Burning mouth syndrome remains a frequent source of diagnostic delay, repeated consultations, and fragmented care because it has long been treated as a “diagnosis of exclusion.” Recent updates in orofacial pain classification and research diagnostic frameworks support a practical shift: from an exclusionary label toward a structured diagnostic algorithm and staged, phenotype-guided management. This narrative, algorithm-focused clinical review aims to summarize clinically actionable evidence and to propose a “minimum sufficient workup” that prioritizes safety, efficiency, and patient-centered communication.We first outline pragmatic diagnostic criteria and key symptom patterns, then integrate current concepts of mixed mechanisms—peripheral neuropathic features, centralociplastic amplification, and psychosocial modulators—that account for symptom fluctuation and discordance between symptom severity and objective findings. The core of this review is a one-page stepwise algorithm: (1) confirm chronicity and absence of visible mucosal disease, (2) screen for red flags requiring urgent evaluation, (3) address common local contributors (e.g., candidiasis, irritants, contact allergy, xerostomia), (4) perform a targeted systemic/medication/deficiency panel, and (5) phenotype patients to guide staged treatment choices and follow-up. Finally, we provide a practical management framework emphasizing education, trigger control, and individualized combinations of topical, systemic, and behavioral interventions with predefined reassessment intervals. Future priorities include phenotype-stratified randomized trials and implementation outcomes that quantify reductions in diagnostic delay, misdiagnosis, and unnecessary testing.

Persistent idiopathic dentoalveolar pain (PIDAP) is a chronic orofacial pain condition characterized by persistent pain in the absence of detectable dental pathology. Due to its ambiguous clinical presentation, PIDAP is frequently overlooked or misdiagnosed, leading to prolonged patient suffering and unnecessary dental treatments. This review provides a structured educational overview of PIDAP for dental students and early-career clinicians, covering its definition, taxonomy, differential diagnosis, pathophysiology, clinical significance, and management principles. A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases with the following search terms: “persistent dentoalveolar pain,” “atypical odontalgia,” “PIDAP,” “orofacial pain,” and “chronic overlapping pain conditions.” The search covered publications up to December 2024, limited to English-language articles. Priority was given to relevant classification guidelines, epidemiological data, and studies addressing diagnostic challenges, nomenclature changes, pathophysiology, and the relationship between PIDAP and chronic overlapping pain conditions (COPCs). Thirty-four key references were included after screening. Current diagnostic criteria, the historical evolution of PIDAP taxonomy, and major pathophysiological hypotheses—including peripheral sensitization, central sensitization, and nociplastic pain mechanisms—are summarized. The high rate of comorbidity with COPCs and the frequent misdiagnosis of PIDAP highlight its clinical importance, as epidemiological data indicate that diagnostic delays may range from several months to years. Improving awareness and understanding of PIDAP among dental students and clinicians can facilitate early recognition, reduce misdiagnosis, and contribute to more effective management. Incorporating PIDAP-related education into undergraduate dental curricula and continuing education programs may further bridge current knowledge gaps and improve patient outcomes.

Estrogen plays a pivotal role in systemic bone and cartilage metabolism. Estrogen receptors have also been identified in temporomandibular joint tissues. Clinical observations, including the predominance of idiopathic condylar resorption (ICR) in adolescent females and increased prevalence of osteoarthritic changes in females have led to longstanding interest in a possible association between estrogen and temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). Estrogen may influence susceptibility to structural alteration of the mandibular condyle and its progression under specific hormonal and mechanical conditions. This narrative review provides an evidence-based overview of the role of estrogen in TMDs, with a focus on osteoarthritis and ICR. A better understanding of these interactions may improve the assessment and management of TMDs.

Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic inflammatory disease, affecting approximately 0.5% to 2% of the global population. OLP can lead to long-term oral pain, reduced quality of life, with the potential for malignant transformation. Current treatment strategies focus on symptom management and reducing the risk of malignancy. Treatment of OLP is challenging and varies from patient to patient, especially in those who do not respond to corticosteroids. The effectiveness and safety of second-line and third-line treatment options in such cases are continually compared and evaluated, and recently, the application of Janus kinase inhibitors, micro ribonucleic acids, and mesenchymal stem cell-based therapies is being assessed. As a result, the ability of clinicians to select the most appropriate treatment modalities for each patient remains crucial. This review aims to evaluate the efficacy of recent treatment modalities and key considerations to assist clinicians in selecting effective and safe treatment strategies for OLP.

Purpose: Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a multifactorial condition influenced by biological, psychological, and social factors. Some patients perceive dental treatment as the cause of their TMD, which may impact symptom perception and treatment response.This study aims to compare the psychosocial and clinical characteristics of patients who attribute their TMD onset to prior dental treatment (DT group) with those who do not (NT group). Methods: A total of 250 patients diagnosed with TMD at Pusan National University Dental Hospital between January and October 2024 were included. Patients were classified into the DT group (n=92) if they attributed their symptoms to previous dental procedures, while the remaining NT group (n=158) consisted of patients with other primary complaints. Patients were additionally categorized into Generation X (1965-1980), Generation Y (1981-1999), and Generation Z (2000-2012). Clinical assessments were conducted following the Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD), and psychosocial factors were evaluated using the Oral Behaviors Checklist (OBC), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15). Results: The DT group had a significantly higher mean age (54.16±16.87 years) compared to the NT group (39.71±19.12 years, p<0.001). Psychological distress scores (PHQ-9, GAD-7, and PHQ-15) were significantly higher in the DT group, particularly among Generation X patients (p<0.05). Muscle-related pain was more prevalent in the DT group (75%) than in the NT group. Interestingly, OBC scores were higher in the NT group (p<0.05). Conclusions Patients who attributed their TMD onset to dental treatment reported higher psychological distress and a greater prevalence of muscle-related pain, underscoring the need for a biopsychosocial approach to TMD management. Clinicians should consider the impact of patient perception on TMD symptoms and integrate psychological assessment and counseling to enhance treatment efficacy and patient adherence.

Xerostomia or dry mouth is commonly associated with medications, head and neck radiation therapy, and Sjögren’s syndrome. Studies report that it predominantly affects older adults and females; however, there is limited research focusing on the atypical and lowrisk groups. This report presents a case of xerostomia in a 35-year-old male following a mandibular fracture (MF). Initial self-care attempts were insufficient, necessitating pharmacological intervention with pilocarpine, which improved both the salivary function and symptoms. This case highlights MF as a rare yet plausible cause of xerostomia, mediated by trauma-induced neural and physiological disruptions. The potential mechanisms include cranial nerve injury, autonomic dysfunction, psychological stress, and the effects of trauma-related medications. These findings emphasize the need to consider xerostomia in nontraditional populations, particularly in those with facial trauma, and call for further research to elucidate its underlying mechanisms and guide effective management strategies.

Foramen of Huschke (FH) is a congenital defect of the external auditory canal (EAC) that may persist into adulthood. Although rare, it can present with symptoms that overlap with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), leading to potential misdiagnosis. This report describes two cases of patients who exhibited common TMDs symptoms, such as temporomandibular joint (TMJ) sounds during function. However, neither patient demonstrated additional signs or symptoms indicative of TMDs in a comprehensive TMDs evaluation. Consequently, they were referred to an otolaryngologist for further assessment to investigate non-TMD etiologies. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), frequently used in dental practice, is effective in assessing osseous structures but is limited in detecting soft tissue abnomalities. To achieve a more comprehensive evaluation, temporal bone computed tomography (TBCT) was performed. TBCT revealed an osseous discontinuity without other underlying causes, along with soft tissue bulging at the affected site, confirming the presence of the FH in the EAC. Given the limitations of CBCT in soft tissue visualization, advanced imaging modalities like TBCT should be considered in cases of persistent TMJ-related symptoms to improve diagnostic accuracy. These cases highlight the importance of differential diagnosis when evaluating patients with symptoms suggestive of TMDs, as soft tissue bulging through the FH can generate TMJ sounds during function, potentially mimicking TMD. Clinicians should consider that non-TMDs etiologies, such as the FH, as possible contributors to similar symptomatology. Accurate assessment and appropriate imaging studies are crucial for ensuring an accurate diagnosis and optimal management.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify reproducible locations for evaluating masseter muscle function by measuring its thickness using ultrasonography (US). The study focused on comparing two measurement locations: the thickest part of the masseter muscle during ultrasonographic scanning (TMUS) and the most prominent part during clenching (PMC). Methods: Forty healthy adults (20 males and 20 females) participated in the study. US images were obtained from both sides of the masseter muscle under resting and clenching conditions. Measurements were taken at the TMUS and PMC locations, and the clenching-to-resting (C/R) ratio was calculated. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and the agreement between the two locations was further analyzed using Bland–Altman (BA) plots. Results: The measurements at both TMUS and PMC showed high intra- and inter-rater agreement, with no significant difference in measurements between the two locations.However, the PMC location demonstrated slightly higher ICC values (0.94) compared to TMUS (0.91). The C/R ratio for PMC showed higher consistency (0.89) compared to TMUS (0.65). BA plots indicated that the agreement between TMUS and PMC was slightly better during clenching than at rest, with smaller mean differences in clenching (–0.06 mm) than resting (–0.13 mm). Additionally, the number of measurements outside the upper and lower limits was lower during clenching (10) than at rest (13). Conclusions Both TMUS and PMC locations demonstrated reliable measurements, but the PMC location showed slightly better consistency across different muscle states. The findings suggest that PMC provides a more reproducible and standardized approach for masseter muscle assessment, making it a better choice for both clinical practice and research in evaluating masticatory function.