Background/Aims: Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) is a rare cause of intestinal dysmotility. First-line treatment in adult patients is medical and nutritional therapy. For patients who fail these treatment options, surgical interventions may be an option. In this scoping review, we aim to investigate the current research on surgical interventions for CIPO in adults. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were queried for articles related to surgical interventions for adults with CIPO. Search terms included:intestinal dysmotility, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, global intestinal dysmotility, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, gastrointestinal paresis, neurogastrointestinal motility disorder, and chronic small intestinal motility disorder. Results: Initial search identified 4763 records; 4722 were deemed irrelevant after screening and were excluded. The remaining 41 reports were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Twenty-one additional studies were excluded after in-depth assessment. The remaining 20 reportswere: 9 cohort studies, 7 case reports, and 4 reviews. Of these, 10 studies had study populations of < 10 patients, while 6 had ≥ 10patients. The remaining 4 were reviews. Results of these papers described the safety and effectiveness of various surgical interventions for adults with CIPO, including percutaneous endoscopic procedures, surgical decompression, small bowel resection, and intestinal transplantation. Conclusions Data pertaining to surgical therapy for CIPO is limited. Although this review suggests that surgical interventions for CIPO may be safe and effective for select patients, strong conclusions cannot be made due to limited number of relevant studies and small sample sizes.Concerted efforts to produce data from large studies on adults with CIPO are necessary.

Background/Aims: Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) is a rare cause of intestinal dysmotility. First-line treatment in adult patients is medical and nutritional therapy. For patients who fail these treatment options, surgical interventions may be an option. In this scoping review, we aim to investigate the current research on surgical interventions for CIPO in adults. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were queried for articles related to surgical interventions for adults with CIPO. Search terms included:intestinal dysmotility, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, global intestinal dysmotility, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, gastrointestinal paresis, neurogastrointestinal motility disorder, and chronic small intestinal motility disorder. Results: Initial search identified 4763 records; 4722 were deemed irrelevant after screening and were excluded. The remaining 41 reports were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Twenty-one additional studies were excluded after in-depth assessment. The remaining 20 reportswere: 9 cohort studies, 7 case reports, and 4 reviews. Of these, 10 studies had study populations of < 10 patients, while 6 had ≥ 10patients. The remaining 4 were reviews. Results of these papers described the safety and effectiveness of various surgical interventions for adults with CIPO, including percutaneous endoscopic procedures, surgical decompression, small bowel resection, and intestinal transplantation. Conclusions Data pertaining to surgical therapy for CIPO is limited. Although this review suggests that surgical interventions for CIPO may be safe and effective for select patients, strong conclusions cannot be made due to limited number of relevant studies and small sample sizes.Concerted efforts to produce data from large studies on adults with CIPO are necessary.

Background/Aims: Chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) is a rare cause of intestinal dysmotility. First-line treatment in adult patients is medical and nutritional therapy. For patients who fail these treatment options, surgical interventions may be an option. In this scoping review, we aim to investigate the current research on surgical interventions for CIPO in adults. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus were queried for articles related to surgical interventions for adults with CIPO. Search terms included:intestinal dysmotility, intestinal pseudo-obstruction, global intestinal dysmotility, chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction, gastrointestinal paresis, neurogastrointestinal motility disorder, and chronic small intestinal motility disorder. Results: Initial search identified 4763 records; 4722 were deemed irrelevant after screening and were excluded. The remaining 41 reports were retrieved and assessed for eligibility. Twenty-one additional studies were excluded after in-depth assessment. The remaining 20 reportswere: 9 cohort studies, 7 case reports, and 4 reviews. Of these, 10 studies had study populations of < 10 patients, while 6 had ≥ 10patients. The remaining 4 were reviews. Results of these papers described the safety and effectiveness of various surgical interventions for adults with CIPO, including percutaneous endoscopic procedures, surgical decompression, small bowel resection, and intestinal transplantation. Conclusions Data pertaining to surgical therapy for CIPO is limited. Although this review suggests that surgical interventions for CIPO may be safe and effective for select patients, strong conclusions cannot be made due to limited number of relevant studies and small sample sizes.Concerted efforts to produce data from large studies on adults with CIPO are necessary.

Background: To compare clinical outcomes following lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) versus RSA with latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) in patients with poor preoperative active external rotation (ER). Methods: We performed a systematic review per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We queried PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify articles reporting clinical outcomes of RSA with LDT or lateralized RSA alone performed in patients with preoperative ER ≤0°. Our primary outcomes were active ER, active forward elevation (FE), Constant score, and the incidence of complications. Results: We included 12 RSA with LDT studies with 188 shoulders and 4 lateralized RSA without transfer studies with 250 shoulders. Mean preoperative ER in RSA with LDT was –14°, while mean preoperative ER in lateralized RSA alone was –11°. Lateralized RSA alone was associated with superior postoperative ER (28° vs. 22°, P=0.010) and Constant score (69 vs. 65, P=0.014), but similar postoperative FE (P=0.590). Pre- to postoperative improvement in ER and FE was similar between cohorts. RSA with LDT had a higher incidence of nerve-related complications (2.1% vs. 0%) and dislocation (2.8% vs. 0.8%) compared to lateralized RSA alone. Conclusions Both RSA with LDT and lateralized RSA are reliable options to restore ER in patients with significantly limited preoperative ER. Our analysis suggests that lateralized RSA alone is superior to RSA with LDT in patients with either a medialized or lateralized implant design and confers a lower risk of complications, particularly nerve injury and dislocation. However, the addition of an LDT may still be indicated in certain patient populations with very severe ER loss.Level of evidence: IV.

Background: This study sought to determine if preoperative forward elevation (FE) weakness affects outcomes of anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) for patients with rotator cuff-intact glenohumeral osteoarthritis (RCI-GHOA). Methods: A retrospective review of a single institution’s prospectively collected shoulder arthroplasty database was performed between 2007 and 2020, including 333 aTSAs and 155 rTSAs for primary RCI-GHOA with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Defining preoperative weakness as FE strength ≤4.9 lb (2.2 kg), three cohorts were matched 1:1:1 by age, sex, and follow-up: weak (n=82) to normal aTSAs, weak (n=44) to normal rTSAs, and weak aTSAs (n=61) to weak rTSAs. Compared outcomes included range of motion, outcome scores, and complication and revision rates at latest follow-up. Results: Weak aTSAs and weak rTSAs achieved similar postoperative outcome measures to normal aTSAs and normal rTSAs, respectively (P>0.05). Compared to weak rTSAs, weak aTSAs achieved superior postoperative passive (P=0.006) and active external rotation (ER) (P=0.014) but less favorable postoperative Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (P=0.032), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (P=0.024), and University of California, Los Angeles scores (P=0.008). Weak aTSAs achieved the minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit at a lower rate for abduction (P=0.045 and P=0.003) and FE (P=0.011 and P=0.001). Weak aTSAs had a higher revision rate (P=0.025) but a similar complication rate (P=0.291) compared to weak rTSAs. Conclusions Patients with RCI-GHOA and preoperative FE weakness obtain postoperative outcomes similar to patients with normal preoperative strength after either aTSA or rTSA. Preoperatively, weak aTSAs achieved greater ER but lower rates of clinically relevant improvement in overhead motion compared to weak rTSAs.Level of evidence: III.

Background: As the population is aging and indications are expanding, shoulder arthroplasty is becoming more frequent, especially bilateral staged replacement. However, surgeons are hesitant to use bilateral reverse prostheses due to potential limitations on activities of daily living. Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted to compare bilateral anatomic to bilateral reverse shoulder implants. PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (pages 1–20) were searched until April 2023. The clinical outcomes consisted of postoperative functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE], Physical Component Score [PCS], Mental Component Score, and Simple Shoulder Test), pain, and range of motion (external rotation and forward elevation). Three studies were included in this meta-analysis. Results: Bilateral anatomic implants had better postoperative functional outcomes and range of motion, but no significant difference was seen in postoperative pain when compared to the reverse prosthesis. Better ASES score, SANE score, and PCS as well as better external rotation and forward elevation were seen in the bilateral anatomic shoulder replacement group, but no significant difference in pain levels was seen between the two groups. Conclusions The results may be explained by the lower baseline seen in the reverse prosthesis group, which may be due to an older population and different indications. Nevertheless, more randomized controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.Level of evidence: III.

Displaced olecranon fractures constitute a challenging problem for elbow surgeons. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the role of suture anchor fixation for treating patients with displaced olecranon fractures. Methods: A retrospective review was performed for all consecutive patients with displaced olecranon fractures treated with suture anchor fixation with at least 2 years of clinical follow-up. Surgical repair was performed acutely in all cases with nonmetallic suture anchors in a double-row configuration utilizing suture augmentation via the triceps tendon. Osseous union and perioperative complications were uniformly assessed. Results: Suture anchor fixation was performed on 17 patients with displaced olecranon fractures. Functional outcome scores were collected from 12 patients (70.6%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 65.6 years, and the mean follow-up was 5.6 years. Sixteen of 17 patients (94%) achieved osseous union in an acceptable position. No hardware-related complications or fixation failure occurred. Mean postoperative shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QuickDASH) score was 3.8±6.9, and mean Oxford Elbow Score was 47.5±1.0, with nine patients (75%) achieving a perfect score. Conclusions: Suture anchor fixation of displaced olecranon fractures resulted in excellent midterm functional outcomes. Additionally, this technique resulted in high rates of osseous union without any hardware-related complications or fixation failures. Level of evidence: IV.

Restoration of external (ER) and internal rotation (IR) after Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is often unreliable. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the influence of RSA medio-lateral offset and subscapularis repair on axial rotation after RSA. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of studies evaluating axial rotation (ER, IR, or both) after RSA with a defined implant design. Medio-lateral implant classification was adopted from Werthel et al. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model. Results: Thirty-two studies reporting 2,233 RSAs were included (mean patient age, 72.5 years; follow-up, 43 months; 64% female). The subscapularis was repaired in 91% (n=2,032) of shoulders and did not differ based on global implant lateralization (91% for both, P=0.602). On meta-analysis, globally lateralized implants achieved greater postoperative ER (40° [36°–44°] vs. 27° [22°–32°], P<0.001) and postoperative improvement in ER (20° [15°–26°] vs. 10° [5°–15°], P<0.001). Lateralized implants with subscapularis repair or medialized implants without subscapularis repair had significantly greater postoperative ER and postoperative improvement in ER compared to globally medialized implants with subscapularis repair (P<0.001 for both). Mean postoperative IR was reported in 56% (n=18) of studies and achieved the minimum necessary IR in 51% of lateralized (n=325, 5 cohorts) versus 36% (n=177, 5 cohorts) of medialized implants. Conclusions: Lateralized RSA produces superior axial rotation compared to medialized RSA. Lateralized RSA with subscapularis repair and medialized RSA without subscapularis repair provide greater axial rotation compared to medialized RSA with subscapularis repair. Level of evidence: 2A.

Purpose: Nocturia significantly impacts patients’ quality of life but remains insufficiently evaluated and treated. The “Sleep C.A.L.M.” system categorizes the factors thought to collectively reflect most underlying causes of nocturia (Sleep disorders, Comorbidities, Actions [i.e., modifiable patient behaviors such as excess fluid intake], Lower urinary tract dysfunction, and Medications). The purpose of this study was to assess the association of nocturia with the Sleep C.A.L.M. categories using a nationally representative dataset. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2013/14–2017/18 cycles was conducted. Pertinent questionnaire, laboratory, dietary, and physical examination data were used to ascertain the presence of Sleep C.A.L.M. categories in adults ≥20 years of age. Nocturia was defined as ≥2 nighttime voids. Results: A total of 12,274 included subjects were included (51.6% female; median age, 49.0 years [interquartile range, 34.0–62.0 years]; 27.6% nocturia). Among subjects with nocturia, the prevalence of 0, ≥1, and ≥2 Sleep C.A.L.M. categories was 3.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.8%–4.4%), 96.5% (95% CI, 95.6%–97.2%), and 81.2% (95% CI, 78.9%–83.3%), respectively. Compared to those with 0–1 Sleep C.A.L.M. categories, the adjusted odds of nocturia in subjects with 2, 3, and 4–5 Sleep C. A.L.M. categories were 1.77 (95% CI, 1.43–2.21), 2.33 (1.89–2.87), and 3.49 (2.81–4.35), respectively (P<0.001). Similar trends were observed for most age and sex subgroups. When assessed individually, each of the 5 Sleep C.A.L.M. categories were independently associated with greater odds of nocturia, which likewise persisted across multiple age and sex subgroups. Conclusions Sleep C.A.L.M. burden is associated with increased odds of nocturia in a dose-dependent fashion, and potentially a relevant means by which to organize the underlying etiologies for nocturia among community-dwelling adults.

Background: To compare clinical outcomes following lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) versus RSA with latissimus dorsi transfer (LDT) in patients with poor preoperative active external rotation (ER). Methods: We performed a systematic review per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We queried PubMed/Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify articles reporting clinical outcomes of RSA with LDT or lateralized RSA alone performed in patients with preoperative ER ≤0°. Our primary outcomes were active ER, active forward elevation (FE), Constant score, and the incidence of complications. Results: We included 12 RSA with LDT studies with 188 shoulders and 4 lateralized RSA without transfer studies with 250 shoulders. Mean preoperative ER in RSA with LDT was –14°, while mean preoperative ER in lateralized RSA alone was –11°. Lateralized RSA alone was associated with superior postoperative ER (28° vs. 22°, P=0.010) and Constant score (69 vs. 65, P=0.014), but similar postoperative FE (P=0.590). Pre- to postoperative improvement in ER and FE was similar between cohorts. RSA with LDT had a higher incidence of nerve-related complications (2.1% vs. 0%) and dislocation (2.8% vs. 0.8%) compared to lateralized RSA alone. Conclusions Both RSA with LDT and lateralized RSA are reliable options to restore ER in patients with significantly limited preoperative ER. Our analysis suggests that lateralized RSA alone is superior to RSA with LDT in patients with either a medialized or lateralized implant design and confers a lower risk of complications, particularly nerve injury and dislocation. However, the addition of an LDT may still be indicated in certain patient populations with very severe ER loss.Level of evidence: IV.