Objectives: This study aims to investigate the challenges faced by individuals with schizophrenia in adhering to COVID-19 prevention guidelines and the difficulties they experienced due to social distancing measures. Methods: The study focused on 286 registered members with schizophrenia who were utilizing mental health welfare center services in the Busan area. The general control group consisted of individuals aged 19 and older in Busan. A survey was used to examine changes in daily life due to COVID-19 and perceptions of preventive measures. The survey also investigated the difficulties in daily life and the services needed by individuals with schizophrenia after the onset of COVID-19.To compare the two groups, independent sample t-tests were used for continuous variables, and chi-square tests were conducted for categorical variables. Results: Compared to the general population, individuals with schizophrenia reported lower levels of anxiety about contracting COVID-19 and experiencing fatal outcomes. They also indicated that they were less likely to engage in new activities or experience conflicts with those around them. Additionally, they rated the necessity of COVID-19 preventive guidelines lower and reported experiencing less stress from adhering to these guidelines. However, individuals with schizophrenia expressed significant discomfort due to the reduction in face-to-face counseling as a result of the suspension of mental health welfare center services. They also reported difficulties with attending outpatient appointments and maintaining regular meals, among other challenges. Conclusions In this study, it was observed that individuals with schizophrenia tended to underestimate the risk and severity of COVID-19 infection and found it challenging to recognize the necessity of preventive measures. Additionally, they appeared to experience greater difficulties in managing their daily lives independently.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced malignant melanoma. This study examined the real-world efficacy of dacarbazine (dimethyl triazeno imidazole carboxamide, DTIC) in patients who had previously received pembrolizumab, based on the hypothesis that prior ICI treatment enhances the therapeutic response to subsequent chemotherapy. Methods: This retrospective study included 71 patients with histologically confirmed malignant melanoma treated at Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital (Daegu, Korea) between 2011 and 2023. The patients received DTIC for unresectable stage IIIC, IIID, or IV melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer, 8th edition). Results: Among the 71 patients, the median patient age was 64 years (range, 25–89 years). When categorized by melanoma subtype, 18 patients (25.4%) had acral melanoma, 40 (56.3%) had cutaneous melanoma, and 13 (18.3%) had mucosal melanoma. Sixteen of the DTIC-treated patients had not received pembrolizumab previously (DTIC-only group), while 55 had (pem-DTIC group). The median progression-free survival was 2.3 months in the DTIC-only group and 3.9 months in the pem-DTIC group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.246; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.106–0.576; p=0.001). The median overall survival was 6.8 months in the DTIC-only group and 19.0 months in the pem-DTIC group (HR, 0.198; 95% CI, 0.068–0.574; p=0.003). The duration of response (DoR) was 4.64 months in the DTIC group and 8.11 months in the pem-DTIC group. Conclusion This study demonstrated that the DoR to DTIC was prolonged following ICI therapy (4.64 months vs. 8.11 months). This indicates that prior ICI treatment may enhance tumor sensitivity to chemotherapy, making DTIC a viable option for treating refractory, relapsed, or progressive melanoma.

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are an important treatment option for ulcerative colitis, providing rapid onset of action, oral administration, and efficacy even after biologic failure. The 3 approved agents—tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib—differ in JAK isoform selectivity, leading to clinically meaningful differences in efficacy and safety. Evidence from network meta-analyses, clinical trials, and real-world studies consistently shows that upadacitinib provides the highest efficacy for induction and maintenance of remission, whereas filgotinib demonstrates the most favorable safety profile. The strong efficacy of upadacitinib and tofacitinib is particularly relevant in patients with severe disease, including acute severe ulcerative colitis, and upadacitinib maintains high efficacy regardless of prior advanced therapy exposure. JAK inhibitors also benefit extraintestinal manifestations. Although risks such as herpes zoster, serious infection, thromboembolism, and major cardiovascular events differ among agents, long-term data suggest generally acceptable safety when used appropriately. Intraclass JAK-to-JAK cycling is feasible, with about half of patients achieving steroid-free clinical remission in retrospective cohorts. Based on mechanistic, clinical, and real-world evidence, filgotinib may be a first-line option for patients with lower disease activity or when safety is a priority, whereas upadacitinib or tofacitinib may be preferred in higher disease activity. Strategically selecting agents may improve durability and outcomes.

Purpose: Hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) refers to a group of genetic neurodegenerative diseases marked by gradually worsening spasticity and hyperreflexia in the lower extremities. This study aimed to describe the clinical and genetic characteristics of Korean patients with spastic paraplegia. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 69 patients with spastic paraplegia from 54 unrelated families between 2002 and 2024. Genetic, clinical, electrophysiological, and radiological features were comprehensively analyzed. Results: Causative genes were identified in 34 (63%) of 54 unrelated families; SPAST, detected in 26 families, was the most prevalent. Seven novel pathogenic variants were identified. Clinically, the median age of symptom onset was 25 years [14.0–37.0]. Out of 69 patients with spastic paraplegia, 51 (74%) presented with the pure form of spastic paraplegia, which included all patients with SPG4. Spastic gait was a universal feature in all patients. Urinary dysfunction was present in 42 (61%) patients. Additional neurologic manifestations included peripheral neuropathy 9 (13%), cognitive impairment 5 (7%), upper limb weakness 4 (6%), dysarthria 4 (6%), dysphagia 3 (4%), ataxia 3 (4%), and scoliosis 1 (3%). Brain MRI findings demonstrated a thin corpus callosum in two patients with SPG11; all patients with SPG4 had normal findings. Spine MRI revealed spinal cord atrophy in 16 (27%) patients, including 6 (21%) patients with SPG4. Conclusion The study comprehensively reviewed genetic and clinical spectra of spastic paraplegia in Korean patients, emphasizing the predominance of SPAST as the causative gene and underscoring the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of spastic paraplegia.

Purpose: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a frequent phenotype of BRCA-mutanttumors. Tumors with BRCAness may show characteristics of BRCA-mutant tumors and respond to similar treatments. Next-generation sequencing is an efficient and cost-effective method for simultaneously sequencing multiple cancer susceptibility genes, surpassing conventional Sanger testing. Methods: A total of 148 women with TNBC were recruited from December 2015 to November 2018, as part of a sub-analysis based on the PEARLY trial data. Of them, 103 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT). The targeted genes related to hereditary cancers were sequenced using the 65-gene germline next-generation sequencing (gNGS) panel pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (P&LPs) were determined by Sanger sequencing. We examined the occurrence of pathologic complete remission (ypCR) in patients with P&LPs. Results: The patients’ median age was 47 years (range, 27–69 years). Twenty (13.7%) of 148 patients had P&LP in six genes, including BARD1 (n = 2), BRCA1 (n = 9), BRCA2 (n = 5), CHEK2 (n = 1), RAD51C (n = 1), and RAD51D (n = 2). Among the 103 patients with NCT, 43 (41.7%) achieved ypCR (P&LPs; 9 individuals vs. non-variants; 34 individuals). Among the 103 patients with NCT, 14 (9.3%) had P&LPs. Nine of 14 patients with P&LPs, including BARD1 (n = 2), BRCA1 (n = 4), BRCA2 (n = 1), RAD51C (n = 1), and RAD51D (n = 1), achieved ypCR, showing a trend toward statistical significance (p = 0.066). Conclusion Germline P&LP mutations in TNBC patients can be detected by gNGS. This panel test can identify BRCA and BRCAness mutations that may predict ypCR in TNBC.

The adhesion of arteries to aneurysm domes can pose significant technical challenges during surgical clipping. Dissection of these vessels carries a risk of iatrogenic wall damage and subsequent complications. We present the case of a 67-year-old woman with three unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Following successful coil embolization of a right posterior communicating artery aneurysm, surgical clipping was planned for the remaining left middle cerebral artery and anterior choroidal artery aneurysms. Intraoperatively, the M2 inferior division was found to be densely adherent to an aneurysm located at the bifurcation of the M2 superior division. After temporary clipping of the parent artery, careful dissection was performed, and the aneurysm was successfully clipped. Postoperatively, the patient failed to regain consciousness. A computed tomography scan revealed diffuse subarachnoid hemorrhage, and subsequent angiography confirmed active contrast extravasation from the dissected M2 inferior division. The family declined reoperation, and the patient subsequently expired after brain death was declared. This case illustrates that in instances of strong arterial adhesion, extreme caution is warranted during dissection. Even without evident intraoperative bleeding, subtle vessel wall injury can lead to fatal delayed rupture. Meticulous inspection and, when necessary, reinforcement of dissected arterial segments is crucial to prevent such devastating outcomes.

Purpose: To propose improvements for promoting eyeball donation and managing donated corneas, this study analyzed the current system in Korea and reviewed relevant Korean laws, international standards, and foreign practices. Methods: To understand the current situation in Korea, annual reports published by the Korean Network for Organ Sharing and existing Korean laws were examined. For the international context, references were made to the National Organ Transplant Act, 21 CFR Part 1271 (Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 Part 1271), Current Good Tissue Practice guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration, and the Medical Standards of the Eye Bank Association of America in the United States. Opinions on promoting eyeball donation, improving the monitoring system for donated corneas and revising laws related to cornea management were gathered. The perspectives of 31 experts affiliated with the Korea Cornea Society were collected through a survey. Results: Currently, there are no laws or regulations that can be appropriately applied to the cornea which has properties of both organs and tissue. Additionally, there is no law regulating imported corneas. Therefore, there is a need to legislate or revise the current law; all experts who conducted the survey agreed on this. Furthermore, the current system faces limitations in the efficient procurement, stable supply, and management of donor corneas, as well as in donation promotion. To address these issues, the establishment of independent legislation for managing donated corneas and a National Central Eye Bank was proposed. This central body would oversee continuous personnel training, education, and monitoring, along with ensuring stable procurement, processing, and supply of corneas within a structured management system. Sixty-eight percent of the surveyed experts agreed with this proposal. Conclusions To establish a safe and efficient Korean corneal supply and demand system, it is imperative to enact cornea-specific laws, including the establishment of a National Central Eye Bank.

Purpose: Preterm birth remains a leading cause of long-term neurodevelopmental impairment, yet early evaluations frequently underestimate subsequent deficits. This study examined longitudinal neurodevelopmental trajectories across gestational age groups and identified predictors of developmental delay. Methods: A retrospective cohort of 532 preterm children, stratified by gestational age, was followed from the neonatal period to early preschool age. Neurodevelopment was assessed using the Korean version of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition at 8–12 months (n=481), 13–24 months (n=118), and 25–42 months (n=100). Longitudinal trajectories were analyzed using general linear models, and predictors of developmental delay were identified through multivariable logistic regression. Results: During the first year, motor scores differed significantly across gestational age groups, with extremely preterm infants showing the lowest values. By the third to fourth years of life, cognitive and language scores diverged markedly, with extremely preterm children exhibiting the steepest decline and additional deficits in motor and adaptive behavior domains. Lower gestational age remained an independent predictor of both cognitive and language delay at early preschool age, while no independent predictors were identified for motor, social-emotional, or adaptive behavior outcomes. Conclusion Neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm children follow dynamic, domain-specific trajectories influenced by gestational age and developmental timing. Motor delays are most evident in infancy, whereas cognitive and language impairments emerge by early preschool age. Gestational age remains a consistent predictor of later delay, emphasizing the need for longitudinal, gestational age–stratified monitoring and early, targeted intervention.

Rectal cancer, which accounts for approximately 40% of colorectal cancers, remains a major clinical concern. Recent advances in diagnostic imaging, surgical techniques, radiotherapy, and systemic treatment have steadily improved rectal cancer outcomes. Considering this, the Korean Rectal Cancer Multidisciplinary (KRCM) Committee has aimed to provide clinicians and policymakers with up-to-date, evidence-based clinical practice guidelines to support optimal decision-making, reflecting current evidence, the Korean healthcare context, and patient values and preferences. The Clinical Practice Guidelines for Rectal Cancer version 2.0 were developed through multidisciplinary collaboration with related academic societies, building upon and updating the KRCM Clinical Practice Guidelines version 1.0 (titled “Multidisciplinary guidelines for the management of rectal cancer”). These consensus guidelines of the KRCM were established based on a comprehensive literature review, evidence synthesis, with recommendation development guided by the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology, and consideration of applicability in real-world clinical practice under the national health insurance system. Each recommendation has been presented with its strength and level of evidence.