Purpose: This study evaluated the feasibility of radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and level IV venous tumor thrombus, compared with CPB-assisted surgery. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed patients with RCC and level IV venous tumor thrombus who underwent surgery at a single center between 2014 and 2020. Feasibility of non-CPB surgery was assessed by comparing perioperative safety-related outcomes, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) between the non-CPB and CPB groups. Perioperative outcomes included operative time, blood loss, severe complications (Clavien-Dindo classification grade ≥III), intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis and generalized Wilcoxon tests were used to compare survival outcomes. Results: A total of 16 patients met eligibility criteria: 5 underwent surgery without CPB, and 11 underwent CPB-assisted surgery. Median operative time was similar between the CPB and non-CPB groups (490 minutes vs. 480 minutes, p=0.650). Compared with the CPB group, blood loss was lower in the non-CPB group (4000 mL vs. 1080 mL, p=0.333). Severe complications occurred in 36.4% of CPB patients and 0% of non-CPB patients (p=0.245). ICU stay was comparable between the non-CPB and CPB groups (2 days vs. 3 days, p=0.356). OS did not differ significantly between groups (p=0.180), whereas PFS was longer in the non-CPB group (p=0.041). Conclusions Radical nephrectomy and thrombectomy without CPB appears feasible and may be associated with lower perioperative morbidity and blood loss without compromising oncologic outcomes. Non-CPB surgery should be considered in selected patients with level IV venous tumor thrombus when technically feasible.

Purpose: The primary objective of this study was to evaluate long-term outcomes in patients who underwent endovascular treatments for type II endoleaks (T2ELs) following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Methods: This single-center, retrospective study included patients who developed early T2EL after EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Patients were divided into those who did and did not receive intervention for T2EL. Study outcomes included 10-year overall survival (OS), open conversion-free survival, and T2EL regression rates without open conversion. Results: Of the 385 patients who underwent EVAR between January 2006 and December 2016, 65 (16.9%) had early T2EL.Of these, 22 (33.8%) underwent T2EL intervention and 43 (66.2%) were treated conservatively. Eight (12.3%) of the 65 patients required open conversion, with no significant difference in open conversion-free survival between the two groups (P = 0.080). T2EL regression occurred in 16 of 62 patients (25.8%), with no difference in T2EL closure rates between the groups (P = 0.755). Analysis of the 31 patients with sac growth showed no significant between-group differences in 10-year OS, open conversion-free survival, and T2EL regression rates, regardless of T2EL intervention. Cox regression analysis identified that the development of other types of endoleak was the only risk factor for open conversion. Conclusion Interventions for T2EL did not improve OS rates, reduce open conversion rates, or increase T2EL closure rates, even in patients with sac growth. This study suggests that current T2EL interventions are not sufficiently effective, emphasizing the need to detect the development of other types of endoleak that may lead to rupture.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a global health challenge, primarily due to atherosclerosis, which leads to conditions such as coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, and peripheral arterial disease. Mitochondrial dysfunction initiates endothelial dysfunction, a key contributor to CVD pathogenesis, as well as triggers the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), energy stress, and cell death in endothelial cells, which are crucial for atherosclerosis development. This review explores the role of PTEN-induced protein kinase 1 (PINK1) in mitochondrial quality control, focusing on its significance in cardiovascular health. PINK1 plays a pivotal role in mitophagy (selective removal of damaged mitochondria), contributing to the prevention of CVD progression. PINK1-mediated mitophagy also affects the maintenance of cardiomyocyte homeostasis in ischemic heart disease, thus mitigating mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, as well as regulates endothelial health in atherosclerosis through influencing ROS levels and inflammatory response.We also investigated the role of PINK1 in vascular smooth muscle cells, emphasizing on its role in apoptosis and atherosclerosis. Dysfunctional mitophagy in these cells accelerates cellular senescence and contributes to adverse effects including plaque rupture and inflammation. Mitophagy has also been explored as a potential therapeutic target for vascular calcification, a representative lesion in atherosclerosis, with a focus on lactate-induced mechanisms. Finally, we highlight the current research and clinical trials targeting mitophagy as a therapeutic avenue for CVD.

Purpose: Endotension is a rare late complication characterized by an increase in sac size without any type of endoleak following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). Due to its rarity, few studies have demonstrated the mechanism behind and the management of endotension. In this study, we aimed to better understand the treatment and the long-term outcome of endotension in a single-center cohort. Materials and Methods: This study was designed for a retrospective review of the patients diagnosed with endotension between January 2006 and December 2017.The study patients were categorized into two groups (primary versus secondary) based on the presence of any type of endoleak before the diagnosis of endotension. We collected data related to endotension treatment, intraoperative findings, and long-term outcomes. Results: In a cohort of 15 patients diagnosed with endotension following EVAR, eight were classified into the primary endotension (PE) group without prior endoleak, and seven exhibited secondary endotension (SE). Among the eight PE patients, endovascular intervention for a preemptive purpose was conducted in six patients; however, three (50%) showed continuous sac expansion and finally received open conversion. Overall, eight patients (five in PE and three in SE) underwent open conversion, and one (12.5%) presented with an undetected endoleak during the operative findings. Postoperative morbidity was observed in three patients with no operative mortality. Conclusion Endotension can be managed initially through simple observation for changes on serial images, along with preemptive endovascular intervention.However, surgical intervention should be considered for patients with specific indications including continuous aneurysm sac enlargement, presence of symptoms, suspicions of migration of stent-graft with endoleak, and infection.

Purpose: Although endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been shown to be superior to open surgical repair (OSR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment, no large-scale studies in the Korean population have compared outcomes and costs. Methods: The National Health Insurance Service database in Korea was screened to identify AAA patients treated with EVAR or OSR from 2008 to 2019. Perioperative, early postoperative, and long-term survival were compared, as were reinterventions and complications. Patients were followed-up through 2020. Results: Of the 13,631 patients identified, 2,935 underwent OSR and 10,696 underwent EVAR. Perioperative mortality rate was lower in the EVAR group (4.2% vs. 8.0%, P < 0.001) even after excluding patients with ruptured AAA (2.7% vs.3.3%, P = 0.003). However, long-term mortality rate per 100 person-years was significantly higher in the EVAR than in the OSR group (9.0 vs. 6.4, P < 0.001), and all-cause mortality was lower in the OSR group (hazard ratio, 0.9; 95% confidence interval, 0.87–0.97, P = 0.008). EVAR had a higher AAA-related reintervention rate per 100 person-years (1.75 vs. 0.52), and AAA-related reintervention costs were almost 10-fold higher with EVAR (US dollar [USD] 6,153,463) than with OSR (USD 624,216). Conclusion While EVAR may have short-term advantages, OSR may provide better long-term outcomes and costeffectiveness for AAA treatment in the Korean population, under the medical expense system in Korea.

Purpose: This study aimed to review our experience with the explantation of infected endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) grafts. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, observational study analyzed the data of 12 consecutive patients who underwent infected aortic stent graft explantation following EVAR between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019, of which 11 underwent in situ graft reconstruction following graft removal. The presentation symptoms, infection route, original pathology of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), graft materials, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results: Six patients underwent total explantation, whereas 5 underwent removal of only the fabric portions. For in situ reconstructions, prosthetic grafts and banked allografts were used in 8 and 3 patients, respectively. Four mechanisms of graft infection were noted in 11 patients: 4 had bacteremia from systemic infections, 3 had persistent infections following EVAR of primary infected AAA, 3 had ascending infections from adjacent abscesses, and 1 had an aneurysm sac erosion resulting in an aortoenteric fistula. No infection-related postoperative complications or reinfections occurred during the mean 65.27-month (standard deviation, ±52.51) follow-up period. One patient died postoperatively because of the rupture of the proximal aortic wall pseudoaneurysm that had occurred during forceful bare stent removal. Conclusion Regardless of graft material, in situ graft reconstruction is safe for interposition in treating an infected aortic stent graft following EVAR. In our experience, the residual bare stent is no longer a risk factor for reinfection. Therefore, it is important not to injure the proximal aortic wall when removing the bare stent by force.

Background: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) is a serious complication of abdominal aortic aneurysm associated with high operative mortality and morbidity rates. The present study evaluated the perioperative and long-term outcomes of Korean patients with rAAA based on national health insurance claims data. Methods: The National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database was searched retrospectively to identify patients with rAAA who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and open surgical repair (OSR) from 2009 to 2018. Perioperative (≤ 30 days), early postoperative (≤ 3 month), and long-term (> 3 month) survival, reinterventions, and complications were assessed. Results: The search identified 1,034 patients with rAAA, including 594 who underwent EVAR and 440 who underwent OSR. When the study period was divided into two, the total numbers of patients with rAAA, patients who underwent EVAR, and octogenarians were higher during the second half. The perioperative mortality rate was 29.8% in the EVAR and 35.0% in the OSR group (P = 0.028). Hartmann’s procedure for bowel infarction was performed more frequently in the OSR than in the EVAR group (adjusted odds ratio, 6.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33–21.84; P = 0.001), but other complication rates did not differ significantly. All-cause mortality during the entire observation period did not differ significantly in the EVAR and OSR groups (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.98–1.41; P = 0.087). Abdominal aortic aneurysm-related reintervention rate was significantly lower in the OSR group (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.14–0.70; P = 0.005). Conclusion Although EVAR showed somewhat superior perioperative outcomes for rAAA, the long-term outcomes of EVAR after excluding initial 3 months were significantly worse than OSR. When anatomically feasible for both treatments, the perioperative mortality risk and reasonable prospects of long-term survival should be considered in rAAA.

Radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy for advanced renal cell carcinoma is an oncologically relevant approach that can achieve long-term survival even in the presence of distant metastases. However, the surgical techniques pose significant challenges. The objective of this clinical review was to present technical recommendations for tumor thrombectomy in the vena cava to facilitate surgical treatment. Transesophageal echocardiography is required to prepare for this procedure. Cardiopulmonary bypass should be considered when the tumor thrombus has invaded the cardiac chamber and clamping is not feasible because of the inability to milk the intracardiac chamber thrombus in the caudal direction. Prior to performing a cavotomy, it is crucial to clamp the contralateral renal vein and infrarenal and suprahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC). If the suprahepatic IVC is separated from the surrounding tissue, it can be gently pulled down toward the patient’s leg until the lower margin of the atrium becomes visible. Subsequently, the tumor thrombus should be carefully pulled downward to a position where it can be clamped. Implementing the Pringle maneuver to reduce blood flow from the hepatic veins to the IVC during IVC cavotomy is simpler than clamping the hepatic veins. Sequential clamping is a two-stage method of dividing thrombectomy by clamping the IVC twice, first suprahepatically and then midretrohepatically. This sequential clamping technique helps minimize hypotension status and the Pringle maneuver time compared to single clamping. Additionally, a spiral cavotomy can decrease the degree of primary closure narrowing. The oncological prognoses of patients can be improved by incorporating these technical recommendations.

Purpose: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has lower perioperative mortality and morbidity rates and shorter hospital stays when compared to open surgical repair (OSR) in octogenarian patients. However, its long-term results remain unclear. Hence, we aimed to analyze and compare the long-term outcomes of OSR and EVAR in this aging population. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, observational study analyzed the data of patients older than 80 years who underwent primary repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) between 2011 and 2016 in our hospital. The primary outcomes were in-hospital complications and 30-day mortality, while the secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and reintervention rate. Results: Among the 48 patients with elective AAA repair, 13 underwent OSR and 35 underwent EVAR. In-hospital complications occurred in 10 patients (20.8%), 5 for OSR (38.5%) and 5 for EVAR (14.3%) with no significant difference between the groups (P = 0.067). In the OSR group, pulmonary complications were the most common events; in the EVAR group, 2 patients had ischemic colitis diagnosed with sigmoidoscopy and recovered by conservative treatment. The 1- and 5-year survival rates were 77.8% and 55.6% in the OSR group, and 66.0% and 54.9% in the EVAR group, respectively. The reintervention rate was 8.6% for the EVAR group; none of the OSR group were readmitted. Conclusion The difference in procedures did not affect patient survival. Therefore, OSR does not necessarily have a worse prognosis than EVAR. Individual risk stratification must be preceded before the selection of an appropriate treatment method.

Purpose: The platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100/200 is widely used to assess platelet function. However, its role in predicting the perioperative risk of bleeding in patients undergoing liver resection remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to ascertain whether the platelet function test could be useful in predicting bleeding risk in patients undergoing hepatic surgery. Methods: The study participants were patients who underwent hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma at our hospital over a period of 10 years from January 1, 2010 to May 31, 2020. PFA-200 values of these patients were divided into 2 groups; normal (n = 333) and prolonged (n = 39). Results: There were no significant differences regarding the volumes of calculated blood loss during surgery between the normal and prolonged PFA groups (879.55 ± 1,046.50 mL vs. 819.74 ± 912.64 mL, respectively; P = 0.733); intraoperative RBC transfusion (0.52 ± 2.02 units vs. 0.26 ± 1.02 units, P = 0.419) and postoperative RBC transfusion (0.24 ± 1.17 units vs. 0.46 ± 1.97 units, P = 0.306) were similar between the 2 groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed no association between PFA closure time and calculated blood loss (hazard ratio, 1.06; P = 0.881). Moreover, there was no association between PFA closure time and preoperative laboratory results or assessment of tool-related liver function in multivariate analysis. Conclusion There was no correlation between the amount of blood loss and platelet function in patients who underwent liver resection. In patients undergoing liver resection who are not managed on antiplatelet agents or do not have chronic kidney disease, the use of routine PFA is not recommended.