Purpose: To evaluate whether time-series analysis of detrusor pressure during the pressure-flow phase provides diagnostic information that complements conventional urodynamic parameters in the assessment of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) in men with lower urinary tract dysfunction. Methods: An observational, analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted including men ≥18 years undergoing urodynamic evaluation for voiding dysfunction. Pressure-flow studies were performed according to International Continence Society standards. Detrusor pressure data recorded during voiding were exported at one-second resolution and analyzed as timeseries restricted to the active flow phase. From these segments, descriptive statistical metrics were derived, including mean detrusor pressure during voiding (mPeDet). BOO was classified using conventional indices and final clinical judgment by an experienced urologist, which served as the reference standard. Diagnostic performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and Cohen kappa. Results: Forty-one patients were included (median age, 59 years). mPeDet showed a strong correlation with the bladder outlet obstruction index (r=0.89, P<0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for mPeDet in identifying BOO, with an area under the curve of 0.95. A cutoff value of 37 cm H₂O yielded a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 87%. Agreement between mPeDet-based classification and final clinical diagnosis was moderate (κ=0.69). Conclusions Time-series-based evaluation of detrusor pressure during voiding provides additional clinically relevant information compared to conventional point-based urodynamic parameters. mPeDet may serve as a simple and reproducible complementary marker for the assessment of BOO, particularly in cases with diagnostic uncertainty.

Purpose: To compare voiding parameters in women with and without increased postvoid residual (PVR) volume, to correlate these parameters with PVR volume and PVR percentage, and to describe their ability to predict an increased PVR volume. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study of urodynamics data prospectively acquired from consecutive symptomatic women over a 5-year period. Patients with spinal cord disorders and with abdominal straining during voiding (abdominal pressure ≥10 cm H2O over baseline at maximum flow rate [Qmax]) were excluded. Increased PVR volume was defined as ≥50 mL. Patients with and without increased PVR volume were matched by age, presence of urodynamic stress urinary incontinence and premicturition bladder volume. Female bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) index (female-BOOI), urethral resistance (UR), projected isovolumetric pressure 1 (PIP1), and relative BOO indexes (female-BOOI/PIP1 and UR/PIP1 ratios) were calculated. Linear regression analysis was applied to correlate the voiding indexes with PVR volume and PVR percentage. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was calculated to describe diagnostic accuracy of these indexes for increased PVR volume. Results: One-hundred ten women with mean age 65.9±13.7 (range, 20–87) years were included. All voiding parameters were significantly different between women with and without increased PVR volume, except for PIP1. Female-BOOI showed the best correlation with increased PVR volume (R2=0.2509, P<0.001) and PVR percentage (R2=0.3677, P<0.001). PIP1 showed no correlation. Relative BOOI indexes did not improve these correlations. ROC curve analyzes confirmed that female-BOOI and UR had good ability to predict increased PVR volume (AUC=0.841 and AUC=0.856, respectively). Conclusions PVR volume and PVR percentage correlated with BOO but not to detrusor contraction strength parameters in symptomatic women that void without abdominal straining. The results of this study contribute to the understanding of the pathophysiology of increased PVR volume in women.

Purpose: To compare voiding parameters in women with and without increased postvoid residual (PVR) volume, to correlate these parameters with PVR volume and PVR percentage, and to describe their ability to predict an increased PVR volume. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study of urodynamics data prospectively acquired from consecutive symptomatic women over a 5-year period. Patients with spinal cord disorders and with abdominal straining during voiding (abdominal pressure ≥10 cm H2O over baseline at maximum flow rate [Qmax]) were excluded. Increased PVR volume was defined as ≥50 mL. Patients with and without increased PVR volume were matched by age, presence of urodynamic stress urinary incontinence and premicturition bladder volume. Female bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) index (female-BOOI), urethral resistance (UR), projected isovolumetric pressure 1 (PIP1), and relative BOO indexes (female-BOOI/PIP1 and UR/PIP1 ratios) were calculated. Linear regression analysis was applied to correlate the voiding indexes with PVR volume and PVR percentage. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was calculated to describe diagnostic accuracy of these indexes for increased PVR volume. Results: One-hundred ten women with mean age 65.9±13.7 (range, 20–87) years were included. All voiding parameters were significantly different between women with and without increased PVR volume, except for PIP1. Female-BOOI showed the best correlation with increased PVR volume (R2=0.2509, P<0.001) and PVR percentage (R2=0.3677, P<0.001). PIP1 showed no correlation. Relative BOOI indexes did not improve these correlations. ROC curve analyzes confirmed that female-BOOI and UR had good ability to predict increased PVR volume (AUC=0.841 and AUC=0.856, respectively). Conclusions PVR volume and PVR percentage correlated with BOO but not to detrusor contraction strength parameters in symptomatic women that void without abdominal straining. The results of this study contribute to the understanding of the pathophysiology of increased PVR volume in women.

Purpose: To compare voiding parameters in women with and without increased postvoid residual (PVR) volume, to correlate these parameters with PVR volume and PVR percentage, and to describe their ability to predict an increased PVR volume. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study of urodynamics data prospectively acquired from consecutive symptomatic women over a 5-year period. Patients with spinal cord disorders and with abdominal straining during voiding (abdominal pressure ≥10 cm H2O over baseline at maximum flow rate [Qmax]) were excluded. Increased PVR volume was defined as ≥50 mL. Patients with and without increased PVR volume were matched by age, presence of urodynamic stress urinary incontinence and premicturition bladder volume. Female bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) index (female-BOOI), urethral resistance (UR), projected isovolumetric pressure 1 (PIP1), and relative BOO indexes (female-BOOI/PIP1 and UR/PIP1 ratios) were calculated. Linear regression analysis was applied to correlate the voiding indexes with PVR volume and PVR percentage. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was calculated to describe diagnostic accuracy of these indexes for increased PVR volume. Results: One-hundred ten women with mean age 65.9±13.7 (range, 20–87) years were included. All voiding parameters were significantly different between women with and without increased PVR volume, except for PIP1. Female-BOOI showed the best correlation with increased PVR volume (R2=0.2509, P<0.001) and PVR percentage (R2=0.3677, P<0.001). PIP1 showed no correlation. Relative BOOI indexes did not improve these correlations. ROC curve analyzes confirmed that female-BOOI and UR had good ability to predict increased PVR volume (AUC=0.841 and AUC=0.856, respectively). Conclusions PVR volume and PVR percentage correlated with BOO but not to detrusor contraction strength parameters in symptomatic women that void without abdominal straining. The results of this study contribute to the understanding of the pathophysiology of increased PVR volume in women.