Purpose: While colonoscopy is the standard surveillance tool for stage I colorectal cancer according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, its effectiveness in detecting recurrence is debated. This study evaluates recurrence risk factors and patterns in stage I colorectal cancer to inform comprehensive surveillance strategies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 2,248 stage I colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery at Samsung Medical Center (2007-2018) was conducted. Exclusions were based on familial history, prior recurrences, preoperative treatments, and inadequate data. Surveillance included colonoscopy, laboratory tests, and computed tomography (CT) scans. Results: Stage I colorectal cancer patients showed favorable 5-year disease-free survival (98.3% colon, 94.6% rectum). Among a total of 1,467 colon cancer patients, 26 (1.76%) experienced recurrence. Of the 781 rectal cancer patients, 47 (6.02%) experienced recurrence. Elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and perineural invasion were significant recurrence risk factors in colon cancer, while tumor budding was significant in rectal cancer. Distant metastasis was the main recurrence pattern in colon cancer (92.3%), while rectal cancer showed predominantly local recurrence (50%). Colonoscopy alone detected recurrences in a small fraction of cases (3.7% in colon, 14.9% in rectum). Conclusion Although recurrence in stage I colorectal cancer is rare, relying solely on colonoscopy for surveillance may miss distant metastases or locoregional recurrence outside the colorectum. For high-risk patients, we recommend considering regular CT scans alongside colonoscopy. This targeted approach may enable earlier recurrence detection and improve outcomes in this subset while avoiding unnecessary scans for the low-risk majority.

Purpose: While colonoscopy is the standard surveillance tool for stage I colorectal cancer according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, its effectiveness in detecting recurrence is debated. This study evaluates recurrence risk factors and patterns in stage I colorectal cancer to inform comprehensive surveillance strategies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 2,248 stage I colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery at Samsung Medical Center (2007-2018) was conducted. Exclusions were based on familial history, prior recurrences, preoperative treatments, and inadequate data. Surveillance included colonoscopy, laboratory tests, and computed tomography (CT) scans. Results: Stage I colorectal cancer patients showed favorable 5-year disease-free survival (98.3% colon, 94.6% rectum). Among a total of 1,467 colon cancer patients, 26 (1.76%) experienced recurrence. Of the 781 rectal cancer patients, 47 (6.02%) experienced recurrence. Elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and perineural invasion were significant recurrence risk factors in colon cancer, while tumor budding was significant in rectal cancer. Distant metastasis was the main recurrence pattern in colon cancer (92.3%), while rectal cancer showed predominantly local recurrence (50%). Colonoscopy alone detected recurrences in a small fraction of cases (3.7% in colon, 14.9% in rectum). Conclusion Although recurrence in stage I colorectal cancer is rare, relying solely on colonoscopy for surveillance may miss distant metastases or locoregional recurrence outside the colorectum. For high-risk patients, we recommend considering regular CT scans alongside colonoscopy. This targeted approach may enable earlier recurrence detection and improve outcomes in this subset while avoiding unnecessary scans for the low-risk majority.

Purpose: While colonoscopy is the standard surveillance tool for stage I colorectal cancer according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, its effectiveness in detecting recurrence is debated. This study evaluates recurrence risk factors and patterns in stage I colorectal cancer to inform comprehensive surveillance strategies. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 2,248 stage I colorectal cancer patients who underwent radical surgery at Samsung Medical Center (2007-2018) was conducted. Exclusions were based on familial history, prior recurrences, preoperative treatments, and inadequate data. Surveillance included colonoscopy, laboratory tests, and computed tomography (CT) scans. Results: Stage I colorectal cancer patients showed favorable 5-year disease-free survival (98.3% colon, 94.6% rectum). Among a total of 1,467 colon cancer patients, 26 (1.76%) experienced recurrence. Of the 781 rectal cancer patients, 47 (6.02%) experienced recurrence. Elevated preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels and perineural invasion were significant recurrence risk factors in colon cancer, while tumor budding was significant in rectal cancer. Distant metastasis was the main recurrence pattern in colon cancer (92.3%), while rectal cancer showed predominantly local recurrence (50%). Colonoscopy alone detected recurrences in a small fraction of cases (3.7% in colon, 14.9% in rectum). Conclusion Although recurrence in stage I colorectal cancer is rare, relying solely on colonoscopy for surveillance may miss distant metastases or locoregional recurrence outside the colorectum. For high-risk patients, we recommend considering regular CT scans alongside colonoscopy. This targeted approach may enable earlier recurrence detection and improve outcomes in this subset while avoiding unnecessary scans for the low-risk majority.

Purpose: Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is common and devastating complication for patients with rectal cancer who have undergone sphincter-sparing surgery. Prunes are a fiber-rich fruit being effective in treating chronic constipation. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of prune consumption on the incidence of LARS. Methods: A prospective, double-arm, parallel, nonblinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted from September 2019 to March 2021 at a single tertiary center for patients who underwent low anterior resection. Patients randomized to the prune group consumed prune daily for 2 weeks after surgery, while those in the no-prune group did not. The primary outcome was the incidence of major LARS at 3 weeks after surgery. Results: A total of 130 patients were randomized and 118 completed the study (81 men, 37 women), including 55 patients (46.6%) in the prune group and 63 patients (53.4%) in the no-prune group. LARS was confirmed in 15 patients (27.3%) in the prune group and 47 patients (74.6%) in the no-prune group (P<0.001). The incidence of major LARS was also significantly lower in the prune group (18.2% vs. 61.9%, P<0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that the level of anastomosis and prune consumption were significantly associated with the incidence of LARS. The prune group had higher emotional scores and lower symptom scores for constipation, sleep disturbance, and loss of appetite in the quality-of-life questionnaire. Conclusion Prune consumption significantly reduced the incidence of LARS and improved quality of life after low anterior resection.Trial registration: CRIS identifier: KCT0006085 (registered on September 1, 2019).

Purpose: Right-sided tumors have been reported to have a poorer survival rate than left-sided tumors; however, there remains debate regarding whether sidedness is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). This study aimed to assess the impact of sidedness on prognosis in resectable CRLM and to identify prognostic factors. Methods: Patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM at Samsung Medical Center from January 2008 to December 2021 were included in the investigation. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed, and prognostic factors were identified. Results: A total of 497 patients were included in the study, with 106 on the right side and 391 on the left side. The rightsided group had a higher percentage of synchronous tumors (90.6% vs. 80.3%, P = 0.020). In survival analysis, the right side showed lower 5-year OS (49.7% vs. 54.2, P = 0.305) and 5-year PFS (57.1% vs. 60.2%, P = 0.271), but the differences were not statistically significant. In the analysis of prognostic factors, synchronous tumor (odds ratio [OR], 5.01; P < 0.001), CEA (OR, 1.46; P = 0.016), and maximum tumor size of hepatic metastasis (OR, 1.09; P = 0.026) were associated with OS. Conclusion In resectable CRLM, there was no difference in prognosis based on sidedness. CEA level, synchronous tumor, and maximum tumor size of hepatic metastasis were identified as prognostic factors.

Purpose: Right-sided tumors have been reported to have a poorer survival rate than left-sided tumors; however, there remains debate regarding whether sidedness is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). This study aimed to assess the impact of sidedness on prognosis in resectable CRLM and to identify prognostic factors. Methods: Patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM at Samsung Medical Center from January 2008 to December 2021 were included in the investigation. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed, and prognostic factors were identified. Results: A total of 497 patients were included in the study, with 106 on the right side and 391 on the left side. The rightsided group had a higher percentage of synchronous tumors (90.6% vs. 80.3%, P = 0.020). In survival analysis, the right side showed lower 5-year OS (49.7% vs. 54.2, P = 0.305) and 5-year PFS (57.1% vs. 60.2%, P = 0.271), but the differences were not statistically significant. In the analysis of prognostic factors, synchronous tumor (odds ratio [OR], 5.01; P < 0.001), CEA (OR, 1.46; P = 0.016), and maximum tumor size of hepatic metastasis (OR, 1.09; P = 0.026) were associated with OS. Conclusion In resectable CRLM, there was no difference in prognosis based on sidedness. CEA level, synchronous tumor, and maximum tumor size of hepatic metastasis were identified as prognostic factors.

Purpose: Right-sided tumors have been reported to have a poorer survival rate than left-sided tumors; however, there remains debate regarding whether sidedness is an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM). This study aimed to assess the impact of sidedness on prognosis in resectable CRLM and to identify prognostic factors. Methods: Patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM at Samsung Medical Center from January 2008 to December 2021 were included in the investigation. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed, and prognostic factors were identified. Results: A total of 497 patients were included in the study, with 106 on the right side and 391 on the left side. The rightsided group had a higher percentage of synchronous tumors (90.6% vs. 80.3%, P = 0.020). In survival analysis, the right side showed lower 5-year OS (49.7% vs. 54.2, P = 0.305) and 5-year PFS (57.1% vs. 60.2%, P = 0.271), but the differences were not statistically significant. In the analysis of prognostic factors, synchronous tumor (odds ratio [OR], 5.01; P < 0.001), CEA (OR, 1.46; P = 0.016), and maximum tumor size of hepatic metastasis (OR, 1.09; P = 0.026) were associated with OS. Conclusion In resectable CRLM, there was no difference in prognosis based on sidedness. CEA level, synchronous tumor, and maximum tumor size of hepatic metastasis were identified as prognostic factors.

Background/Aims: Prokinetic agents and neuromodulators are among the treatment options for functional dyspepsia (FD), but their comparative efficacy is unclear. We aimed to compare the efficacy of mosapride controlled-release (CR) and nortriptyline in patients with FD after 4 weeks of treatment. Methods: Participants with FD were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive mosapride CR (mosapride CR 15 mg and nortriptyline placebo) or nortriptyline (mosapride CR placebo and nortriptyline 10 mg) in double-placebo, double-blinded, randomized controlled, parallel clinical study. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients with overall dyspepsia improvement after 4 weeks treatment. The secondary endpoints were changes in individual symptom scores, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Results: One hundred nine participants were recruited and assessed for eligibility, and 54 in the mosapride CR group and 50 in the nortriptyline group were included in the modified intention-to-treat protocol. The rate of overall dyspepsia improvement was similar between groups (53.7% vs 54.0%, P = 0.976). There was no difference in the efficacy of mosapride CR and nortriptyline in a subgroup analysis by FD subtype (59.3% vs 52.5% in postprandial distress syndrome, P = 0.615; 44.4% vs 40.0% in epigastric pain syndrome, P = > 0.999; 50.0% vs 59.1% in overlap, P = 0.565; respectively). Both treatments significantly improved anxiety, depression, and quality of life from baseline. Conclusion Mosapride CR and nortriptyline showed similar efficacy in patients with FD regardless of the subtype. Both treatments could be equally helpful for improving quality of life and psychological well-being while also relieving dyspepsia.

Further study is warranted to determine the association between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or albuminuria and the risk of death from diverse causes. Methods: We screened >10 million general health screening examinees who received health examinations conducted in 2009 using the claims database of Korea. After the exclusion of those previously diagnosed with renal failure and those with missing data, 9,917,838 individuals with available baseline kidney function measurements were included. The primary outcome was mortality and cause-specific death between 2009 and 2019 identified through death certificates based on the diagnostic codes of International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision. Multivariable Cox regression analysis adjusted for various clinicodemographic and social characteristics was used to assess mortality risk. Results: The hazard ratio of death was significantly high in both the eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and in the eGFR ≥120 mL/ min/1.73 m2 groups in univariable and multivariable regression analyses when compared to those within the reference range (eGFR of 90–120 mL/min/1.73 m2). The results were similar for death by cardiovascular, cancer, infection, endocrine, respiratory, and digestive causes. We also found that albuminuria was associated with higher risk of death regardless of eGFR range, and those in the higher categories of dipstick albuminuria showed higher risk. Conclusion: We reconfirmed the significant association between eGFR, albuminuria, and mortality. Healthcare providers should keep in mind that albuminuria and decreased eGFR as well as kidney hyperfiltration are independent predictors of mortality.

Objectives: This research delves into the application of texture analysis in spine computed tomography (CT) scans and its correlation with bone mineral density (BMD), as determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).It specifically addresses the discordance between the 2 measurements, suggesting that certain spinal-specific factors may contribute to this discrepancy. Methods: The study involved 405 cases from a single institution collected between May 6, 2012 and June 30, 2021. Each case underwent a spinal CT scan and a DXA scan. BMD values at the lumbar region (T12 to S1) and total hip were recorded. Texture features from axial cuts of T12 to S1 vertebrae were extracted using gray-level co-occurrence matrices, and a regression model was constructed to predict the BMD values. Results: The correlation between CT texture analysis results and BMD from DXA was moderate, with a correlation coefficient ranging between 0.4 and 0.5. This discordance was examined in light of factors unique to the spine region, such as abdominal obesity, aortic calcification, and lumbar degenerative changes, which could poten tially affect BMD measurements. Conclusions Emerging from this study is a novel insight into the discordance between spinal CT texture analysis and DXA-derived BMD measurements, highlighting the unique influence of spinal attributes. This revelation calls into question the exclusive reliance on DXA scans for BMD assessment, particularly in scenarios where DXA scanning may not be feasible or accurate.