1.The impact of enteral feeding intolerance on the prognosis of patients with septic shock in South Korea
Hyun-Jun PARK ; Yoon Hae AHN ; Hong Yeul LEE ; Sang-Min LEE ; Jinwoo LEE
Acute and Critical Care 2025;40(2):304-312
Background:
While enteral feeding intolerance (EFI) is associated with worse clinical outcomes in critically ill patients, the relationship between the number of days of EFI and mortality outcomes remains unclear.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed adult patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit (ICU) with septic shock at a tertiary referral center. EFI was defined as the presence of vomiting, abdominal distension, pain, diarrhea, or radiographic evidence of ileus. EFI status was assessed daily, and we evaluated the prognostic impact of total number of EFI days during the first 3 days of enteral feeding on clinical outcomes.
Results:
A total of 94 patients were included in the analysis, with 77 (81.9%) experiencing EFI. During the first 3 days of enteral feeding, 25 patients (26.6%) experienced EFI for 1 day, 22 patients (23.4%) experienced EFI for 2 days, and 30 patients (31.9%) experienced EFI for all 3 days. The total number of EFI days was identified as an independent risk factor of 90-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.400; 95% CI 1.021–1.919). Higher total EFI days was significantly associated with increased ICU mortality (P for trend=0.036), in-hospital mortality (P for trend=0.007), 30-day mortality (P for trend=0.004), and 90-day mortality (P for trend=0.006).
Conclusions
An increase in the total number of EFI days was significantly associated with mortality outcomes in patients with septic shock, suggesting that EFI may serve as a useful indicator for predicting outcomes in this population.
2.Prospective Comparative Evaluation of the Xpert MTB/RIF and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Assays for Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Rifampin Resistance in High-resource, Intermediate-burden Settings
Eunsang SUH ; Sangsoo JUNG ; Jun-Ki LEE ; Byung Woo JHUN ; Tae Yeul KIM ; Hee Jae HUH ; Nam Yong LEE
Annals of Laboratory Medicine 2025;45(6):583-590
Background:
The Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) was introduced to enhance the sensitivity of tuberculosis detection, particularly in smear-negative cases, compared with its predecessor, Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert). However, its performance in high-resource, intermediateburden settings remains unassessed. We prospectively compared the diagnostic accuracy of Xpert Ultra and Xpert for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and rifampin resistance in Korea.
Methods:
In total, 309 respiratory specimens were analyzed using both assays. We used two reference standards: mycobacterial culture and a composite reference standard based on clinical diagnosis and treatment decisions. Diagnostic performance, including sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between the two assays, was assessed. Spiking experiments using 13 MTB isolates with known rpoB mutations were performed to evaluate rifampin resistance detection.
Results:
Xpert Ultra showed increased, albeit not significantly, sensitivity (73.7% vs. 65.8% with culture; 63.8% vs. 53.2% with the composite reference standard) over Xpert. Its specificity was comparable to that of Xpert; however, a few false-positive results were observed among trace- and very low-positives. Among six culture-negative but Xpert Ultra-positive cases, two were clinically diagnosed as tuberculosis. Of the 13 rpoB mutant strains, Xpert correctly detected all mutations in the rifampin resistance-determining region, whereas Xpert Ultra yielded indeterminate results for Q432P and Q429H/L430P/H445Q.
Conclusions
Xpert Ultra tends to have increased sensitivity; however, it shows potential diagnostic ambiguity associated with trace- or very low-positive results. These findings highlight the importance of clinical correlation, particularly in culture-negative cases. Indeterminate results in certain rpoB mutations require cautious interpretation.
3.Clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer
Chan Hyuk PARK ; Dong-Hoon YANG ; Jong Wook KIM ; Jie-Hyun KIM ; Ji Hyun KIM ; Yang Won MIN ; Si Hyung LEE ; Jung Ho BAE ; Hyunsoo CHUNG ; Kee Don CHOI ; Jun Chul PARK ; Hyuk LEE ; Min-Seob KWAK ; Bun KIM ; Hyun Jung LEE ; Hye Seung LEE ; Miyoung CHOI ; Dong-Ah PARK ; Jong Yeul LEE ; Jeong-Sik BYEON ; Chan Guk PARK ; Joo Young CHO ; Soo Teik LEE ; Hoon Jai CHUN
Intestinal Research 2021;19(2):127-157
Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.
4.Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis among Germplasm of Agaricus bisporus by SSR Markers
Hyejin AN ; Hwa-Yong LEE ; Hyeran SHIN ; Jun Hyoung BANG ; Seahee HAN ; Youn-Lee OH ; Kab-Yeul JANG ; Hyunwoo CHO ; Tae Kyung HYUN ; Jwakyung SUNG ; Yoon-Sup SO ; Ick-Hyun JO ; Jong-Wook CHUNG
Mycobiology 2021;49(4):376-384
Agaricus bisporus is a popular edible mushroom that is cultivated worldwide. Due to its secondary homothallic nature, cultivated A. bisporus strains have low genetic diversity, and breeding novel strains is challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of globally collected A. bisporus strains using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Agaricus bisporus strains were divided based on genetic distance-based groups and model-based subpopulations. The major allele frequency (MAF), number of genotypes (NG), number of alleles (NA), observed heterozygosity (HO), expected heterozygosity (HE), and polymorphic information content (PIC) were calculated, and genetic distance, population structure, genetic differentiation, and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were assessed. Strains were divided into two groups by distance-based analysis and into three subpopulations by model-based analysis. Strains in subpopulations POP A and POP B were included in Group I, and strains in subpopulation POP C were included in Group II. Genetic differentiation between strains was 99%. Marker AB-gSSR-1057 in Group II and subpopulation POP C was confirmed to be in HWE. These results will enhance A. bisporus breeding programs and support the protection of genetic resources.
5.Clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer
Chan Hyuk PARK ; Dong-Hoon YANG ; Jong Wook KIM ; Jie-Hyun KIM ; Ji Hyun KIM ; Yang Won MIN ; Si Hyung LEE ; Jung Ho BAE ; Hyunsoo CHUNG ; Kee Don CHOI ; Jun Chul PARK ; Hyuk LEE ; Min-Seob KWAK ; Bun KIM ; Hyun Jung LEE ; Hye Seung LEE ; Miyoung CHOI ; Dong-Ah PARK ; Jong Yeul LEE ; Jeong-Sik BYEON ; Chan Guk PARK ; Joo Young CHO ; Soo Teik LEE ; Hoon Jai CHUN
Intestinal Research 2021;19(2):127-157
Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.
6.Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Population Structure Analysis among Germplasm of Agaricus bisporus by SSR Markers
Hyejin AN ; Hwa-Yong LEE ; Hyeran SHIN ; Jun Hyoung BANG ; Seahee HAN ; Youn-Lee OH ; Kab-Yeul JANG ; Hyunwoo CHO ; Tae Kyung HYUN ; Jwakyung SUNG ; Yoon-Sup SO ; Ick-Hyun JO ; Jong-Wook CHUNG
Mycobiology 2021;49(4):376-384
Agaricus bisporus is a popular edible mushroom that is cultivated worldwide. Due to its secondary homothallic nature, cultivated A. bisporus strains have low genetic diversity, and breeding novel strains is challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate the genetic diversity and population structure of globally collected A. bisporus strains using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers. Agaricus bisporus strains were divided based on genetic distance-based groups and model-based subpopulations. The major allele frequency (MAF), number of genotypes (NG), number of alleles (NA), observed heterozygosity (HO), expected heterozygosity (HE), and polymorphic information content (PIC) were calculated, and genetic distance, population structure, genetic differentiation, and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) were assessed. Strains were divided into two groups by distance-based analysis and into three subpopulations by model-based analysis. Strains in subpopulations POP A and POP B were included in Group I, and strains in subpopulation POP C were included in Group II. Genetic differentiation between strains was 99%. Marker AB-gSSR-1057 in Group II and subpopulation POP C was confirmed to be in HWE. These results will enhance A. bisporus breeding programs and support the protection of genetic resources.
7.Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer
Chan Hyuk PARK ; Dong-Hoon YANG ; Jong Wook KIM ; Jie-Hyun KIM ; Ji Hyun KIM ; Yang Won MIN ; Si Hyung LEE ; Jung Ho BAE ; Hyunsoo CHUNG ; Kee Don CHOI ; Jun Chul PARK ; Hyuk LEE ; Min-Seob KWAK ; Bun KIM ; Hyun Jung LEE ; Hye Seung LEE ; Miyoung CHOI ; Dong-Ah PARK ; Jong Yeul LEE ; Jeong-Sik BYEON ; Chan Guk PARK ; Joo Young CHO ; Soo Teik LEE ; Hoon Jai CHUN
Journal of Digestive Cancer Report 2020;8(1):1-50
Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.
8.cal Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer
Chan Hyuk PARK ; Dong-Hoon YANG ; Jong Wook KIM ; Jie-Hyun KIM ; Ji Hyun KIM ; Yang Won MIN ; Si Hyung LEE ; Jung Ho BAE ; Hyunsoo CHUNG ; Kee Don CHOI ; Jun Chul PARK ; Hyuk LEE ; Min-Seob KWAK ; Bun KIM ; Hyun Jung LEE ; Hye Seung LEE ; Miyoung CHOI ; Dong-Ah PARK ; Jong Yeul LEE ; Jeong-Sik BYEON ; Chan Guk PARK ; Joo Young CHO ; Soo Teik LEE ; Hoon Jai CHUN
The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 2020;75(5):264-291
Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.
9.Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer
Chan Hyuk PARK ; Dong-Hoon YANG ; Jong Wook KIM ; Jie-Hyun KIM ; Ji Hyun KIM ; Yang Won MIN ; Si Hyung LEE ; Jung Ho BAE ; Hyunsoo CHUNG ; Kee Don CHOI ; Jun Chul PARK ; Hyuk LEE ; Min-Seob KWAK ; Bun KIM ; Hyun Jung LEE ; Hye Seung LEE ; Miyoung CHOI ; Dong-Ah PARK ; Jong Yeul LEE ; Jeong-Sik BYEON ; Chan Guk PARK ; Joo Young CHO ; Soo Teik LEE ; Hoon Jai CHUN
The Korean Journal of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research 2020;20(2):117-145
Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.
10.Clinical Practice Guideline for Endoscopic Resection of Early Gastrointestinal Cancer
Chan Hyuk PARK ; Dong-Hoon YANG ; Jong Wook KIM ; Jie-Hyun KIM ; Ji Hyun KIM ; Yang Won MIN ; Si Hyung LEE ; Jung Ho BAE ; Hyunsoo CHUNG ; Kee Don CHOI ; Jun Chul PARK ; Hyuk LEE ; Min-Seob KWAK ; Bun KIM ; Hyun Jung LEE ; Hye Seung LEE ; Miyoung CHOI ; Dong-Ah PARK ; Jong Yeul LEE ; Jeong-Sik BYEON ; Chan Guk PARK ; Joo Young CHO ; Soo Teik LEE ; Hoon Jai CHUN
Journal of Digestive Cancer Report 2020;8(1):1-50
Although surgery was the standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers, endoscopic resection is now a standard treatment for early gastrointestinal cancers without regional lymph node metastasis. High-definition white light endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and image-enhanced endoscopy such as narrow band imaging are performed to assess the edge and depth of early gastrointestinal cancers for delineation of resection boundaries and prediction of the possibility of lymph node metastasis before the decision of endoscopic resection. Endoscopic mucosal resection and/or endoscopic submucosal dissection can be performed to remove early gastrointestinal cancers completely by en bloc fashion. Histopathological evaluation should be carefully made to investigate the presence of risk factors for lymph node metastasis such as depth of cancer invasion and lymphovascular invasion. Additional treatment such as radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy should be considered if the endoscopically resected specimen shows risk factors for lymph node metastasis. This is the first Korean clinical practice guideline for endoscopic resection of early gastrointestinal cancer. This guideline was developed by using mainly de novo methods and encompasses endoscopic management of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, early gastric cancer, and early colorectal cancer. This guideline will be revised as new data on early gastrointestinal cancer are collected.

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail