BACKGROUND

Occupational burnout is a growing concern in healthcare, which affects professionals across various disciplines. Radiographers working in non-traditional practice settings may face unique stressors that contribute to burnout, yet this population remains understudied, particularly in the Philippines.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to (1) assess and compare burnout levels among Filipino radiographers in non-traditional roles, (2) investigate the relationship between demographic variables and burnout, and (3) assess burnout severity by imaging role.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, quantitative survey design was employed. Participants (n = 188) completed an online survey including demographic questions and the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI). Data analysis was performed using SPSS 23. Non-parametric tests were used to assess relationships between demographic variables and MBI scores.

RESULTS

Significant differences in burnout scores were found across imaging roles (p = .000). Mobile imaging professionals reported the highest emotional exhaustion (M = 48.4, SD = 4.7) and depersonalization (M = 21.5, SD = 4.7), and the lowest personal accomplishment (M = 18.1, SD = 7.2). Forensic imaging professionals reported the lowest overall burnout (M = 58.9, SD = 13.8) and depersonalization (M = 7.7, SD = 4.3), and the highest personal accomplishment (M = 29.4, SD = 8.3). Sex differences were observed for depersonalization (p = .045), with males scoring higher. Participants with graduate degrees reported lower personal accomplishment (p = .036). Severe burnout was the dominant category, especially in mobile, military, and veterinary imaging.

CONCLUSION

Burnout levels vary significantly among Filipino radiographers in non-traditional roles, with mobile imaging professionals at particularly high risk. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to mitigate burnout and promote wellbeing in this population.

Human ; Burnout, Professional ; Technology, Radiologic ; Philippines ; Cross-sectional Studies

BACKGROUND

Mobile clinics offer crucial healthcare services, including X-ray examinations, to underserved communities. Minimizing image repeats in this setting is vital due to radiation exposure, patient inconvenience, and cost implications.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the prevalence and causes of image repeat in conventional radiography performed within mobile clinics in the Philippines.

METHODS

A retrospective review analyzed data from five mobile clinics located in two highly urbanized cities in the Philippines from July to December 2023). Radiology staff assessed image quality, with suboptimal images requiring retakes. Reasons for rejection were categorized.

RESULTS

Out of 871 radiographs taken, 118 (13.55%) were repeated. Vertebrae and pelvic girdle images had the highest repeat rates (33.33%). Positioning errors were the most common cause (44.07%), followed by underexposure and overexposure.

CONCLUSION

This study identified a concerning repeat rate (13.55%) for mobile X-rays, primarily due to improper patient positioning, particularly for specific body parts. Targeted training programs and stricter protocols for mobile clinic staff are needed. Radiography education should also emphasize these skills, potentially through collaboration with mobile clinic operators to ensure graduates are prepared for the unique challenges of this environment.

Mobile Health Units ; Patient Positioning ; Radiography ; X-rays ; X-ray Film

BACKGROUND

Mobile clinics offer crucial healthcare services, including X-ray examinations, to underserved communities. Minimizing image repeats in this setting is vital due to radiation exposure, patient inconvenience, and cost implications.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the prevalence and causes of image repeat in conventional radiography performed within mobile clinics in the Philippines.

METHODS

A retrospective review analyzed data from five mobile clinics located in two highly urbanized cities in the Philippines from July to December 2023). Radiology staff assessed image quality, with suboptimal images requiring retakes. Reasons for rejection were categorized.

RESULTS

Out of 871 radiographs taken, 118 (13.55%) were repeated. Vertebrae and pelvic girdle images had the highest repeat rates (33.33%). Positioning errors were the most common cause (44.07%), followed by underexposure and overexposure.

CONCLUSION

This study identified a concerning repeat rate (13.55%) for mobile X-rays, primarily due to improper patient positioning, particularly for specific body parts. Targeted training programs and stricter protocols for mobile clinic staff are needed. Radiography education should also emphasize these skills, potentially through collaboration with mobile clinic operators to ensure graduates are prepared for the unique challenges of this environment.

Mobile Health Units ; Patient Positioning ; Radiography ; X-rays ; X-ray Film