Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Purpose: This study evaluated the postoperative quality of life (QoL) after various types of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Materials and Methods: A multicenter prospective observational study was conducted in Korea using the Korean Quality of Life in Stomach Cancer Patients Study (KOQUSS)-40, a new QoL assessment tool focusing on postgastrectomy syndrome. Overall, 496 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled, and QoL was assessed at 5 time points: preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Results: Distal gastrectomy (DG) and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (PPG) showed significantly better outcomes than total gastrectomy (TG) and proximal gastrectomy (PG) with regard to total score, indigestion, and dysphagia. DG, PPG, and TG also showed significantly better outcomes than PG in terms of dumping syndrome and worry about cancer. Postoperative QoL did not differ significantly according to anastomosis type in DG, except for Billroth I anastomosis, which achieved better bowel habit change scores than the others. No domains differed significantly when comparing double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy after PG. The total QoL score correlated significantly with postoperative body weight loss (more than 10%) and extent of resection (P<0.05 for both).Reflux as assessed by KOQUSS-40 did not correlate significantly with reflux observed on gastroscopy 1 year postoperatively (P=0.064). Conclusions Our prospective observation using KOQUSS-40 revealed that DG and PPG lead to better QoL than TG and PG. Further study is needed to compare postoperative QoL according to anastomosis type in DG and PG.

Background: Acute deterioration of patients in general wards often leads to major adverse events (MAEs), including unplanned intensive care unit transfers, cardiac arrest, or death. Traditional early warning scores (EWSs) have shown limited predictive accuracy, with frequent false positives. We conducted a prospective observational external validation study of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based EWS, the VitalCare - Major Adverse Event Score (VC-MAES), at a tertiary medical center in the Republic of Korea. Methods: Adult patients from general wards, including internal medicine (IM) and obstetrics and gynecology (OBGYN)—the latter were rarely investigated in prior AI-based EWS studies—were included. The VC-MAES predictions were compared with National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) predictions using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and logistic regression for baseline EWS values. False-positives per true positive (FPpTP) were assessed based on the power threshold. Results: Of 6,039 encounters, 217 (3.6%) had MAEs (IM: 9.5%, OBGYN: 0.26%). Six hours prior to MAEs, the VC-MAES achieved an AUROC of 0.918 and an AUPRC of 0.352, including the OBGYN subgroup (AUROC, 0.964; AUPRC, 0.388), outperforming the NEWS (0.797 and 0.124) and MEWS (0.722 and 0.079). The FPpTP was reduced by up to 71%. Baseline VC-MAES was strongly associated with MAEs (P<0.001). Conclusions The VC-MAES significantly outperformed traditional EWSs in predicting adverse events in general ward patients. The robust performance and lower FPpTP suggest that broader adoption of the VC-MAES may improve clinical efficiency and resource allocation in general wards.

Background: Although patients with lymphoma appear particularly vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, the clinical evolution of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a patient with lymphoid malignancies has been under-represented, especially in relation to chemo-, chemo-immunotherapy. Materials and Methods: Among adult patients with lymphoma receiving treatment in a specialized lymphoma center at a 500-bed, university-affiliated hospital, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection from January 2020 to April 2022. Results: A total of 117 patients with a median age of 53 years were included. One hundred twelves (95.7%) were non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Eighty-six patients (73.5%) were on active chemotherapy and 9 were post stem cell transplant state. Sixty-one patients had more than one comorbidity and 29 had hypogammaglobulinemia. Thirty-four patients (29.1%) had never received a COVID-19 vaccine. During a median follow-up of 134 days, COVID-19 pneumonia developed in 37 patients (31.6%). Excluding three patients who died before the 30 days, 31 out of 34 patients had ongoing symptomatic COVID-19. Eleven patients (9.4%) had post COVID-19 lung condition that persisted 90 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Overall mortality was 10.3% (12 of 117), which was higher in patients with pneumonia. In multivariate analyses, age 65 years or older, follicular lymphoma, receiving rituximab maintenance therapy, and lack of vaccination were significantly associated with the development of COVID-19 pneumonia. Conclusion Patients with lymphoma are at high risk for developing pneumonia after SARS-CoV-2 infection and suffer from prolonged symptoms. More aggressive vaccination and protective measures for patients with lymphoma who have impaired humoral response related to rituximab maintenance therapy and hypogammaglobulinemia are needed.

Background: Although patients with lymphoma appear particularly vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, the clinical evolution of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a patient with lymphoid malignancies has been under-represented, especially in relation to chemo-, chemo-immunotherapy. Materials and Methods: Among adult patients with lymphoma receiving treatment in a specialized lymphoma center at a 500-bed, university-affiliated hospital, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection from January 2020 to April 2022. Results: A total of 117 patients with a median age of 53 years were included. One hundred twelves (95.7%) were non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Eighty-six patients (73.5%) were on active chemotherapy and 9 were post stem cell transplant state. Sixty-one patients had more than one comorbidity and 29 had hypogammaglobulinemia. Thirty-four patients (29.1%) had never received a COVID-19 vaccine. During a median follow-up of 134 days, COVID-19 pneumonia developed in 37 patients (31.6%). Excluding three patients who died before the 30 days, 31 out of 34 patients had ongoing symptomatic COVID-19. Eleven patients (9.4%) had post COVID-19 lung condition that persisted 90 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Overall mortality was 10.3% (12 of 117), which was higher in patients with pneumonia. In multivariate analyses, age 65 years or older, follicular lymphoma, receiving rituximab maintenance therapy, and lack of vaccination were significantly associated with the development of COVID-19 pneumonia. Conclusion Patients with lymphoma are at high risk for developing pneumonia after SARS-CoV-2 infection and suffer from prolonged symptoms. More aggressive vaccination and protective measures for patients with lymphoma who have impaired humoral response related to rituximab maintenance therapy and hypogammaglobulinemia are needed.

Background: Although patients with lymphoma appear particularly vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, the clinical evolution of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a patient with lymphoid malignancies has been under-represented, especially in relation to chemo-, chemo-immunotherapy. Materials and Methods: Among adult patients with lymphoma receiving treatment in a specialized lymphoma center at a 500-bed, university-affiliated hospital, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection from January 2020 to April 2022. Results: A total of 117 patients with a median age of 53 years were included. One hundred twelves (95.7%) were non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Eighty-six patients (73.5%) were on active chemotherapy and 9 were post stem cell transplant state. Sixty-one patients had more than one comorbidity and 29 had hypogammaglobulinemia. Thirty-four patients (29.1%) had never received a COVID-19 vaccine. During a median follow-up of 134 days, COVID-19 pneumonia developed in 37 patients (31.6%). Excluding three patients who died before the 30 days, 31 out of 34 patients had ongoing symptomatic COVID-19. Eleven patients (9.4%) had post COVID-19 lung condition that persisted 90 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. Overall mortality was 10.3% (12 of 117), which was higher in patients with pneumonia. In multivariate analyses, age 65 years or older, follicular lymphoma, receiving rituximab maintenance therapy, and lack of vaccination were significantly associated with the development of COVID-19 pneumonia. Conclusion Patients with lymphoma are at high risk for developing pneumonia after SARS-CoV-2 infection and suffer from prolonged symptoms. More aggressive vaccination and protective measures for patients with lymphoma who have impaired humoral response related to rituximab maintenance therapy and hypogammaglobulinemia are needed.