=0.095). Conclusion Tumor bilaterality, multifocality (≥5 foci), and satellite pattern were associated with aggressive features and higher recurrence risk. Although not independent predictors, these factors may serve as useful surrogate markers of aggressive disease biology and help guide personalized surgical strategies in patients with PTC.

In patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), initial recurrence risk stratification based on clinical, histopathological, and perioperative data remains the key determinant for guiding management strategies during the first 1-2 years post-treatment. However, the adoption of ongoing risk stratification (ORS), which dynamically reassesses risk by integrating longitudinal clinical data and treatment response, enables more precise long-term prognostic assessment and facilitates highly individualized management. Building upon recent guidelines, the 2026 KTA guideline has been further refined by incorporating robust evidence from large-scale national cohorts and comprehensive systematic reviews. These updated recommendations outline contemporary concepts of ORS, risk-adapted TSH suppression targets, optimized surveillance modalities for recurrence detection, and disease-specific long-term follow-up strategies. Reflecting the paradigm shift toward de-escalated treatment, this revision integrates evolved perspectives on TSH suppression intensity, the clinical interpretation of thyroglobulin levels, and tailored follow-up intervals. These evidence-based recommendations aim to minimize unnecessary treatment and excessive surveillance in the large proportion of patients with excellent prognosis after initial therapy, while ensuring that each patient receives appropriately tailored and effective long-term management.

The gut microbiome is not just a bystander of colorectal carcinogenesis but is an active driver of colorectal cancer (CRC). CRC-associated microbiome contributes in the tumorigenesis through chronic inflammation, formation of toxic metabolite and genotoxins, oncogenic signal activation, immune evasion, and barrier disruption—all reinforcing a tumor microenvironment. In contrast, beneficial microbiome supports the barrier-immune-metabolic axis by maintaining mucosal integrity and balanced immune tone. Despite extensive studies of microbiome-based CRC biomarkers, microbiome-based CRC biomarkers have not been yet ready for routine clinical use due to variation across populations and lack of standardization of key steps such as sampling, analysis, cutoffs, and interpretation. Microbiome-based therapies aim to change the overall intestinal ecosystem rather than simply adding or removing single strains. At present, dietary modulation and prebiotics are considered supportive measures, while probiotics or synbiotics are in preclinical stage. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) still faces important challenges in effectiveness, standardization and safety. By its role in reshaping the tumor–host immune environment, FMT is viewed as a potential option for cancer therapy after further development through well-controlled clinical trials with careful safety monitoring.

Background: Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have accelerated their integration into clinical domains, including laboratory medicine. The performance of LLMs in answering board-level laboratory medicine questions has not been comprehensively evaluated. Given the importance of diagnostic accuracy in this field, rigorous and objective evaluations of LLM capabilities are essential. Methods: We assessed 12 LLMs from OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google using 320 Korean Residency Examination questions (2021–2024) spanning six laboratory medicine subspecialties. Standardized prompts were provided via their application programming interfaces under deterministic settings (temperature = 0). Questions were administered thrice to assess response reproducibility. Outputs were compared with validated answers and analyzed for accuracy, reasoning quality, and error typology. Results: Google’s Gemini 2.0 Pro achieved the highest accuracy (80.0%), followed by OpenAI’s GPT-4.5 (77.2%) and Anthropic’s Claude 3.7 Sonnet (74.1%). Accuracy decreased as the difficulty of questions increased (78.0% for easy vs. 45.1% for challenging). Subspecialty performance varied. Al models underperformed on questions on transfusion medicine (mean accuracy: 38.8%), primarily because of limitations in domain-specific and regional knowledge representations. Incorrect answers primarily resulted from reasoning errors. Reproducibility exceeded 95% for most models; however, some residual non-determinism appeared even with greedy decoding (temperature = 0). Conclusions LLMs demonstrated substantial potential for integration into laboratory medicine, particularly in clinical chemistry and immunology. Performance inconsistencies (particularly for high-difficulty questions) and knowledge gaps (notably for transfusion medicine) highlight the necessity for further development—potentially including domain-specific fine-tuning and retrieval-augmented generation integration—and robust expert oversight before clinical application.

Background: Fusion genes are major drivers of acute leukemia. Conventional diagnostics are limited in detecting the diverse fusions included in recently updated acute leukemia classifications. We evaluated the fusion detection performance of RNA sequencing (RNAseq) compared with that of conventional diagnostics in patients with acute leukemia. Methods: We retrospectively obtained the data of 101 patients with acute leukemia who underwent conventional diagnostics (i.e., karyotyping, FISH, or multiplex reverse transcription PCR) at diagnosis at Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between September 2022 and September 2023. Whole RNA-seq was performed using the Illumina Stranded mRNA Prep kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The concordance, sensitivity, and specificity of RNA-seq for fusion gene detection were compared with those of conventional diagnostics. Results: RNA-seq helped identify 52 fusion genes in 51 (50.5%) of 101 patients, with detection rates of 40.7%, 70.3%, 37.5%, and 50% in acute myeloid leukemia, B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and mixed-phenotype acute leukemia, respectively. RNA-seq showed 83.3% sensitivity and 80.8% concordance with conventional diagnostics; it missed eight fusions, likely because of low transcript abundance or enhancer hijacking. RNA-seq also helped clarify three previously unspecified rearrangements and detected 12 fusions (21.4%) in 56 cases that tested negative with conventional diagnostics, including four novel (KMT2A::THAP12 , RUNX1::PRPF19 , MLLT10::UBE2L6, and FUS::ZNF362) and three rare (HNRNPH1::ERG, RUNX1::USP42, and ETV6::NCOA2) fusions. Conclusions This was the first study to evaluate the performance of whole RNA-seq in fusion detection in patients with acute leukemia in Korea. Incorporating RNA-seq into diagnostic workflows may facilitate earlier and more precise therapeutic decisions and improve prognostic assessment in patients with acute leukemia.

Background/Aims: Nocturnal acid reflux disrupts sleep and impairs quality of life. Proton pump inhibitors provide insufficient suppression of nocturnal acid secretion, whereas fexuprazan offers prolonged acid suppression. We compared the efficacy of fexuprazan and esomeprazole in controlling nocturnal reflux. Methods: In a randomized and crossover study, patients received fexuprazan or esomeprazole daily for 4 weeks, followed by a washout and crossover to the alternate medication for another 4 weeks, with a final washout completing the sequence. Severity (scores 0-10), frequency, sleep disturbance, and medication preferences were evaluated. Results: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled and randomized to receive either fexuprazan (n = 20) or esomeprazole (n = 19) first. After the first treatment, fexuprazan reduced severity from 7.5 ± 1.7 to 1.4 ± 1.7 (81.3% decrease), versus 7.8 ± 1.5 to 2.8 ± 1.9 (64.1% decrease) with esomeprazole (P = 0.012). In patients with severe symptoms (scores ≥ 7), fexuprazan led to significantly greater improvement than esomeprazole (P = 0.008). Following the first washout, the second crossover treatment resulted in greater improvement in symptom severity with fexuprazan (P = 0.001). During the second washout, nocturnal symptoms severity and frequencies were better controlled with fexuprazan than with esomeprazole (P = 0.005 and 0.019). Patients who switched from esomeprazole to fexuprazan preferred fexuprazan (P = 0.018). Conclusions Fexuprazan was more effective than esomeprazole in controlling nocturnal reflux symptom, particularly in patients with severe symptoms. Fexuprazan may offer a therapeutic advantage for patients with severe and persistent nocturnal reflux despite proton pump inhibitor therapy.

Purpose: This study examined the current status, perceptions, and educational needs of primary care education in medical and nursing schools to provide foundational data that can inform effective curriculum development. Methods: In total, 40 medical and 64 nursing schools were eligible for this study. Data were collected through an online survey using Google Forms, developed by the research team, from November 2024 to January 2025. Frequency analysis and independent t-tests were performed to compare perceptions on primary care education between the two schools types. Borich Needs Assessment and Locus-for-Focus model were used to identify and prioritize educational needs. Results: Responses from 21 medical and 24 nursing schools were analyzed. All medical schools primarily offered education in primary care clinics (100%), whereas most nursing schools offered it in community healthcare institutions (87.5%). Visits and observations were the most common educational methods (>80%). Reports, presentations, and discussions were the most used assessment methods (>60%). Multidisciplinary team-based practicums were limited in both medical (9.5%) and nursing (25.0%) schools. Both groups rated the need to expand primary care education and multidisciplinary team approach highly (>4.4/5). “Longitudinality” and “generalism” were educational priority needs across both groups, whereas other elements showed variations. Conclusion This study identified the shared and distinct aspects of primary care education across schools. The findings highlight the importance of enhancing and tailoring primary care education to each school’s specific context and needs, while fostering interprofessional collaboration to strengthen community-based healthcare.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Dietary supplement use is common among breast cancer survivors, but studies on Asian populations remain limited. This study investigated dietary supplement use among Korean breast cancer survivors, distinguishing between vitamin/ mineral (VM) and non-vitaminon-mineral (NVNM) supplements. SUBJECTS/METHODS: This cross-sectional study included 1,136 stage I–III breast cancer survivors from 12 Korean hospitals, who survived more than 6 mon post-surgery. The participants completed a questionnaire on post-diagnostic dietary supplement use. Stepwise logistic regression was applied, calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to identify the demographic and clinical factors associated with VM and NVNM use. RESULTS: Seventy percent of survivors reported supplement use, with 25% using a single product. The most common VM supplements were multivitamins/minerals, vitamin D, and vitamin C, while the most common NVNM supplements included omega-3 fatty acids, probiotics, and ginseng. Survivors with higher education and greater physical activity were more likely to use VM supplements (ORs [95% CIs], 2.74 [1.76–4.25] for college graduates or above vs. middle school or below; 1.38 [1.02–1.88] for the most active group vs. the least active group). NVNM use was associated with higher education, greater physical activity levels, and a history of smoking (ORs [95% CIs], 2.29 [1.46–3.58] for college graduates or above vs. middle school or below; 1.52 [1.13–2.06] for the most active group vs. the least active group; 2.00 [1.23–3.25] for ever smokers vs. never smokers). Survivors who had undergone chemotherapy were also more likely to use NVNM supplements than those who had not (OR [95% CI], 1.37 [1.02–1.84]). CONCLUSION Seventy percent of Korean breast cancer survivors used dietary supplements in this study. VM use was associated with higher education and physical activity, while higher NVNM use was associated with higher education, greater physical activity, a history of smoking, and chemotherapy.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the detection ability of quality of life (QoL) changes and responsiveness of the KOrean QUality of life in Stomach cancer patients Study group (KOQUSS)-40 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ). Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted to evaluate QoL changes after various gastrectomies between January 2021 and April 2022. Participants were instructed to complete the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. QoL changes over time and QoL responsiveness were assessed for each questionnaire. Results: Data from 491 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer at 22 institutions were analyzed. The summary scores of the KOQUSS-40 and EORTC QLQ-STO22 showed significant differences between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.044 and p=0.038, respectively), but no difference was observed for the EORTC QLQ-C30. Dysphagia on the KOQUSS-40 was significantly different between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups (p=0.031); however, dysphagia on the EORTC QLQ-STO22 did not differ. The responsiveness of the KOQUSS-40 was similar to that of the EORTC QLQ in patients who experienced ≥ 10% body weight loss, but approximately 10% less in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy than the EORTC QLQ. Conclusion KOQUSS-40 has several advantages over EORTC QLQ-C30/STO22 when comparing QoL between the total and proximal gastrectomy groups. The findings provide information for researchers investigating the QoL of patients who have undergone curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.