This review summarizes the establishment of the 2025 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans (KDRIs), the third national standard for nutrient reference values in Korea. The 2025KDRIs build on lessons from revisions in 2010, 2015, and 2020, and chart a path forward by addressing 4 priorities: upgrading the scientific evidence base through systematic evaluation, strengthening intake monitoring using national survey data, advancing international harmonization, and responding to changes in the nutrition and health environment, including those associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The scientific basis of the KDRIs was advanced by systematically evaluating the findings across exposure indicators, health assessment indicators, and the health outcomes, and reorganizing the indicators to estimate the nutrient requirements. Adequate Intake was set using explicit criteria when an Estimated Average Requirement could not be derived, data gaps, uncertain outcomes, and limited representativeness were documented. Key inputs, including coefficients of variation and uncertainty factors, as well as life stage estimation procedures, were re-evaluated in alignment with current evidence and international standards. The 2025 KDRIs incorporate intake evidence from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to inform policy and practice and support intake monitoring. For international harmonization, the NUQUEST-based literature framework was updated, and recent DRIs from other countries were compared. The shifts in anthropometric characteristics and dietary intake patterns observed during the COVID-19 pandemic were considered to reflect a changing context. The review identified remaining challenges for future revisions, including validating Koreanspecific indicators, developing evidence for infants and older adults, stronger translation of reference values into policy and practice, prioritizing of nutrients for future review within the 5-year revision cycle. Together, these advances will position the 2025 KDRIs as a science-based national reference integrating policy, practice, and evidence to support implementation aimed at improving nutritional status and healthy life expectancy in Korea.

Purpose: The Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans (KDRIs) serve as a foundation for nutrition policy, nutrition education, and dietary intake evaluation among healthy Koreans.The KDRIs are revised every five years to ensure that the guidelines are based on a robust and up-to-date scientific foundation. For the 2025 KDRIs for calcium, the 2020 KDRIs were revisited, and references were critically evaluated. Methods: All references cited in the 2020 KDRIs were extracted, reviewed, and organized according to the framework for the estimated average requirement (EAR). Each reference was evaluated based on the participant characteristics, including age, race/ethnicity, and health status, as well as study design, exposure, and outcomes. In addition, calculations for the EAR and Recommended Nutritient Intakes were re-examined for each sex and age group and compared with the current literature. Results: Major revisions in the 2025 KDRIs were driven by updates in the reference bodyweight, improved consistency in rounding and coefficients of variation, inclusion of studies in East Asian populations, and clarification of the use of calcium balance studies.Nevertheless, further studies in Koreans, particularly in pregnant and lactating women, are needed to strengthen the scientific evidence for the calcium DRI. Conclusion The 2025 KDRIs for calcium were revised to be based on more robust logical reasoning and calculation methods. Future research conducted on Korean populations is necessary to define the calcium requirements for Koreans more accurately.

The Korean Dietary Reference Intakes (KDRIs) are essential guidelines for promoting public health and preventing chronic diseases. For the 2025 KDRI revision, the implementation of a highly standardized and scientifically rigorous systematic review (SR) methodology became dominant to enhance the consistency and reproducibility of evidence synthesis. This paper describes the standardized 8-stage SR and umbrella review (UR) protocol developed for the 2025 KDRIs: 1) formulating research questions and analytic frameworks, 2) establishing selection criteria (PICOTS), 3) literature searching, 4) screening, 5) data extraction, 6) quality assessment, 7) data synthesis, and 8) evidence grading and conclusion derivation.A major hallmark is the transition to the NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools (NUQUEST), which prioritizes the accuracy and maintenance of nutrient exposure while ensuring that the key potential confounders are systematically accounted for. The 2025 protocol expanded its scope by incorporating existing SRs through an UR approach to capture the highest level of global evidence. A case study on sodium and cerebrovascular disease showed that studies previously rated as ‘Low Risk’ by the generic Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were reclassified as ‘Moderate to High Risk’ when evaluated using NUQUEST, primarily because of the limitations in dietary assessment validity. The evidence was ultimately synthesized and graded using the Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review grading rubric, considering consistency, directness, precision, and generalizability to the Korean population.The 2025 KDRI protocol minimizes the subjective bias and maximizes scientific integrity by prioritizing nutritional specificity. The adoption of NUQUEST and UR methodologies ensures that the dietary standards are founded on transparent, methodologically sound evidence. This standardized framework provides a robust model for future nutritional evidence synthesis and public health policy development in Korea.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate age- and sex-specific dietary vitamin B12 intake among Koreans, assess adequacy relative to the 2025 Korean Dietary Reference Intakes, and identify major food groups using nationally representative data from the 2022–2024 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Methods: Data from 19,191 participants in the KNHANES 2022–2024 aged1 year and older were analyzed after excluding individuals with extreme energy intake values. Individual vitamin B12 intake was calculated based on 24-hour dietary recall data using the Korean National Standard Food Composition Database (version 10.3). Intake levels were evaluated against age- and sex-specific Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and Recommended Nutrient Intake (RNI) values. Complex sample general linear models and cross-tabulation analyses were conducted to examine differences in intake and adequacy. Results: The mean vitamin B12 intake of the study population was 8.27 μg/day, exceeding the RNI in most age groups. The proportion of individuals meeting or exceeding the RNI was generally high; however, the prevalence of intake below the EAR increased with age, particularly among older women, approximately 35% of whom were at risk of inadequate intake. Animal-based foods, including fish and shellfish, meat, eggs, and dairy products, were the primary contributors to vitamin B12 intake. Adults and older adults with intake below the RNI consumed significantly lower amounts of these food groups compared with those meeting the RNI. Conclusion Although overall vitamin B12 intake among Koreans appears sufficient, older adults remain at increased risk of insufficient intake. Continuous monitoring of vitamin B12 nutritional status and targeted dietary strategies, with a focus on older populations, is warranted to prevent potential deficiencies.

Dietary protein is a crucial macronutrient for systemic homeostasis, and the global interest in protein supplements has surged because of their roles in muscle synthesis, immune function, and sarcopenia prevention. In South Korea, the proportion of energy derived from protein has increased steadily over the past decade, reflecting a significant shift in dietary patterns toward greater reliance on protein. Concurrently, a wide range of protein- and amino acidbased processed foods and dietary supplements has been developed and actively consumed.Nevertheless, comprehensive data on the prevalence of protein supplement users, their characteristics across different life stages, and the contribution of supplements to total daily protein requirements are lacking. Unlike other macronutrients, the human body lacks a dedicated reservoir for protein storage, necessitating a continuous dietary supply to support protein turnover, particularly for older adults facing anabolic resistance and individuals with high physical demands. Although clinical evidence highlights that protein supplementation, particularly when combined with resistance exercise, effectively improves muscle mass and physical performance, the magnitude of these benefits remains inconsistent across different life stages and protein sources. Conversely, emerging concerns about the potential metabolic risks from chronic overconsumption suggest that the validity and safety of protein supplementation are unclear, highlighting the need for a precision nutrition approach. Thus, this review evaluates the status of protein supplement intake among Koreans, synthesizes evidence on its physiological benefits and drawbacks and examines international trends and regulatory frameworks. Developed as part of the technical assessment for the 2025 revision of the Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans, this review addresses the current lack of longterm safety data on chronic protein overconsumption. It provides a foundational framework for evidence-based dietary guidelines and serves as a critical scientific basis for establishing future tolerable upper intake levels and nutrition policies for protein supplement use in Korea.

Choline is an essential nutrient that serves as a fundamental structural component of membrane phospholipids and plays critical roles in one-carbon metabolism, acetylcholine synthesis, lipid transport, and signal transduction. Although it is synthesized endogenously in the human body, the amount produced may not be sufficient to meet the nutrient's total biological demand, necessitating consistent dietary intake from various food sources. Since its recognition as an essential nutrient by the Institute of Medicine (U.S.) in 1998, several countries and regions, including Australia and New Zealand, Europe, and China, have established specific Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs) to monitor and manage choline intake among their respective populations. In response to the growing demand for national dietary guidelines, the Committee for the Establishment and Revision of the 2025 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans (KDRIs) conducted a thorough, systematic review. This initiative was undertaken to re-evaluate the necessity and strength of scientific evidence supporting DRIs for choline in the Korean population. Furthermore, the committee analyzed the distribution of actual choline intake among healthy Koreans by applying a newly developed choline database to the recent five-year data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. By comprehensively reviewing both the calculated reference values based on existing evidence and the actual intake distribution, the committee successfully established the Adequate Intake and Tolerable Upper Intake Level for choline across different age and gender groups in Korea. This review details the development process and core components of the KDRIs for choline and presents the key issues to be addressed in future revisions of these standards.

The recommendations for carbohydrate intake were revised in the 2025 Korean Dietary Reference Intakes to reflect updated evidence on chronic disease risk and to clarify the interpretation of the Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and Recommended Nutrient Intake (RNI). These revisions aim to strengthen both the scientific basis and the practical interpretation of carbohydrate intake guidance across the life course of an individual. For individuals aged 1 year and older, the Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range for carbohydrates was lowered from 55–65% of total energy to 50–65%. This adjustment reflects accumulating evidence from prospective cohort studies and meta-analyses indicating that very high carbohydrate intake is associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes. In contrast, an intake of approximately 50–55% of total energy is associated with the lowest mortality risk. Importantly, this change does not imply a preference for low-carbohydrate diets, as overall dietary quality, including carbohydrate quality, remains a critical consideration. The EAR (100 g/day) and RNI (130 g/day) are derived from estimates of brain glucose utilization and metabolic adaptation and should be interpreted as physiological minimum intake levels rather than population-based intake targets. In addition, life-stage-specific recommendations were updated based on new evidence, including recalculating the Adequate Intake (AI) for infants (55 g/day for 0–5 months and 85 g/day for 6–11 months) and revising the additional requirements during pregnancy (+35 g/day) and lactation (+55 g/day).Because no Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) has been established for total carbohydrate intake, excess intake should be managed through dietary adjustments, including limiting added sugars and refined carbohydrates, ensuring adequate fiber intake, and maintaining overall macronutrient balance. Collectively, these revisions provide an updated evidencebased framework for carbohydrate intake guidance for the Korean population.

Vitamin B6 is an essential water-soluble vitamin involved in amino acid metabolism, neurotransmitter synthesis, heme biosynthesis, and one-carbon metabolism. Its active form, pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (PLP), serves as a coenzyme in more than 100 enzymatic reactions and is critical for maintaining metabolic homeostasis, immune regulation, and nervous system function. Epidemiological studies have reported inverse associations between vitamin B6 intake or the circulating PLP concentrations and the risk of cardiovascular disease, certain cancers, and diabetes-related metabolic dysfunction. The proposed mechanisms include the modulation of inflammation, oxidative stress, and homocysteine metabolism. Nevertheless, most available evidence is derived from observational studies conducted in Western or non-Korean populations, limiting generalizability and precluding revisions to current intake recommendations based on the chronic disease outcomes. Relevant epidemiological studies, mechanistic evidence, and recent international and national risk assessment reports were reviewed. Although excessive intake from habitual diets is uncommon, the increasing use of dietary supplements has raised concerns regarding chronic high-dose exposure. Accumulating human evidence suggests that long-term supplementation with high pyridoxine doses may induce sensory peripheral neuropathy, even at lower intake levels than previously assumed. Accordingly, recent international risk assessments, including the 2023 re-evaluation by the European Food Safety Authority, have proposed substantially lower Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL) using benchmark dose modeling based on human data. In the 2025 Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans, the UL for adults was set at 50 mg/day, reflecting the updated safety evidence and domestic supplement use patterns, while the recommended intake levels were maintained based on the established metabolic requirements. Further population-specific prospective studies and long-term safety data are needed to refine intake guidance and strengthen evidence-based risk management strategies in Korea.

Purpose: This study examined the awareness and knowledge levels regarding food additives among single-person adult households. Methods: An online survey was conducted with 715 single-person households aged between 19 and 64 years, residing in urban areas across 17 metropolitan cities and provinces nationwide. The questionnaire included items on the demographic characteristics, nutrition quotient, awareness of food additives and sources of information, trust in information sources, and knowledge related to food additives. Awareness and knowledge of food additives were analyzed according to the participants’ gender, age group, nutrition quotient grade, and reported awareness of food additives. Results: The proportion of respondents who reported an awareness of food additives was 53.0%, with significantly higher awareness among women and those classified in the medium or high nutrition quotient categories. Participants who were aware of food additives obtained information primarily from the internet, television, or radio. By contrast, those who were unaware attributed this to insufficient promotion and information, or to difficulty understanding the content related to food additives. The information provided by physicians, pharmacists, and professional literature was considered trustworthy, while trust in information disseminated by government agencies was notably low (< 20%). The perceived health risk score of food additives was 3.32, and significantly higher scores were observed among the subjects aged 50–64 years and those with medium or high nutrition quotient grades. The knowledge levels regarding food additives were significantly greater among older subjects, those with medium or high nutrition quotient grades, and those who reported awareness of food additives. Conclusion This study provides baseline data for developing food additive education tailored to single-person adult households, supporting educational media, program design, and promotional strategies, and extending its relevance from academic research to practical contributions in public health and consumer awareness.

Purpose: This study was conducted to revise the Nutrition Quotient for Preschool children (NQ-P), a tool for evaluating the overall dietary quality and eating behavior among Korean preschool-aged children. Methods: At the first stage, 20 items for assessing dietary behavior were selected based on the previous NQ-P checklist, incorporating the results of the Seventh Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, national nutrition policies, dietary guidelines, and recent literature reviews. A pilot study was conducted with 100 preschool children residing in Seoul and Gyeonggi Province, using an 18-item checklist. After exploratory factor analysis and expert consultation, 15 items were finalized for use in nationwide survey checklists. The nationwide survey was conducted with a stratified sample of 800 preschool children across six metropolitan cities. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to revise the NQ-P 2021 and make it suitable for the structural equation model. Results: The NQ-P 2021 was developed using 15 checklist items organized into three factors:balance (7 items), moderation (4 items), and practice (4 items). The standardized path coefficients were used as item weights to determine the nutrition quotients. The weights of balance, moderation, and practice were 0.40, 0.15, and 0.45, respectively. In the nationwide survey, the mean NQ-P 2021 score was 59.67. The average scores for balance, moderation, and practice were 51.00, 62.45, and 66.46, respectively. Conclusion The revised NQ-P 2021 provides a validated and practical tool for assessing the dietary quality and eating behaviors of preschool children in Korea.