Background: Laser procedures are integral to dermatologic practice, yet safety measures- particularly regarding ocular protection and plume control- are poorly studied in real-world settings. Objective: To evaluate current practices in eye protection, infection control, and occupational risk awareness among Korean dermatologists performing laser treatments. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among board-certified dermatologists at the 2024 Korean Society for Dermatologic Laser Surgery meeting. The questionnaire covered demographics, laser frequency, use of goggles and masks, infection control strategies, ophthalmologic monitoring, and history of warts or cancer. Results: Seventy-nine respondents completed the survey. All reported using protective goggles, but only 26.6% and 22.8% did so for CO 2 and erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet lasers, respectively. Only 24.1% underwent regular eye exams, and 13.9% reported eye conditions after starting laser practice. While 89.9% used masks, 40.8% used dental masks, which are inadequate for plume protection. Suction devices were used by 94.9%, though performance specifications were unclear. Warts were reported by 46.8% of respondents; two reported cancer diagnoses after initiating laser work. Conclusion Despite high overall adherence to basic safety practices, critical gaps remain. Our findings highlight the need for standardized guidelines and long-term occupational health monitoring to ensure safe laser practice.

Background: Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder characterized by erythema, papules, ocular symptoms, and heightened sensitivity. Patients with neurogenic symptoms such as burning or stinging remain particularly difficult to manage. Current guidelines often underrepresent energy-based devices (EBDs), pigmentary sequelae, psychosocial burden, and ocular comorbidities. Objective: To examine Korean dermatologists’ expert perspectives on rosacea management, focusing on skin sensitivity, neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary changes, psychosocial impact, ocular involvement, and EBD use. Methods: A web-based, 29-item survey was administered to 25 board-certified Korean dermatologists (May–June 2025). Quantitative and qualitative responses were analyzed. Results: Erythematotelangiectatic and papulopustular phenotypes with sensitivity skin predominated. EBDs (pulsed dye laser, intense pulsed light) were frequently used but limited by cost and sensitivity issues. Neurogenic symptoms were recognized but rarely treated with neuromodulators. Post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation was infrequent, yet monitoring was inconsistent.Psychosocial and ocular aspects were acknowledged but seldomly systematically addressed.Respondents expressed interest in emerging adjunctive treatments such as cold plasma, skin boosters, and holistic care approaches. Conclusion Korean dermatologists adopt individualized strategies for rosacea, yet practice gaps remain regarding neurogenic symptoms, pigmentary complications, and psychosocial and ocular comorbidities. Findings support the need for updated multidisciplinary, phenotype-driven guidelines aligned with real-world practice.

Background/Aims: Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) have emerged as promising alternatives to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) to treat erosive esophagitis (EE). This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of P-CABs and PPIs in patients with mild to severe EE stratified by treatment phase. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of P-CABs and PPIs for EE were included. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A frequentist network meta-analysis was performed, and treatment ranking was assessed using P-scores. Results: Nineteen studies evaluating 5 P-CABs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, keverprazan, fexuprazan, and zastaprazan) and 2 PPIs (lansoprazole and esomeprazole) were included. P-CABs demonstrated superior efficacy in healing EE during the initial phase, particularly in patients with severe EE (RR = 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.20) and were also associated with a lower EE recurrence risk during maintenance treatment (RR = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.85). The efficacy was notably greater in patients with higher EE severity and among cytochrome P450 2C19 extensive metabolizers. The safety profiles of the P-CABs and PPIs were comparable. Vonoprazan consistently ranked the highest for both initial treatment (P-score = 0.68) and maintenance (P-score = 0.94). Conclusions P-CABs, especially vonoprazan, showed superior efficacy compared to PPIs in both the initial and maintenance treatment of EE. These findings support the use of P-CABs as a potent and reliable first-line option for EE management, particularly in high-risk populations, with acceptable safety outcomes.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a chronic and relapsing gastrointestinal disorder characterized by the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus, leading to troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Since the publication of the 2020 Seoul Consensus on GERD, significant new evidence has emerged, particularly regarding acid-suppressive therapies and diagnostic approaches. This 2025 focused update aims to refine GERD management strategies by incorporating the latest evidence on acid suppressive therapies and regional considerations in Asian populations. This study builds on the 2020 Seoul Consensus by integrating systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and expert consensuses to offer updated recommendations for the definition and medical treatment of GERD. These guidelines incorporate recent advances in acid-suppressive therapies, particularly potassium-competitive acid blockers, and adopt updated diagnostic frameworks in accordance with the Lyon Consensus 2.0. Key clinical questions were identified and structured using the following format: Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome. The resulting recommendations address the initial treatment, long-term maintenance strategies, and role of personalized therapy based on disease severity, such as the grade of reflux esophagitis. Six key statements are presented: updated definition and classification of GERD (Statement 1); initial and long-term treatment strategies tailored to GERD phenotypes, such as non-erosive reflux disease, mild erosive esophagitis, and severe erosive esophagitis (Statements 2-5); and dose optimization strategies for long-term safety (Statement 6). These guidelines aim to support gastroenterologists and general healthcare providers in making individualized evidence-based decisions for GERD management.

Purpose: This developmental study explored the conceptual feasibility and applicability of a metaverse-based clinical assessment platform as a complementary tool to conventional objective structured clinical examinations in undergraduate medical education. Methods: A targeted literature review and expert consensus process were conducted to identify domains of clinical competence in which metaverse technologies could provide added value. Based on these findings, prototype virtual patient simulations were developed within a metaverse environment. Large language models (LLMs) were integrated to support dynamic, interactive history-taking simulations, and pilot modules for physical examination were also created. Results: Integration of LLMs into virtual patient scenarios enabled realistic, context-sensitive medical interviews, facilitating interactive dialogue between examinees and simulated patients. In contrast, physical examination modules faced technical limitations, particularly in replicating procedures requiring tactile or haptic feedback, such as palpation and percussion. Nevertheless, the metaverse environment enabled delivery of consistent and reproducible scenarios, supporting objective assessment of communication and diagnostic reasoning skills. Conclusion Metaverse-based simulations augmented by LLMs offer a promising approach to scalable and standardized clinical assessment, particularly within cognitive and interpersonal competency domains. Although current technological constraints limit the fidelity of physical examination simulations, rapid advancements in immersive and haptic technologies may help overcome these barriers in the near future. Further research is needed to evaluate the educational efficacy, validity, and feasibility of deploying such platforms in summative, high-stakes assessment contexts.

Subglottic stenosis (SGS) and tracheal stenosis (TS) are rare conditions that can cause significant breathing difficulties and, if not properly managed, may lead to life-threatening complications. Despite their clinical importance, debate continues regarding the optimal management of adult SGS and TS, and no comprehensive guidelines have been established to date. The Korean Bronchoesophagological Society appointed a task force to develop clinical practice guidelines with the goal of providing evidence-based recommendations for managing SGS and TS in adults. The task force conducted a systematic review of the relevant literature by searching PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library using predefined search terms aligned with key clinical questions. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, which also informed the formulation and reporting of the recommendations. The strength of each recommendation reflects the guideline panel’s confidence that the benefits of an intervention outweigh its risks for eligible patients. After drafting the guidelines, feedback was obtained through Delphi questionnaires completed by members of the Korean Bronchoesophagological Society. Ultimately, the committee developed 17 evidence-based recommendations across four categories: initial evaluation, medical management, surgical treatment, and postoperative management and rehabilitation. These guidelines aim to support clinicians in delivering optimal care to adult patients with SGS and TS.

Background: This study was performed to evaluate the prognostic utility of a positive T wave in lead augmented vector right (TaVR) and elevated E/e′ ratio in predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis. Methods: We retrospectively examined 296 adults on thrice-weekly hemodialysis with baseline electrocardiography and transthoracic echocardiography (October 2018–April 2024). TaVR positivity was T-wave amplitude, >0 mV and high E/e′, ≥19. Primary outcome was the first MACE—cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, heart-failure admission, or revascularization. Multivariable Cox models adjusted for clinical covariates; incremental value was gauged with Harrell’s C-index, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI). Sensitivity analysis was performed using a guideline-recommended E/e′ threshold of ≥15 to assess robustness. Results: Over 56.5 months (1,325 patient-years), 118 MACE occurred (8.9/100 patient-years). Incidence was higher with TaVR positivity than negativity (16.0/100 patient-years vs. 3.7/100 patient-years; log-rank p < 0.001). Adjusted hazard ratios were 3.19 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.00–5.08) for TaVR and 2.92 (95% CI, 1.71–4.96) for high E/e′. Adding both markers to the clinical model increased the C-index from 0.65 to 0.75 (Δ 0.10) and improved IDI (0.10) and NRI (0.16) (all p < 0.01). A significant negative interaction (hazard ratio, 0.21; p = 0.01) indicated complementary but partly overlapping information. Sensitivity results were similar. Conclusion TaVR positivity is a strong independent electrocardiography predictor of cardiovascular events in hemodialysis. Combining TaVR with E/e′ adds prognostic value and supports a pragmatic two-step strategy— electrocardiography triage followed by focused echocardiography—for cardiovascular risk stratification in this high-risk population.

Purpose: Due to chronic toxicity, tacrolimus-sparing is an important issue in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Several studies have shown that bisphosphonate use is associated with favorable graft outcomes in KTRs. We investigated whether the association between tacrolimus trough levels (TTLs) and graft outcomes differed according to bisphosphonate use in KTRs. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study encompassing 1441 KTRs who were administered tacrolimus-based immunosuppressants. The primary exposure was a time-dependent cross-product of TTLs (low TTLs vs. normal-high TTLs with a reference of 6 ng/mL) and bisphosphonate use. Two primary outcomes were evaluated: overall graft loss (death or conversion to kidney replacement) and an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m 2 . Results: During the median follow-up of 6.1 (3.4–9.7) years, overall graft loss occurred in 157 (10.9%) patients. Cox regression revealed that normal-high TTLs without bisphosphonate use were associated with a reduced risk of overall graft loss [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45–0.95] compared to low TTLs without bisphosphonate use. The use of bisphosphonate in conjunction with normal-high TTLs correlated with an even lower risk of overall graft loss (aHR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08–0.80) compared with low TTLs without bisphosphonate use. In patients with low TTLs, bisphosphonate use was associated with a reduced risk of overall graft loss compared with non-use (aHR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.09–0.43). Similar trends were observed in the eGFR outcome. Conclusion The use of bisphosphonate was associated with favorable graft outcomes, even with low TTLs. Incorporating bisphosphonate into a conventional immunosuppressant regimen may potentially reduce tacrolimus requirement.

The global shortage of healthcare personnel, especially in low- and middle-income countries, has raised concerns about the quality and availability of medical education across these economies. Therefore, standardization and accreditation of medical education are essential to ensure the competence of healthcare professionals. This study reports the first-ever application of the set of standards developed by the Korean Institute of Medical Education and Evaluation (KIMEE) to assess a Vietnamese medical school. Under this initiative, the Accreditation Standards of KIMEE 2019 (ASK 2019) was implemented under the auspices of a Korea International Cooperation Agency Development Project. This study compared the evaluation results of a Vietnamese medical school’s performance with that of accredited Korean medical schools. The findings revealed both strengths and areas requiring significant improvement and underscore the need for Vietnam to develop its own contextually appropriate accreditation system.

Background: Dutasteride, a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor, is prescribed for male androgenetic alopecia (AGA) in Korea and Japan. Despite its efficacy, its use is limited by its long half-life, potent dihydrotestosterone suppression, and adverse effects. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of 0.2 mg dutasteride for male AGA. Methods: Patients with male AGA were randomized to receive 0.2 mg dutasteride, placebo, or 0.5 mg dutasteride (2:2:1) once daily for 24 weeks. Safety and efficacy endpoints were assessed. Results: Overall, 139 men were analyzed. At week 24, the change in hair count within the target area at the vertex from baseline was significantly higher in the 0.2 mg dutasteride group than in the placebo group (21.53 vs. 5.96, p=0.0072). Dutasteride (0.2 mg) treatment led to greater hair growth improvement, as assessed by investigators at week 24 (p=0.0096) and an independent panel at weeks 12 and 24 (p=0.0306, p=0.0001). For all efficacy endpoints, 0.2 mg dutasteride was as effective as 0.5 mg dutasteride. The incidence of adverse events was low and not statistically different between the 0.2 mg dutasteride and placebo groups. The limitation of this study is the limited number of participants. Conclusion Low-dose (0.2 mg) dutasteride for male AGA showed significant efficacy and favorable safety profile.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04825561