1.Does modified Blumgart pancreatojejunostomy compared with original Blumgart pancreatojejunostomy decrease the rate of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula? A single-center propensity score-matched analysis
Fernando Revoredo REGO ; Gustavo Reaño PAREDES ; Fritz Kometter BARRIOS ; Tongbo WANG ; Guillermo Herrera CHÁVEZ ; Luis Villanueva ALEGRE ; Jorge Tang SING ; Mónica Uribe LEÓN ; Wuilber Ludeña HURTADO ; José Arenas GAMIO ; Sheyla Alfaro ITA ; Vanessa Bermúdez ALFARO ; Liliana Fonseca CAVERO ; Félix Carrasco MASCARO ; Italo Landeo ALIAGA ; Samy Castillo FLORES ; José de Vinatea de CÁRDENAS
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 2026;30(2):234-243
Background:
s/Aims: The most common cause of morbidity following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is the clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). There is currently no universally accepted technique for pancreato-enteric anastomosis. This study aims to compare the Blumgart technique (B-PJ) with the modified Blumgart technique (mB-PJ).
Methods:
This is a retrospective study involving patients who underwent PD between January 2011 and December 2021. The primary endpoint was to compare the incidence of CR-POPF. Secondary endpoints included major morbidity, length of postoperative stay, rates of reoperation, hospital readmission, postoperative mortality, and predictors of CR-POPF. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to minimize potential selection bias.
Results:
The study included 292 patients. After PSM, the incidence of CR-POPF was not significantly different between B-PJ and mBPJ (18.9% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.566). No statistical differences were observed in the secondary endpoints. Independent predictors of CRPOPF included preoperative cholangitis (odds ratio [OR]: 4.906, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.440–16.713, p = 0.011), soft pancreas (OR: 4.259, 95% CI: 1.043–17.376, p = 0.043), and main pancreatic duct size ≤ 3 mm (OR: 5.229, 95% CI: 1.865–14.656, p = 0.002).
Conclusions
This study did not demonstrate that mB-PJ is superior to B-PJ in reducing the incidence of CR-POPF. Factors such as soft pancreas, main pancreatic duct size, and preoperative cholangitis are identified as independent risk factors for CR-POPF.
2.Obesity and Cecal Intubation Time.
Deepanshu JAIN ; Abhinav GOYAL ; Jorge URIBE
Clinical Endoscopy 2016;49(2):187-190
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Obesity is a much-debated factor with conflicting evidence regarding its association with cecum intubation rates during colonoscopy. We aimed to identify the association between cecal intubation (CI) time and obesity by eliminating confounding factors. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of subjects undergoing outpatient colonoscopy was conducted. The population was categorized by sex and obesity (body mass index [BMI, kg/m2]: I, <24.9; II, 25 to 29.9; III, ≥30). CI time was used as a marker for a difficult colonoscopy. Mean CI times (MCT) were compared for statistical significance using analysis of variance tests. RESULTS: A total of 926 subjects were included. Overall MCT was 15.7±7.9 minutes, and it was 15.9±7.9 and 15.5±7.9 minutes for men and women, respectively. MCT among women for BMI category I, II, and III was 14.4±6.5, 15.5±8.3, and 16.2±8.1 minutes (p=0.55), whereas for men, it was 16.3±8.9, 15.9±8.0, and 15.6±7.2 minutes (p=0.95), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BMI had a positive association with CI time for women, but had a negative association with CI for men.
Cecum
;
Colonoscopy
;
Female
;
Gender Identity
;
Humans
;
Intubation*
;
Male
;
Obesity*
;
Outpatients
;
Retrospective Studies

Result Analysis
Print
Save
E-mail