Background/Aims: This study investigated the clinical efficacy of low-dose mepolizumab (100 mg) in controlling severe eosinophilic asthma, aiming to induce eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) remission and reduce systemic steroid usage. Additionally, we constructed a basic frame for our longitudinal EGPA cohort by collecting serial blood samples before, during, and after mepolizumab treatment in EGPA patients. Methods: We conducted a 2-year prospective observational cohort study in patients with uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma and refractory EGPA who used systemic steroids (≥ 7.5 mg/day of prednisolone) or other immunosuppressant drugs for at least 6 months. All patients were treated with 100 mg of mepolizumab every 4 weeks for 1 year to control severe eosinophilic asthma and then were followed for an additional 1 year to monitor their disease course. We analyzed total systemic steroid use and EGPA remission/relapse during the study period. Results: Three EGPA patients were included in this study and completed 16 study visits over a 2-year period. After 1 year of treatment with mepolizumab (100 mg monthly), all 3 patients were able to reduce their maintenance dose of systemic steroids, with 2 patients completely discontinuing use. These 2 patients achieved EGPA remission during mepolizumab treatment, and their remission status remained stable for 1 year after they stopped receiving the medication. Conclusions Low-dose mepolizumab treatment demonstrated clinical efficacy in reducing the maintenance dose of systemic steroids required for severe refractory EGPA. While not all patients achieved EGPA remission with low-dose mepolizumab, some did, and their remission persisted even after treatment discontinuation.

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is increasingly recognized as a disorder with significant vascular involvement, with microvascular damage and thromboinflammation often preceding classical amyloid pathology by several years. Elevated levels of prothrombin and thrombin, along with aberrant platelet activation, have been reported in individuals with AD. We hypothesized that platelet hyperactivity in AD results from an exaggerated response to thrombin in the presence of elevated amyloid beta 1-40 (Aβ₁₋₄₀), a peptide that accumulates during the early stages of AD. Platelet activation in response to Aβ₁₋₄₀ and thrombin was assessed using aggregation assays with an aggregometer, adhesion measurements by confocal microscopy, and spreading via both confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and integrin α IIbβ 3 activation were quantified by flow cytometry. The roles of NADPH oxidase (NOX), ROS, and integrin signaling were examined using selective inhibitors. Aβ₁₋₄₀ significantly enhanced thrombin-induced platelet adhesion, aggregation, and spreading via NOX-derived ROS and integrin α IIbβ 3 activation. Aβ₁₋₄₀ also promoted platelet binding to fibrinogen and cerebrovascular endothelial cells, accompanied by distinct morphological changes. Inhibition of NOX or integrin α IIbβ 3 significantly reduced these effects. These findings identify a novel Aβ₁₋₄₀–NOX–ROS–integrin α IIbβ 3 axis that drives platelet hyperactivation and cerebrovascular interactions in AD.Targeting this pathway with antithrombotic or antioxidative strategies may offer therapeutic potential in mitigating AD-associated vascular pathology.

Purpose: Alectinib has been approved for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at 300 mg twice daily in Japan, lower than global standard of 600 mg twice daily. This study evaluated the clinical relevance of the reduced dose by comparing outcomes between the two doses. Materials and Methods: This study included patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC who received alectinib at Samsung Medical Center, Korea. The progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, cumulative incidence of central nervous system (CNS) progression, and safety profiles were retrospectively reviewed and compared. Results: Among 306 patients, 32 and 274 received alectinib at either 300 or 600 mg twice daily, respectively. The 300 mg group showed a slight but not significant advantage in PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44 to 1.51; p=0.51) and overall survival (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.20 to 1.21; p=0.13). Superior outcome with 300 mg was remarkable in patients with lower body weight (≤ 60 kg), but diminished in patients with higher body weights. Patients with baseline brain metastasis in the 300 mg group exhibited a slight increase in incidence of CNS failure (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 0.53 to 5.8; p=0.36). Although the safety profiles were mostly mild, adverse events were more frequent in the 600 mg group, 50% of which requiring dose reduction. Conclusion Alectinib at 300 mg twice daily seems an acceptable dose in East Asians with ALK-positive NSCLC. Notably, our data favor 300 mg twice daily in patients with lower body weight and no baseline brain metastasis, considering the more tolerable safety profiles and the potential to reduce medical costs.

Background: and Purpose: Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) is a crucial diagnostic tool for Alzheimer's disease (AD), but its application is constrained by cost and accessibility. This study aimed to create a practical composite index to predict cerebral amyloid positivity in patients with cognitive impairment. Methods: We included patients with mild cognitive impairment or early-stage AD who underwent amyloid PET. Various combinations of clinical and imaging variables were assessed through receiver operating characteristic analysis to identify the optimal model for predicting amyloid positivity. The Amyloid Beta Composite (ABC) index, a risk scoring model, was developed using logistic regression and a weighted scoring system. We evaluated the ABC index's performance based on accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, and conducted internal validation using a chronological split-sample from the same cohort. Results: We analyzed a total of 223 patients. The best-performing model incorporated five variables: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), secondary memory recall from the modified MMSE, Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, medial temporal lobe atrophy, and apolipoprotein E genotype. This model demonstrated excellent performance in the development group (area under the curve [AUC], 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–0.94).In the validation group, the ABC index achieved an AUC of 0.74, with an accuracy of 0.70, sensitivity of 0.63, and specificity of 0.78. Conclusions The ABC index, utilizing commonly accessible clinical data, serves as a simple and practical screening tool for predicting cerebral amyloid deposition. It may aid in patient selection for amyloid PET, anti-amyloid therapies, and clinical trials, thereby reducing unnecessary imaging.

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are an important treatment option for ulcerative colitis, providing rapid onset of action, oral administration, and efficacy even after biologic failure. The 3 approved agents—tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib—differ in JAK isoform selectivity, leading to clinically meaningful differences in efficacy and safety. Evidence from network meta-analyses, clinical trials, and real-world studies consistently shows that upadacitinib provides the highest efficacy for induction and maintenance of remission, whereas filgotinib demonstrates the most favorable safety profile. The strong efficacy of upadacitinib and tofacitinib is particularly relevant in patients with severe disease, including acute severe ulcerative colitis, and upadacitinib maintains high efficacy regardless of prior advanced therapy exposure. JAK inhibitors also benefit extraintestinal manifestations. Although risks such as herpes zoster, serious infection, thromboembolism, and major cardiovascular events differ among agents, long-term data suggest generally acceptable safety when used appropriately. Intraclass JAK-to-JAK cycling is feasible, with about half of patients achieving steroid-free clinical remission in retrospective cohorts. Based on mechanistic, clinical, and real-world evidence, filgotinib may be a first-line option for patients with lower disease activity or when safety is a priority, whereas upadacitinib or tofacitinib may be preferred in higher disease activity. Strategically selecting agents may improve durability and outcomes.

Background: Shortage of organ donors in the Republic of Korea has become a major problem. To address this, it has been questioned whether heart transplant (HTx) allocation should be modified to reduce priority of older patients. We aimed to evaluate post-HTx outcomes according to recipient age and specific pre-HTx conditions using a nationwide prospective cohort. Methods: We analyzed clinical characteristics of 628 patients from the Korean Organ Transplant Registry who received HTx from January 2015 to December 2020. Enrolled recipients were divided into three groups according to age. We also included comorbidities including ambulatory status. Non-ambulatory status was defined as pre-HTx support with either extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, continuous renal replacement therapy, or mechanical ventilation. Results: Of the 628 patients, 195 were < 50 years, 322 were 50–64 years and 111 were ≥ 65years at transplant. Four hundred nine (65.1%) were ambulatory and 219 (34.9%) were nonambulatory. Older recipients tended to have more comorbidities, ischemic cardiomyopathy, and received older donors. Post-HTx survival was significantly lower in older recipients (P = 0.025) and recipients with non-ambulatory status (P < 0.001). However, in contrast to non-ambulatory recipients who showed significant survival differences according to the recipient’s age (P = 0.004), ambulatory recipients showed comparable outcomes (P = 0.465). Conclusion Our results do not support use of age alone as an allocation criterion. Transplant candidate age in combination with some comorbidities such as non-ambulatory status may identify patients at a sufficiently elevated risk at which suitability of HTx should be reconsidered.

Background: Colorectal carcinomas (CRCs) with caudal-type homeobox 2 (CDX2) loss are recognized to pursue an aggressive behavior but tend to be accompanied by a high density of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). However, little is known about whether there is an interplay between CDX2 loss and TIL density in the survival of patients with CRC. Methods: Stage III CRC tissues were assessed for CDX2 loss using immunohistochemistry and analyzed for their densities of CD8 TILs in both intraepithelial (iTILs) and stromal areas using a machine learning-based analytic method. Results: CDX2 loss was significantly associated with a higher density of CD8 TILs in both intraepithelial and stromal areas. Both CDX2 loss and a high CD8 iTIL density were found to be prognostic parameters and showed hazard ratios of 2.314 (1.050–5.100) and 0.378 (0.175–0.817), respectively, for cancer-specific survival. A subset of CRCs with retained CDX2 expression and a high density of CD8 iTILs showed the best clinical outcome (hazard ratio of 0.138 [0.023–0.826]), whereas a subset with CDX2 loss and a high density of CD8 iTILs exhibited the worst clinical outcome (15.781 [3.939–63.230]). Conclusions Altogether, a high density of CD8 iTILs did not make a difference in the survival of patients with CRC with CDX2 loss. The combination of CDX2 expression and intraepithelial CD8 TIL density was an independent prognostic marker in adjuvant chemotherapy-treated patients with stage III CRC.

Background: This study aimed to determine whether a shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen is non-inferior to the standard 6-month tuberculosis regimen. Methods: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial enrolled participants with respiratory specimen positivity by Xpert MTB/RIF assay or Mycobacterium tuberculosis culture without rifampicin-resistance. Participants were randomized at 1:1 to the investigational or control group. The investigational group received high-dose rifampicin (30 mg/kg/day), isoniazid, and pyrazinamide until culture conversion, followed by high-dose rifampicin and isoniazid for 12 weeks. The control group received the standard 6-month regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of unfavorable outcomes at 18 months post-randomization. The non-inferiority margin was set at <6% difference in unfavorable outcomes rates. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04485156) Results: Between 4 November 2020 and 3 January 2022, 76 participants were enrolled. Of these, 58 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. Unfavorable outcomes occurred in 10 (31.3%) of 32 in the control group and 10 (38.5%) of 26 in the investigational group. The difference was 7.2% (95% confidence interval, ∞ to 31.9%), failing to prove non-inferiority. Serious adverse events and grade 3 or higher adverse events did not differ between the groups. Conclusion The shorter high-dose rifampicin regimen failed to demonstrate non-inferiority but had an acceptable safety profile.

Purpose: The career ladder system is a pivotal strategy for securing excellent nurses. The aim of this study is to understand hospital nurses’ experiences of participating in the career ladder system and to explore the essence of this system. Methods: In February 22 to March 3, 2022, nurses employed at a general hospital in South Korea were selected for this study using snowball and purposive sampling. Data were collected from interviews with three focus groups, the compositions of which are as follows: group 1, 6 participants; group 2, 5 participants; and group 3, 6 participants. All interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and subsequently analyzed using qualitative research methods. Results: The following six categories were derived under the overall theme of “the arduous journey to discovering a nurse’s true name”: (1) rites of passage to becoming the ideal nurse; (2) unexpected challenges in the promotion preparation process; (3) biased criteria for evaluating nursing competencies; (4) unclear changes in roles and perceptions after promotion; (5) self-discovered pride and fulfillment as a nurse; and (6) the unspoken struggles of evaluators. Conclusion The findings suggest that the career ladder system fosters nurses’ professional growth and self-actualization. However, for effective implementation, nurses’ deep understanding and systematic management of the career ladder system are essential. This study offers valuable insights and benchmarks for healthcare institutions aiming to adopt the system.